MP Andrew Bridgen is convening a group of experts to present evidence of criminal corruption during Covid to the Royal Police. I want a seat at that table. Oxford's trial authors should be nervous.
Knowingly designing treatment trials with potentially fatal doses of HCQ is the right place to start criminal investigations. Thank you Andrew Bridgen, and thank you for this clear and thorough explanation, Dr. Kory
Yes, intention is everything, the educated have the responsibility because we have command of the wisdom and knowledge. Therefore, we have the responsibility to wield it to protect and save others not infect and annihilate.
Those holding the wisdom and education to make proper informed decisions yet decide not to should they be criminally prosecuted with
((( extreme prejudice )))
We do not hesitate to persecute, prosecute, and execute for so much as a stick of bubble gum-
but for intentionally participating in the willful infliction of the illness injury and death of the general public which places there trust in us as doctors is not only unforgivable- it's diabolical!
In the GP Ben Goldacre's book Bad Science he tells of how fraudulent or non-reported (because of bad outcomes) pharma trials can cause a GP to prescribe the wrong medicine. Because of the fraud the information they need to have to hand is often incomplete and/or downright misleading. He mis-prescribed something to someone thinking he was helping his patient, when it turned out that he had been mis-led and the patient suffered very bad side-effects. Goldacre, of course, was tortured by what had happened whereas Pharma take the money and run. So yes, pharma fraud should be a criminal offence.. I'm in the UK, and I'm not a Tory - neither, of course, is Andrew Bridgen these days, but in any case I salute his integrity, courage and tenacity!
This filmmaker calls for people who have information “that can bring down this cartel of organized medical crime to come forward.” He provides an email address.
Tom Haviland emailed him the results of our embalmer blood clot survey.
Steve Kirsch recently linked this film in his stack.
Many thanks for your enterprise, courage and determination Pierre and Paul. You will be interested in a patent that relates to the treatment of shingles with Ivermectin. https://patents.google.com/patent/US20130172282A1/en
I wonder about anti-swatting laws. So-called "swatting" is a criminal attempt to influence authorities, who are normally charged with public safety, to harm or kill an innocent person by falsely claiming that person is a threat to others. The idea is to get a response from a police SWAT team whose initial information is based on deliberate lies, which increases the possibility of a tragic outcome.
It's hard to see much difference between that and deliberately influencing authorities to take actions that are likely to harm or kill innocent people.
This is a serious problem that there are no laws against scientific misconduct. Kind of shocking but not surprising when you consider the power that the pharmaceutical industrial complex has over the politicians, medical schools, corporate media, medical journals, etc.
Every time I think about our current allopathic medical system, I think about how it has essentially become a “snake oil salesman” like system, but most people seem to assumes it’s highly scientific. Now that the Covid situation has exposed the problem, a lot of people are starting to see it, which is hopefully helpful in trying to solve the issues.
If laws are written to criminalize scientific misconduct, I have no doubts that those laws will have loop holes written into them, and somehow those laws will be used against anyone who tries to discover truths that threaten the pharmaceutical industrial complex. Jaded. I know.
Also, I am definitely not a legal expert but I suspect the PREP Act would nullify any decent laws once a “health emergency” is declared by the HHS. (See Sasha Latypova and/or Katherine Watts substacks) If I am not mistaken, we are still living technically in a declared “Health Emergency”. That’s why all these new EUA mRNA vaccines are able to hit the market with virtually no testing for things like RSV and covid. That’s also why we are 4 years into this mess and no lawsuits have been successful to stop the carnage and compensate the victims.
Here’s a small tidbit from my experience in scientific misconduct. My husband was diagnosed with cancer several years ago. It was a fairly rare appendicile type cancer. The oncologists would type the name of the cancer into their little computer and then tell us that he needed chemotherapy immediately. We had two oncologist go through the EXACT same process. I took about a week of personal time, when we were in a hotel while my husband was recovering from the surgery to remove the tumor (amazing but brutal procedure) and I scoured pubmed for information regarding chemotherapy for his particular cancer. There were NO studies supporting the use of chemotherapy for his cancer. At least there were none that I could find, which was confusing to me since the oncologist was so certain he needed the chemo.
