Our USA Today Op-Ed "silently suggesting" vaccines cause excess mortality was inspired by damning data from the Society of Actuaries. Unsurprisingly, the report conclusions suggest self-censorship.
like some many other analyses over the past few years, this one certainly offers and important trend, call it a safety signal, that something is happening. so the SOA and others say "we can't prove causality therefore don't care and have no curiosity." No one seems to be saying, "people are dying in this country at rates that defy chance. let's organize a thorough study of why." dumb me, I always assumed that why we had things like NIH/CDC. this inexplicable behavior tells me there is consciousness of guilt.
I don’t have the data to support it, but from what I know locally and from personal experience, there is not a strong union presence in many southern states in the same way there is in the northeast. Government workers either did it or didn’t do it down here, and generally didn’t have a force behind them to act as an advocate. A family member who works for a large northeastern city’s police department said that their union basically said “no, they’re not getting vaccinated,” and that was that. This was surprising to me given that the media in this very large city had reported stories that made it seem like most of the force was vaccinated (not true). This may be a reason why the southeast is overrepresented in the actuarial data.
Another interesting note is that the first few hospitals to mandate vaccination were in Texas and South Carolina. This was all the way back in March/April 2021. These are huge hospital systems with reach across their respective states. Despite the hesitation among these hospital populations, the vast majority of staff ended up getting vaccinated.
I knew the insurance actuaries would eventually ring their alarm bell. To me, that was ‘obvious’. Shame the health insurance carriers went along with the murderous hospital protocols and lethal injections. No matter how much money they were bought off by CMS, CDC, FDA, their losses have certainly blown through the blood money they were paid to kill their policyholders.
I have to wonder how long it will take before life insurance refuses to pay out on deaths of the vaxxed. This is likely to bankrupt them. They could refuse on the grounds that it was experimental. Someone is likely getting hush money to keep it quiet.
Why would there be a difference in harm from COVID itself, which contains the spike protein, and the mRNA shots, which contain the spike protein? Is it the dose of spike protein, is it where the spike protein is introduced into the body and where it goes subsequently, is it other ingredients in the shots?
Powerful & informative article Dr. Kory. Thank you for being a courageous medical TRUTH Warrior. May GOD bless you & your family for all your efforts in being on the right side of history ...
@Dr Kory: Referring to Point 9a (especially Figure 9.15), the graph appears to show the greater the vaccination rate, the lower the excess mortality. However, I would assume there is confounding between % vaccination and socioeconomic status. That is, the Northeast region with the greatest vaccination rates is more prosperous than the Southeast region with the lowest vaccination rate. I believe this is referred to as the "healthy user bias." {HUB)
I recall reading an excellent discussion of HUB by Mathew Crawford in his "Rounding the Earth" Substack (ie. this bias makes the Covid vaccines appear to show much greater "efficacy" than in reality). I believe it's worth taking a look at his work, and then re-examining these graphs taking into account the HUB.
When you have to caveat your correlation analysis report with “apparent correlation is not correlated”, leaving no correlation remaining as viable, you are working too hard to lie.
Dr. Kory, all the curves seem to line up with variant waves.
They cooked the Data. That means they were afraid of the Pushers.
like some many other analyses over the past few years, this one certainly offers and important trend, call it a safety signal, that something is happening. so the SOA and others say "we can't prove causality therefore don't care and have no curiosity." No one seems to be saying, "people are dying in this country at rates that defy chance. let's organize a thorough study of why." dumb me, I always assumed that why we had things like NIH/CDC. this inexplicable behavior tells me there is consciousness of guilt.
I don’t have the data to support it, but from what I know locally and from personal experience, there is not a strong union presence in many southern states in the same way there is in the northeast. Government workers either did it or didn’t do it down here, and generally didn’t have a force behind them to act as an advocate. A family member who works for a large northeastern city’s police department said that their union basically said “no, they’re not getting vaccinated,” and that was that. This was surprising to me given that the media in this very large city had reported stories that made it seem like most of the force was vaccinated (not true). This may be a reason why the southeast is overrepresented in the actuarial data.
