Although a low percentage of toddlers have received COVID-19 injections, the U.S count has reached 879,000. Parents, inform yourselves. Your child's life and well-being depends on it.
A thorough and brilliant letter. The patient's doctor would never read it, would call you a loon and promptly offer the jab.
We've arrived at the place and time where, as individuals, We must decide based on the information we can access, what is the Right Thing to do. While it would be wonderful to Trust others (who supposedly should "know better"), doing so is really no longer a viable option. Many of those we should be able to Trust have utterly failed us, either through their own ignorance, hubris, or being manipulated or coerced (e.g. losing their livelihoods).
Truly, at this point, if we take poison jabs or allow our children to be given poison jabs, the onus is on Us. And while we should be able to, rightly, blame our doctors for not warning us, it is We who will suffer the consequences! It is our Children who will suffer them!
TBH, the letter was for a court case where the judge was going to rule on whatever the MD recommended. The mom will ask him to read it before he gives his recommendation to the court so.. there is a chance he will read it. Every statement has a hyperlinked reference to support, so I don't think he can really say I am loon who is making stuff up. Although, actually, he will probably call me a loon anyway
I would expect a judge to read it as it counts as testimony in front of the court. And I might even suspect the judge to be more open minded(?!!) than a doctor, but then I am neither a doctor or a judge. You presented a tour-de-force of well referenced information, without a doubt. My comments are more my cynicism against the Establishment than anything you wrote!
But yeah, anyone speaking Truth to Power today is classified as either a loon or a terrorist by the Establishment. And just for fun...
Q: "What is the difference between a Conspiracy Theory and the Truth?" Answer: "These days, about six months."
I'm so glad to hear that "the letter was for a court case". Early on in my career, I was a law clerk and later a lawyer. So I can't hep but reading your posts through "legal" eyes, i.e. I skim. :)
Doing so, I felt a sadness creeping in. None of my old friends (some of whom are lawyers, all of whom are multi-jabbed, a few quite gladly), would take the time to read this astoundingly well-supported and reasoned article. So my creeping sadness was about this kind of brilliance being shouted into the wind and lost to posterity (beyond those of us in the church choir).
But then you said this was for a court case, and I perked up. Those f-tards have no choice but to read your opus. It's their job.
Reminds me of a thought I had a few months ago: It will be a court case through which the voices of you, Dr. Malone, Dr. McCullough et al will finally break through the wall of ignorance. Not (directly) through media. Nor through politics.
And this breakthrough will come not because you folks are super-smart (you are). Nor because your arguments are persuasive (they are).
No. It's because in a court case, they HAVE to listen.
I read your first letter. I just can’t wait to read every word of this tomorrow on my long trip to Boston. I had a terrible argument with my brother who wants to vaccinate his 10 month old right after the baby just covid and is totally fine. It’s insanity. As I mentioned earlier I need all this information to share with my husband who still things it’s good to vaccinate my 5 year old. I’m constantly reading about the data thanks to heroes like you Dr. Kory
I plan to print this out and bring to my pediatrician. Thank you so much.
I can't figure out how to print this out. Is there any way to do that? Can someone please make a pdf and post it here? I can copy paste but then it doesn't show the tables and graphs, which are a big part of it. Trying to get this info urgently to someone who already jabbed his 1 year-old -- trying to enlighten him to prevent a 2nd jab.
Dang. That must have taken you a while to write . If that isn’t convincing , I don’t know what is. Must read for all honest pediatricians looking out for the interests of their patients , not their pocketbooks.
Omg, if that letter doesn’t do it, what will?! Thank you for sharing! I’m going to forward it to our state assemblyman who coauthored the Dr “misinformation” bill.
Another one out of the park, Dr. Kory. Few in medicine will listen now or ever. I could relate 20 or 30 relevant tales of death and damage and willful, arrogant ignorance, about family alone and their physicians. I'm supplying the letter to still living relatives in hope they will stop the carnage with their grandkids.
Exactly what I hoped you would do.. although I agree that this isn't a data argument, and that data doesn't seem to change minds, but I feel like I have to try. It makes me sick to think of a well-meaning Mom and/or Dad taking their two year old to go play Russian Roulette.. with no money or prizes offerred to the "winner" except they get to keep their life or health so they can get COVID more often than anyone else
I love how Dr. Paul Offit is the Chair of the FDA Vaccine Advisory Board and also made Millions off his Rotavirus vaccine. No conflict of interest there. That’s our government in action.