At our next oncologist appointment, when I directly asked her what evidence there was supporting this expensive, invasive, and very poisonous/harmful treatment, she looked down at her feet and mumbled, “ we just don’t know.” And then she composed herself again and went back to pushing my husband to take the chemotherapy. We had this EXACT same experience with a second oncologist. They both behaved and said the same words while looking down at their shoes.
What?! “We just don’t know” but you’re willing to poison my husband with something you know for sure is harmful but you have no scientific evidence it helps? Because your computer tells you so? And you make money off of this?! It’s literally the modern version of snake oil but probably much more toxic than actual snake oil and definitely more expensive. (Remind anyone of remdesivir?)
It was in those moments in the oncologist office (in addition to other similar experiences that I had had, including a recommendation for surgery for a lump in my breast that I cured with topical iodine for about $20), that I could see the medical system for what it was. It was not as evidence based as it pretended to be and it was not centered around the well-being of the patient. It was designed to extract as much money as possible out of patients and still maintain an heir of being cutting edge science.
These doctors are all much more intelligent than I but somehow they remain ignorant of fairly simple, logical truths regarding treatments and their efficacy. Maybe laws will help but the corruption is so very deep and intertwined with conflicts of interest (careers/income) that I personally have decided that the best option at this point is to avoid the system as much as possible and do your own extensive research before taking any allopathic medical advice.
And, I do want to recognize that amazing, life saving procedures are performed regularly, mixed in with dangerous, toxic, invasive treatments. I just have lost hope that laws can fix the very serious and deep flaws that have imbedded themselves into the system. Patients taking charge of their health and avoiding chronic diseases as much as possible, therefore not feeding the system, is probably most of the answer.
Justice will only be served when the State terminates the carbon dioxide emissions of people like Fauci Collins Birx Dasak etc. until then the there can be no justice.
Heroic effort by Kory et al. Unfortunately most of the people who approved the lies are still in charge of protecting their lies. How to get around that?
We must rewrite criteria for obtaining government money for scientific research. We need new international accords against development of bioweapons, and we must STOP giving money to support such efforts, and instead grind them out of existence. If a proposed inquiry does not promote health and freedom it should be buried, not supported, and then praised. People like Fauci should not control research pursestrings, and positions like his old one should have the responsibilities redistributed.
Are you even remotely aware of the work of the" Interest of Justice" group based in Costa Rica and working for the past several years in initiating legal prosecutions and not just on behalf of Costa Rica but with world-wide application; they have been relentless in their efforts to provide evidence to be used in both civil and criminal cases and have already won a number of cases against Costa Rica's minister of health for knowingly lying about claiming the "vaccines" were safe and effective; why Costa Rica? because it is the ONLY country which is applying INTERNATIONAL standards of law applicable to ALL nations and under the principles established in the Nuremberg Code.
Superb compilation and writing. "Follow the science." Were they really saying: Foul the science?
The trust in the medical system is so broken now. Everyone I know are looking into alternatives. In particular vitamins and herbs.
Off Topic, but: I just had an interesting thing happen to me. I have taken BP medicine: Lisinopril for several years. I was also on a water pill: Hydrochlorothiazide. That would give me gout, so they had me take Allopurinol. Still got gout at times. So the doc took me off the Hydrochlorothiazide but doubled the dose of Lisinopril. I did not need that much so I halved it. Also did not need the Allopurinol. I had no gout for over a year and half until two weeks ago when it struck my right foot. My wife had read of people using Ivermectin on gout. I tried it and the gout was mostly gone the next day except for soreness. My second dose ended the gout completely that day. I am impressed! No nsaids needed, no Chanca Piedra (Stone Breaker).
