I compiled a concise, organized, and referenced document detailing the scientific and clinical evidence that spike protein shedding causes side efects in a cohort of people exposed to the vaccinated.
Wonderfully put together document. I’ll be sharing with our member base. Thank you for your hard work in putting this together and sharing with the public. God Bless. Gil Levy - founder of Pure Blood Registry
In terms of "shedding": if it's possible as many people believe, when Self Amplifying RNA "vaccines" (Replicon vaccines) become more and more prevalent this issue could create serious problems because even a 'small' amount of shedding could presumably replicate in an uncontrolled manner
Hey there. The “initial nine part study” link in the opening sentence leads to a private page. Not sure if you’re aware or if that’s purposeful- I’d love to have access to it to be able to share with friends.
I am a victim of shedding. I'm 71 yrs old....and have always been the critical thinker in my family and did my very best to educate my siblings including my sister who is a NICU nurse regarding the Clot Shot. SHE DID NOT BELIEVE A WORD I SAID and not only did she get two jabs, made her husband and my two brothers get them as well. Couple weeks later her entire household was ill with COVID. I took them my protocol. In less than 48 hours I could barely stand, Oxygen Sat= Low-Mid 70's, extreme pain on my right side. Went to local ER & told them "WRITE : NO REMDESIVIR , NO VENTILATOR ON MY CHART NOW" They did. Was in hospital two weeks with : CLOT TO LEFT KIDNEY, CLOT TO LEFT LUNG, BILATERAL PNEUMONIA. I was denied breathing tretments. They said they don't give breathing treatments to COVID patients. Because of that my coughing was excessive and I was without a voice for 6 months. Needless to say my voice did not return to what it was. Have tried to inform my sister that severe heart conditions are occurring in very young people and that they are vaccinated. Told her that it is causing Myocarditis. Her response was " I know you think you are right about this BUT YOU'RE NOT !" I told her we would have to agree to disagree about that. Since then her own heart condition has worsened......and they are considering an ablasion. I have come to the conclusion that I have done all I can to help her and will continue to do whatever she needs from me but I will not have COVID discussions any longer with her.
I have a democrat friend that is 86 years old. Mad at the world all the time. She runs out every time a new jab is offered, then she announces to everyone that she got her shot and advises everyone to do the same. She’s mad at her kids for not being jabbed. She’s mad at her kids for voting for DJT. She taking away their inheritance and says DJT will raise the age of retirement to 76 and that her kids will regret what they’ve done.
I honestly do not understand that craziness.
Your sister is a true believer just like my friend Jenny.
Perhaps there weren’t many responses from those individuals injured by tainted blood due to the fact of fatal complications. This was a very good article and possibly this could be another avenue for litigation due to injury against the blood banks for not protecting the public. They would not be covered under the pharmaceutical companies blanket immunity. I did contact the Blood Bank of Delaware and they are not even asking if a patient has been vaccinated for C19, and I specifically asked that question.
I am less worried about exposure to a few shed spike proteins. I am much more concerned about exposure to mRNA particles themselves - which could sit in my body causing damage for an indefinite amount of time. Is there any reason to believe that shedding of the actual mRNA lipid nanoparticles is not happening? Are there any substances we can take to break down this synthetic mRNA? (Given the pseudouridine seems to prevent normal breakdown processes indefinitely)
Indian online pharmacies are reliable. You can search on IndiaMart app and loads will get in touch offering to supply. Also good for obtaining antibiotics and other basic medicines. In India ivermectin and hydroxychloroquine are basic over the counter medicines so they are happy to ship you box of 100 at cheap prices.
Nanoporous membranes have been shown to be valuable tools for filtering out impurities from water and numerous other applications. However, there's still much work to be done in perfecting their designs. Recently, the lab of Prof. Amir Haji-Akbari has demonstrated that exactly where the nanosized holes are placed on the membrane can make a big difference. The results are published in ACS Nano.
