MP Andrew Bridgen is convening a group of experts to present evidence of criminal corruption during Covid to the Royal Police. I want a seat at that table. Oxford's trial authors should be nervous.
Knowingly designing treatment trials with potentially fatal doses of HCQ is the right place to start criminal investigations. Thank you Andrew Bridgen, and thank you for this clear and thorough explanation, Dr. Kory
The good doctor forgot about the other part- medical misconduct. Wonder why?
The evidence clearly indicates a harsh and uncomfortable reality – there was no pandemic.
Portraying the deeds of the past four years as mere mistakes serves to conceal the deadly protocols established in the hospitals and nursing homes as well as provides cover for those who designed and executed this operation.
We have not been and are not facing what RFK Jr. has termed “a mismanaged pandemic,” a stance supported by most “health freedom” celebrities. What we are dealing with is fraud, tyranny and mass murder.
Terrorizing and isolating elderly people especially those living in care homes, denying them visits from relatives and reducing or eliminating in-person visits from health and social carers became “standard of care.”
Mechanical ventilators push oxygen into patients whose lungs are failing. Using these machines involves sedating a patient and sticking a tube into the throat. It was massive overuse of a treatment (ventilation) known to be extremely harmful.
Large doses of Midazolam, Propofol. Fentanyl and Morphine cocktails were given to people in hospitals to create the illusion of the first wave of the hoax pandemic. They didn’t have the bodies in 2009- they got them this time- not to mention data fraud.
Yes, intention is everything, the educated have the responsibility because we have command of the wisdom and knowledge. Therefore, we have the responsibility to wield it to protect and save others not infect and annihilate.
Those holding the wisdom and education to make proper informed decisions yet decide not to should they be criminally prosecuted with
((( extreme prejudice )))
We do not hesitate to persecute, prosecute, and execute for so much as a stick of bubble gum-
but for intentionally participating in the willful infliction of the illness injury and death of the general public which places there trust in us as doctors is not only unforgivable- it's diabolical!
In the GP Ben Goldacre's book Bad Science he tells of how fraudulent or non-reported (because of bad outcomes) pharma trials can cause a GP to prescribe the wrong medicine. Because of the fraud the information they need to have to hand is often incomplete and/or downright misleading. He mis-prescribed something to someone thinking he was helping his patient, when it turned out that he had been mis-led and the patient suffered very bad side-effects. Goldacre, of course, was tortured by what had happened whereas Pharma take the money and run. So yes, pharma fraud should be a criminal offence.. I'm in the UK, and I'm not a Tory - neither, of course, is Andrew Bridgen these days, but in any case I salute his integrity, courage and tenacity!
While most politicians are shite, liberals take the cake, as it were. Stop voting for liberals as a start to cleaning up the messes we find ourselves in here in the West!
Today's illiberal Left are undeserving of the label they stole from the classical liberals, who actually liberated people. HRH Victoria of the UK, HRH Aleksandr II of Russia, and the Hon Abraham Lincoln of the US liberated people from peonage and slavery. Even the con men of their day, notably Napoleon III who invaded Mexico over unpaid debts incurred by the dictator Santa Anna (who overthrew democracy there in 1836 and killed thousands of democracy backers), replacing him with new dictator Maximilian, had to put a libertarian spin on their actions, by announcing plans for a future democracy in Mexico that they would grant to the Mexican people as soon as they finished robbing them blind. Also of note was American politician Jefferson Davis, who crafted an elaborate fraud called the Confederate Constitution, which legalized slave ownership by calling it "freedom" for the owners. Thankfully Victoria and Aleksandr threatened to starve France into revolution, had Napoleon III formed an alliance with Davis against Lincoln. The threat was real because Davis' Confederacy grew hemp, cotton, indigo and tobacco for export, none of which were edible. The US, Canada and Russia all had grain for export, and cutting it off to France would have knocked Napoleon III out of power. There is nothing liberal nor liberating about compelling people to participate in a global biological experiment, nor about obstructing all questions about the experiment's safety, nor in obstructing scientific independence by defaming every medical practitioner who devised means of palliative care for a COVID infection. IVM and HCQ did NOT cure COVID. The practitioners who used them, did so to reduce the severity of infection. Ultimately the experimental mRNA "vaccines" proved to do no more. Everyone on the planet caught COVID and developed natural immunity, and the virus is now endemic like the flu. It keeps mutating to circumvent existing natural immunity and people update our immune systems when we reinfect. There was nothing liberal nor liberating about mass death and destruction, mass deception, nor mass impoverishment to fund these experiments.
