The consensus theory explaining the cause of cancer is called the Somatic Mutation Theory. It has guided research and treatment in cancer for over 70 years. Let's examine its (non) validity.
After reading your substack I read "Tripping Over the Truth" by Christofferson, which cements in my mind the point of view that the SMTC is worthless. its being kept alive like a zombie by the cancer industry and oncologists that feed off it. The Metabolic Theory of Cancer put cancer prevention and treatment back in the hands of the patient instead being at the mercy of the industry and conflicted doctors.
I just finished The War on Ivermectin. I cried through many parts of it especially the testimonials. I had no idea that Jenny McCarthy was so accomplished. Thank you, Thank you both!
What is your take on Ivermectin and Fendbendazole for cancer, in addition to dietary changes?
What about chlorine dioxide for cancer?
What about Methylene blue in this arena for prevention and treatment?
Just reading this post now. I came across a book (at a thrift shop) called The Hidden Story of Cancer by Brian Scott Peskin (2006). It introduced the work of Warburg and, even as a layperson, opened my eyes to the root cause of cancer. Dr. Jason Fung's book Cancer Code was another one that did a good job reviewing and dispelling the causes of cancer over the years.
I took a graduate class covering cancer from Johns Hopkins. I asked why toxic chemo didn't cause more cancer. The response was the standard "kills fast replicating cells," which didn't really address the question. Now, I've seen some admissions in research papers that treatments can cause cancer, but I'm guessing the more I learn about the MTOC the more I'll understand cancer remission and relapse. Looking forward to it.
As a survivor of testicular cancer myself, I did not know about those chimney sweep boys. Very interesting, thanks. I hope someday this gets figured out.
PS When I had chemo, they also injected me steroids which made me hungry (and not throw up). It made me want to eat junk food. I am now thinking how completely stupid that was, I'm sure it was just to make the hospital more money.
Dr Kory thank you for all your hard work! I just read the scariest article on Substack from these last 4 years. We’d like to read your opinion on this. I’m sure the timing isn’t coincidental either.
This article might interest you. My doctor sent it to me today. I am having extreme pain (a couple days a mth) and I have anticardiolipin. We are exploring pain management. She told me that outside her other concerns of opioids, opioids kill mitochondria. Now, I don't know that she meant fully kills, she's just talking to me generally, but definitely is implying that it negatively impacts them to some degree. Which obviously, based on what you're writing, isn't a good thing. This article below talks about how opioids affect the metabolism pathway and has a negative impact on cancers and reoccurrences. I could not read the whole thing because it's too smart for me. However, it made me think of you and your recent articles immediately.
Pharmaceutics | Free Full-Text | Impact of Opioids on Cellular Metabolism: Implications for Metabolic Pathways Involved in Cancer
Ahhh, what I would have given to have met you 18 years ago. [sigh] Alas my wife died from uterine cancer despite our fervent attempts to curb it at least a little. Devastating hideous disease.
The flip side is that I have been a voracious reader of all things cancer since then, trying to learn about prevention as first priority.
I’ve become familiar with various failings in our current medical understanding. Our current medical industry’s emphasis is focused on treating diseases rather than preventing them. Apparently that’s where the big money is, catching people at their moments of desperation and offering them a way out. While I’m grateful for effective treatments when they are available, I have to wonder at a practice that seems to limit itself to curing diseases instead of promoting whole body health. Seems self serving.
I can’t tell you how many times I’ve talked to people who have somehow managed to go into remission from their cancer and then are sent home with no further instructions other than enjoy your life. There is no hint that anything they were doing before helped to bring on their cancer in the first place. And many years later most of folks of those wind up developing the very cancer that they had held in remission. It’s almost like you know for sure that you are going to die from cancer but you just don’t know when.
I couldn’t go through more than 5 minutes of that BS without throwing up. Good lord!
So Ivermectin has been around for something like 30 or 40 years and it’s only now that they have discovered what a horrible poison it is? Really??
People can be so easily led to believe utterly absurd thoughts as absolute truth. All you need to do is promote fear with any made up “facts” and insinuate that this new horrible fear applies to the matter at hand.
