The History Of Chlorine Dioxide
Chlorine dioxide was discovered over 200 years ago. It's use has steadily expanded into many industries and therapeutic applications despite a near global regulatory blockade on clinical research.
I believe that my writings on chlorine dioxide are the most important (and the most dangerous) work I have yet done on Substack. Although several experts have written extensively on this topic previously (here, here, and here), this similar effort of mine simply results from my wish to become as knowledgeable as possible about this critically important therapeutic (there is no better way to do so than personally researching and writing about a topic).
This is the 3rd in my ongoing series of posts. In the first two I presented the political context in which chlorine dioxide has been attacked during Covid (“Trump’s Bleach Conference”) and in the 2nd post I detailed the success achieved by Bolivia’s national chlorine dioxide program against Covid.
In this post I will review its discovery, chemical properties, industrial applications, and therapeutic mechanisms. Upcoming posts will cover the history of the attacks faced by the pioneering researchers and practitioners, followed by a review of the safety studies of oral ingestion and a compilation of studies showing efficacy in a number of diseases. Be sure to subscribe so as not to miss out on these critical upcoming posts.
Ultimately, what me and my growing network of clinical and scientific experts of this therapeutic compound want to achieve, is for the FDA (and the copycat regulatory agencies worldwide) to lift its restrictions on performing clinical research trials of chlorine dioxide in human diseases. If anyone from MAHA is reading this right now (and I know some are), please add chlorine dioxide (and DMSO) to the list of therapies currently being suppressed by the FDA that need to be reversed (RFK Jr listed more than a dozen other such therapies in the below recent tweet):
Note that, in the below, many (but not all) references were found from the superlative theuniversalantidote.com’s website, from their “interactive reference guidebook” document.
Chlorine Dioxide - What It is, What It Isn’t
Chlorine Dioxide is a small, volatile and strong molecule consisting of 1 chlorine atom and 2 oxygen atoms.
It is a gas at normal temperatures and pressures.
Yellowish/green color and has an odor similar to that of chlorine.
Denser than air and is water soluble at standard temperatures and pressures up to 2500ppm.
Explosive in air at concentrations >10%. It is therefore normally generated in-situ (on-site) within an aqueous solution at <0.3%
Chlorine dioxide is a biocide. This means it kills all bacteria, viruses, and fungus on contact through a process of oxidization.
Chlorine dioxide was initially discovered in 1814 by Sir Humphrey Davy and was commercially produced in 1940 as a bleaching agent. It is labeled as a strong oxidizing agent, microbicide, and antiseptic. Based on these references here and here, chlorine dioxide is also known to have the ability to “neutralize various toxins, pesticides, herbicides, and pharmaceuticals contaminating drinking water.”
As an added bonus, it can do all of that without producing any harmful organic compounds as occurs with nearly all other disinfectants (like bleach - which contrary to FDA “warnings,” chlorine dioxide certainly is not).
Chlorine dioxide is more effective as a disinfectant than chlorine in most circumstances against waterborne pathogenic agents such as viruses, bacteria, and protozoa – including the cysts of Giardia and the oocysts of Cryptosporidium.
Chlorine dioxide has been extensively studied within multiple fields (commercial, industrial, healthcare) and by multiple entities including: EPA, HHS, USDA, CDC, NIH, NASA, DOD, independent laboratories, and universities worldwide.
Chlorine dioxide is registered as a sterilizer and biocide and is used to sterilize medical facilities and laboratories including BSL-3 and BSL-4 labs which handle the world's most deadly pathogens. It was used to decontaminate the Senate offices in 2001 after the anthrax attack, and was also used in Ebola hot spots.
From this systematic review paper on chlorine dioxide as a disinfectant:
Different chemical structures with properties of disinfectants have been identified. These chemical structures include alcohol, aldehydes, anilides, biguanides, bisphenols, diamidines, halogen-releasing agents, halophenols, heavy metal derivatives, peroxygens, quaternary ammonium compounds, phenols, and cresols. However, each disinfectant attacks different target areas of the micro-organisms. Disinfectants can be divided into two broad groups: oxidizing and non-oxidizing disinfectants. Disinfectants containing halogens such as chlorine, iodine, and oxygen releasing materials are called oxidizing disinfectants, while disinfectants that bond to structures such as quaternary ammonium compounds and amphoterics are known as non-oxidizing disinfectants.
Oxidizing agents like chlorine dioxide are chemical compounds that accept electrons from “electron donors.” This is important because relative to chlorine dioxide, all pathogens (disease causing organisms or substances) are electron donors.
