65 Comments
Dec 1, 2022Liked by Pierre Kory, MD, MPA

thank you so much Dr. Kory for being a champion for the truth!! In a world that seems to have gone insane, your words of truth are so very appreciated!! Bless you!

Expand full comment

Fauci belongs in prison ; on another topic, those involved in the money laundering con in Ukraine should be investigated as well.

Expand full comment
Dec 1, 2022Liked by Pierre Kory, MD, MPA

Yes. But getting Fauci Biden both the Joe and the Hunter and PelosiGirl put away For Ukraine for the virus and for destroying our country in every way possible. Praise God! This will happen!

Expand full comment

Thank you from the bottom of my heart for the way you've stayed the course.

Expand full comment
Dec 1, 2022Liked by Pierre Kory, MD, MPA

Thank you for your dedication to several issues1. The abject failure and harm of the COVID vaccine. A friend told me today that the mRNA vaccines did not affect DNA 🧬 nor did it enter the nucleus of the cell. We discussed How exactly this mRNA enters the cell and programs the DNA to produce spike proteins We talked about the harm of the spike proteins and the lack of a turnoff of these modified DNA . She was astonished and dismayed that she hadn’t worked that out. We were in Microbiology and Organic Chemistry together. She is quite Brillant in her field of expertise .

2. The preventative and early treatment using Ivermectin ++ diffusing the bullshit npromoted by Dr. Fauci!

3. The future of new declared pandemics ;( monkeypox ) and addressing the CDCWHONIH grouping and refusing to “Do as told”. Dr Fauche related that he wishywashed school closures, masking and other closures in his closing address and I was moved to violence, truly.

I twittered several things re: COVID/wuhan THE VACCINES AND THE IN- EFFECTIVENESS OF the shot as well as calling out badmouthing of Ivermectin you can use early and treat this virus and even others effectively and get completely well! Keep up your incredible devotion and energy. It and you shall prevail! You are one of my heroes!

Expand full comment

Kudos for all your work. F's incessant lying is a psychopath feature. Read about it in my new book, free download here: https://dl.bookfunnel.com/t2feeen29q

Expand full comment

Follow the money 💰

Expand full comment
Dec 1, 2022Liked by Pierre Kory, MD, MPA

Follow the $ and destroy those who were paid to allow people with COVID TO DIE!!!!!!!

Expand full comment
Dec 1, 2022Liked by Pierre Kory, MD, MPA

Your headline just delivered the best news I've heard all day. All week, actually. Maybe more, lol. CONGRATS on your thoughts getting some well-deserved exposure/attention. Bravo. And thank you.

Expand full comment
Dec 1, 2022Liked by Pierre Kory, MD, MPA

Thanks Doctor Kory.

Expand full comment
Dec 1, 2022Liked by Pierre Kory, MD, MPA

So much gratitude Dr. Kory you are like magic illuminating the dark.

Expand full comment
Dec 1, 2022Liked by Pierre Kory, MD, MPA

Thank you Dr. Kory for all you do for medical freedom, including your telehealth clinic. I was so glad I remembered it when I contracted covid, and that it was up and running. All I can say is a very big thank you from the bottom of my heart - highly recommend!

Expand full comment
Dec 1, 2022Liked by Pierre Kory, MD, MPA

It is a pleasure to support your Substack writing as well as the FLCCC's incredible work. You have kept me informed, sane and hopeful. Thank you & keep up the amazing work!

Expand full comment
Dec 1, 2022Liked by Pierre Kory, MD, MPA

I am hoping for justice in their the courts or by the people, for the people to which I suspect Fauci will try to avoid by moving to his new headquarters in China to collect his pay for serving the CCP.

Expand full comment

Who is talking about solutions? The most powerful force on Earth is human collaboration. Why don’t we have the tools to do that better?? Imagine a platform where we could collaborate on “missions” together on everything from decentralizing medicine and the FDA, to developing better tools to make government transparent, to building a town park.

We need better tools.

https://joshketry.substack.com/p/why-doesnt-this-exist-building-a

Expand full comment

Dr. Kory, you saved countless lives and continue to do so. I share all your articles with my friends and now the die-hard pro vaccine ones are refusing to get more boosters based more on what they have seen and experienced versus what I have been sharing. But the breakthrough is now they ALL now seek my advice when they get covid and I send them the FLCCC protocols. They agree they are excellent when they first scoffed at me in 2020 and 2021. So progress!! You and your fellow doctors are true heroes and you took considerable risks to your own personal safety speaking out from the very beginning. I prayed for your safety and continues to do so as your work is so very important. I thank God for you and all that pursued truth over group think and massive doctor coercion by this administration, local state governments like California, medical boards and our extremely evil, biased press who are responsible for many deaths as THEY ignored the truth and didn’t publish the true medical studies on Ivermectin. So many needless deaths are on their hands. We will not forget.

Expand full comment

Hi Dr. Kory, as a scientist, I have been (and continue to be) a staunch admirer of your lifesaving work. I think two points are quite clear to anyone who takes an unbiased look at the high-quality evidence:

1. mRNA vaccines DO NOT save lives overall, in fact they are slightly more likely to "kill" than "save", as this is what the gold-standard randomized clinical trials done by Pfizer and Moderna themselves showed. The overall effect of mRNA vaccines on mortality in the two clinical trials was 4 excess non-COVID deaths (cardiovascular-related) for every 3 COVID deaths that the vaccines averted.

