The entire field of oncology is built on an incorrect scientific model as to the proximate cause of cancer. This error has led to 70 years of largely ineffective, toxic, and expensive treatments.
Per request of many of you, I uploaded an audio version of this post!! Hope you don't mind my New Yawk accent (which has faded immensely since my childhood on Long Island :)
Thanks for the audio recording in your own voice. There's something about hearing a thing in the authors own voice that feels like healthy connective tissue.🙏
As well as link to waste from parasites untreated… enough chatter on this to justify a deep dive in my opinion, also feeds into ivermectin having positive impact on some cancer diagnosed patients
Dr. Kory, you are awesomeness embodied! Listening to you read your post makes me feel more connected to you as a subscriber than I do when I read your posts.
The War on Ivermectin is one of the best books I’ve ever read!!
The suppression of this wonder drug by the greedy money motivated is an unparalleled modern evil!
Dr Kory uncovers these painful truths and shows how this repurposed drug could have changed the course of the pandemic. There are only a few people who I would designate as ‘my hero’….Dr Pierre Kory is one of them!!! The War on Ivermectin is well worth the read!!
Dr. Kory, you never fail to amaze me with your brilliance and depth of knowledge of any subject you choose to speak about. When I get discouraged about the world, I think there are people like you and for that I am grateful.
In the included picture of your staff, I see someone on the right side with a very strong and well developed ’spine’. Comes with job I suspect. A real rarity in the industry.
Thank you (it can’t be said enough).
PS: my dog with a year ago splenic tumor diagnosis is still alive today because of you and others that have taken your lead and added an educational perspective on canine cancers.
I think working backward from what appears to eradicate some cancers might be enlightening. For example, the antiparasitic fenbendazole selectively kills many different types of cancer using common vulnerabilities present in most cancer cells, namely microtubule depolymerization (destruction). So because many different types of cancers share a common vulnerability maybe the diifferences between cancer cell type are meaningless in the face of fenbendazole. Likewise, because a parasitic kills cancer cells one could jump to the conclusion that cancer behaves like a parasite. Which is conceptually very different than saying cancer is caused by parasites. https://fenbendazole.substack.com
I believe that is exactly what the repurposed drug clinical observation studies he referenced above within his clinic is doing! I was very excited to see it and have attempted to steer folks this way but sadly they just want to do their chemo and obey their doctors because they are scared and brainwashed. But I keep trying!
Yep. Cancer is treated like some kind of invader, whether by genes or a virus causing it.
The theory of the immune system is so half assed that they don't know much of how it works.
If we look at instead as a garbage collection system, it makes a lot more sense. When the garbage collection is backed up whether due to excess cell death or toxins or in the case of LNPs clogging the vascular system, illness ensues.
A metabolic issue also means that the garbage collection system is hampered!
If too much junk cannot be eliminated, it gets sequestered in "garbage bags" we call cancer.
Instead, oncology treats cancer like it needs to be zapped by radiation or poisoned by chemo. Chemo has a single digit % success rate and I'll say it's actually negative because if someone died because of the chemo, they usually call it a cancer death. They did the same where vax issues with polio were called transverse myelitis, or a death from the COVID shots were blamed on COVID....
Good effective and gentle remedies for cancer, healing methodologies which reliably worked and saved patients' live with a minimum of effort and no suffering were discovered as early as the 1940's. Dr. Max Gerson created an excellent healing program based on using fresh raw/unprocessed foods and freshly made vegetable juices. He created it to cure his own migraines, discovered it worked miracles on his tuberculosis patients, then found it worked wonderfully on cancer patients. His book, A Cancer Therapy, Results of Fifty Cases is a classic in healing cancer, and the Gerson Institute is still active, I think in Mexico. In the '60's, a courageous mother of a young girl murdered by toxic oncology treatments, started The Foundation for the Advancement in Cancer Therapies (FACT, www.rethinkingcancer.org) a volunteer organization which uses excellent healing protocols from doctors who have had reliable safe results healing cancer, using nutrition. There are other similar approaches around, if one looks, but these two have helped me and many others I know, so I would recommend them. The important point to remember is that cancer is the result of body toxicity. When the body is properly nourished, and detoxified by a gentle program of nutrition, which can easily be done at home, the body, in its own time, and in its own way, rebalances and heals itself.