Studies? Who needs those stinking studies.
You can just make up any scary BS you want that will draw in a percentage of the population who live in a state of unending freakish paranoia. Feeding that propensity will override valid research or common sense every time, and doesn’t require anything more than a connection to the internet.
…
The Music Man, movie from the 1960s, had a great scene that should be required for all high school students to watch. It was one of the early scenes where “professor” Harold Hill was dreaming up his scheme to induce the good folks of River City Iowa to fork over money to him. The scheme to buy band instruments was sold as an idea to keep their youth from getting involved in playing pool (billiards). He had convinced the good folks of River City that pool would be the ruin of their children by drawing a line between trouble and pool: “That starts with “T” which rhymes with “P” and course that stands for pool.”
So much of what I read and see today is nothing more than that sales pitch, hysterics amplified beyond control.
The notion that cells use EITHER oxygen OR glucose to make energy is not how I understand it. I thought both process use glucose, though the one with oxygen and glucose can produce ~32 ATP, while the one without oxygen (only glucose) can only produce 2 or 4 ATP. This gets to the three stages of cell respiration: the first two stages can be without oxygen (glycolosis in the cytoplasm and the Krebs cycle in the mitochondria) but the third one (electron transport in the mitochondria) is where most of the ATP is produced. The first two try to keep up when your cells can't get enough oxygen (like in extreme exercise, anaerobic respiration). Can you help me understand what I have gotten wrong please?
Everyone be aware that Substack continues to charge my bank account for discontinued publications and we (the subscribers) have no one to contact except chat bots which offer no resolution.
I'm so sorry to bother you with an off topic question, but my daughter thinks one of my grandsons suffers from this. It's pretty out there and I'm wondering if you can tell me anything helpful since you're my favorite Doctor to read. If not I completely understand! https://www.instagram.com/reel/C_LDZkUuXts/?igsh=MzRlODBiNWFlZA==
The proof of "present cause" of an illness is found in the cure. Modern medicine does not have a definition of cancer cured because it cannot address the current "theoretical cause" of cancer, the genetic mutation. So, logically, modern medicine cannot cure a case of cancer and cannot even tell if one has been cured.
The cure proves the cause.
However, if cancer has a metabolic cause, then it presumably has a metabolic cure. There is evidence of cancers being cured under the metabolic model, however - such cures cannot be recognized by anyone who believes the genetic model. The genetic cause has not been afdressed. The cure proves the cause. To your health, tracy
Hi Pierre, there is a new theory published in 2023 - the Cell Suppression Theory of cancer (CST). I think you'll find it interesting as it is the first to explain all hallmarks, and many other features of cancer besides.
This post has been replicated in the comments by at least 2 different users. One post is interesting. Two posts are enthusiastic. Three or more posts - I start to think spammy.
Saw a talk last night (Corbett) which indicated that something like 47% of all traffic on social media is bots.
Cell suppression sounds fascinating, but the bulk of posts, and inclination to avoid bots, steers me away.
It is worrying. All I would say to that is, how many bots have published a book and have their own website? My authenticity is easily and quickly established by a quick google search of my name.
Antifungals may prove useful in combatting many cancers according the “The Cancer ReSolution?” by Mark Lintern May 15, 2023.) Definitely worth a read - it goes beyond the metabolic theory, considering several additional 'hallmarks of cancer', and fits them all far better. See more at https://www.cellsuppression.com/ . The ivermectin / fenbendazole approach took me from what my doctors called untreatable metastasized prostate bone cancer to full remission in about 6 weeks.
After reading your substack I read "Tripping Over the Truth" by Christofferson, which cements in my mind the point of view that the SMTC is worthless. its being kept alive like a zombie by the cancer industry and oncologists that feed off it. The Metabolic Theory of Cancer put cancer prevention and treatment back in the hands of the patient instead being at the mercy of the industry and conflicted doctors.
I just finished The War on Ivermectin. I cried through many parts of it especially the testimonials. I had no idea that Jenny McCarthy was so accomplished. Thank you, Thank you both!