We need to tell the statist dictators and oligarchs that they do not deserve the title "Liberal", even though they use it to conceal their motives.
And I concur: Voting the buggers out is the best way to make that point.
“Liberal” has been tainted in my view since the 60s. That is when many people began to lose their ability to think logically. Most of your examples are much much earlier than that. We used to have good debates about liberal vs conservative policies. For me it all comes down to Big vs Small government. I think it is safe to say that Big Government (liberal policies) have finally ruined our country. Something I saw coming from the time I was a teenager. It really isn’t difficult to figure out.
I think your timeline is spot-on, Patti! On 11-22-1963 bullets fired from multiple directions killed John F Kennedy. Immediately afterward our Government and mass media announced a "magic bullet" theory, defying all the known laws of physics, on how a gun that was too rusty for its firing mechanism to fire a single bullet, was somehow used by the late Lee H Oswald to shoot two bullets, one of which reversed course in midair twice, cleaned itself of any blood, magically landed in Governor Connolly's clothing, and fell into the stretcher at the hospital in pristine condition. Many people doubted the irrational story and said so. Many others refused to doubt the official story out of fear and misplaced patriotism. Texas physician and Congressman recently called the Kennedy murder a coup d'êtat. A government that is too big and terrifying to question, is simply too big. As we became more fearful to question what it did to us, it grew bigger. And of course the winners call themselves Liberal because no one questions their choice of words.
But . . . But . . . The Warren Commission said it was Oswald, and it was composed of brilliant, fearless, and patriotic leaders who overturned every stone in researching this event. . . /s/
This has nothing to do with politics, right-wing and left-wing countries have done the same thing, introducing graphene into vials. Therefore it leads you to the conclusion that politicians do not run the world.
Why do you think they continue injecting people with graphene, knowing that there are many people who already know about it? Because they don't care, they know that something prepared supports them.
This filmmaker calls for people who have information “that can bring down this cartel of organized medical crime to come forward.” He provides an email address.
Tom Haviland emailed him the results of our embalmer blood clot survey.
Steve Kirsch recently linked this film in his stack.
Many thanks for your enterprise, courage and determination Pierre and Paul. You will be interested in a patent that relates to the treatment of shingles with Ivermectin. https://patents.google.com/patent/US20130172282A1/en
So is there a product on the market, I know several people who are still suffering from shingles.
Also about 5 yrs back my husband and I both had the two shingle vaccines. We were told this was a lifetime vaccine. This week our pharmacy contacted us saying they have a new shingles vaccine available and we should get this now. We will not but this marketing worries me.
It's remarkable and very depressing what wads of cash will do to people. I hope they are haunted by the mayhem they've helped to cause in years to come.
Agree but I still have a hard time comprehending how mentally depraved a person would have to be to knowingly inflict such harm. And if by chance it was unknowingly at first then "right your wrong" as much as possible.
Then you are totally ignorant of history with its countless examples of evil perpetrators who had little problem in devising ways to outdo each other when it came to crimes against humanity!
Tony, I'm well aware of the historical atrocities, unfortunately. My point was the depth of harm one "human" can inflict on another is what I find difficult.
I wonder about anti-swatting laws. So-called "swatting" is a criminal attempt to influence authorities, who are normally charged with public safety, to harm or kill an innocent person by falsely claiming that person is a threat to others. The idea is to get a response from a police SWAT team whose initial information is based on deliberate lies, which increases the possibility of a tragic outcome.
It's hard to see much difference between that and deliberately influencing authorities to take actions that are likely to harm or kill innocent people.
Yeah it's pretty nuts that they have the right to break down your door and raid your house on a "tip".
Anyway the Constitution was a scam from the start...
The Constitution was so lacking that they had to AMEND it with the bill of rights, because people were protesting the lack of rights in the Constitution!