So what happens to chlorine dioxide after it reacts and oxidizes the pathogens? In aqueous systems, chlorine dioxide eventually decomposes into generally safe byproducts that naturally occur in our environment, i.e. chloride ions (like in table salt), oxygen (O₂), and other non-toxic residues.
From Chat GPT when asked to contrast chlorine dioxide with bleach:
Chlorine dioxide and bleach (sodium hypochlorite) are both powerful oxidizing agents commonly used as disinfectants, but they differ significantly in their chemical structure, mechanism of action, and applications. Here's how they compare:
1. Chemical Composition
Chlorine Dioxide (ClO₂): A gas at room temperature, typically dissolved in water for use. It is a single molecule composed of one chlorine atom and two oxygen atoms.
Bleach (Sodium Hypochlorite, NaOCl): A liquid solution containing sodium hypochlorite as the active ingredient, along with water and small amounts of other chemicals.
2. Mechanism of Action
Chlorine Dioxide: Kills microorganisms by disrupting their metabolic processes and breaking down cell membranes and proteins. It primarily reacts with organic matter through oxidation.
Bleach: Also acts as an oxidizer, generating hypochlorous acid (HOCl) in water, which destroys bacteria and viruses by disrupting their enzymes and proteins.
3. By-products
Chlorine Dioxide: Produces fewer harmful by-products, primarily chlorite and chlorate ions (initially), which are less persistent in water systems compared to bleach by-products.
Bleach: Can produce potentially harmful chlorinated organic compounds (e.g., trihalomethanes and chloramines), especially when reacting with organic matter in water. (Editorial note: this is extremely important, trihalomethanes are suspected carcinogenic disinfection by-products[ associated with chlorination of naturally occurring organics in raw water.
4. Effectiveness
Chlorine Dioxide: Remains effective over a wide pH range (4–10) and is less affected by the presence of organic matter, making it suitable for challenging disinfection tasks.
Bleach: Its efficacy decreases significantly outside a pH range of 6–8 and in the presence of organic matter.
5. Applications
Chlorine Dioxide:
Water treatment (municipal, industrial, and potable water systems).
Food and beverage sanitation.
Medical disinfection and biofilm removal.
Bleach:
Household cleaning and laundry.
Pool and spa disinfection.
Surface disinfection in healthcare and other settings.
6. Safety and Stability
Chlorine Dioxide: Typically generated on-site because it is unstable as a concentrated gas and can decompose explosively. However, it is considered safer for certain applications due to fewer toxic by-products.
Bleach: Stable in liquid form but degrades over time, particularly when exposed to light and heat. It has a strong, recognizable smell and can be irritating to skin and respiratory systems.
7. Odor and Residue
Chlorine Dioxide: Has a less pronounced odor and does not leave a strong chemical residue or taste in treated water.
Bleach: Has a strong chlorine smell and can leave noticeable chemical residues.
Summary:
While both are effective disinfectants, chlorine dioxide is often preferred for applications requiring minimal by-products and effectiveness in diverse conditions, whereas bleach is more common for general-purpose household and industrial disinfection.
TIMELINE OF ITS ADOPTION ACROSS INDUSTRIES
Taken from pioneer Jim Humble’s website, here I provide a short paraphrased history of its use in industry where I also dug up the references:
1811: Chlorine dioxide is discovered by Sir Humphrey Davy, when he adds sulfuric acid (H2SO4) to potassium chlorate (KClO3). In the early 1900’s it was recognized as an antimicrobial biocide and became known for its disinfectant properties.
1930’s: Due to concerns about the logistics of safely transporting the gas, sodium chlorite began to be manufactured as a relatively safe precursor chemical, and the industries using chlorine dioxide would then generate the gas onsite as needed. Because of chlorine dioxide’s solubility in water, it starts being used as a water treatment.
1944: First commercial application. Used as a biocide/taste and odor control agent in domestic water at Niagara Falls in the USA.
1950’s: Increasing use of chlorine dioxide in water treatment plants and swimming pools in the U.S.A. Likewise it is discovered that chlorine dioxide destroys biofilm, the algal slime that collects in cooling towers, among other places and harbors harmful bacteria. Chlorine bleach by contrast cannot kill biofilm.
1956: Brussels, Belgium, switches to chlorine dioxide from chlorine for its drinking water disinfection operations. This marks the first large scale use of chlorine dioxide for potable water treatment.