In my own family, for 200 years they were farmers living off the land. No cancer cases and all lived into their 80's if they made it out of their teens. The only ones to die of cancer and to die before 80 was an aunt who lived in the city and smoked (died of lung cancer), a great uncle who died in his 60's on the farm (non-cancer) and a grandfather who worked himself to non cancer death in WW2 supervising wartime construction for the government (non military).
This makes sense. In 1931, a superb book appeared, based on the research of Dr. Weston A Price, who traveled the world, researching areas where people had perfect teeth (no dentists, toothbrushes or toothpaste) and excellent health. They lived in totally different places, ate different diets, but the one factor which united all of them was dependence on fresh natural foods, not adulterated, not preserved, not processed, and mostly minimally cooked. The book, titled Nutrition and Physical Degeneration attracted some attention, but was predictably ignored by most of the medical profession. It was, of course, a terrible threat to the pharma industry and to "modern" dentistry. The Weston A Price Foundation carries on Dr. Price's work, and is an ardent defender of raw milk and raw dairy products, meat, especially organ meats, and fish. They are a good antidote to Vegan and vegetarian enthusiasts.
In 1934 Monsanto - General Electric & Harvard School of Public Health conspired to cover up PCB cancer connection and put focus on diagnostics. For generations money has poured into chasing cures and screening for disease while causes are ignored and toxic exposures grown.
The 4 horsemen (big pharma, big food, cartel medicine, government democide) have caused the metabolic poisoning known as cancer (among other things) to keep us weak, feeble, controlled, broke and then dead.
I stopped giving to the Cancer society at the beginning of the introduction of the "covid vax" as they promoted it. Besides that I thought after 50 years they would be closer to a solution and treatment than they are. It appears to me that more has been done in the past 2 years to treat cancer by independent researchers than the last 50 by the Cancer Societies.
There was an estimate some decades ago that all cancer research money was wasted as long as people smoked cigarettes- that is, a better mortality result would have occurred if everyone quit smoking.
Nowadays fewer people smoke but cancer is on the upswing. You did make me remember one time when I was on a job site and I saw a worker working with a concrete quick cut saw with no eye protection, no hearing protection and a cigarette hanging out of his mouth. I said to his boss, "some things never change."
I shiver reading all these obituaries of people killed by their doctors, thanking them for the good care, and then asking for donations to the cancer foundation (which would be useless too if doctors healed their patients) Dr Warburg got a Nobel prize but not Nurse Budwig, later Doctor Budwig, who treated people with diet, massage, and natural ways. Her method is still used here and there after almost 100 years, and has a high success rate. Same with Dr. Moerman and all the doctors and therapists, who found a working solution.
There's simply not as much money in helping the body take care of itself. As Warburg noted, low cellular oxygen is a key factor for flipping cell activity into survival mode and relying on anaerobic respiration. Rather than take advantage of that key insight, modern cancer wisdom is to restrict the movement of bodily fluids to prevent the migration of cancer cells--which are already in circulation long before. Factors like exercise which will oxygenate the tissues are shunned rather than embraced, both for prevention and as one aspect of treatment. Just one example of how wrong-headed approaches are embraced in some twisted form of logic as a way to feed the beast of the industry.
Am I the only one who noticed that Dr. Hulga Clark was among the first to say that worms caused cancer before dewormers became popular for successfully treating it?
While the Warburg effect occurs, there is something else that triggers it. This is what we need to focus on. It is bacteria, funghi, and, in some cases, viruses that trigger the Warburg effect. It is not sugar in itself. However, sugar and other things such as elevated estrogens can feed funghi, which then can trigger Warburg later on.
Dr Seyfried talks about this exact thing in many of his lectures ...
Dog food is really nothing more than sugar pellets, and domestic dogs get cancer ... yet wolves in the wild, living and eating in their natural ways, never get cancer ...
Case report: Resolution of malignant canine mast cell tumor using ketogenic metabolic therapy alone
Still does not address what triggers cancer, which would be important to know regarding prevention. He also admits that since glutamine is in literally every food, suppressing it is not a realistic proposition.
Cancer is caused by dysregulated cell growth, which is primarily the result of damage to oxidative phosphorylation and a compensatory fermentation process -- this is what triggers cancer.
You're right about glutamine, which is an essential amino acid and is found everywhere in our food -- In MTOC glutamine is addressed with low doses of glutamine inhibitors after glucose is reduced and ketones are raised.
Prevention boils down to keeping your mitochondria healthy by keeping glucose levels down while raising your ketones -- both are done via diet (glucose) and lifestyle (moving/exercise = ketones).
