170 Comments
User's avatar
Sherril's avatar

Though this is an older article, I am hoping for a bit of help. I live remote (not around jabbed people in my circle) and am not jabbed. In a couple days I need to spend the day with a family member who let me know she just had her flu shot and Cv shot. I have Ivermectin and CDS and MB. What would be the best prophylactic against shedding. I usually don’t take the CDS on family visit days, and don’t fast those days. Other days I do. Ivermectin would be the easiest. Thoughts?

Thanks!!

Mike S's avatar

I’ve seldom seen such a methodologically useless study. It suffers from multiple fatal biases and flaws.

In addition, it is published in an unindexed, predatory, “pay to play” journal, and two of the study’s authors are on the editorial board of the journal.

You could hardly make this sh1t up if you tried… but here we are, with people pronouncing what a marvellous study this is. If a pharma company tried the same tactic, and claimed they had a great study, they would be laughed out the room by the entire scientific community.

Lynda's avatar

The vaccinated have ruined our blood supply.

morag's avatar

A fellow worker at work nipped out for 30minutes for her COVID jab, when she came back I was on a break. She came into break room , sitting at opposite ends of break room for about 10 minutes. By the end of my shift I had a scratchy throat and started to not feel well. I went home and boom I was ill for 2 weeks with terrible flu like symptoms...then slowly over next week or so loads of folk came down with it..I truly believe she shed her Vax on us.

Gene Balfour's avatar

Very thorough and compelling information. If only our citizens could break through the wall of liability protection that prevents the guilty authorities from being tried and convicted.

RandyDelivers's avatar

The studies presented don't seem too scientific and since correlation doesn't prove causation, It would seem the studies are making assumptions, just like the assumption that there really was a pandemic or the assumption that the virus ever really existed, or the assumption that promoting a criminal organization's product like Ivermectin form Merck would squelch a non-existent pathogen. Like all lies by the government and its' agencies, shedding is just another lie to get people to fear being around people. Divide and conquer is alive and well in the USA.

Roy's avatar

To see how to detox the spike, see Stew Peters interview with Dr Bryan Ardis in “Watch the Water” parts 1 and 2

Aminata Diouf's avatar

30 days after the dose sheeding? You kidding me,here are people with high spikeprotein exposure,still after 4 years.

Dani B.'s avatar

It happened to me. I got full on blood clots bad and almost died after going to a small

Music festival in New England in 2021 after a big shot came out and assume tons got it but I never got a vaccine. I know it was shedding. Something I never believed in past but I don’t believe it’s imperative to take one foreign chemical into one’s body unless emergency saving drug for something I can’t think of. But vaccines never. There’s no guarantee and not one systems engineer for my body except God. I’d rather die of Covid or pneumonia or measles than fake prepare. Ridiculous.

Ben Perkins's avatar

if a young lady had 2 moderna shots what is best way to detox PLEASE

Miep 💥's avatar

“To promote vaccine acceptance, the CDC stated on its website that the components of the mRNA “do not last long in the body.”” remember when Monsanto claimed Round-up broke down after 48 hours?

Unjabbed.Net's avatar

Here is a video showing close contact with the vaccinated can cause blood changes in the unvaccinated.

https://odysee.com/@Unvaccinated-Dating:7/covid-vaccine-shedding:1?r=aanrEsqEvpe7pcnvygd6C5pWM3kRWB4U

Chris Elliott's avatar

A lot of information here. I'm up to the studies that showed more protective effect from menstrual irregularities from close proximity to a "vaccinated" partner than out in the general public. I had an insight that this may be because the partner is, theoretically, of the opposite sex, whereas more public exposure would mean being exposed to "vaccinated" women.

Chris Elliott's avatar

A lot of information here. I'm up to the studies that showed more protective effect from menstrual irregularities from close proximity to a "vaccinated" partner than out in the general public. I had an insight that this may be because the partner is, theoretically, of the opposite sex, whereas more public exposure would mean being exposed to "vaccinated" women.