Re “Shedding studies were not done because, even though the vaccines are gene-therapies, they legally fell under the legal definition of a “countermeasure” in a public health emergency.”
What exactly was the ‘public health emergency’?
There never was a ‘public health emergency’. It was a ‘PHEIC’ aka fake.
Re “Shedding studies were not done because, even though the vaccines are gene-therapies, they legally fell under the legal definition of a “countermeasure” in a public health emergency.”
What exactly was the ‘public health emergency’?
There never was a ‘public health emergency’. It was a ‘PHEIC’ aka fake.
This fiasco has been a deliberately manufactured crisis to facilitate a massive vaccine market and control of the people.
Yes, especially when there were no benefits to lockdowns at all.
I think I remember Fauci being asked about the cost of lockdowns (after they had been underway for sometime) and he said something to the effect that it’s not his job or specialty to asses the harms. What an absolute snake. Apparently, he’s not qualified to asses harms or benefits to the public because he got everything wrong on those two accounts. But, he was very qualified to be making decisions based on benefits to his bank account and business dealings for the NIH. Such a murderous man.
The lockdowns were about pressuring the public to take the "vaccine"- we will let you out of prison after you take the "vaccine" and only after you comply. It was a behavioural pressure point much like a Pavlov's dog experiment. Everything that is being done is about deluding the public into compliance. The problem is that the "unvaccinated" and the "partially vaccinated" disturbed the narrative. So compliance on several fronts has fallen apart. Forced compliance is difficult once too many people wake up.
Yes, you are right. The lockdowns definitely had a benefit for the plan to coheres and frighten as many people as possible into voluntarily taking an experimental gene therapy. It also had a massive financial benefit to several large corporations, like chain grocery stores, online retailers (Amazon particularly), zoom, etc. And on top of that, the extra compensation that the hospitals received for following NIH recommendations during lockdowns kept hospitals financially afloat. So I guess I should clarify my comment to say that there was never any public health benefit, nor did they have any data suggesting there would be a benefit, unless you count fraudulent modeling with a dismal track record.
Compliance is low now but I was shocked at how many people accepted the injections, who wouldn’t have if they had been fully informed and had not been brainwashed out of their minds. I would say the lockdowns were successful for the intended purpose, sadly.
In all "crises" (much of planned), the pop. relies on 5-10 % of the authentic leadership within it to show the way forward. This is as true today as it was during the Elizabethan Era and the King James one which followed. The removal of Church control from England begins in earnest with Henry VIII but continues on with these two successive reigns. Had it not been for the Separatists like Henry Barrow, the enslavement of the pop. would have transferred to the elites with no Parliamentary mediation. The French Revolution gave us The Declaration of the Rights of Man and the model for Western Constitutions. Great thanks to William Tyndale who translated the Bible, both Old and New Testaments, into English. He was martyred in 1536. Western Constitutions are founded on Biblical Principles. We need to better teach Critical Thinking Skills, History and Constitutional Understanding. More skepticism is needed.
I agree that people need better critical thinking skills. That was on full display during the last three years. Sadly, public elementary education, and actually, “higher” education, seems to be moving in the opposite direction.
You have to do a lot of the Research and Critical Thinking on your own. The school system is unreliable and does not tell you what you need to know - Seven Habits of Highly Critical Thinkers -
Through experience and reflection, I’ve noticed that critical thinking has drawbacks that make it untenable for many. First, a person has to be willing to be the “weird sheep”. And that’s a very uncomfortable place to be when you belong to a culture/society/group, especially with the introduction of social media. Very stressful.
And a second obvious drawback is that it’s very emotionally difficult to give up comfortable and reassuring beliefs. (Notice the word “lie” tucked into the word belief) existential crises are terrible and painful.
People in power know the downsides of critical thinking and constantly set up conditions to discourage it. Propaganda and brainwashing are strong and prevalent. Especially with AI algorithms. It’s a significant challenge for individuals/society to overcome.
I’m not going to lie, I’ve actually lost most hope in humanity after seeing what has transpired. (People I know were actually admitting to supporting defunding the police?! Vaccine passports?! And other such nonsense) But life goes on either way. Help where we can, right?
I think one of the biggest challenges is overcoming TIME constraints. Critical Thinkers come from a wide variety of backgrounds. In this case, the white collar class of "educated professionals" were the most likely to have bought into the "system propaganda narrative", precisely because they work largely for the "matrix" and the system had served them well. People who did not fall for it were blue collar / tradespeople / independent business people / PhD's. The TIME to do the Research and to apply Critical Thinking beyond mere survival strategies, is also very important. Many of us rebels have also been thinking "off the beaten path" well before the "crisis". Aquarius is the zodiac sign for oddity. Aries is the sign of courage under pressure. Pisces is the sign of reading between the lines and Intuition. Those of us towards the end of the Zodiac Wheel - Aquarius / Pisces / Aries. I think had an advantage because nothing is "missing" and these "end / beginning of wheel signs" dip into each other.
Re “Shedding studies were not done because, even though the vaccines are gene-therapies, they legally fell under the legal definition of a “countermeasure” in a public health emergency.”
What exactly was the ‘public health emergency’?
There never was a ‘public health emergency’. It was a ‘PHEIC’ aka fake.
This fiasco has been a deliberately manufactured crisis to facilitate a massive vaccine market and control of the people.