Don't take my word for all this -- go watch Dr. Seyfried explain all this in the many interviews now populating youtube.
What you described as the cancer cause is an effect triggered by something else, namely by bacteria, fungi, and, in some cases, viruses. Sugar, the cleanest element for ATP production, only becomes a problem after cancer has developed.
A: go to you-tube and listen to any of the many interviews/lectures by Dr. Thomas Seyfried
If you want exact words from people to explain in technical terms what causes dysregulated cell growth, beyond what has already been said, you're asking too much.
Mark Lintern argues that intercellular fungal infections are the cause of the Warburg effect. He calls it the Cell Suppression Theory. Anyone curious about the causes and treatment of cancer should read his well researched book. https://www.cellsuppression.com
About damn time the somatic mutation theory of cancer was overthrown! The abject failure to bring down cancer rates despite decades and billions spent on research and ghastly treatments is proof in itself that something's not working. If ever I am unfortunate enough to contract cancer, I will skip the chemo or radiation and try HBOT and high-dose melatonin. But it isn't about helping people heal. It's about the moolah. Unless something changes even more radically than a new theory of cancer, it always will be about the greenbacks. That is the western medical model. Forget alleviating disease and suffering! Profit off of it! (I bought The War on Ivermectin and gave it a 5-star Amazon rating when it first came out last year. )
Dear subscribers,
Per request of many of you, I uploaded an audio version of this post!! Hope you don't mind my New Yawk accent (which has faded immensely since my childhood on Long Island :)
Thanks for the audio recording in your own voice. There's something about hearing a thing in the authors own voice that feels like healthy connective tissue.🙏
An additional view that goes with the metabolic idea is found in The Cancer Resolution by Lintern. Lots of studies to back up the fungal aspect of it.
As well as link to waste from parasites untreated… enough chatter on this to justify a deep dive in my opinion, also feeds into ivermectin having positive impact on some cancer diagnosed patients
This series is a wonderful way to give the finger to the ABIM, right where it hurts.
Dr. Kory, you are awesomeness embodied! Listening to you read your post makes me feel more connected to you as a subscriber than I do when I read your posts.
Thank you!
The War on Ivermectin is one of the best books I’ve ever read!!
The suppression of this wonder drug by the greedy money motivated is an unparalleled modern evil!
Dr Kory uncovers these painful truths and shows how this repurposed drug could have changed the course of the pandemic. There are only a few people who I would designate as ‘my hero’….Dr Pierre Kory is one of them!!! The War on Ivermectin is well worth the read!!
Dr. Kory, you never fail to amaze me with your brilliance and depth of knowledge of any subject you choose to speak about. When I get discouraged about the world, I think there are people like you and for that I am grateful.
Wow! Quite the compliment.. I try!
In the included picture of your staff, I see someone on the right side with a very strong and well developed ’spine’. Comes with job I suspect. A real rarity in the industry.
Thank you (it can’t be said enough).
PS: my dog with a year ago splenic tumor diagnosis is still alive today because of you and others that have taken your lead and added an educational perspective on canine cancers.
I found information here:
https://substack.com/@fenbendazole
I second this sentiment. I have followed him for four years now.
very well said! Dr Pierre Kory has been my absolute favourite amongst all the fighters against the narrative.
I think working backward from what appears to eradicate some cancers might be enlightening. For example, the antiparasitic fenbendazole selectively kills many different types of cancer using common vulnerabilities present in most cancer cells, namely microtubule depolymerization (destruction). So because many different types of cancers share a common vulnerability maybe the diifferences between cancer cell type are meaningless in the face of fenbendazole. Likewise, because a parasitic kills cancer cells one could jump to the conclusion that cancer behaves like a parasite. Which is conceptually very different than saying cancer is caused by parasites. https://fenbendazole.substack.com
I believe that is exactly what the repurposed drug clinical observation studies he referenced above within his clinic is doing! I was very excited to see it and have attempted to steer folks this way but sadly they just want to do their chemo and obey their doctors because they are scared and brainwashed. But I keep trying!
Well pointed out. The implications need to be correctly understood.
Cancer is big business for Big Pharma. They buy up all the patents and put them on a shelf. If they refuse to "cure" cancer, who will?
Anyone who bothers to read the alternative publishing in the field.
Abolish patents and all Intellectual Property (IP) except trademark!
Yep. Cancer is treated like some kind of invader, whether by genes or a virus causing it.