Some good points. Hilarious that Supreme Court "justice" Ketanji Brown Jackson is alarmed that certain interpretations of the first amendment might be (mis)construed to hamstring the federal government's ability to restrict allowable speech.
It's funny that all of these people forget that a person is above an organization in the eyes of god. But they flipped it to mean that the organization is like a super person in law.
This is a serious problem that there are no laws against scientific misconduct. Kind of shocking but not surprising when you consider the power that the pharmaceutical industrial complex has over the politicians, medical schools, corporate media, medical journals, etc.
Every time I think about our current allopathic medical system, I think about how it has essentially become a “snake oil salesman” like system, but most people seem to assumes it’s highly scientific. Now that the Covid situation has exposed the problem, a lot of people are starting to see it, which is hopefully helpful in trying to solve the issues.
If laws are written to criminalize scientific misconduct, I have no doubts that those laws will have loop holes written into them, and somehow those laws will be used against anyone who tries to discover truths that threaten the pharmaceutical industrial complex. Jaded. I know.
Also, I am definitely not a legal expert but I suspect the PREP Act would nullify any decent laws once a “health emergency” is declared by the HHS. (See Sasha Latypova and/or Katherine Watts substacks) If I am not mistaken, we are still living technically in a declared “Health Emergency”. That’s why all these new EUA mRNA vaccines are able to hit the market with virtually no testing for things like RSV and covid. That’s also why we are 4 years into this mess and no lawsuits have been successful to stop the carnage and compensate the victims.
Here’s a small tidbit from my experience in scientific misconduct. My husband was diagnosed with cancer several years ago. It was a fairly rare appendicile type cancer. The oncologists would type the name of the cancer into their little computer and then tell us that he needed chemotherapy immediately. We had two oncologist go through the EXACT same process. I took about a week of personal time, when we were in a hotel while my husband was recovering from the surgery to remove the tumor (amazing but brutal procedure) and I scoured pubmed for information regarding chemotherapy for his particular cancer. There were NO studies supporting the use of chemotherapy for his cancer. At least there were none that I could find, which was confusing to me since the oncologist was so certain he needed the chemo.
At our next oncologist appointment, when I directly asked her what evidence there was supporting this expensive, invasive, and very poisonous/harmful treatment, she looked down at her feet and mumbled, “ we just don’t know.” And then she composed herself again and went back to pushing my husband to take the chemotherapy. We had this EXACT same experience with a second oncologist. They both behaved and said the same words while looking down at their shoes.
What?! “We just don’t know” but you’re willing to poison my husband with something you know for sure is harmful but you have no scientific evidence it helps? Because your computer tells you so? And you make money off of this?! It’s literally the modern version of snake oil but probably much more toxic than actual snake oil and definitely more expensive. (Remind anyone of remdesivir?)
It was in those moments in the oncologist office (in addition to other similar experiences that I had had, including a recommendation for surgery for a lump in my breast that I cured with topical iodine for about $20), that I could see the medical system for what it was. It was not as evidence based as it pretended to be and it was not centered around the well-being of the patient. It was designed to extract as much money as possible out of patients and still maintain an heir of being cutting edge science.
These doctors are all much more intelligent than I but somehow they remain ignorant of fairly simple, logical truths regarding treatments and their efficacy. Maybe laws will help but the corruption is so very deep and intertwined with conflicts of interest (careers/income) that I personally have decided that the best option at this point is to avoid the system as much as possible and do your own extensive research before taking any allopathic medical advice.
And, I do want to recognize that amazing, life saving procedures are performed regularly, mixed in with dangerous, toxic, invasive treatments. I just have lost hope that laws can fix the very serious and deep flaws that have imbedded themselves into the system. Patients taking charge of their health and avoiding chronic diseases as much as possible, therefore not feeding the system, is probably most of the answer.
Butchered by Healthcare was an excellent read. Yoho makes it sounds like most doctors know they are committing fraud but I think there’s a great spectrum of awareness of the fraud that occurs. I suspect there’s a lot of cognitive dissonance. Willful ignorance.
