Both work for me, but a bifurcation point is something I would normally associate with chaos theory, whereas a point of inflection is something I'd lump in with plots of polynomials & suchlike.
Given the way the world has behaved over the past 3 years, I'd say things have been more like a chaotic rather than a smooth function.
Both work for me, but a bifurcation point is something I would normally associate with chaos theory, whereas a point of inflection is something I'd lump in with plots of polynomials & suchlike.
Given the way the world has behaved over the past 3 years, I'd say things have been more like a chaotic rather than a smooth function.
I have to disagree. This is not chaos. IMO, a choice has been made (note my use of the passive voice). I'm not within the club, so I cannot say whether it's a bifurcation or an inflection point. AMD is within the club, it appears. He would know. I'm more inclined to call it a bifurcation because it feels like a rupture not a nuanced change of tone about a controversial subject.
There were some in the so-called medical freedom movement (MFM) who spoke out clearly and directly about the dangers of the mRNA vaxx technology, independent of the known dangers of the spike protein. I listed them in my first comment.
These MFM "thought leaders" are curiously silent now, which I find troubling.
The NIH is starting human trials at Duke of their brand new mRNA-flavored universal flu "vaccine" (something Rick Bright and Fauci were alluding to in those C-Span clips at the Milken Institute in...drum roll, please...2019).
There are literally crickets about this on the CHD website.
The monster keeps rolling.
And the "thought leaders" are silent.
The mRNA "vaccine" technology is dangerous and unnecessary.
The monster wants to covert the entire childhood schedule to mRNA.
Why?
And why are the MFM "thought leaders" silent?
I have theory.
I think they're all afraid of one particular person.
There's a quote attributed to German Lutheran Pastor Dietrich Bonhoeffer:
“Silence in the face of evil is itself evil: God will not hold us guiltless.
Not to speak is to speak.
Not to act is to act.”
It fits the moment.
Of course, if you don't believe in God, then I guess you're good.
I've heard Peter McCullough and Ryan Cole both say categorically(in different interviews) that turning our cells into bioreactors to create viral proteins is a bad idea. McCullough (to whom I was referring above) posted an article a few weeks ago that, imo, misrepresented the paper by Tess Lawrie (Jessica Rose was also involved in that paper). I couldn't find the article on his substack when I was writing my initial comment. Either McCullough removed the article or I missed it. I like Dr. McCullough. I think he's a good man, so it surprised me.
The mRNA "vaccine" technology platform is dangerous and unnecessary. It has many potential mechanisms of harm beyond of the toxic spike protein.
I suspect one person is shutting down criticism of the tech platform. If you've been paying attention, you know who I'm talking about.
Books...substack articles...reports from the latest confab in the wine country...personal narratives that no one asked for...vote for Bobby...we love freedom films...
But not one clear statement against the mRNA "vaccine" technology, even though the NIH is starting human trials of the brand new extra special mRNA-flavored universal flu "vaccine".
They are cowards.
And Rick Bright got his entity of excitement after all.
Thank you for partially answering my questions. I’m baffled by your refusal to name the ‘one person shutting down criticism…’. - why the mystery? And what’s with the ‘if you’ve been paying attention…’ comment? At least explain why you’re treating this as some big secret.
Both work for me, but a bifurcation point is something I would normally associate with chaos theory, whereas a point of inflection is something I'd lump in with plots of polynomials & suchlike.
Given the way the world has behaved over the past 3 years, I'd say things have been more like a chaotic rather than a smooth function.
I have to disagree. This is not chaos. IMO, a choice has been made (note my use of the passive voice). I'm not within the club, so I cannot say whether it's a bifurcation or an inflection point. AMD is within the club, it appears. He would know. I'm more inclined to call it a bifurcation because it feels like a rupture not a nuanced change of tone about a controversial subject.
There were some in the so-called medical freedom movement (MFM) who spoke out clearly and directly about the dangers of the mRNA vaxx technology, independent of the known dangers of the spike protein. I listed them in my first comment.
These MFM "thought leaders" are curiously silent now, which I find troubling.
The NIH is starting human trials at Duke of their brand new mRNA-flavored universal flu "vaccine" (something Rick Bright and Fauci were alluding to in those C-Span clips at the Milken Institute in...drum roll, please...2019).
There are literally crickets about this on the CHD website.
The monster keeps rolling.
And the "thought leaders" are silent.
The mRNA "vaccine" technology is dangerous and unnecessary.
The monster wants to covert the entire childhood schedule to mRNA.
Why?
And why are the MFM "thought leaders" silent?
I have theory.
I think they're all afraid of one particular person.
There's a quote attributed to German Lutheran Pastor Dietrich Bonhoeffer:
“Silence in the face of evil is itself evil: God will not hold us guiltless.
Not to speak is to speak.
Not to act is to act.”
It fits the moment.
Of course, if you don't believe in God, then I guess you're good.
Who are the MFM ‘Thought leaders’ to whom you refer? Who is the ‘one particular person’?
I've heard Peter McCullough and Ryan Cole both say categorically(in different interviews) that turning our cells into bioreactors to create viral proteins is a bad idea. McCullough (to whom I was referring above) posted an article a few weeks ago that, imo, misrepresented the paper by Tess Lawrie (Jessica Rose was also involved in that paper). I couldn't find the article on his substack when I was writing my initial comment. Either McCullough removed the article or I missed it. I like Dr. McCullough. I think he's a good man, so it surprised me.
The mRNA "vaccine" technology platform is dangerous and unnecessary. It has many potential mechanisms of harm beyond of the toxic spike protein.
I suspect one person is shutting down criticism of the tech platform. If you've been paying attention, you know who I'm talking about.
Books...substack articles...reports from the latest confab in the wine country...personal narratives that no one asked for...vote for Bobby...we love freedom films...
But not one clear statement against the mRNA "vaccine" technology, even though the NIH is starting human trials of the brand new extra special mRNA-flavored universal flu "vaccine".
They are cowards.
And Rick Bright got his entity of excitement after all.
Thank you for partially answering my questions. I’m baffled by your refusal to name the ‘one person shutting down criticism…’. - why the mystery? And what’s with the ‘if you’ve been paying attention…’ comment? At least explain why you’re treating this as some big secret.
Ask Peter Breggin