Offit comes off as an affable academic etc but he is out of his mind in not only in conflicts but also judgement/reasoning/logic. Never forget he was one of the yes votes for shots for tots
Of course he was. Anyone questioning vaccines is sure to question his own creation next. Have you read much about the rotavirus vaccine? It’s similar to the Covid vaccine in that it’s not that common for Children to be hospitalized if they do catch the rotavirus, even if they are hospitalized it’s likely for IV fluids as the treatment, and one of the side effects of the rotavirus vaccine is Intussusception. This, according to the CDC: https://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/vpd/rotavirus/about-intussusception.html
Now as a parent would you rather risk a concerning case of rotavirus and an overnight stay with fluids, or a surgical complication? As an anesthesia provider, this vaccine along with the Covid vaccine sealed my skepticism and that this guy is on a government vaccine advisory board?! Unconscionable. (Edited for grammar).
Unconscionable. At least when that word meant something. Now? Everything is conscionable. Like the event where you have 20+ people on two different regulatory agency committees voting unanimously for toddler jabs. You don't get on those committees unless your vote is assured/Pharma knows you will play ball. Otherwise, you can toil in obscurity. The rotavirus analogy is damning.
You’re right. I forgot that the definition of unconscionable changed right around the time when government advisory boards such as the CDC, FDA, NIH, NIAID lost all credibility. It frustrates me to recall that I used to think they were objective scientists and not greedy political hacks.
At least I took the red pill and my child can benefit.
I’m in Canada and of course most of what you write has relevance for us here as well.
This letter is such an excellent summation of so much of the evidence against mRNA shots, that I’ve bookmarked it for future reference. As well, it’s invaluable to answer those public health “authorities” and others guilty of wilful blindness.
This letter prompted me to sign up just now as a paid subscriber.
Thank you for all the time and energy you spend waking up people around the world!
Excellent analysis. But I'm sure you're aware it won't be accepted or even read by most doctors. This is not an academic topic subject to rational discussion. Steve Kirsch has a naive fetish of bribing others to debate. No one takes him up on it, indicating they know their position is not debatable. They know the harm they're causing.
If mom wants to protect her children, she would have better results with a lawyer than a doctor. But that's an uphill battle, too. Lots of people, young and old, have been sacrificed to this pernicious cult. Many more will be.
It will take several successful malpractice suits to get their attention. Or prosecutions. Lots of lawyers are going to get rich chasing this ambulance. And lots of docs are going to get poorer.
Pierre, out of curiosity, how many doctors have contacted you stating that they have counterintuitive information regarding the 'vaccination' of children?
Wednesday a gentleman that is awaiting his 3rd booster next month said he had proof that the shots are safe and effective. I asked him to show me the information and, lo and behold, he was unable to. This is why I suspect you will never be contacted regarding your letter.
Thank you Dr. Kory. THIS is the article I'm sending to the parents of babies/young children. The most comprehensive list of data/studies I have read. If they choose to delete at least I can say I tried!
Love the names in your letter. Very apropos. Faith and Hope Spring Eternal that Reason and Strength will Prevail.
This is good for court. Maybe, just maybe, a judge will read it, but please do not expect too much. Parents and doctors probably won’t read it unless you create an executive summary Q&A style. Many may dismiss it as “TMI” — Too Much Information.
Additional ideas for parent consultations:
1. Most parents want grandkids to love on someday. Although you did mention fertility concerns in your letter, consider informing parents that they may NEVER see healthy grandchildren if their child takes this shot, which initial studies and real-world evidence indicate is “sterilization” by another name.
2. Have the dissenting parent require the consenting parent to read and sign the Catherine Austin Fitts / Solari Informed Consent documents here: https://home.solari.com/forms/ . If these don’t change hearts and minds, nothing will.
3. Remind the parent there is NO liability — ZERO! — if the child is harmed, disabled long-term, or killed by the shot. No one will pay for injuries / death except the parents. (The Solari forms make this abundantly clear.)