No laws against scientific misconduct!? Actually there are several but individual nations either ignore them or pick and choose what to apply or not apply; the Nuremberg Code was created precisely to put and end to medical and scientific experimentation on human beings and details just what those crimes against humanity would entail and it was fully intended to be adopted into law by every nation of the world; to the detriment of all humanity that never happened and to this day the Code has not been officially adopted in its entirety as law by any nation or as ethics by any major medical association (Costa Rica being the notable exception as I point out in a previous post here).
I’m not sure if you are agreeing that there are no laws or disagreeing…? Either way, no pharmaceutical company executives ever go to jail, even though they are one of the most criminal industries in history. The laws just seem to have various fees that never approach the amount of profits that are made by the crimes.
And no one has gone to jail for any of the Covid schemes, which have been happening for 4 years.
One of the problems in today’s society is the sheer complexity of our legal system, which is to the delight of nefarious actors. Who could possibly know all the laws? And any laws that there are, always seem to have loopholes built in (thank you pharmaceutical lobbyists!). Or there are conflicting laws that nullify. Whatever the case, a lot of people died and were harmed in a variety of ways and the crimes/wrongs just continue to take place.
I have no ideas if more laws would help but I suspect the justice system that we have is inadequate to combat the levels of fraud that exist. That’s why I think most of the answer is for people to rebel and live in such a way that they don’t need the current system. This is also unlikely to happen on a large scale, because healthy diet and lifestyles are difficult but it’s the best strategy that I have personally come up with.
Be really, really healthy and do not comply. I don’t spend money in our current medical system so that’s how I personally try to fight it. If we all did that, (or at least a majority of us) the system would collapse.
Justice will only be served when the State terminates the carbon dioxide emissions of people like Fauci Collins Birx Dasak etc. until then the there can be no justice.
Heroic effort by Kory et al. Unfortunately most of the people who approved the lies are still in charge of protecting their lies. How to get around that?
We must rewrite criteria for obtaining government money for scientific research. We need new international accords against development of bioweapons, and we must STOP giving money to support such efforts, and instead grind them out of existence. If a proposed inquiry does not promote health and freedom it should be buried, not supported, and then praised. People like Fauci should not control research pursestrings, and positions like his old one should have the responsibilities redistributed.
Are you even remotely aware of the work of the" Interest of Justice" group based in Costa Rica and working for the past several years in initiating legal prosecutions and not just on behalf of Costa Rica but with world-wide application; they have been relentless in their efforts to provide evidence to be used in both civil and criminal cases and have already won a number of cases against Costa Rica's minister of health for knowingly lying about claiming the "vaccines" were safe and effective; why Costa Rica? because it is the ONLY country which is applying INTERNATIONAL standards of law applicable to ALL nations and under the principles established in the Nuremberg Code.
Superb compilation and writing. "Follow the science." Were they really saying: Foul the science?
The trust in the medical system is so broken now. Everyone I know are looking into alternatives. In particular vitamins and herbs.
Off Topic, but: I just had an interesting thing happen to me. I have taken BP medicine: Lisinopril for several years. I was also on a water pill: Hydrochlorothiazide. That would give me gout, so they had me take Allopurinol. Still got gout at times. So the doc took me off the Hydrochlorothiazide but doubled the dose of Lisinopril. I did not need that much so I halved it. Also did not need the Allopurinol. I had no gout for over a year and half until two weeks ago when it struck my right foot. My wife had read of people using Ivermectin on gout. I tried it and the gout was mostly gone the next day except for soreness. My second dose ended the gout completely that day. I am impressed! No nsaids needed, no Chanca Piedra (Stone Breaker).
Knowingly designing treatment trials with potentially fatal doses of HCQ is the right place to start criminal investigations. Thank you Andrew Bridgen, and thank you for this clear and thorough explanation, Dr. Kory
The good doctor forgot about the other part- medical misconduct. Wonder why?
The evidence clearly indicates a harsh and uncomfortable reality – there was no pandemic.
Portraying the deeds of the past four years as mere mistakes serves to conceal the deadly protocols established in the hospitals and nursing homes as well as provides cover for those who designed and executed this operation.
We have not been and are not facing what RFK Jr. has termed “a mismanaged pandemic,” a stance supported by most “health freedom” celebrities. What we are dealing with is fraud, tyranny and mass murder.