Knowingly designing treatment trials with potentially fatal doses of HCQ is the right place to start criminal investigations. Thank you Andrew Bridgen, and thank you for this clear and thorough explanation, Dr. Kory
Yes, intention is everything, the educated have the responsibility because we have command of the wisdom and knowledge. Therefore, we have the responsibility to wield it to protect and save others not infect and annihilate.
Those holding the wisdom and education to make proper informed decisions yet decide not to should they be criminally prosecuted with
((( extreme prejudice )))
We do not hesitate to persecute, prosecute, and execute for so much as a stick of bubble gum-
but for intentionally participating in the willful infliction of the illness injury and death of the general public which places there trust in us as doctors is not only unforgivable- it's diabolical!
In the GP Ben Goldacre's book Bad Science he tells of how fraudulent or non-reported (because of bad outcomes) pharma trials can cause a GP to prescribe the wrong medicine. Because of the fraud the information they need to have to hand is often incomplete and/or downright misleading. He mis-prescribed something to someone thinking he was helping his patient, when it turned out that he had been mis-led and the patient suffered very bad side-effects. Goldacre, of course, was tortured by what had happened whereas Pharma take the money and run. So yes, pharma fraud should be a criminal offence.. I'm in the UK, and I'm not a Tory - neither, of course, is Andrew Bridgen these days, but in any case I salute his integrity, courage and tenacity!
Democide is a crime against humanity, and can be prosecuted in many jurisdictions.
Pierre - are you familiar with this documentary on the suppression of HCQ?
https://www.epidemicoffraud.com/
This filmmaker calls for people who have information “that can bring down this cartel of organized medical crime to come forward.” He provides an email address.
Tom Haviland emailed him the results of our embalmer blood clot survey.
Steve Kirsch recently linked this film in his stack.
Many thanks for your enterprise, courage and determination Pierre and Paul. You will be interested in a patent that relates to the treatment of shingles with Ivermectin. https://patents.google.com/patent/US20130172282A1/en
The bought media should also be held liable.
I wonder about anti-swatting laws. So-called "swatting" is a criminal attempt to influence authorities, who are normally charged with public safety, to harm or kill an innocent person by falsely claiming that person is a threat to others. The idea is to get a response from a police SWAT team whose initial information is based on deliberate lies, which increases the possibility of a tragic outcome.
It's hard to see much difference between that and deliberately influencing authorities to take actions that are likely to harm or kill innocent people.
Concerning the British Police, I won't be holding my breath.
It will be a ground breaking event should they take up this case.
That alone would be headline news.
This is a serious problem that there are no laws against scientific misconduct. Kind of shocking but not surprising when you consider the power that the pharmaceutical industrial complex has over the politicians, medical schools, corporate media, medical journals, etc.
Every time I think about our current allopathic medical system, I think about how it has essentially become a “snake oil salesman” like system, but most people seem to assumes it’s highly scientific. Now that the Covid situation has exposed the problem, a lot of people are starting to see it, which is hopefully helpful in trying to solve the issues.
If laws are written to criminalize scientific misconduct, I have no doubts that those laws will have loop holes written into them, and somehow those laws will be used against anyone who tries to discover truths that threaten the pharmaceutical industrial complex. Jaded. I know.
Also, I am definitely not a legal expert but I suspect the PREP Act would nullify any decent laws once a “health emergency” is declared by the HHS. (See Sasha Latypova and/or Katherine Watts substacks) If I am not mistaken, we are still living technically in a declared “Health Emergency”. That’s why all these new EUA mRNA vaccines are able to hit the market with virtually no testing for things like RSV and covid. That’s also why we are 4 years into this mess and no lawsuits have been successful to stop the carnage and compensate the victims.
Here’s a small tidbit from my experience in scientific misconduct. My husband was diagnosed with cancer several years ago. It was a fairly rare appendicile type cancer. The oncologists would type the name of the cancer into their little computer and then tell us that he needed chemotherapy immediately. We had two oncologist go through the EXACT same process. I took about a week of personal time, when we were in a hotel while my husband was recovering from the surgery to remove the tumor (amazing but brutal procedure) and I scoured pubmed for information regarding chemotherapy for his particular cancer. There were NO studies supporting the use of chemotherapy for his cancer. At least there were none that I could find, which was confusing to me since the oncologist was so certain he needed the chemo.