I am interested in your comments and interpretation of the Covid -OUT trial published a couple weeks ago in the execrable NEJM, mixing and mashing ivermectin with fluvoxamine and metformin. The primary endpoints were as usual, a bit odd, (ER visits and a pulse ox of 93% were two that raise question marks), hospitalizations and death a bit more realistic. The methods section is full of confounders, eg different durations and start stop time of the drugs, age groupings, etc. so you cannot , as they admit, compare the results between different groups, overall. To me a pulse ox reading at home ,by a patient, of 93% doesn't ring alarm bells and suggest any particular treatment regimen "failure".
As you are well aware , most of these studies are 'designed to fail' with respect to ivermectin. The NEJM wont publish any article extolling any use of ivermectin, nor will it refrain from a publication exhorting more mRNA inocula.
This article just made me a founding member. Thank you for writing it. It reads just like the papers I would write in school when reviewing literature to put into practice in the ICU! Thank you!!
I am a critical care Clinical Nurse Specialist, Navy Nurse, retiring in June of 2023. If you know of parallel healthcare systems that are forming, I’d love to join!
A thorough and brilliant letter. The patient's doctor would never read it, would call you a loon and promptly offer the jab.
We've arrived at the place and time where, as individuals, We must decide based on the information we can access, what is the Right Thing to do. While it would be wonderful to Trust others (who supposedly should "know better"), doing so is really no longer a viable option. Many of those we should be able to Trust have utterly failed us, either through their own ignorance, hubris, or being manipulated or coerced (e.g. losing their livelihoods).
Truly, at this point, if we take poison jabs or allow our children to be given poison jabs, the onus is on Us. And while we should be able to, rightly, blame our doctors for not warning us, it is We who will suffer the consequences! It is our Children who will suffer them!
Don't get on the boxcars.
TBH, the letter was for a court case where the judge was going to rule on whatever the MD recommended. The mom will ask him to read it before he gives his recommendation to the court so.. there is a chance he will read it. Every statement has a hyperlinked reference to support, so I don't think he can really say I am loon who is making stuff up. Although, actually, he will probably call me a loon anyway
I would expect a judge to read it as it counts as testimony in front of the court. And I might even suspect the judge to be more open minded(?!!) than a doctor, but then I am neither a doctor or a judge. You presented a tour-de-force of well referenced information, without a doubt. My comments are more my cynicism against the Establishment than anything you wrote!
But yeah, anyone speaking Truth to Power today is classified as either a loon or a terrorist by the Establishment. And just for fun...
Q: "What is the difference between a Conspiracy Theory and the Truth?" Answer: "These days, about six months."
Thanks, from all of us, for what you are doing.
Ooo, I like that one, definitely gonna borrow that - "6 months"
I'm so glad to hear that "the letter was for a court case". Early on in my career, I was a law clerk and later a lawyer. So I can't hep but reading your posts through "legal" eyes, i.e. I skim. :)
Doing so, I felt a sadness creeping in. None of my old friends (some of whom are lawyers, all of whom are multi-jabbed, a few quite gladly), would take the time to read this astoundingly well-supported and reasoned article. So my creeping sadness was about this kind of brilliance being shouted into the wind and lost to posterity (beyond those of us in the church choir).
But then you said this was for a court case, and I perked up. Those f-tards have no choice but to read your opus. It's their job.
Reminds me of a thought I had a few months ago: It will be a court case through which the voices of you, Dr. Malone, Dr. McCullough et al will finally break through the wall of ignorance. Not (directly) through media. Nor through politics.
And this breakthrough will come not because you folks are super-smart (you are). Nor because your arguments are persuasive (they are).
No. It's because in a court case, they HAVE to listen.
I read your first letter. I just can’t wait to read every word of this tomorrow on my long trip to Boston. I had a terrible argument with my brother who wants to vaccinate his 10 month old right after the baby just covid and is totally fine. It’s insanity. As I mentioned earlier I need all this information to share with my husband who still things it’s good to vaccinate my 5 year old. I’m constantly reading about the data thanks to heroes like you Dr. Kory
I plan to print this out and bring to my pediatrician. Thank you so much.