Terrorizing and isolating elderly people especially those living in care homes, denying them visits from relatives and reducing or eliminating in-person visits from health and social carers became “standard of care.”
Mechanical ventilators push oxygen into patients whose lungs are failing. Using these machines involves sedating a patient and sticking a tube into the throat. It was massive overuse of a treatment (ventilation) known to be extremely harmful.
Large doses of Midazolam, Propofol. Fentanyl and Morphine cocktails were given to people in hospitals to create the illusion of the first wave of the hoax pandemic. They didn’t have the bodies in 2009- they got them this time- not to mention data fraud.
Of course it was all a farce. You just need to analyze the vaccines to realize it, as we did in 2021-
Yes, intention is everything, the educated have the responsibility because we have command of the wisdom and knowledge. Therefore, we have the responsibility to wield it to protect and save others not infect and annihilate.
Those holding the wisdom and education to make proper informed decisions yet decide not to should they be criminally prosecuted with
((( extreme prejudice )))
We do not hesitate to persecute, prosecute, and execute for so much as a stick of bubble gum-
but for intentionally participating in the willful infliction of the illness injury and death of the general public which places there trust in us as doctors is not only unforgivable- it's diabolical!
Why would anyone trust one of the most indoctrinated and bought off class of professionals on earth- doctors.
Do not blindly place your trust in doctors, experts .... Do your own research. They all have a bias.
In the GP Ben Goldacre's book Bad Science he tells of how fraudulent or non-reported (because of bad outcomes) pharma trials can cause a GP to prescribe the wrong medicine. Because of the fraud the information they need to have to hand is often incomplete and/or downright misleading. He mis-prescribed something to someone thinking he was helping his patient, when it turned out that he had been mis-led and the patient suffered very bad side-effects. Goldacre, of course, was tortured by what had happened whereas Pharma take the money and run. So yes, pharma fraud should be a criminal offence.. I'm in the UK, and I'm not a Tory - neither, of course, is Andrew Bridgen these days, but in any case I salute his integrity, courage and tenacity!
While most politicians are shite, liberals take the cake, as it were. Stop voting for liberals as a start to cleaning up the messes we find ourselves in here in the West!
Today's illiberal Left are undeserving of the label they stole from the classical liberals, who actually liberated people. HRH Victoria of the UK, HRH Aleksandr II of Russia, and the Hon Abraham Lincoln of the US liberated people from peonage and slavery. Even the con men of their day, notably Napoleon III who invaded Mexico over unpaid debts incurred by the dictator Santa Anna (who overthrew democracy there in 1836 and killed thousands of democracy backers), replacing him with new dictator Maximilian, had to put a libertarian spin on their actions, by announcing plans for a future democracy in Mexico that they would grant to the Mexican people as soon as they finished robbing them blind. Also of note was American politician Jefferson Davis, who crafted an elaborate fraud called the Confederate Constitution, which legalized slave ownership by calling it "freedom" for the owners. Thankfully Victoria and Aleksandr threatened to starve France into revolution, had Napoleon III formed an alliance with Davis against Lincoln. The threat was real because Davis' Confederacy grew hemp, cotton, indigo and tobacco for export, none of which were edible. The US, Canada and Russia all had grain for export, and cutting it off to France would have knocked Napoleon III out of power. There is nothing liberal nor liberating about compelling people to participate in a global biological experiment, nor about obstructing all questions about the experiment's safety, nor in obstructing scientific independence by defaming every medical practitioner who devised means of palliative care for a COVID infection. IVM and HCQ did NOT cure COVID. The practitioners who used them, did so to reduce the severity of infection. Ultimately the experimental mRNA "vaccines" proved to do no more. Everyone on the planet caught COVID and developed natural immunity, and the virus is now endemic like the flu. It keeps mutating to circumvent existing natural immunity and people update our immune systems when we reinfect. There was nothing liberal nor liberating about mass death and destruction, mass deception, nor mass impoverishment to fund these experiments.
We need to tell the statist dictators and oligarchs that they do not deserve the title "Liberal", even though they use it to conceal their motives.
And I concur: Voting the buggers out is the best way to make that point.