1967: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) of the United States first registers chlorine dioxide as a disinfectant and sanitizer. The registration is for chlorine dioxide in the liquid form. Indicated uses include food processing (!), handling and storage plants, bottling plants, washing fruit and vegetables (!), sanitizing water, controlling odors, and treating medical wastes.
1970’s: The EPA begins recommending using chlorine dioxide instead of chlorine bleach to treat water. Hundreds of municipal water systems successfully convert to chlorine dioxide. This happens across the United States and Europe; more so for the latter. The conversion is catalyzed by a safer environmental profile of chlorine dioxide over chlorine, because chlorine dioxide does not produce any harmful byproducts, as does chlorine bleach.
1977: Three thousand municipal water systems achieve biological control using chlorine dioxide (EPA document here)
1980’s: Chlorine dioxide gradually replaces chlorine in many industries – in the pulp and paper industry as a bleaching agent, in industrial water treatment as a biocide and as an odor control agent, in food processing as a sanitizer.
1983: The EPA recommends chlorine dioxide as a solution for the problem of trihalomethanes (THMs). When chlorine is used to disinfect water and make it potable (chlorination), THMs are produced as a by-product. THMs have been linked to cancer (i.e., they are carcinogenic). Chlorine dioxide does not produce THMs.
1988: The EPA registers chlorine dioxide as a sterilizer. This means chlorine dioxide is both safe and effective to use in hospitals, healthcare facilities, and laboratories.
1990: Use of chlorine dioxide as a disinfectant, sanitizer and sterilizer grows across many industries and countries. Some of the industries are the beverage industry, fruit and vegetable processing plants, pulp and paper industries, and industrial waste treatment sites. These industries are spread across the United States, the United Kingdom and Europe.
2001: The Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) and other government agencies use chlorine dioxide to decontaminate buildings contaminated with Anthrax. The chlorine dioxide was completely effective against the tiny Anthrax spores. The buildings, walls and furnishings suffered no damage from the treatment.
2005: FEMA again uses chlorine dioxide. It is used to eradicate mold infestations in homes damaged by the flood waters from Hurricane Katrina. After a 12-hour treatment, a New Orleans restaurant is able to banish all mold inside without rebuilding.
2010: The United States Food and Drug Administration issue a warning on using the chlorine dioxide formulation called Miracle Mineral Solution (MMS - made by combining sodium chlorite with hydrochloric acid) and pioneered by Jim Humble in his numerous treatment protocols. The FDA repeatedly describes it as industrial bleach while at the same time approving chlorine dioxide for use in mouthwashes, toothpastes, and as a food service disinfectant, citing it as being a better alternative than chlorine.
2014: The Centers for Disease Control (CDC) registers ProKure V and PERFORMACIDE® as disinfectants against the Ebola virus. Both contain chlorine dioxide. ProKure V claims it “begins to kill pathogens in a matter of seconds, whereas other commonly used, more traditional disinfectants take minutes. The rapid speed in which ProKure V kills pathogens makes it a product of choice for helping contain infectious-disease outbreaks and keeping public facilities cleaner and safer for everyone.” Chlorine dioxide is a potent virucide.”
EFFICACY AND SAFETY AS A BIOCIDE
Chlorine dioxide is one of, if not the fastest known and “complete spectrum” disinfectants, killing all forms of bacteria (aerobic, anaerobic, gram positive and negative), viruses, fungi and yeast, typically within a minute of contact, (spores a little longer), and notably without damage to animal cells, or even tissue culture cells.
In this mouse study (know that mice are more sensitive than humans to toxicities for many but not all compounds), they found that at concentrations between 5 and 20 ppm (this concentration becomes highly relevant in a later post when I discuss safety of oral treatment dose concentrations), chlorine dioxide killed almost all of the bacteria and fungi present while no damage to lung cells, eyes, or other organs was observed, even when 40ppm was added to their drinking water sub-chronically. The study concluded “chlorine dioxide showed favorable disinfection activity and a higher safety profile tendency than in previous reports.”
This is a very short list of papers showing in vitro and/or in vivo (animals) efficacy against a number of viruses and bacteria (more on this in a later post).
Typhoid, Norovirus, Hepatitis C virus, HPV, HIV, Influenza A Virus, E.Coli, Listeria, Rotavirus, Mycobacterium Avium, Hepatitis A Virus, staph aureus, also hospital pathogens like Acinetobacter baumannii, Escherichia coli, Enterococcus faecalis, Mycobacterium smegmatis, and Staphylococcus aureus.