What is your take on Ivermectin and Fendbendazole for cancer, in addition to dietary changes?
What about chlorine dioxide for cancer?
What about Methylene blue in this arena for prevention and treatment?
Just reading this post now. I came across a book (at a thrift shop) called The Hidden Story of Cancer by Brian Scott Peskin (2006). It introduced the work of Warburg and, even as a layperson, opened my eyes to the root cause of cancer. Dr. Jason Fung's book Cancer Code was another one that did a good job reviewing and dispelling the causes of cancer over the years.
I took a graduate class covering cancer from Johns Hopkins. I asked why toxic chemo didn't cause more cancer. The response was the standard "kills fast replicating cells," which didn't really address the question. Now, I've seen some admissions in research papers that treatments can cause cancer, but I'm guessing the more I learn about the MTOC the more I'll understand cancer remission and relapse. Looking forward to it.
As a survivor of testicular cancer myself, I did not know about those chimney sweep boys. Very interesting, thanks. I hope someday this gets figured out.
PS When I had chemo, they also injected me steroids which made me hungry (and not throw up). It made me want to eat junk food. I am now thinking how completely stupid that was, I'm sure it was just to make the hospital more money.
Dr Kory thank you for all your hard work! I just read the scariest article on Substack from these last 4 years. We’d like to read your opinion on this. I’m sure the timing isn’t coincidental either.
Thank you again,
https://danielnagase.substack.com/p/japans-plan-to-destroy-the-world
Thank you Dr Kory!!!!! Just amazing :)
This article might interest you. My doctor sent it to me today. I am having extreme pain (a couple days a mth) and I have anticardiolipin. We are exploring pain management. She told me that outside her other concerns of opioids, opioids kill mitochondria. Now, I don't know that she meant fully kills, she's just talking to me generally, but definitely is implying that it negatively impacts them to some degree. Which obviously, based on what you're writing, isn't a good thing. This article below talks about how opioids affect the metabolism pathway and has a negative impact on cancers and reoccurrences. I could not read the whole thing because it's too smart for me. However, it made me think of you and your recent articles immediately.
Pharmaceutics | Free Full-Text | Impact of Opioids on Cellular Metabolism: Implications for Metabolic Pathways Involved in Cancer
https://www.mdpi.com/1999-4923/15/9/2225
Have a good night and thank you for all your writings. 🫶
OH YHIT! All the cancer patients I know are doped up to the gills. Sure, they feel better, but -
Sheesh!
Ahhh, what I would have given to have met you 18 years ago. [sigh] Alas my wife died from uterine cancer despite our fervent attempts to curb it at least a little. Devastating hideous disease.
The flip side is that I have been a voracious reader of all things cancer since then, trying to learn about prevention as first priority.
I’ve become familiar with various failings in our current medical understanding. Our current medical industry’s emphasis is focused on treating diseases rather than preventing them. Apparently that’s where the big money is, catching people at their moments of desperation and offering them a way out. While I’m grateful for effective treatments when they are available, I have to wonder at a practice that seems to limit itself to curing diseases instead of promoting whole body health. Seems self serving.
I can’t tell you how many times I’ve talked to people who have somehow managed to go into remission from their cancer and then are sent home with no further instructions other than enjoy your life. There is no hint that anything they were doing before helped to bring on their cancer in the first place. And many years later most of folks of those wind up developing the very cancer that they had held in remission. It’s almost like you know for sure that you are going to die from cancer but you just don’t know when.
I very much appreciate the work you are doing.
Thank Q for healing people. Could you read my messages please 🙏 thank Q
Dr. Kory,
Here is what I believe is an Ivermectin hit piece video. Scroll to 45 minute mark to where the FLCCC is disparaged.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5DwzMP08NGs
The war is never ending and unrelenting. Thanks for the good fight and best wishes!!!
I couldn’t go through more than 5 minutes of that BS without throwing up. Good lord!
So Ivermectin has been around for something like 30 or 40 years and it’s only now that they have discovered what a horrible poison it is? Really??
