The first three posts (Part 1, Part 2, Part 3) in this series provided evidence of the following: The FDA and the EMA define the mRNA vaccines as gene therapies. The FDA requires that gene therapy products undergo human shedding studies given the known risks of shedding
Dr Thorpe’s comment about the golden rule of never giving a novel product to a pregnant woman… and yet it seems all of the universe lost their minds and complied.
A physician friend of mine - pregnant - got the damn booster recently. Because she was flying overseas. And was scared of getting sick. Asked three OBs about it, and they ALL SAID YES.
I just cannot even begin to formulate words to describe the lunacy and the brainwashing.
Thank you Dr. Kory . I too , as an unjabbed ob/gyn, lost my job. I’m better off. The placental abruptions and second trimester losses , were all getting to me mentally and the residents were too woke for words. I do office work only now and this affords me the opportunity to explain to women, not to take the jab. ACOG still recommends the jabs . (That’s a whole other discussion both medically and legally when discussing “standard of care “) Thanks again , and I direct many to FLCCC . You and Dr. Marik have been awesome 👏🏻.
This was a major flag I'm sure to many, because as Copernicus mentions, the golden rule of not experimenting on pregnant women historically. One of many indications that the makers of these products, the regulatory bodies of these products, and the governing bodies enforcing these products, they knew. They know. They don't care.
#wearemany #wearememory #wewillnotforgive #getnoisy #getlocalised
Thank you so much for your Substack and all the research that goes into it.
I’ve been so concerned about shedding when attending large events for work. I’ve haven’t been on a plane in almost 3 years.
My husband and I are unjabbed and never had Covid (our blood tests show no exposure, either). When we know we’ll be around a lot of people (like on a cruise) we prophylacticly take IVM along with other things the FLCCC recommends. 😉
I’m a believer in terrain theory over germ theory. I do worry a lot about what the next few years will look like with death and disability. My dad passed after he got the booster last year. In his ALF, I saw a severe decline in many of the residents after the booster. I do believe the CDC and FDA wanted to kill us. No doubt in my mind. It breaks me heart to read about pregnant women and their babies. 💔
Your articles are invaluable!! We need more Dr. Korys in this world! 🙏
I begged my pregnant niece-in-law and nephew and their dad (my brother) NOT TO GET JABBED and not to give jabs to their baby. As far as I know, they did it anyway. Mom and baby may be doing OK (so far), but don’t know for sure as we’re not close physically or socially.
Brother had two eye issues that required emergency surgery followed by cataract surgery; I’m convinced eye issues were jab related. Brother got Covid anyway. Said he wouldn’t get more shots because they don’t work. Still, he refuses to read or share any science related to these jabs. He is otherwise conservative.
Leftist sister and her now dying-from-recurrent-prostate-cancer leftist husband are brainwashed believers who won’t talk to me after I tried to provide them with information that didn’t come from MSM, FDA, CDC, or Politico. She (a lawyer with experience defending nurses, pharmacists, and doctors at her university job) participated in jab clinics and denied informed consent to pre-jab vaccinees in order to prevent “vaccine hesitancy” -- UGH! I did try to warn them all.
This story repeats and rhymes, like history, in family and friends throughout the globe. The destruction of humanity is well underway, through bioweapons, war, and abject stupidity.
Any research on secondary shedding and miscarriages? I am unjabbed as are my husband and children, but after a week and a half sharing a vacation house with my jabbed parents and siblings and their families in July-August 2021, I had a miscarriage. Based on the baby's size on the ultrasound when I found out he/she no longer had a heartbeat, his/her death occurred on one of the last days of that vacation. So if the shot caused that miscarriage, it was not because I shed the shot directly to the baby, but because others shed the shot to me, which I then shed across the placenta.
I probably would have thought nothing of the connection with the shot and would have assumed it was just a "normal" miscarriage, but I also developed a heart rhythm issue - premature atrial contractions - along with a substantial change in the severity of preexisting hemorrhoids within a day or two of when the baby's heartbeat stopped. (So many significant changes happened all at once that I can't believe they aren't related.) These other 2 issues have not resolved during the 2+ years since. I have fortunately gone on to have a successful pregnancy since that loss, but I will always be haunted by the idea that that baby died because of the shot, even though I was scrupulous about avoiding it myself.
One-day-old newborn baby the youngest vaccine injury case reported in Taiwan: One of the many articles I wrote that were suppressed by big tech in the pandemic hysteria era:
The vast majority of data and discussions about side effects focus on the Pfizer and Moderna jabs. What sort of long term issues are you most concerned with the J&J jabs which did not use LNPs but instead used adenovirus vectors w mutated DNA to provoke spike protein production in recipients? And do they shed the same way that PFE and MRNA do?? I cannot find any clear info about this.
Is there any data on unjabbed women having kids with jabbed men, and how this may affect the pregnancies and the newborn babies?
Kory, my main concern has always been CoVax fallout triggering WW3 which you should check out here...
... however that its far from my only concern, as I'm getting some feedback from your Resistance colleagues, we may have effectively poisoned our genome, Rush
Why? Malthus strikes again.
The 1974 Club of Rome report titled, Mankind at the Turning Point stated, “The real enemy then, is humanity itself.” Their solution was simple – engineer a massive reduction in population and utterly change the socio-economic system through centralized planning via total government control. And yes, this does smack of being called “The Final Solution” to me, too. This “man is the enemy” was reiterated by the Club of Rome in 1993, as well, when they stated in their The First Global Revolution, downloadable at http://www.scribd.com/doc/2297152/Alexander-King-Bertrand-Schneider-The-First-Global-Revolution-Club-of-Rome-1993-Edition that “In searching for a new enemy to unite us, we came up with the idea that pollution, the threat of global warming, water shortages, famine and the like would fit the bill….All these dangers are caused by human intervention, and it is only through changed attitudes and behavior that they can be overcome. The real enemy then, is humanity itself.” A full Club of Rome history can be found here, https://www.clubofrome.org/history/ from the Club itself. Also from the Club “The earth has cancer and the cancer is man.”
Transmitted in breast milk.
That is, for those kids who didn't avoid partial birth abortion.
So does nattokinase deactivate the spike and the nanoparticles? I take that and also take ivermectin 2X week.
I am not sure that it matters about shedding for crossing the placental barrier. If you look at this small excerpt about the RSV vaccine for pregnant women meant for the fetus, they already have that intent. Who knows what damage this one will do to mother and child.
In addition, this week the FDA approved the first RSV vaccine for pregnant women. Pfizer’s maternal vaccine protects infants, from birth through six months, against RSV. Pfizer’s study found the vaccine 82% effective at preventing a severe case of RSV from birth to three months, and 69% effective at six months.
“This left them with 39 of the 248 adverse events (8.5%) resulting in spontaneous abortion. Now, although this rate of spontaneous abortion is consistent with traditional rates in pregnancy”.... where is your source for 8.5% being inline with traditional rates? Miscarriage rates drop every week of pregnancy. Spontaneous abortion is just a miscarriage after 20 weeks. 8.5% seems very high to me.