The entire field of oncology is built on an incorrect scientific model as to the proximate cause of cancer. This error has led to 70 years of largely ineffective, toxic, and expensive treatments.
I had read about the ‘New German Medicine’ by the late Dr. Geerd Hamer. According to Hamer, cancer is a ‘special biological survival program’ that in the animal kingdom helps an animal to better survive a crisis. And those laws apply to us, too, because we inherited those from the animal kingdom as we evolved.
My elder brother was diagnosed with bladder cancer and I immediately looked it up in my books from Hamer. The emotional trigger: “House, inheritance” and that nailed it! My brother feared the loss of his home, a complicated inheritance case. He didn’t want to move, he literally said ‘I don’t want to move, I’ll never will have a nicer home as I have now, I rather die!’ He underwent a neobladder operation that he didn’t survive.
Then I had read about the Trophoblastic Theory of Cancer’ by Dr. John Beard from 100 years ago. He compared the trophoblast which is a cancer-like tumor growth that attaches the fertilized egg to the uterus wall. At the 52 day, or so, of pregnancy, the pancreas of the becoming mother starts producing the enzyme chymotrypsin and that stops and digests the trophoblast and a normal placenta forms, etc. If this enzyme is not produced, then the trophoblast will continue to grow like an aggressive cancer and the woman will die in a few weeks.
Dr. Donald Kelley, a dentist in Texas, cured himself from pancreatic cancer in the 1960s ingesting raw animal pancreas. Later he formulated an enzyme product and started to treat cancer patients. His enzyme product is still available.
Then Dr. Nicholas Gonzales started Kelley’s therapy and was killed under strange circumstances.
Now I think that Dr. Hamer’s theory is correct but that in order for cancer to start growing, the ‘special program’ which is controlled by the brain through the central nervous system, has to first shut down the chymotrypsin production for cancer to grow!
So it is also possible that the mRNA induced turbo cancers may have to do with an injury of the pancreas by the spike protein.
While I am just reading this post and have not yet read your deeper dive into cancer, I want to make sure you and readers of this comment also know about the book "The Cancer Resolution?: Cancer reinterpreted through another lens" by Mark Lintern. (Dr Nasha Winters of www.mtih.org wrote the Forward.) This book both goes into the history of cancer research and the hallmarks of cancer but also presents an alternative cause of cancer that satisfies all the cancer hallmarks. Most importantly its written for cancer patients and care givers (as well as doctors) and provides options that both honor and go beyond Dr. Thomas Seyfried's metabolic theory of cancer.
I also want to thank you for your leadership in health over the last 5 years!
Like the forces that fought & still resist ivermectin, ascorbic acid, etc for COVID treatment, oncology/pharma/hospitals will delay, ridicule, dismiss the metabolic mitochondrial disease theory - using fenben/ivermectin, keto diet, IV ascorbic acid etc at all costs. You have to figure a way for the powers to make $ from it.
Thank you Dr. Kory for seeking the truth wherever it leads. 🙏🙏🙏
This topic is massively important! Thank you for getting the word out.
My eyes were opened 20 years ago regarding the systemic corruption of the healthcare industry, but reading Travis Christofferson’s book “Tripping Over The Truth” provided me with the detailed story of the corrupt cancer industry. Seyfried “Cancer as a Metabolic Disease”, Nasha Winter’s “The Metabolic Approach to Cancer”, and Ray Peat’s writings on Energy, Mitochondria and Cancer were all very helpful.
Thank you for the audio & laying out the next series. I’ve much respect for Dr Seyfried’s work & it’s incredibly encouraging when someone like yourself is convinced enough to focus on his combined approach to cancer. I believe it will help many people 🙏🏻
I totally agree as one HCP to another. A book that changed my perspective was “Tripping Over The Truth” by Travis Christofferson. He provided a lot of background information on Warburg and Syfried as well. It was fascinating.
At the start of 2020 I was diagnosed with a cancer and had immunotherapy until September that year when I realised it was a scam. I worked out I had been poisoned by sodium nitrite (E250) via bacon I ate. I write about some of the issues here.
Thank you for reading article aloud. I like to hear your voice & inflections vs generic monotone voice. It brings your effort to life.
I saw my subscription list & noticed your cost was much less than Saleeby & AMD, so I was going to recommend you increase your price based on the value you provide, but noticed you have a 'founding member' option, so I thought you deserve that added financial committment from me.
You may bring the 'founding member' option to your subscribers, who may have signed up initially to survey your work, but now find your substack to be of greater value.
Please personally narrating articles, for those who may want to follow your work as they do tasks throughout the day, to develop an even closer personal connection.
That’s because (like many other government backed agendas) we declared a “WAR” on cancer. Exactly how well has the government done at winning wars?? Covid?? Terrorism? Poverty?? The list is endless.
