After 4 years of catastrophic health agency tyranny, physicians finally score a legal victory. I think the FDA settled because their Pharma masters were terrified of discovery. Here is the backstory.
On ivermectin ban, m-RNA push, early treatments and old school medicines etc, we are certain the medical administrations in the USA (e.g. FDA), Europe and a few other countries in the Western Block were acting in concert, at the behest of the Big Pharma. There could be some 40 or 45 countries in this block. Assuming each administration had about 6 decision making and government advising top heads, this is about 250 people who wielded the influence on the fate of about 3 billion population. As Dr. Shankara Chetty’s case goes, South Africa was a surprise member of this unofficial block. Almost all of them could be doctors professionally, many renowned and specialists too. How come such a large number of elite got to be influenced by the views of big pharma, under what considerations instead of thinking as doctors first - like saving the sick first, quickly grasping disease presentations, relating it to known treatments from other indications even just symptoms, quick look in to the past related research etc etc, the pandemic picture would have been totally different, history by as early as end 2021. Even conceding their concern for the spread in terms of vaccine development push, where was their open concern for the thousands and thousands getting ill or dying around each on them ? How come not even 3 out of 6 think of such priorities ? Whom were they beholden to ? Who would unravel the herd behaviour of these top elites ? As we see here in this case here, even on the path of law, only compromise seems like the best possible outcome.
So, why did you settle? You play right into the FDA's and medical cabal's hands when you keep up the narrative of drug therapies, and viruses. You don't realize this is their narrative and they are happy whether you are for or against, as long as you play the game. We can make the case that their condemnation of Ivermectin was just to the fast track of the vaccine, but to uphold the belief that this drug was the answer to fighting a virus undermines all your efforts to expose their lies. They invent a virus and then push vaccines to "save the lives of millions" but you are operating by the same playbook. What is achieved? Only more drugs and lies.
“had to bury the evidence of efficacy of ivermectin at all costs: little ‘ole ivermectin threatened both the EUA for the vaccines and the global vaccine market (north of a $100 billion).”
Yes!!! Plus the fact that they did not want people getting well, their actual GOAL was/is lots and lots of DEAD PEOPLE!
“had to bury the evidence of efficacy of ivermectin at all costs: little ‘ole ivermectin threatened both the EUA for the vaccines and the global vaccine market (north of a $100 billion).”
Yes!!! Plus the fact that they did not want people getting well, their actual GOAL was/is lots and lots of DEAD PEOPLE!
My career was honed from the very start on the development and validation of “targeted precision medicines.” I have considerable expertise in this area, and believe that it’s the best way to propel rational interventions into medicines and public health care.
Covid was different. It made me realize that the knowledge we have to apply rational interventions is not only limited, but often ineffective. It’s still not clear to me whether that is due to a deficiency in knowledge, or due to disease and host variability.
So the bottom line here is that the FDA should have relearned an old lesson. Effective Clinical responses can arise both by rational development schemes, but also by serendipity. Serendipity is not to be denied access into the healthcare marketplace just because it revealed itself without considerable backing.
Congratulations on your win. It is win for all of us. Without the perseverance of the FLCCC and your remarkable attorney it would never have happened. It’s a start. There are many things that must change. Onward heroes!!
I liked a comment on another site: “don’t remove their statements, but rather leave them up, with big red ❌s through each false statement.” Really provides a contrast between the lies next to the actual truth & reality.
A tremendous undertaking by the bravest physicians out there right now. But sound legal strategy doesn't lead to the best outcomes. Its hard to be excited and not disappointed. Erasing their crimes from existence and being allowed to pretend it didn't happen while at the same time being allowed to say they didn't do anything wrong, is difficult to see as having any meaningful impact in changing the behavior of the agencies that need to be held accountable and be transparent.