2. Ivermectin administered in proper regimens saves lives among COVID patients. It is blatantly obvious that most ivermectin clinical trials, especially the large-scale ones, were deliberately designed to fail by using woefully inadequate regimens: very short treatment durations (3 days or less) on an empty stomach after very long treatment delays (around 7 days). Even in spite of most large trials being set up to fail, the overall effect in all 18 published randomized clinical trials to date was that ivermectin prevented about 1 in 3 COVID deaths: https://c19ivm.org/meta.html#fig_fprd. But the one large-scale randomized trial (I-TECH) that used a somewhat reasonable regimen (5 days of ivermectin with a meal, after a 5 day delay) had a much more impressive result of 70% reduction in deaths with ivermectin. Of course, Paxlovid was also proven to be highly effective at saving lives in its clinical trial (unlike the worse-than-useless mRNA vaccines), but ivermectin’s safety record is much stronger, and chances are ivermectin will perform similarly to Paxlovid when administered in proper regimens AND combined with at least some of the other clinically proven items that FLCCC recommends (such as curcumin, melatonin, fluvoxamine, quercetin, etc.). Ironically, Paxlovid itself is a combination drug!

Now the issue where it has been impossible so far to reach a TRULY unbiased scientific consensus is masks, as there is no proper high-quality evidence IN EITHER DIRECTION. The so-called “randomized controlled trials” which people love to cite as evidence that “masks don’t work” have distressing similarities to the designed-to-fail ivermectin trials that used terribly inadequate regimens and then claimed “ivermectin doesn’t work”. From reading the mask trial publications it is apparent that a very high percentage of intervention subjects DID NOT properly adhere to wearing masks at the potential TIME OF EXPOSURE TO COVID (especially not at the higher-risk prolonged contact exposures), so these trials certainly cannot be used to claim that “masks don’t work”. Still, the effect estimates from these trials were non-significantly in favor of masks, similar to the overall effects in the designed-to-fail ivermectin trials. Also, the very short-sighted arguments like “a mask cannot block tiny virus particles” are eerily similar to “the concentrations of ivermectin needed to kill COVID would kill the patient first”; these arguments are purely based on flawed theoretical assumptions rather than the real-life reality, obviously motivated by pre-existing deep biases against the intervention, and fail to take so many critical factors into account.

In my mind, the overarching question is: Does masking AT THE TIME OF A TRULY HIGH-RISK COVID EXPOSURE potentially save lives (or at least dramatically reduce the chance of being infected and/or the severity of illness if one still gets infected)? If I had to bet my life on the correct answer, I would confidently go with YES, based on clear trends from my observations of people all over the place, and also based on consideration of ALL the limited, imperfect data that exists (not only the data that people cherry-pick to make a certain argument). Let me say, I think masks are unnecessary almost all of the time, and I am certainly not advocating for community mask mandates at this point, but I definitely think the truth about whether masks provide COVID protection is important. I would be very interested in your opinion (and any experiences and high-quality evidence you can share) regarding the value of wearing masks at the time of a truly high-risk COVID exposure.

Expand full comment
author

You are absolutely spot on about so much here. I 100% agree with you on masks - these are impossible to design to detect efficacy over prolonged periods. For acute and finite situations, masks do work, but Np5's are way more effective. The errors in mask beliefs that I see are:

1) Not differentiating studies in viral models that are predominant large droplet transmission like flu from Covid ( aerosol transmission

2) Not differentiating focused, discrete use vs. mask mandates where by everyone is supposed to wear one

3) not understanding how N95's work.. it is NOT just about pore size, their are other barrier dynamics in play within those masks

4) Hospital studies from the original SARS are generally positive for boht standard masking and N95's with the literature for N95's generally stronger

5) In the initial NYC wave, lots of docs were getting COVID, once they went to universal N95 use in the hospital.. very few did

6) Fun fact: I was one of the very first (not the first) to call aerosol transmission as the predominant mode of spread with COVId. It was accepted by the NY times in April 2020 but then dropped after the op ed board got fired for that Senator Tom cotton editorial. I later published it in USA today, can read it here, obviously there are some things I might change in it if I had to write it today but you get the gist: https://www.usatoday.com/story/opinion/2020/07/01/slow-covid-19-more-americans-need-wear-n-95-masks-indoors-column/3278779001/

Expand full comment
Dec 2, 2022Liked by Pierre Kory, MD, MPA

Thank you for this great response, Dr. Kory. You are a true hero (along with Dr. Marik and a very select few). In addition to your expertise and knowledge, your integrity and honesty are one-of-a-kind. Keep up the outstanding work of saving lives while exposing the truth.

Expand full comment
Dec 1, 2022Liked by Pierre Kory, MD, MPA

Thank you Dr Kory. Good to talk to you today, thank you for your expert advice. I am thankful for the work you and other FLCCC crew are doing. Jim

Expand full comment