Major Covid mRNA policy reversals and awakenings occurred within a major U.S health system, a large U.S state, a South American country, and in the UK. The dominoes are starting to fall.
I read this article with interest, but all of the negative information on mRNA I've seen has been based on the disasters of the mRNA genetic treatment for covid. Clearly this treatment for covid was not ready for prime time and, clearly, the concept of how it works is flawed along with sloppy production of the serum. I am also aware of the trials where animals later died in 2014.
Recently, though, I heard from someone who works in the AIDS area of CDC that an mRNA treatment has created tremendous excitement as it has been shown to make the AID virus which firmly attaches to cells let loose (to explain it simply) and then it can be eradicated. Apparently they are now moving to further, I think animal, tests. It unclear to me if a whole technology should be discarded based on the covid disaster, but I have seen nothing more on the broader subject of mRNA.
I'm glad they've finally stopped the COVID jab madness but it's not an awakening, its a typical corporate decision to distance themselves from the likely legal fall out & suits that are building. The CEO, medical staff, & hospital administration should face severe punishment, their protocols killed patients, they refused to promote or allow early treatments killed people, they ruined people's lives & destroyed careers over COVID policies. If not for you & a few like you there would have been no guide lines for early treatment, no body questioning the mRNA jab. I'm not going to forget or forgive. Ever. They sold out medicine
I am curious what Dr Corey and others think of the protein subunit vaccine made in Taiwan. I'm not a medical professional but think that might avoid some of the dangers of the spike protein. I don't intend to be vaccinated but I have relatives in places that are using that vaccine who may be pressured.
Fl has not dropped it all. I will be a future transplant patient and Tampa general currently requires it. Looking for hospitals in Fl who do not require it. Managed to not take it , now to live I must how ironic. @ other friends who had transplants during covid were required both are now dead due to turbo cancers. If anyone know of one that doesn't require it would be very helpful.
Any doctor or medical professional who hasn't figure this out is too stupid to be in the industry and is probably too stupid to be part of society in general.
Also, the mRNA covid vaccine is still approved under EUA, when there is “no longer an emergency”, why?
Allowing the continued use under EUA, gives people the perception that it is safe.
The use of mRNA biotechnology in the targeted treatment of an existing specific disease has been successful. The use of this biotechnology to prevent and mitigate illness from a viral contagion is a novel application. Which, in my mind has not been proven out to be successful.
I know very little about science and medicine but I agree that the use of this biotechnology forces genetic change, the short/long term consequences to the bodies of humans and animals - is unknown and I suspect will not be good.
Your rational as to OSUMC’s change in Covid vax requirement for employees, makes sense.
I observed MetLife (a number of years ago) reinsuring (I think was their entire portfolio) of its group life insurance policies (those sold to businesses for coverage to employees). The reinsurance of this portfolio occurred a little over a year after Covid pandemic. I was suspect that this business decision was because the company knew or highly suspected the mRNA vaccines (not having been thoroughly tested) would cause death, hence a huge financial loss.
The life insurance industry’s business decisions can be another lense for which the safety of the mRNA biotechnology can be viewed.
Financial Incentives and Regulatory Agencies: The development of self-replicating RNA vaccines has been driven by financial incentives, with pharmaceutical companies like Arcturus Therapeutics investing heavily in this technology. Regulatory agencies, such as the European Committee for Medicinal Products for Human Use (CHMP), have recommended approving self-replicating mRNA vaccines, despite significant safety concerns and lack of long-term data.
Safety Concerns: The safety concerns associated with self-replicating RNA vaccines are substantial, with reports of adverse events, systemic reactions, and deaths in clinical trials. The lack of long-term safety data and the potential for these vaccines to transform cells, induce cancerous mutations, or trigger autoimmune responses remain unstudied. Epidemiologists and health professionals have raised concerns about the risks of these vaccines, citing the need for rigorous, independent studies to ensure their safety and efficacy.
Adverse Event Rates: High rates of adverse events have been reported in clinical trials, with 90% of participants experiencing adverse events after the first dose, and 74.5% reporting systemic reactions.
Lack of Long-Term Safety Data: The lack of long-term safety data for self-replicating RNA vaccines is a significant concern, with epidemiologists warning that these products are “completely new” and have “absolutely no long-term safety data” available.
Regulatory Oversight: The regulatory oversight of self-replicating RNA vaccines has been criticized, with concerns that pharmaceutical companies are exerting undue influence over regulatory agencies, and that the approval process is being rushed despite significant safety concerns.
I read this article with interest, but all of the negative information on mRNA I've seen has been based on the disasters of the mRNA genetic treatment for covid. Clearly this treatment for covid was not ready for prime time and, clearly, the concept of how it works is flawed along with sloppy production of the serum. I am also aware of the trials where animals later died in 2014.
Recently, though, I heard from someone who works in the AIDS area of CDC that an mRNA treatment has created tremendous excitement as it has been shown to make the AID virus which firmly attaches to cells let loose (to explain it simply) and then it can be eradicated. Apparently they are now moving to further, I think animal, tests. It unclear to me if a whole technology should be discarded based on the covid disaster, but I have seen nothing more on the broader subject of mRNA.