At our next oncologist appointment, when I directly asked her what evidence there was supporting this expensive, invasive, and very poisonous/harmful treatment, she looked down at her feet and mumbled, “ we just don’t know.” And then she composed herself again and went back to pushing my husband to take the chemotherapy. We had this EXACT same experience with a second oncologist. They both behaved and said the same words while looking down at their shoes.
What?! “We just don’t know” but you’re willing to poison my husband with something you know for sure is harmful but you have no scientific evidence it helps? Because your computer tells you so? And you make money off of this?! It’s literally the modern version of snake oil but probably much more toxic than actual snake oil and definitely more expensive. (Remind anyone of remdesivir?)
It was in those moments in the oncologist office (in addition to other similar experiences that I had had, including a recommendation for surgery for a lump in my breast that I cured with topical iodine for about $20), that I could see the medical system for what it was. It was not as evidence based as it pretended to be and it was not centered around the well-being of the patient. It was designed to extract as much money as possible out of patients and still maintain an heir of being cutting edge science.
These doctors are all much more intelligent than I but somehow they remain ignorant of fairly simple, logical truths regarding treatments and their efficacy. Maybe laws will help but the corruption is so very deep and intertwined with conflicts of interest (careers/income) that I personally have decided that the best option at this point is to avoid the system as much as possible and do your own extensive research before taking any allopathic medical advice.
And, I do want to recognize that amazing, life saving procedures are performed regularly, mixed in with dangerous, toxic, invasive treatments. I just have lost hope that laws can fix the very serious and deep flaws that have imbedded themselves into the system. Patients taking charge of their health and avoiding chronic diseases as much as possible, therefore not feeding the system, is probably most of the answer.
Justice will only be served when the State terminates the carbon dioxide emissions of people like Fauci Collins Birx Dasak etc. until then the there can be no justice.
In a world where people have been conditioned to be afraid of everything anything can be made illegal.
Heroic effort by Kory et al. Unfortunately most of the people who approved the lies are still in charge of protecting their lies. How to get around that?
We must rewrite criteria for obtaining government money for scientific research. We need new international accords against development of bioweapons, and we must STOP giving money to support such efforts, and instead grind them out of existence. If a proposed inquiry does not promote health and freedom it should be buried, not supported, and then praised. People like Fauci should not control research pursestrings, and positions like his old one should have the responsibilities redistributed.
Are you even remotely aware of the work of the" Interest of Justice" group based in Costa Rica and working for the past several years in initiating legal prosecutions and not just on behalf of Costa Rica but with world-wide application; they have been relentless in their efforts to provide evidence to be used in both civil and criminal cases and have already won a number of cases against Costa Rica's minister of health for knowingly lying about claiming the "vaccines" were safe and effective; why Costa Rica? because it is the ONLY country which is applying INTERNATIONAL standards of law applicable to ALL nations and under the principles established in the Nuremberg Code.
Superb compilation and writing. "Follow the science." Were they really saying: Foul the science?
The trust in the medical system is so broken now. Everyone I know are looking into alternatives. In particular vitamins and herbs.
Off Topic, but: I just had an interesting thing happen to me. I have taken BP medicine: Lisinopril for several years. I was also on a water pill: Hydrochlorothiazide. That would give me gout, so they had me take Allopurinol. Still got gout at times. So the doc took me off the Hydrochlorothiazide but doubled the dose of Lisinopril. I did not need that much so I halved it. Also did not need the Allopurinol. I had no gout for over a year and half until two weeks ago when it struck my right foot. My wife had read of people using Ivermectin on gout. I tried it and the gout was mostly gone the next day except for soreness. My second dose ended the gout completely that day. I am impressed! No nsaids needed, no Chanca Piedra (Stone Breaker).