The theory of the immune system is so half assed that they don't know much of how it works.
If we look at instead as a garbage collection system, it makes a lot more sense. When the garbage collection is backed up whether due to excess cell death or toxins or in the case of LNPs clogging the vascular system, illness ensues.
A metabolic issue also means that the garbage collection system is hampered!
If too much junk cannot be eliminated, it gets sequestered in "garbage bags" we call cancer.
https://barn0346.substack.com/p/life-is-not-a-battle
Instead, oncology treats cancer like it needs to be zapped by radiation or poisoned by chemo. Chemo has a single digit % success rate and I'll say it's actually negative because if someone died because of the chemo, they usually call it a cancer death. They did the same where vax issues with polio were called transverse myelitis, or a death from the COVID shots were blamed on COVID....
I like the correlation between the Cancer industry and garbage collection:
We’re dealing with an industry that is either a “run-away” dump truck, or a dumpster fire, or likely both.
Our bodies have a productive garbage collection system.
They on the other hand have a non productive garbage making system.
It's like that book Bullshit Jobs, where jobs are created to counter the mess ups in other areas.
I'm glad that finally some of the medical people are finally questioning the establishment garbage.
Good effective and gentle remedies for cancer, healing methodologies which reliably worked and saved patients' live with a minimum of effort and no suffering were discovered as early as the 1940's. Dr. Max Gerson created an excellent healing program based on using fresh raw/unprocessed foods and freshly made vegetable juices. He created it to cure his own migraines, discovered it worked miracles on his tuberculosis patients, then found it worked wonderfully on cancer patients. His book, A Cancer Therapy, Results of Fifty Cases is a classic in healing cancer, and the Gerson Institute is still active, I think in Mexico. In the '60's, a courageous mother of a young girl murdered by toxic oncology treatments, started The Foundation for the Advancement in Cancer Therapies (FACT, www.rethinkingcancer.org) a volunteer organization which uses excellent healing protocols from doctors who have had reliable safe results healing cancer, using nutrition. There are other similar approaches around, if one looks, but these two have helped me and many others I know, so I would recommend them. The important point to remember is that cancer is the result of body toxicity. When the body is properly nourished, and detoxified by a gentle program of nutrition, which can easily be done at home, the body, in its own time, and in its own way, rebalances and heals itself.
In my own family, for 200 years they were farmers living off the land. No cancer cases and all lived into their 80's if they made it out of their teens. The only ones to die of cancer and to die before 80 was an aunt who lived in the city and smoked (died of lung cancer), a great uncle who died in his 60's on the farm (non-cancer) and a grandfather who worked himself to non cancer death in WW2 supervising wartime construction for the government (non military).
This makes sense. In 1931, a superb book appeared, based on the research of Dr. Weston A Price, who traveled the world, researching areas where people had perfect teeth (no dentists, toothbrushes or toothpaste) and excellent health. They lived in totally different places, ate different diets, but the one factor which united all of them was dependence on fresh natural foods, not adulterated, not preserved, not processed, and mostly minimally cooked. The book, titled Nutrition and Physical Degeneration attracted some attention, but was predictably ignored by most of the medical profession. It was, of course, a terrible threat to the pharma industry and to "modern" dentistry. The Weston A Price Foundation carries on Dr. Price's work, and is an ardent defender of raw milk and raw dairy products, meat, especially organ meats, and fish. They are a good antidote to Vegan and vegetarian enthusiasts.
In 1934 Monsanto - General Electric & Harvard School of Public Health conspired to cover up PCB cancer connection and put focus on diagnostics. For generations money has poured into chasing cures and screening for disease while causes are ignored and toxic exposures grown.
The 4 horsemen (big pharma, big food, cartel medicine, government democide) have caused the metabolic poisoning known as cancer (among other things) to keep us weak, feeble, controlled, broke and then dead.
I stopped giving to the Cancer society at the beginning of the introduction of the "covid vax" as they promoted it. Besides that I thought after 50 years they would be closer to a solution and treatment than they are. It appears to me that more has been done in the past 2 years to treat cancer by independent researchers than the last 50 by the Cancer Societies.
There was an estimate some decades ago that all cancer research money was wasted as long as people smoked cigarettes- that is, a better mortality result would have occurred if everyone quit smoking.
It is a good point.
Nowadays fewer people smoke but cancer is on the upswing. You did make me remember one time when I was on a job site and I saw a worker working with a concrete quick cut saw with no eye protection, no hearing protection and a cigarette hanging out of his mouth. I said to his boss, "some things never change."