There is another issue here which gets very little attention and that is that many people who on paper are perfect candidates for metabolic approaches will literally die as long as they can blame it on someone else by saying they did what their oncologist said to do. I am seeing this with people in my social circle right now who have a poor prognosis due to cancer but who have walled themselves off from any input from anyone other than mainstream sources. Trying to use logic on someone whose self-image is centered around formal credentials and blame-shifting is IMO a far bigger obstacle than coming up with effective therapies. Lack of independent thinking in a culture is root cause issue for many problems, not just those related to health.
I had a breast cancer blip in late 2019 (doing fine so far, knock on wood). For treatment I went to the Huntsman Cancer Center in Salt Lake City. When you enter the institutional cancer treatment process, it feels for all the world like you're on a train and cannot deviate from the track; the professionals you interact with can't even *imagine* anything outside the track. Aside from surgery for the tumor and positive lymph nodes, there was a month of radiation (I managed to get into a clinical trial minimizing radiation exposure, otherwise would've declined it altogether) and have declined any subsequent hormone-suppressing pharmaceuticals.
I made it a point to ask every professional I encountered if there were any dietary or lifestyle actions that might improve the outcome. Every single one looked at me like I was from Mars.
I was already familiar with the work of Warburg, Seyfried, and Longo; it's surprising that these practitioners seem to have absolutely no curiosity about the metabolic theory of cancer.
If I haven't said before, I was diagnosed with a cancer at start of 2020 and had immunotherapy until September that year when I realised it was a scam. When I asked the oncologist if I should do anything to my diet she said 'No'. I now realise she was an unthinking idiot, a mere adminstrator of poisons.
“ I was already familiar with the work of Warburg, Seyfried, and Longo; it's surprising that these practitioners seem to have absolutely no curiosity about the metabolic theory of cancer.”
Maybe those three didn’t have student debt to pay off.
I had read about the ‘New German Medicine’ by the late Dr. Geerd Hamer. According to Hamer, cancer is a ‘special biological survival program’ that in the animal kingdom helps an animal to better survive a crisis. And those laws apply to us, too, because we inherited those from the animal kingdom as we evolved.
My elder brother was diagnosed with bladder cancer and I immediately looked it up in my books from Hamer. The emotional trigger: “House, inheritance” and that nailed it! My brother feared the loss of his home, a complicated inheritance case. He didn’t want to move, he literally said ‘I don’t want to move, I’ll never will have a nicer home as I have now, I rather die!’ He underwent a neobladder operation that he didn’t survive.
Then I had read about the Trophoblastic Theory of Cancer’ by Dr. John Beard from 100 years ago. He compared the trophoblast which is a cancer-like tumor growth that attaches the fertilized egg to the uterus wall. At the 52 day, or so, of pregnancy, the pancreas of the becoming mother starts producing the enzyme chymotrypsin and that stops and digests the trophoblast and a normal placenta forms, etc. If this enzyme is not produced, then the trophoblast will continue to grow like an aggressive cancer and the woman will die in a few weeks.
Dr. Donald Kelley, a dentist in Texas, cured himself from pancreatic cancer in the 1960s ingesting raw animal pancreas. Later he formulated an enzyme product and started to treat cancer patients. His enzyme product is still available.
Then Dr. Nicholas Gonzales started Kelley’s therapy and was killed under strange circumstances.
Now I think that Dr. Hamer’s theory is correct but that in order for cancer to start growing, the ‘special program’ which is controlled by the brain through the central nervous system, has to first shut down the chymotrypsin production for cancer to grow!
So it is also possible that the mRNA induced turbo cancers may have to do with an injury of the pancreas by the spike protein.
While I am just reading this post and have not yet read your deeper dive into cancer, I want to make sure you and readers of this comment also know about the book "The Cancer Resolution?: Cancer reinterpreted through another lens" by Mark Lintern. (Dr Nasha Winters of www.mtih.org wrote the Forward.) This book both goes into the history of cancer research and the hallmarks of cancer but also presents an alternative cause of cancer that satisfies all the cancer hallmarks. Most importantly its written for cancer patients and care givers (as well as doctors) and provides options that both honor and go beyond Dr. Thomas Seyfried's metabolic theory of cancer.
I also want to thank you for your leadership in health over the last 5 years!
TRUTH
Like the forces that fought & still resist ivermectin, ascorbic acid, etc for COVID treatment, oncology/pharma/hospitals will delay, ridicule, dismiss the metabolic mitochondrial disease theory - using fenben/ivermectin, keto diet, IV ascorbic acid etc at all costs. You have to figure a way for the powers to make $ from it.
Thank you Dr. Kory for seeking the truth wherever it leads. 🙏🙏🙏
This topic is massively important! Thank you for getting the word out.