FYI, please see some of my BMJ (aka The British Medical Journal) rapid responses published in 2020…
There should never have been a vaccine…but it was always about the vaccine, and control of the people:
- Is it ethical to impede access to natural immunity? The case of SARS-CoV2, 25 March 2020: https://www.bmj.com/content/368/bmj.m1089/rr-6
- Is it ethical to vaccinate children to protect the elderly? 5 August 2020: https://www.bmj.com/content/364/bmj.l108/rr-4
- Why do we need a vaccine for Covid-19? 1 September 2020: https://www.bmj.com/content/370/bmj.m3258/rr-9
- SARS-CoV-2 virus - disproportionate and ill-targeted response, 5 October 2020: https://www.bmj.com/content/371/bmj.m3511/rr-0
- Liberal democracies being turned upside down to 'protect health services', 18 December 2020: https://www.bmj.com/content/371/bmj.m4847/rr-16
There never was any need for any shutdown
The proper model is Shutdown Costs vs Shutdown Benefits - Opposite Sloping Regression Lines. Improper model: 2 weeks to flatten the curve
The proper model would easily show Costs exceed Benefits, wrong path.
Yes, especially when there were no benefits to lockdowns at all.
I think I remember Fauci being asked about the cost of lockdowns (after they had been underway for sometime) and he said something to the effect that it’s not his job or specialty to asses the harms. What an absolute snake. Apparently, he’s not qualified to asses harms or benefits to the public because he got everything wrong on those two accounts. But, he was very qualified to be making decisions based on benefits to his bank account and business dealings for the NIH. Such a murderous man.
The lockdowns were about pressuring the public to take the "vaccine"- we will let you out of prison after you take the "vaccine" and only after you comply. It was a behavioural pressure point much like a Pavlov's dog experiment. Everything that is being done is about deluding the public into compliance. The problem is that the "unvaccinated" and the "partially vaccinated" disturbed the narrative. So compliance on several fronts has fallen apart. Forced compliance is difficult once too many people wake up.
Yes, you are right. The lockdowns definitely had a benefit for the plan to coheres and frighten as many people as possible into voluntarily taking an experimental gene therapy. It also had a massive financial benefit to several large corporations, like chain grocery stores, online retailers (Amazon particularly), zoom, etc. And on top of that, the extra compensation that the hospitals received for following NIH recommendations during lockdowns kept hospitals financially afloat. So I guess I should clarify my comment to say that there was never any public health benefit, nor did they have any data suggesting there would be a benefit, unless you count fraudulent modeling with a dismal track record.
Compliance is low now but I was shocked at how many people accepted the injections, who wouldn’t have if they had been fully informed and had not been brainwashed out of their minds. I would say the lockdowns were successful for the intended purpose, sadly.
In all "crises" (much of planned), the pop. relies on 5-10 % of the authentic leadership within it to show the way forward. This is as true today as it was during the Elizabethan Era and the King James one which followed. The removal of Church control from England begins in earnest with Henry VIII but continues on with these two successive reigns. Had it not been for the Separatists like Henry Barrow, the enslavement of the pop. would have transferred to the elites with no Parliamentary mediation. The French Revolution gave us The Declaration of the Rights of Man and the model for Western Constitutions. Great thanks to William Tyndale who translated the Bible, both Old and New Testaments, into English. He was martyred in 1536. Western Constitutions are founded on Biblical Principles. We need to better teach Critical Thinking Skills, History and Constitutional Understanding. More skepticism is needed.
I agree that people need better critical thinking skills. That was on full display during the last three years. Sadly, public elementary education, and actually, “higher” education, seems to be moving in the opposite direction.
You have to do a lot of the Research and Critical Thinking on your own. The school system is unreliable and does not tell you what you need to know - Seven Habits of Highly Critical Thinkers -
https://timvangelder.com/2013/12/18/seven-habits-of-highly-critical-thinkers/
That was an excellent article.
Through experience and reflection, I’ve noticed that critical thinking has drawbacks that make it untenable for many. First, a person has to be willing to be the “weird sheep”. And that’s a very uncomfortable place to be when you belong to a culture/society/group, especially with the introduction of social media. Very stressful.
And a second obvious drawback is that it’s very emotionally difficult to give up comfortable and reassuring beliefs. (Notice the word “lie” tucked into the word belief) existential crises are terrible and painful.
People in power know the downsides of critical thinking and constantly set up conditions to discourage it. Propaganda and brainwashing are strong and prevalent. Especially with AI algorithms. It’s a significant challenge for individuals/society to overcome.
I’m not going to lie, I’ve actually lost most hope in humanity after seeing what has transpired. (People I know were actually admitting to supporting defunding the police?! Vaccine passports?! And other such nonsense) But life goes on either way. Help where we can, right?
I think one of the biggest challenges is overcoming TIME constraints. Critical Thinkers come from a wide variety of backgrounds. In this case, the white collar class of "educated professionals" were the most likely to have bought into the "system propaganda narrative", precisely because they work largely for the "matrix" and the system had served them well. People who did not fall for it were blue collar / tradespeople / independent business people / PhD's. The TIME to do the Research and to apply Critical Thinking beyond mere survival strategies, is also very important. Many of us rebels have also been thinking "off the beaten path" well before the "crisis". Aquarius is the zodiac sign for oddity. Aries is the sign of courage under pressure. Pisces is the sign of reading between the lines and Intuition. Those of us towards the end of the Zodiac Wheel - Aquarius / Pisces / Aries. I think had an advantage because nothing is "missing" and these "end / beginning of wheel signs" dip into each other.
It is ethical to vaccinate children because otherwise they'll reproduce and contribute to excess population.
Excess population and civilian release of CO2, etc. See Club of Rome and Bill Gates. Starting wildfires doesn't count. (Antifa isn't civilian?)