I shiver reading all these obituaries of people killed by their doctors, thanking them for the good care, and then asking for donations to the cancer foundation (which would be useless too if doctors healed their patients) Dr Warburg got a Nobel prize but not Nurse Budwig, later Doctor Budwig, who treated people with diet, massage, and natural ways. Her method is still used here and there after almost 100 years, and has a high success rate. Same with Dr. Moerman and all the doctors and therapists, who found a working solution.
As Florence Nightingale did!
Similarly, the foundational study for researching Alzheimer’s …$millions and millions spent…was a fraud. Motives?
Statin drugs are finally being recognized as a primary cause of the Alzheimer's epidemic.
Not at Medscrape!
Since Medscrape uses AI, I'm going to assume it also hallucinates.
There's simply not as much money in helping the body take care of itself. As Warburg noted, low cellular oxygen is a key factor for flipping cell activity into survival mode and relying on anaerobic respiration. Rather than take advantage of that key insight, modern cancer wisdom is to restrict the movement of bodily fluids to prevent the migration of cancer cells--which are already in circulation long before. Factors like exercise which will oxygenate the tissues are shunned rather than embraced, both for prevention and as one aspect of treatment. Just one example of how wrong-headed approaches are embraced in some twisted form of logic as a way to feed the beast of the industry.
Am I the only one who noticed that Dr. Hulga Clark was among the first to say that worms caused cancer before dewormers became popular for successfully treating it?
While the Warburg effect occurs, there is something else that triggers it. This is what we need to focus on. It is bacteria, funghi, and, in some cases, viruses that trigger the Warburg effect. It is not sugar in itself. However, sugar and other things such as elevated estrogens can feed funghi, which then can trigger Warburg later on.
Agree we need to know better what (and how) the Warburg effect is triggered...
per Dr. Seyfried, cancer is fueled by glucose and glutamine ... those are the only fuels of cancer.
Dogs & cats don’t eat sugar, but do get cancer. Other mammals too??
Dr Seyfried talks about this exact thing in many of his lectures ...
Dog food is really nothing more than sugar pellets, and domestic dogs get cancer ... yet wolves in the wild, living and eating in their natural ways, never get cancer ...
Case report: Resolution of malignant canine mast cell tumor using ketogenic metabolic therapy alone
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10086349/
Still does not address what triggers cancer, which would be important to know regarding prevention. He also admits that since glutamine is in literally every food, suppressing it is not a realistic proposition.
Cancer is caused by dysregulated cell growth, which is primarily the result of damage to oxidative phosphorylation and a compensatory fermentation process -- this is what triggers cancer.
You're right about glutamine, which is an essential amino acid and is found everywhere in our food -- In MTOC glutamine is addressed with low doses of glutamine inhibitors after glucose is reduced and ketones are raised.
Prevention boils down to keeping your mitochondria healthy by keeping glucose levels down while raising your ketones -- both are done via diet (glucose) and lifestyle (moving/exercise = ketones).
Don't take my word for all this -- go watch Dr. Seyfried explain all this in the many interviews now populating youtube.
What you described as the cancer cause is an effect triggered by something else, namely by bacteria, fungi, and, in some cases, viruses. Sugar, the cleanest element for ATP production, only becomes a problem after cancer has developed.
Cancer is dysregulated cell growth.
Q: what causes dysregulated cell growth?
A: go to you-tube and listen to any of the many interviews/lectures by Dr. Thomas Seyfried
If you want exact words from people to explain in technical terms what causes dysregulated cell growth, beyond what has already been said, you're asking too much.
Mark Lintern argues that intercellular fungal infections are the cause of the Warburg effect. He calls it the Cell Suppression Theory. Anyone curious about the causes and treatment of cancer should read his well researched book. https://www.cellsuppression.com
About damn time the somatic mutation theory of cancer was overthrown! The abject failure to bring down cancer rates despite decades and billions spent on research and ghastly treatments is proof in itself that something's not working. If ever I am unfortunate enough to contract cancer, I will skip the chemo or radiation and try HBOT and high-dose melatonin. But it isn't about helping people heal. It's about the moolah. Unless something changes even more radically than a new theory of cancer, it always will be about the greenbacks. That is the western medical model. Forget alleviating disease and suffering! Profit off of it! (I bought The War on Ivermectin and gave it a 5-star Amazon rating when it first came out last year. )
Say it again sister!