Discussion about this post

User's avatar
John Q Liberty's avatar

Brilliant piece. This medical layman fails to comprehend how Ivermectin saved enough millions of lives to win the Nobel Peace Prize then later got demonized as 'horse paste' and unfit for human consumption by America's FDA. Had Ivermectin (and other successful early approaches) been employed early on, millions of lives might have been saved around the world - this, months before the first so-called 'vaccine' ever got injected into the first arm.

'Mass murder', on the part of those who censored life-saving treatments? The shoe fits.

C'mon, legal profession... Get off your duffs. there HAS to be a class action suit somewhere in this.

Expand full comment
Margaret Anna Alice's avatar

I don’t know how this could be pulled off, but I would love to see a study/paper submitted to peer-reviewed journals with Paxlovid substituted for ivermectin, and when the paper is accepted, the authors reveal that the drug tested was actually ivermectin, and the journal would be forced to proceed with publishing what they had already accepted lest their bias be revealed.

Perhaps Peter Boghossian, James Lindsay, and Helen Pluckrose can give some pointers on how to submit hoax papers—although it’s probably a lot easier to get away with in the social sciences ;-) (https://www.nytimes.com/2018/10/04/arts/academic-journals-hoax.html)

Expand full comment
44 more comments...

No posts