Its about time!!!!!
No shots for anyone!
Better late than never! Trust the authentic science. No one is above the law. Justice delayed is justice denied.
I'm glad they've finally stopped the COVID jab madness but it's not an awakening, its a typical corporate decision to distance themselves from the likely legal fall out & suits that are building. The CEO, medical staff, & hospital administration should face severe punishment, their protocols killed patients, they refused to promote or allow early treatments killed people, they ruined people's lives & destroyed careers over COVID policies. If not for you & a few like you there would have been no guide lines for early treatment, no body questioning the mRNA jab. I'm not going to forget or forgive. Ever. They sold out medicine
Took ya awhile
I am curious what Dr Corey and others think of the protein subunit vaccine made in Taiwan. I'm not a medical professional but think that might avoid some of the dangers of the spike protein. I don't intend to be vaccinated but I have relatives in places that are using that vaccine who may be pressured.
Fl has not dropped it all. I will be a future transplant patient and Tampa general currently requires it. Looking for hospitals in Fl who do not require it. Managed to not take it , now to live I must how ironic. @ other friends who had transplants during covid were required both are now dead due to turbo cancers. If anyone know of one that doesn't require it would be very helpful.
Any doctor or medical professional who hasn't figure this out is too stupid to be in the industry and is probably too stupid to be part of society in general.
VAXX INSIGHT
- Real Cause of Seasonal Flu & Pandemics
https://talknet.substack.com/p/real-cause-of-seasonal-flu-and-pandemics
- Vaccines Cause Autoimmune Diseases
https://talknet.substack.com/p/vaccines-and-autoimmune-diseases
- Big Pharma’s Most Profitable Side Effects
https://talknet.substack.com/p/big-pharmas-most-profitable-side
- Censored Studies Prove: Virus Myth, 5G Flu, Vaxx Sickness/Death/Cancer
https://talknet.substack.com/p/studies-prove-virus-myth-5g-flu-vaxx
Also, the mRNA covid vaccine is still approved under EUA, when there is “no longer an emergency”, why?
Allowing the continued use under EUA, gives people the perception that it is safe.
The use of mRNA biotechnology in the targeted treatment of an existing specific disease has been successful. The use of this biotechnology to prevent and mitigate illness from a viral contagion is a novel application. Which, in my mind has not been proven out to be successful.
I know very little about science and medicine but I agree that the use of this biotechnology forces genetic change, the short/long term consequences to the bodies of humans and animals - is unknown and I suspect will not be good.
Your rational as to OSUMC’s change in Covid vax requirement for employees, makes sense.
I observed MetLife (a number of years ago) reinsuring (I think was their entire portfolio) of its group life insurance policies (those sold to businesses for coverage to employees). The reinsurance of this portfolio occurred a little over a year after Covid pandemic. I was suspect that this business decision was because the company knew or highly suspected the mRNA vaccines (not having been thoroughly tested) would cause death, hence a huge financial loss.
The life insurance industry’s business decisions can be another lense for which the safety of the mRNA biotechnology can be viewed.
All covid drugs need to be pulled from the market!
Once you as a physician or CEO know the shots kill, and you still offer them to patients, you should be jailed for life.
Financial Incentives and Regulatory Agencies: The development of self-replicating RNA vaccines has been driven by financial incentives, with pharmaceutical companies like Arcturus Therapeutics investing heavily in this technology. Regulatory agencies, such as the European Committee for Medicinal Products for Human Use (CHMP), have recommended approving self-replicating mRNA vaccines, despite significant safety concerns and lack of long-term data.
Safety Concerns: The safety concerns associated with self-replicating RNA vaccines are substantial, with reports of adverse events, systemic reactions, and deaths in clinical trials. The lack of long-term safety data and the potential for these vaccines to transform cells, induce cancerous mutations, or trigger autoimmune responses remain unstudied. Epidemiologists and health professionals have raised concerns about the risks of these vaccines, citing the need for rigorous, independent studies to ensure their safety and efficacy.
Adverse Event Rates: High rates of adverse events have been reported in clinical trials, with 90% of participants experiencing adverse events after the first dose, and 74.5% reporting systemic reactions.
Lack of Long-Term Safety Data: The lack of long-term safety data for self-replicating RNA vaccines is a significant concern, with epidemiologists warning that these products are “completely new” and have “absolutely no long-term safety data” available.
Regulatory Oversight: The regulatory oversight of self-replicating RNA vaccines has been criticized, with concerns that pharmaceutical companies are exerting undue influence over regulatory agencies, and that the approval process is being rushed despite significant safety concerns.
Study of 2 million people vaccinated against COVID-19 reveals 1,236% increase in cardiac arrest deaths
This past week they’ve allowed bad information about the jabs to become more mainstream? Why?
Something is not right.
https://substack.com/@ogre/note/c-82742022