In recent years, nanoporous membranes made from graphene, polymers, silicon and other materials have been used successfully for separating gas, desalinating water, virus filtration, power generation, gas storage, and drug delivery. However, creating membranes that let all the right molecules pass through while keeping the undesired ones out has proven tricky.
For desalinating water, for instance, it's crucial that the membrane has a high permeability for water while sufficiently blocking small ionic and molecular solutes, and other impurities. But researchers have found that enhancing the permeability of a membrane often compromises its selectivity, and vice versa.
One promising approach is to optimize the chemistry and geometry of isolated nanopores to achieve the desired permeability and selectivity, and place as many of those pores as possible within a nanoporous membrane. Exactly how neighboring pores affect each other, though, is unclear.
At the nanoscale, molecules interacting with pore walls can exhibit behaviors that defy conventional theories. The Haji-Akbari lab explored whether they could design innovative membrane systems with increased precision and efficiency by fine-tuning the nanopores.
With computer simulations, Haji-Akbari's research team found that nanoscale proximity between pores can detrimentally affect water permeability and salt rejection. Specifically, they created simulations of membranes with varying patterns of pore placement, including a hexagonal lattice and a honeycomb lattice. What they found was that the hexagonal pattern, which allowed for more distance between pores, had a greater permeability/selectivity performance than the membrane with the honeycomb pattern.
These effects deviate from established theories, Haji-Akbari said.
"This assumption that the pore resistance is independent of the proximity of the pore is not correct," said Haji-Akbari, assistant professor of chemical & environmental engineering. "Clearly, it depends on proximity."
Their findings shed insight on how these effects accelerate the movements of certain ions through membranes while causing other ions to decelerate. Further, it can inform better designs of nanoporous membranes for enhanced separation processes such as water desalination and other applications.
Anyway, Wikipedia says that shedding is very rare, and that it “is only possible with an attenuated vaccine”. They are totally trustworthy. How could a site with so much true information about celebs and innocuous issues like trains or dogs be wrong about something that is science related?
You may want to investigate just how addictive nicotine is. There is plenty of research to say that it is not particularly addictive when not part of tobacco.
I am an ex smoker. I was afraid to use the patches in case I revived my addiction. I plucked up the courage and used the lowest dose patch for 6 days as recommended by Ardis. I stopped as per his instructions and also to test myself for a newly awakened addiction. Nothing. The symptoms of pain, stiffness and weakness that I had hoped to reduce were also unchanged. However, the brain fog that had pretty much taken my life away from me completely resolved. Without the patches my brain started to deteriorate again, so I did two more stretches of 6 days each with a gap between them, the brain clarity came back, and the weakness resolved, and still with no hint of addiction. However, again, the pain and stiffness did not resolve.
I have not used them for about a month and I can feel myself slightly deteriorating again, so it is looking like my careful approach is not allowing the time for the nicotine to do it's work on whatever is causing all the problems.
(The pain and stiffness are part of pre-covid fibromyalgia, the weakness and brain fog are part of post covid "long-covid" and I am suspecting that long covid has resolved itself thanks to the nicotine but not FMS.)
I am not from medicine, but I am pretty sure about the clinical soundness of one point, which I have raised in many places like this. Any pathological condition related to Covid, from primary infection to long Covid, from vaccine spike shedding to long vax and every thing in between can not be comprehensively treated by a single drug or molecule. You definitely need a combination of them including an appropriate anti histamine. Most of them have to be of some direct therapeutic value. In your case, Nicotine alone was not sufficient, you didn’t give yourself enough anti viral fire power and that is why the condition kept returning when you suspended the treatment with the Nicotine patch. The cause for all conditions related to Covid I mentioned above are residual reservoirs of the virus or vaccine spikes ( may be the lipid nano particles) or all of them - post infection/vaccination/ now spike shedding. Medicinally, they must be dissolved to get lasting relief.