“Liberal” has been tainted in my view since the 60s. That is when many people began to lose their ability to think logically. Most of your examples are much much earlier than that. We used to have good debates about liberal vs conservative policies. For me it all comes down to Big vs Small government. I think it is safe to say that Big Government (liberal policies) have finally ruined our country. Something I saw coming from the time I was a teenager. It really isn’t difficult to figure out.
I think your timeline is spot-on, Patti! On 11-22-1963 bullets fired from multiple directions killed John F Kennedy. Immediately afterward our Government and mass media announced a "magic bullet" theory, defying all the known laws of physics, on how a gun that was too rusty for its firing mechanism to fire a single bullet, was somehow used by the late Lee H Oswald to shoot two bullets, one of which reversed course in midair twice, cleaned itself of any blood, magically landed in Governor Connolly's clothing, and fell into the stretcher at the hospital in pristine condition. Many people doubted the irrational story and said so. Many others refused to doubt the official story out of fear and misplaced patriotism. Texas physician and Congressman recently called the Kennedy murder a coup d'êtat. A government that is too big and terrifying to question, is simply too big. As we became more fearful to question what it did to us, it grew bigger. And of course the winners call themselves Liberal because no one questions their choice of words.
But . . . But . . . The Warren Commission said it was Oswald, and it was composed of brilliant, fearless, and patriotic leaders who overturned every stone in researching this event. . . /s/
1963 is rearing it’s ugly head in 2024.
This has nothing to do with politics, right-wing and left-wing countries have done the same thing, introducing graphene into vials. Therefore it leads you to the conclusion that politicians do not run the world.
Democide is a crime against humanity, and can be prosecuted in many jurisdictions.
Why do you think they continue injecting people with graphene, knowing that there are many people who already know about it? Because they don't care, they know that something prepared supports them.
Pierre - are you familiar with this documentary on the suppression of HCQ?
https://www.epidemicoffraud.com/
This filmmaker calls for people who have information “that can bring down this cartel of organized medical crime to come forward.” He provides an email address.
Tom Haviland emailed him the results of our embalmer blood clot survey.
Steve Kirsch recently linked this film in his stack.
Actually was planning on watching it yesterday.. but never got around to it! Will watch
Many thanks for your enterprise, courage and determination Pierre and Paul. You will be interested in a patent that relates to the treatment of shingles with Ivermectin. https://patents.google.com/patent/US20130172282A1/en
So is there a product on the market, I know several people who are still suffering from shingles.
Also about 5 yrs back my husband and I both had the two shingle vaccines. We were told this was a lifetime vaccine. This week our pharmacy contacted us saying they have a new shingles vaccine available and we should get this now. We will not but this marketing worries me.
Ivermectin is available for humans and livestock.
Very interesting study! Hopefully people will cotton on to this.
The bought media should also be held liable.
It's remarkable and very depressing what wads of cash will do to people. I hope they are haunted by the mayhem they've helped to cause in years to come.
Agree but I still have a hard time comprehending how mentally depraved a person would have to be to knowingly inflict such harm. And if by chance it was unknowingly at first then "right your wrong" as much as possible.
Then you are totally ignorant of history with its countless examples of evil perpetrators who had little problem in devising ways to outdo each other when it came to crimes against humanity!
Tony, I'm well aware of the historical atrocities, unfortunately. My point was the depth of harm one "human" can inflict on another is what I find difficult.
Because they may not be human.
I wonder about anti-swatting laws. So-called "swatting" is a criminal attempt to influence authorities, who are normally charged with public safety, to harm or kill an innocent person by falsely claiming that person is a threat to others. The idea is to get a response from a police SWAT team whose initial information is based on deliberate lies, which increases the possibility of a tragic outcome.
It's hard to see much difference between that and deliberately influencing authorities to take actions that are likely to harm or kill innocent people.
Yeah it's pretty nuts that they have the right to break down your door and raid your house on a "tip".
Anyway the Constitution was a scam from the start...
The Constitution was so lacking that they had to AMEND it with the bill of rights, because people were protesting the lack of rights in the Constitution!
https://www.michaeltsarion.com/constitution-con.html
"We are under a Constitution, but the Constitution is what the judges say it is." - Judge Charles Evans Hughes
“Justice will not be served until those who are unaffected are as outraged as those who are.” ― Benjamin Franklin
Some good points. Hilarious that Supreme Court "justice" Ketanji Brown Jackson is alarmed that certain interpretations of the first amendment might be (mis)construed to hamstring the federal government's ability to restrict allowable speech.