Moving away from in vitro data in order to show that it can cure infectious disease in animals (in vivo study), in a randomized controlled trial from 2008 they exposed 10 mice to aerosolized influenza A and aerosolized chlorine dioxide at (0.03 ppm) simultaneously for 15 minutes. A control group of 10 mice were exposed to only the aerosolized influenza A for 15 minutes. Sixteen days after exposure, none of the mice exposed to the chlorine dioxide influenza A group had died, but 7 out of 10 mice in the influenza only control group died. That is a 70% fatality for the mice that did not receive aerosolized chlorine dioxide. Did you catch that? Extremely low doses of chlorine dioxide protected 100% of those mice from influenza.
Moving past in vitro and in vivo trials, in a later post I will review the efficacy of chlorine dioxide in the treatment of infectious and other diseases in humans. There I will provide a compilation of all published human clinical trials and studies (which are artificially few due to the suppression of clinical research using chlorine dioxide.
A comprehensive list of all organisms it has been studied and shown efficacy against is beyond the scope of this post, however, know that in a 2010 study, concentrations ranging from 1 to 100 ppm inactivated ≥ 99.9% of the viruses with a 15 sec treatment. The antiviral activity of CD was approximately 10 times higher than that of sodium hypochlorite which is standard bleach.
NASA actually referred to chlorine dioxide as “A Universal Antidote” back in 1988 (p.118 from this Annual Report), where these statements appear:
The special properties of the Alcidem formulation, which has been approved by U.S. regulatory authorities, enable it to destroy mold and fungus, as well as bacteria and viruses, with minimal harm to humans, animals or plants
NERAC conducted a computer search of more than a dozen databases and uncovered scores of applications, among them treatment of viral, fungal and bacterial infections in animals; treatment of human skin diseases; disinfection and sterilization of medical facilities;
The University of Connecticut Medical School is studying the effects of the Alcide compound on human wound healing and scar tissue suppression.
At Israel's Hebrew University Dental School, trials are in progress on a plaque reducing mouthwash and in England researchers are meeting success in human clinical trials of treating herpes and other sexually transmitted diseases.
I cannot over emphasize the importance of the above NASA document from 1988. In it, they admit that it treats a broad range of infections in animals, aids in wound healing (I have a lot on that later), and was having success in treating herpes and other STD’s. Never forget this when you read statements from regulatory agencies across the world where they repeatedly warn that it is a “toxic bleach,” “bleach like substance,” and is “dangerous for ingestion.” Absurd.
Also take note of the fact that NASA never refers to it again in such a positive way. The next mention by NASA was in 1991 when referring to its use in the space shuttle where they caution of the risk of developing hemolytic anemia and disturbing thyroid function (such risks are negligible to non-existent in clinical practice).
Overall, studies and treatment experiences reveal that treatment with chlorine dioxide:
is broadly antimicrobial against nearly all infectious pathogens
reduces inflammation
prevents scarring
aids in wound healing
is non-toxic when orally ingested (in appropriate concentrations)
reduces oral plaque
treats oral atrophic candidiasis
is a potent deodorizer
has in-vitro anti-cancer cell effects, stimulates an in-vivo anti-cancer cell immune response and is also effective when injected intra-tumorally, or via a combination of oral, enema, and IV administration.
This combination of properties is not found in any other compound. The therapeutic uses for chlorine dioxide are endless. And therein lies the problem. Stay tuned for my upcoming post which compiles the studies and trials in a diverse set of human diseases.
** Please know that I am not recommending that anyone use chlorine dioxide orally given it is not FDA approved for oral ingestion in any medical condition, nor has it been approved by any foreign regulatory agency, nor is it classified as a food supplement. What I am trying to do is amass the critical information needed to petition the “new” FDA (and other regulatory agencies worldwide) to remove their restriction on performing human subjects research with orally ingested chlorine dioxide.
If this post whet your appetite for learning more about chlorine dioxide and you appreciate the time and effort I put into researching and writing my posts, please consider a paid subscription. My next posts will contain more detailed and referenced information on the safety and efficacy of oral, topical, and IV administration
.
This is great summary of ClO2. I’m an integrative MD practicing for 39 years. I have been using it for twenty years. I am so happy that conventional MDs have become interested in other substances besides medication. Thank you for helping transform the future of health and humanity. Self care is the new heath care.
I have used CD off and on for several years, but I was always concerned with whether the CD was also killing off the good bacteria in my gut, since it’s killing off all the other bacteria in the body. This question has never been fully answered, either by studies I’ve read or Jim Humble’s book. Is there a definitive answer to this? Thank you.