Agreed, which is why i am trying so many of them, carefully at first to ensure I do no harm. I have also been taking ivermectin, fenbendazole and artemisinin in various protocols designed to make them bio-available, and the only observable change has been from the nicotine. That is not to say that the others are not doing fabulous stuff behind the scenes, and who knows whether I am dosing correctly for any of them while I am using them, but in the absence of a knowledgeable doctor to help, I have to intuit it all.
Your fibromyalgia is a long haul condition, but first you must get rid of your lingering LC condition totally. Are you taking those three concurrently or one by one on experimental basis ? Ivermectin is fine, but not sure if the other two are adequate. You have to look at different options, but I am sorry about your helplessness on knowledgable doctors. That is the bane of this pandemic in the USA. Please take care and I wish you well in your personal efforts.
COVID-19 vaccines and adverse events of special interest: A multinational Global Vaccine Data Network (GVDN) cohort study of 99 million vaccinated individuals
Sorry if I missed it BUT is the biggest risk of shedding transmission the transfer of the lipid nanoparticles <or> the spike itself? I would think the former is the scary one for shedding transmission. The latter is just the risk of another spike "infection" (which of course could be bad enough).
Mariko of Moderna, the 'brilliant Nobel Laureate, confirmed a couple of years ago, in a tweet, that shedding from the Covid vaxx certainly occurs but 'does not result in significant malaise'.
This is never referenced for some reason.
Take the reassurance with a suitable pinch of salt, given the source!
Wonderfully put together document. I’ll be sharing with our member base. Thank you for your hard work in putting this together and sharing with the public. God Bless. Gil Levy - founder of Pure Blood Registry
In terms of "shedding": if it's possible as many people believe, when Self Amplifying RNA "vaccines" (Replicon vaccines) become more and more prevalent this issue could create serious problems because even a 'small' amount of shedding could presumably replicate in an uncontrolled manner
https://safeblood.net/en/2024/07/27/red-cross-usa-changes-guidelines-increases-the-hurdle-for-directed-donations/
Hey there. The “initial nine part study” link in the opening sentence leads to a private page. Not sure if you’re aware or if that’s purposeful- I’d love to have access to it to be able to share with friends.
ty will share with the community as we have a number of vax shedders
I am a victim of shedding. I'm 71 yrs old....and have always been the critical thinker in my family and did my very best to educate my siblings including my sister who is a NICU nurse regarding the Clot Shot. SHE DID NOT BELIEVE A WORD I SAID and not only did she get two jabs, made her husband and my two brothers get them as well. Couple weeks later her entire household was ill with COVID. I took them my protocol. In less than 48 hours I could barely stand, Oxygen Sat= Low-Mid 70's, extreme pain on my right side. Went to local ER & told them "WRITE : NO REMDESIVIR , NO VENTILATOR ON MY CHART NOW" They did. Was in hospital two weeks with : CLOT TO LEFT KIDNEY, CLOT TO LEFT LUNG, BILATERAL PNEUMONIA. I was denied breathing tretments. They said they don't give breathing treatments to COVID patients. Because of that my coughing was excessive and I was without a voice for 6 months. Needless to say my voice did not return to what it was. Have tried to inform my sister that severe heart conditions are occurring in very young people and that they are vaccinated. Told her that it is causing Myocarditis. Her response was " I know you think you are right about this BUT YOU'RE NOT !" I told her we would have to agree to disagree about that. Since then her own heart condition has worsened......and they are considering an ablasion. I have come to the conclusion that I have done all I can to help her and will continue to do whatever she needs from me but I will not have COVID discussions any longer with her.
I have a democrat friend that is 86 years old. Mad at the world all the time. She runs out every time a new jab is offered, then she announces to everyone that she got her shot and advises everyone to do the same. She’s mad at her kids for not being jabbed. She’s mad at her kids for voting for DJT. She taking away their inheritance and says DJT will raise the age of retirement to 76 and that her kids will regret what they’ve done.
I honestly do not understand that craziness.