It's funny that all of these people forget that a person is above an organization in the eyes of god. But they flipped it to mean that the organization is like a super person in law.
Haha, we're in for more absurdities!
Concerning the British Police, I won't be holding my breath.
It will be a ground breaking event should they take up this case.
That alone would be headline news.
The Met must be one of the most corrupt police forces on the planet.
Yes, quite the joke in a country that can't even protect its own children!
This is a serious problem that there are no laws against scientific misconduct. Kind of shocking but not surprising when you consider the power that the pharmaceutical industrial complex has over the politicians, medical schools, corporate media, medical journals, etc.
Every time I think about our current allopathic medical system, I think about how it has essentially become a “snake oil salesman” like system, but most people seem to assumes it’s highly scientific. Now that the Covid situation has exposed the problem, a lot of people are starting to see it, which is hopefully helpful in trying to solve the issues.
If laws are written to criminalize scientific misconduct, I have no doubts that those laws will have loop holes written into them, and somehow those laws will be used against anyone who tries to discover truths that threaten the pharmaceutical industrial complex. Jaded. I know.
Also, I am definitely not a legal expert but I suspect the PREP Act would nullify any decent laws once a “health emergency” is declared by the HHS. (See Sasha Latypova and/or Katherine Watts substacks) If I am not mistaken, we are still living technically in a declared “Health Emergency”. That’s why all these new EUA mRNA vaccines are able to hit the market with virtually no testing for things like RSV and covid. That’s also why we are 4 years into this mess and no lawsuits have been successful to stop the carnage and compensate the victims.
Here’s a small tidbit from my experience in scientific misconduct. My husband was diagnosed with cancer several years ago. It was a fairly rare appendicile type cancer. The oncologists would type the name of the cancer into their little computer and then tell us that he needed chemotherapy immediately. We had two oncologist go through the EXACT same process. I took about a week of personal time, when we were in a hotel while my husband was recovering from the surgery to remove the tumor (amazing but brutal procedure) and I scoured pubmed for information regarding chemotherapy for his particular cancer. There were NO studies supporting the use of chemotherapy for his cancer. At least there were none that I could find, which was confusing to me since the oncologist was so certain he needed the chemo.
At our next oncologist appointment, when I directly asked her what evidence there was supporting this expensive, invasive, and very poisonous/harmful treatment, she looked down at her feet and mumbled, “ we just don’t know.” And then she composed herself again and went back to pushing my husband to take the chemotherapy. We had this EXACT same experience with a second oncologist. They both behaved and said the same words while looking down at their shoes.
What?! “We just don’t know” but you’re willing to poison my husband with something you know for sure is harmful but you have no scientific evidence it helps? Because your computer tells you so? And you make money off of this?! It’s literally the modern version of snake oil but probably much more toxic than actual snake oil and definitely more expensive. (Remind anyone of remdesivir?)
It was in those moments in the oncologist office (in addition to other similar experiences that I had had, including a recommendation for surgery for a lump in my breast that I cured with topical iodine for about $20), that I could see the medical system for what it was. It was not as evidence based as it pretended to be and it was not centered around the well-being of the patient. It was designed to extract as much money as possible out of patients and still maintain an heir of being cutting edge science.
These doctors are all much more intelligent than I but somehow they remain ignorant of fairly simple, logical truths regarding treatments and their efficacy. Maybe laws will help but the corruption is so very deep and intertwined with conflicts of interest (careers/income) that I personally have decided that the best option at this point is to avoid the system as much as possible and do your own extensive research before taking any allopathic medical advice.
And, I do want to recognize that amazing, life saving procedures are performed regularly, mixed in with dangerous, toxic, invasive treatments. I just have lost hope that laws can fix the very serious and deep flaws that have imbedded themselves into the system. Patients taking charge of their health and avoiding chronic diseases as much as possible, therefore not feeding the system, is probably most of the answer.