My eyes were opened 20 years ago regarding the systemic corruption of the healthcare industry, but reading Travis Christofferson’s book “Tripping Over The Truth” provided me with the detailed story of the corrupt cancer industry. Seyfried “Cancer as a Metabolic Disease”, Nasha Winter’s “The Metabolic Approach to Cancer”, and Ray Peat’s writings on Energy, Mitochondria and Cancer were all very helpful.
Keep up your amazing work Dr Kory! 👏👏🙏🙏
Thank you for the audio & laying out the next series. I’ve much respect for Dr Seyfried’s work & it’s incredibly encouraging when someone like yourself is convinced enough to focus on his combined approach to cancer. I believe it will help many people 🙏🏻
I totally agree as one HCP to another. A book that changed my perspective was “Tripping Over The Truth” by Travis Christofferson. He provided a lot of background information on Warburg and Syfried as well. It was fascinating.
You’re right that the prevailing theory of carcinogenesis and it’s evolution to a lethal disease has been replaced.
You’re incorrect that MTOC replaces that theory.
Both cancer-lethality, and MTOC are byproducts of progressively increasing mosaicism.
They are effects of the progressive loss of genomic/epigenomic fidelity, not causes.
How do I find a doctor willing to prescribe ivermectin?
At the start of 2020 I was diagnosed with a cancer and had immunotherapy until September that year when I realised it was a scam. I worked out I had been poisoned by sodium nitrite (E250) via bacon I ate. I write about some of the issues here.
https://baldmichael.substack.com/p/sodium-nitrite-e250-the-poison-in?utm_source=publication-search
Thank you for reading article aloud. I like to hear your voice & inflections vs generic monotone voice. It brings your effort to life.
I saw my subscription list & noticed your cost was much less than Saleeby & AMD, so I was going to recommend you increase your price based on the value you provide, but noticed you have a 'founding member' option, so I thought you deserve that added financial committment from me.
You may bring the 'founding member' option to your subscribers, who may have signed up initially to survey your work, but now find your substack to be of greater value.
Please personally narrating articles, for those who may want to follow your work as they do tasks throughout the day, to develop an even closer personal connection.
Sorry for the narrating comment, just read above, & many others mentioned the same.
In nearly 50 years, there has been little progress in cancer treatment. It's clearly been a complete failure.
That’s because (like many other government backed agendas) we declared a “WAR” on cancer. Exactly how well has the government done at winning wars?? Covid?? Terrorism? Poverty?? The list is endless.
In the war on cancer, the government is not the main leader; researchers and doctors are. Their reductionist thinking is the primary reason.
https://clo2xuewuliu.substack.com/p/first-principles-and-reductionism
There's a Kickstarter campaign for a filmmaker working on new ideas about cancer. I see he's already interviewed Dr. Marik.
https://www.kickstarter.com/projects/justinuk/changing-cancer
Hi. Thank you so much for your work.
The metabolic theory is so compelling to support good health in general. I wish MSM (main stream medicine) would at least incorporate it.
Do you have any thoughts on the research by Mark Lintern "The Cancer Resolution"
There is another issue here which gets very little attention and that is that many people who on paper are perfect candidates for metabolic approaches will literally die as long as they can blame it on someone else by saying they did what their oncologist said to do. I am seeing this with people in my social circle right now who have a poor prognosis due to cancer but who have walled themselves off from any input from anyone other than mainstream sources. Trying to use logic on someone whose self-image is centered around formal credentials and blame-shifting is IMO a far bigger obstacle than coming up with effective therapies. Lack of independent thinking in a culture is root cause issue for many problems, not just those related to health.
I had a breast cancer blip in late 2019 (doing fine so far, knock on wood). For treatment I went to the Huntsman Cancer Center in Salt Lake City. When you enter the institutional cancer treatment process, it feels for all the world like you're on a train and cannot deviate from the track; the professionals you interact with can't even *imagine* anything outside the track. Aside from surgery for the tumor and positive lymph nodes, there was a month of radiation (I managed to get into a clinical trial minimizing radiation exposure, otherwise would've declined it altogether) and have declined any subsequent hormone-suppressing pharmaceuticals.
I made it a point to ask every professional I encountered if there were any dietary or lifestyle actions that might improve the outcome. Every single one looked at me like I was from Mars.
I was already familiar with the work of Warburg, Seyfried, and Longo; it's surprising that these practitioners seem to have absolutely no curiosity about the metabolic theory of cancer.
If I haven't said before, I was diagnosed with a cancer at start of 2020 and had immunotherapy until September that year when I realised it was a scam. When I asked the oncologist if I should do anything to my diet she said 'No'. I now realise she was an unthinking idiot, a mere adminstrator of poisons.
“ I was already familiar with the work of Warburg, Seyfried, and Longo; it's surprising that these practitioners seem to have absolutely no curiosity about the metabolic theory of cancer.”
Maybe those three didn’t have student debt to pay off.
‘Metabolic’ might not quite pay it off.
😝