Your sister is a true believer just like my friend Jenny.
Perhaps there weren’t many responses from those individuals injured by tainted blood due to the fact of fatal complications. This was a very good article and possibly this could be another avenue for litigation due to injury against the blood banks for not protecting the public. They would not be covered under the pharmaceutical companies blanket immunity. I did contact the Blood Bank of Delaware and they are not even asking if a patient has been vaccinated for C19, and I specifically asked that question.
I am less worried about exposure to a few shed spike proteins. I am much more concerned about exposure to mRNA particles themselves - which could sit in my body causing damage for an indefinite amount of time. Is there any reason to believe that shedding of the actual mRNA lipid nanoparticles is not happening? Are there any substances we can take to break down this synthetic mRNA? (Given the pseudouridine seems to prevent normal breakdown processes indefinitely)
Can anyone tell me where I can get quality ivermectin and if it’s breastfeeding safe? My kids and I were around my in laws and we’re all sick again
Indian online pharmacies are reliable. You can search on IndiaMart app and loads will get in touch offering to supply. Also good for obtaining antibiotics and other basic medicines. In India ivermectin and hydroxychloroquine are basic over the counter medicines so they are happy to ship you box of 100 at cheap prices.
Thank you!
I suggest not linking to that particular "Augmented NAC". Just link to a reputable regular NAC like a Now or Jarrow product:
"Thanks to special patented machines using the principles of quantum physics..."
Quantum physics? If you talk about quantum physics on the same page as your NAC supplement... big red flag
A Consumer Lab subscription is a great investment:
https://www.consumerlab.com/reviews/n-acetyl-cysteine-nac-supplements/n-acetyl-cysteine/
Feb 7, 2024
0
Nanotechnology Nanomaterials
Editors' notes
Very small pores make a big difference in filtering technology
by Yale University
Very small pores make a big difference in filtering technology
Credit: ACS Nano (2024). DOI: 10.1021/acsnano.3c07489
Nanoporous membranes have been shown to be valuable tools for filtering out impurities from water and numerous other applications. However, there's still much work to be done in perfecting their designs. Recently, the lab of Prof. Amir Haji-Akbari has demonstrated that exactly where the nanosized holes are placed on the membrane can make a big difference. The results are published in ACS Nano.
In recent years, nanoporous membranes made from graphene, polymers, silicon and other materials have been used successfully for separating gas, desalinating water, virus filtration, power generation, gas storage, and drug delivery. However, creating membranes that let all the right molecules pass through while keeping the undesired ones out has proven tricky.
For desalinating water, for instance, it's crucial that the membrane has a high permeability for water while sufficiently blocking small ionic and molecular solutes, and other impurities. But researchers have found that enhancing the permeability of a membrane often compromises its selectivity, and vice versa.
One promising approach is to optimize the chemistry and geometry of isolated nanopores to achieve the desired permeability and selectivity, and place as many of those pores as possible within a nanoporous membrane. Exactly how neighboring pores affect each other, though, is unclear.
At the nanoscale, molecules interacting with pore walls can exhibit behaviors that defy conventional theories. The Haji-Akbari lab explored whether they could design innovative membrane systems with increased precision and efficiency by fine-tuning the nanopores.
With computer simulations, Haji-Akbari's research team found that nanoscale proximity between pores can detrimentally affect water permeability and salt rejection. Specifically, they created simulations of membranes with varying patterns of pore placement, including a hexagonal lattice and a honeycomb lattice. What they found was that the hexagonal pattern, which allowed for more distance between pores, had a greater permeability/selectivity performance than the membrane with the honeycomb pattern.
These effects deviate from established theories, Haji-Akbari said.
"This assumption that the pore resistance is independent of the proximity of the pore is not correct," said Haji-Akbari, assistant professor of chemical & environmental engineering. "Clearly, it depends on proximity."