Butchered by Healthcare was an excellent read. Yoho makes it sounds like most doctors know they are committing fraud but I think there’s a great spectrum of awareness of the fraud that occurs. I suspect there’s a lot of cognitive dissonance. Willful ignorance.
No laws against scientific misconduct!? Actually there are several but individual nations either ignore them or pick and choose what to apply or not apply; the Nuremberg Code was created precisely to put and end to medical and scientific experimentation on human beings and details just what those crimes against humanity would entail and it was fully intended to be adopted into law by every nation of the world; to the detriment of all humanity that never happened and to this day the Code has not been officially adopted in its entirety as law by any nation or as ethics by any major medical association (Costa Rica being the notable exception as I point out in a previous post here).
I’m not sure if you are agreeing that there are no laws or disagreeing…? Either way, no pharmaceutical company executives ever go to jail, even though they are one of the most criminal industries in history. The laws just seem to have various fees that never approach the amount of profits that are made by the crimes.
And no one has gone to jail for any of the Covid schemes, which have been happening for 4 years.
One of the problems in today’s society is the sheer complexity of our legal system, which is to the delight of nefarious actors. Who could possibly know all the laws? And any laws that there are, always seem to have loopholes built in (thank you pharmaceutical lobbyists!). Or there are conflicting laws that nullify. Whatever the case, a lot of people died and were harmed in a variety of ways and the crimes/wrongs just continue to take place.
I have no ideas if more laws would help but I suspect the justice system that we have is inadequate to combat the levels of fraud that exist. That’s why I think most of the answer is for people to rebel and live in such a way that they don’t need the current system. This is also unlikely to happen on a large scale, because healthy diet and lifestyles are difficult but it’s the best strategy that I have personally come up with.
THEY control everything, they control science and the laws. How are you going to fight the system if they control it?
THEY control everything, they control science and the laws. How are you going to fight the system if they control it?
Be really, really healthy and do not comply. I don’t spend money in our current medical system so that’s how I personally try to fight it. If we all did that, (or at least a majority of us) the system would collapse.
Justice will only be served when the State terminates the carbon dioxide emissions of people like Fauci Collins Birx Dasak etc. until then the there can be no justice.
In a world where people have been conditioned to be afraid of everything anything can be made illegal.
Heroic effort by Kory et al. Unfortunately most of the people who approved the lies are still in charge of protecting their lies. How to get around that?
How do all of us diverse people pull together and (somehow) push back?
We must rewrite criteria for obtaining government money for scientific research. We need new international accords against development of bioweapons, and we must STOP giving money to support such efforts, and instead grind them out of existence. If a proposed inquiry does not promote health and freedom it should be buried, not supported, and then praised. People like Fauci should not control research pursestrings, and positions like his old one should have the responsibilities redistributed.
Government needs to get out of that business altogether!
THEY control the system, you can't do anything. Just act for yourself.
Are you even remotely aware of the work of the" Interest of Justice" group based in Costa Rica and working for the past several years in initiating legal prosecutions and not just on behalf of Costa Rica but with world-wide application; they have been relentless in their efforts to provide evidence to be used in both civil and criminal cases and have already won a number of cases against Costa Rica's minister of health for knowingly lying about claiming the "vaccines" were safe and effective; why Costa Rica? because it is the ONLY country which is applying INTERNATIONAL standards of law applicable to ALL nations and under the principles established in the Nuremberg Code.
Superb compilation and writing. "Follow the science." Were they really saying: Foul the science?
The trust in the medical system is so broken now. Everyone I know are looking into alternatives. In particular vitamins and herbs.
Off Topic, but: I just had an interesting thing happen to me. I have taken BP medicine: Lisinopril for several years. I was also on a water pill: Hydrochlorothiazide. That would give me gout, so they had me take Allopurinol. Still got gout at times. So the doc took me off the Hydrochlorothiazide but doubled the dose of Lisinopril. I did not need that much so I halved it. Also did not need the Allopurinol. I had no gout for over a year and half until two weeks ago when it struck my right foot. My wife had read of people using Ivermectin on gout. I tried it and the gout was mostly gone the next day except for soreness. My second dose ended the gout completely that day. I am impressed! No nsaids needed, no Chanca Piedra (Stone Breaker).