On ivermectin ban, m-RNA push, early treatments and old school medicines etc, we are certain the medical administrations in the USA (e.g. FDA), Europe and a few other countries in the Western Block were acting in concert, at the behest of the Big Pharma. There could be some 40 or 45 countries in this block. Assuming each administration had about 6 decision making and government advising top heads, this is about 250 people who wielded the influence on the fate of about 3 billion population. As Dr. Shankara Chetty’s case goes, South Africa was a surprise member of this unofficial block. Almost all of them could be doctors professionally, many renowned and specialists too. How come such a large number of elite got to be influenced by the views of big pharma, under what considerations instead of thinking as doctors first - like saving the sick first, quickly grasping disease presentations, relating it to known treatments from other indications even just symptoms, quick look in to the past related research etc etc, the pandemic picture would have been totally different, history by as early as end 2021. Even conceding their concern for the spread in terms of vaccine development push, where was their open concern for the thousands and thousands getting ill or dying around each on them ? How come not even 3 out of 6 think of such priorities ? Whom were they beholden to ? Who would unravel the herd behaviour of these top elites ? As we see here in this case here, even on the path of law, only compromise seems like the best possible outcome.
So, why did you settle? You play right into the FDA's and medical cabal's hands when you keep up the narrative of drug therapies, and viruses. You don't realize this is their narrative and they are happy whether you are for or against, as long as you play the game. We can make the case that their condemnation of Ivermectin was just to the fast track of the vaccine, but to uphold the belief that this drug was the answer to fighting a virus undermines all your efforts to expose their lies. They invent a virus and then push vaccines to "save the lives of millions" but you are operating by the same playbook. What is achieved? Only more drugs and lies.
“had to bury the evidence of efficacy of ivermectin at all costs: little ‘ole ivermectin threatened both the EUA for the vaccines and the global vaccine market (north of a $100 billion).”
Yes!!! Plus the fact that they did not want people getting well, their actual GOAL was/is lots and lots of DEAD PEOPLE!
“had to bury the evidence of efficacy of ivermectin at all costs: little ‘ole ivermectin threatened both the EUA for the vaccines and the global vaccine market (north of a $100 billion).”
Yes!!! Plus the fact that they did not want people getting well, their actual GOAL was/is lots and lots of DEAD PEOPLE!
I read it!
I found it easy to read and well laid out.
So good I couldn’t wait to get back to it
between breaks.
Buy it. Buy several. Your offspring
will have a piece amazing history.
5 Stars ⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️
I wonder is Berenson will change his tune on Ivermectin
My career was honed from the very start on the development and validation of “targeted precision medicines.” I have considerable expertise in this area, and believe that it’s the best way to propel rational interventions into medicines and public health care.
Covid was different. It made me realize that the knowledge we have to apply rational interventions is not only limited, but often ineffective. It’s still not clear to me whether that is due to a deficiency in knowledge, or due to disease and host variability.
So the bottom line here is that the FDA should have relearned an old lesson. Effective Clinical responses can arise both by rational development schemes, but also by serendipity. Serendipity is not to be denied access into the healthcare marketplace just because it revealed itself without considerable backing.
So are doctors free to prescribe Ivermectin now without repercussions?
I read your book, Mr. Kory, and followed the lawsuit ( what little the media would cover). Congratulations. Sometimes the good guys win.
Bravo! and Thanks.
Congratulations on your win. It is win for all of us. Without the perseverance of the FLCCC and your remarkable attorney it would never have happened. It’s a start. There are many things that must change. Onward heroes!!
So , does this mean that pharmacies will now have to fill prescriptions for Ivermectin?
I liked a comment on another site: “don’t remove their statements, but rather leave them up, with big red ❌s through each false statement.” Really provides a contrast between the lies next to the actual truth & reality.
I’ll take the advice of Dr. Kory over any government stooge, period!
Congratulations!
A tremendous undertaking by the bravest physicians out there right now. But sound legal strategy doesn't lead to the best outcomes. Its hard to be excited and not disappointed. Erasing their crimes from existence and being allowed to pretend it didn't happen while at the same time being allowed to say they didn't do anything wrong, is difficult to see as having any meaningful impact in changing the behavior of the agencies that need to be held accountable and be transparent.