In your next vaxx-backer encounter, ask if the person would have taken a vaxx produced by Enron as long as it was recommended by CDC and approved by FDA.
Would that be considered a gamble, or would that be safe and effective? If the answer is a gamble, then your vaxxer just upended the imprimatur of the FDA.
In your next vaxx-backer encounter, ask if the person would have taken a vaxx produced by Enron as long as it was recommended by CDC and approved by FDA.
Would that be considered a gamble, or would that be safe and effective? If the answer is a gamble, then your vaxxer just upended the imprimatur of the FDA.
If so, that means caution is advised generally, because even an honest vetting can get snookered by a fast play.
Then ask, if a major USA company can be corrupt and its officers jailed for felonies, why is an agency immune from the same employee hazard?
Then ask, “what if the vaxx wasn’t AS safe and effective as advertised?”
For the finale, ask “why would a vaxx manufacturer intentionally mix its production lots so that they are widely mixed geographically?”
In your next vaxx-backer encounter, ask if the person would have taken a vaxx produced by Enron as long as it was recommended by CDC and approved by FDA.
Would that be considered a gamble, or would that be safe and effective? If the answer is a gamble, then your vaxxer just upended the imprimatur of the FDA.
If so, that means caution is advised generally, because even an honest vetting can get snookered by a fast play.
Then ask, if a major USA company can be corrupt and its officers jailed for felonies, why is an agency immune from the same employee hazard?
Then ask, “what if the vaxx wasn’t AS safe and effective as advertised?”
For the finale, ask “why would a vaxx manufacturer intentionally mix its production lots so that they are widely mixed geographically?”