People can be so easily led to believe utterly absurd thoughts as absolute truth. All you need to do is promote fear with any made up “facts” and insinuate that this new horrible fear applies to the matter at hand.
Studies? Who needs those stinking studies.
You can just make up any scary BS you want that will draw in a percentage of the population who live in a state of unending freakish paranoia. Feeding that propensity will override valid research or common sense every time, and doesn’t require anything more than a connection to the internet.
…
The Music Man, movie from the 1960s, had a great scene that should be required for all high school students to watch. It was one of the early scenes where “professor” Harold Hill was dreaming up his scheme to induce the good folks of River City Iowa to fork over money to him. The scheme to buy band instruments was sold as an idea to keep their youth from getting involved in playing pool (billiards). He had convinced the good folks of River City that pool would be the ruin of their children by drawing a line between trouble and pool: “That starts with “T” which rhymes with “P” and course that stands for pool.”
So much of what I read and see today is nothing more than that sales pitch, hysterics amplified beyond control.
Dr. Kory,
The notion that cells use EITHER oxygen OR glucose to make energy is not how I understand it. I thought both process use glucose, though the one with oxygen and glucose can produce ~32 ATP, while the one without oxygen (only glucose) can only produce 2 or 4 ATP. This gets to the three stages of cell respiration: the first two stages can be without oxygen (glycolosis in the cytoplasm and the Krebs cycle in the mitochondria) but the third one (electron transport in the mitochondria) is where most of the ATP is produced. The first two try to keep up when your cells can't get enough oxygen (like in extreme exercise, anaerobic respiration). Can you help me understand what I have gotten wrong please?
I am an RN and that's exactly what I learned in nursing school. I was confused as well.
Everyone be aware that Substack continues to charge my bank account for discontinued publications and we (the subscribers) have no one to contact except chat bots which offer no resolution.
I'm so sorry to bother you with an off topic question, but my daughter thinks one of my grandsons suffers from this. It's pretty out there and I'm wondering if you can tell me anything helpful since you're my favorite Doctor to read. If not I completely understand! https://www.instagram.com/reel/C_LDZkUuXts/?igsh=MzRlODBiNWFlZA==
Damn I hate Instagram. PANDAS. Makes me think about the dozens of strep throat infections I had as a child, and my later behavioural problems.
Healthline says to treat with SSRI's. Please beware, they are contraindicated in children, and risky in adults.
The proof of "present cause" of an illness is found in the cure. Modern medicine does not have a definition of cancer cured because it cannot address the current "theoretical cause" of cancer, the genetic mutation. So, logically, modern medicine cannot cure a case of cancer and cannot even tell if one has been cured.
The cure proves the cause.
However, if cancer has a metabolic cause, then it presumably has a metabolic cure. There is evidence of cancers being cured under the metabolic model, however - such cures cannot be recognized by anyone who believes the genetic model. The genetic cause has not been afdressed. The cure proves the cause. To your health, tracy
Hi Pierre, there is a new theory published in 2023 - the Cell Suppression Theory of cancer (CST). I think you'll find it interesting as it is the first to explain all hallmarks, and many other features of cancer besides.
More information can be found here: www.cellsuppression.com
This post has been replicated in the comments by at least 2 different users. One post is interesting. Two posts are enthusiastic. Three or more posts - I start to think spammy.
Saw a talk last night (Corbett) which indicated that something like 47% of all traffic on social media is bots.
Cell suppression sounds fascinating, but the bulk of posts, and inclination to avoid bots, steers me away.
It is worrying. All I would say to that is, how many bots have published a book and have their own website? My authenticity is easily and quickly established by a quick google search of my name.
Antifungals may prove useful in combatting many cancers according the “The Cancer ReSolution?” by Mark Lintern May 15, 2023.) Definitely worth a read - it goes beyond the metabolic theory, considering several additional 'hallmarks of cancer', and fits them all far better. See more at https://www.cellsuppression.com/ . The ivermectin / fenbendazole approach took me from what my doctors called untreatable metastasized prostate bone cancer to full remission in about 6 weeks.