Another interesting note is that the first few hospitals to mandate vaccination were in Texas and South Carolina. This was all the way back in March/April 2021. These are huge hospital systems with reach across their respective states. Despite the hesitation among these hospital populations, the vast majority of staff ended up getting vaccinated.
I knew the insurance actuaries would eventually ring their alarm bell. To me, that was ‘obvious’. Shame the health insurance carriers went along with the murderous hospital protocols and lethal injections. No matter how much money they were bought off by CMS, CDC, FDA, their losses have certainly blown through the blood money they were paid to kill their policyholders.
Be sure to share this widely:
https://rumble.com/v36uula-medicine-failed-us-nurse-gail-mccrae.html
I have to wonder how long it will take before life insurance refuses to pay out on deaths of the vaxxed. This is likely to bankrupt them. They could refuse on the grounds that it was experimental. Someone is likely getting hush money to keep it quiet.
WHAT WILL IT TAKE TO REMOVE & DESTROY THESE DEATH JABS
Why would there be a difference in harm from COVID itself, which contains the spike protein, and the mRNA shots, which contain the spike protein? Is it the dose of spike protein, is it where the spike protein is introduced into the body and where it goes subsequently, is it other ingredients in the shots?
The Insurance companies know. And they know WE know. But they FEAR their Government Overlords.
Truly - "It is difficult to get a man to understand something, when his salary depends on his not understanding it."
Powerful & informative article Dr. Kory. Thank you for being a courageous medical TRUTH Warrior. May GOD bless you & your family for all your efforts in being on the right side of history ...
@Dr Kory: Referring to Point 9a (especially Figure 9.15), the graph appears to show the greater the vaccination rate, the lower the excess mortality. However, I would assume there is confounding between % vaccination and socioeconomic status. That is, the Northeast region with the greatest vaccination rates is more prosperous than the Southeast region with the lowest vaccination rate. I believe this is referred to as the "healthy user bias." {HUB)
I recall reading an excellent discussion of HUB by Mathew Crawford in his "Rounding the Earth" Substack (ie. this bias makes the Covid vaccines appear to show much greater "efficacy" than in reality). I believe it's worth taking a look at his work, and then re-examining these graphs taking into account the HUB.
P.S. I just looked his posts and discovered that Crawford actually discussed the SAME Society of Actuaries chart (from their previous Aug 2022 report) at https://roundingtheearth.substack.com/p/questioning-the-answers
Also, here's the link to Crawford's 2022 analysis of the Society of Actuaries previous report (and he discusses Simpson's Paradox): https://roundingtheearth.substack.com/p/reanalysis-of-the-society-of-actuaries
Here's the links to his seven-part series on HUB: https://www.campfire.wiki/doku.php?id=rounding_the_earth:the_vaccine_wars#vaccine_efficacy_effectiveness
Part 1: The Healthy User Bias Dismantles the Vaccine Effectiveness Debate
Part 2: The Challenge of Quantifying the Healthy User Bias
Part 3: The Profoundly Confounding and the Profoundly Unconfounding
Part 4: Evidence of the HUB and the Zero Efficacy Hypothesis for COVID-19 Vaccines
Part 5: How Does the HUB Get Missed? What are the Implications?
Part 6: Questioning the Answers
Part 7: Nothing But Healthy User Bias
Part 8: Adding to Fenton's Miscategorization Illusion, Part 1
Have you seen Dr. Denis Rancourt’s presentation regarding excess mortality at the National Citizens Inquiry Canada? https://rumble.com/v2ohtte-physicist-dr-denis-rancourt-presents-his-findings-on-all-cause-mortality-ot.html
When you have to caveat your correlation analysis report with “apparent correlation is not correlated”, leaving no correlation remaining as viable, you are working too hard to lie.
This is so factual, evidentiary and logical. I will have to share it with my friends and family so they can DISMISS it!
Very well done.