Their findings shed insight on how these effects accelerate the movements of certain ions through membranes while causing other ions to decelerate. Further, it can inform better designs of nanoporous membranes for enhanced separation processes such as water desalination and other applications.
Is that image available in a shirt? On a shirt.
Anyway, Wikipedia says that shedding is very rare, and that it “is only possible with an attenuated vaccine”. They are totally trustworthy. How could a site with so much true information about celebs and innocuous issues like trains or dogs be wrong about something that is science related?
I always look at it this way: when you or your loved one are the victim, "rare" goes out the window.
You may want to investigate just how addictive nicotine is. There is plenty of research to say that it is not particularly addictive when not part of tobacco.
I am an ex smoker. I was afraid to use the patches in case I revived my addiction. I plucked up the courage and used the lowest dose patch for 6 days as recommended by Ardis. I stopped as per his instructions and also to test myself for a newly awakened addiction. Nothing. The symptoms of pain, stiffness and weakness that I had hoped to reduce were also unchanged. However, the brain fog that had pretty much taken my life away from me completely resolved. Without the patches my brain started to deteriorate again, so I did two more stretches of 6 days each with a gap between them, the brain clarity came back, and the weakness resolved, and still with no hint of addiction. However, again, the pain and stiffness did not resolve.
I have not used them for about a month and I can feel myself slightly deteriorating again, so it is looking like my careful approach is not allowing the time for the nicotine to do it's work on whatever is causing all the problems.
(The pain and stiffness are part of pre-covid fibromyalgia, the weakness and brain fog are part of post covid "long-covid" and I am suspecting that long covid has resolved itself thanks to the nicotine but not FMS.)
I am not from medicine, but I am pretty sure about the clinical soundness of one point, which I have raised in many places like this. Any pathological condition related to Covid, from primary infection to long Covid, from vaccine spike shedding to long vax and every thing in between can not be comprehensively treated by a single drug or molecule. You definitely need a combination of them including an appropriate anti histamine. Most of them have to be of some direct therapeutic value. In your case, Nicotine alone was not sufficient, you didn’t give yourself enough anti viral fire power and that is why the condition kept returning when you suspended the treatment with the Nicotine patch. The cause for all conditions related to Covid I mentioned above are residual reservoirs of the virus or vaccine spikes ( may be the lipid nano particles) or all of them - post infection/vaccination/ now spike shedding. Medicinally, they must be dissolved to get lasting relief.
Agreed, which is why i am trying so many of them, carefully at first to ensure I do no harm. I have also been taking ivermectin, fenbendazole and artemisinin in various protocols designed to make them bio-available, and the only observable change has been from the nicotine. That is not to say that the others are not doing fabulous stuff behind the scenes, and who knows whether I am dosing correctly for any of them while I am using them, but in the absence of a knowledgeable doctor to help, I have to intuit it all.
Your fibromyalgia is a long haul condition, but first you must get rid of your lingering LC condition totally. Are you taking those three concurrently or one by one on experimental basis ? Ivermectin is fine, but not sure if the other two are adequate. You have to look at different options, but I am sorry about your helplessness on knowledgable doctors. That is the bane of this pandemic in the USA. Please take care and I wish you well in your personal efforts.
COVID-19 vaccines and adverse events of special interest: A multinational Global Vaccine Data Network (GVDN) cohort study of 99 million vaccinated individuals
For those who haven't read it yet:
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0264410X24001270?ref=pdf_download&fr=RR-2&rr=85a341fe69dc281c
Sorry if I missed it BUT is the biggest risk of shedding transmission the transfer of the lipid nanoparticles <or> the spike itself? I would think the former is the scary one for shedding transmission. The latter is just the risk of another spike "infection" (which of course could be bad enough).
Mariko of Moderna, the 'brilliant Nobel Laureate, confirmed a couple of years ago, in a tweet, that shedding from the Covid vaxx certainly occurs but 'does not result in significant malaise'.
This is never referenced for some reason.
Take the reassurance with a suitable pinch of salt, given the source!