I can't figure out how to print this out. Is there any way to do that? Can someone please make a pdf and post it here? I can copy paste but then it doesn't show the tables and graphs, which are a big part of it. Trying to get this info urgently to someone who already jabbed his 1 year-old -- trying to enlighten him to prevent a 2nd jab.
Dang. That must have taken you a while to write . If that isn’t convincing , I don’t know what is. Must read for all honest pediatricians looking out for the interests of their patients , not their pocketbooks.
Omg, if that letter doesn’t do it, what will?! Thank you for sharing! I’m going to forward it to our state assemblyman who coauthored the Dr “misinformation” bill.
well all I can say is "mic drop". Any pediatrician who gets this should be scared to death.
Another one out of the park, Dr. Kory. Few in medicine will listen now or ever. I could relate 20 or 30 relevant tales of death and damage and willful, arrogant ignorance, about family alone and their physicians. I'm supplying the letter to still living relatives in hope they will stop the carnage with their grandkids.
Exactly what I hoped you would do.. although I agree that this isn't a data argument, and that data doesn't seem to change minds, but I feel like I have to try. It makes me sick to think of a well-meaning Mom and/or Dad taking their two year old to go play Russian Roulette.. with no money or prizes offerred to the "winner" except they get to keep their life or health so they can get COVID more often than anyone else
Pierre, I just want to say how much I love you. You are the angel we all need in these trying times.
Aloha
Aloha Paul!!! Love ya back brother (I am blushing :)
I love how Dr. Paul Offit is the Chair of the FDA Vaccine Advisory Board and also made Millions off his Rotavirus vaccine. No conflict of interest there. That’s our government in action.
Offit comes off as an affable academic etc but he is out of his mind in not only in conflicts but also judgement/reasoning/logic. Never forget he was one of the yes votes for shots for tots
Of course he was. Anyone questioning vaccines is sure to question his own creation next. Have you read much about the rotavirus vaccine? It’s similar to the Covid vaccine in that it’s not that common for Children to be hospitalized if they do catch the rotavirus, even if they are hospitalized it’s likely for IV fluids as the treatment, and one of the side effects of the rotavirus vaccine is Intussusception. This, according to the CDC: https://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/vpd/rotavirus/about-intussusception.html
Now as a parent would you rather risk a concerning case of rotavirus and an overnight stay with fluids, or a surgical complication? As an anesthesia provider, this vaccine along with the Covid vaccine sealed my skepticism and that this guy is on a government vaccine advisory board?! Unconscionable. (Edited for grammar).
Unconscionable. At least when that word meant something. Now? Everything is conscionable. Like the event where you have 20+ people on two different regulatory agency committees voting unanimously for toddler jabs. You don't get on those committees unless your vote is assured/Pharma knows you will play ball. Otherwise, you can toil in obscurity. The rotavirus analogy is damning.
You’re right. I forgot that the definition of unconscionable changed right around the time when government advisory boards such as the CDC, FDA, NIH, NIAID lost all credibility. It frustrates me to recall that I used to think they were objective scientists and not greedy political hacks.
At least I took the red pill and my child can benefit.
I completely identify. At least COVID provided a lot of us with high doses of red pills.
Dr. Kory,
I’m in Canada and of course most of what you write has relevance for us here as well.
This letter is such an excellent summation of so much of the evidence against mRNA shots, that I’ve bookmarked it for future reference. As well, it’s invaluable to answer those public health “authorities” and others guilty of wilful blindness.
This letter prompted me to sign up just now as a paid subscriber.
Thank you for all the time and energy you spend waking up people around the world!
Excellent analysis. But I'm sure you're aware it won't be accepted or even read by most doctors. This is not an academic topic subject to rational discussion. Steve Kirsch has a naive fetish of bribing others to debate. No one takes him up on it, indicating they know their position is not debatable. They know the harm they're causing.
If mom wants to protect her children, she would have better results with a lawyer than a doctor. But that's an uphill battle, too. Lots of people, young and old, have been sacrificed to this pernicious cult. Many more will be.
It will take several successful malpractice suits to get their attention. Or prosecutions. Lots of lawyers are going to get rich chasing this ambulance. And lots of docs are going to get poorer.
Pierre, out of curiosity, how many doctors have contacted you stating that they have counterintuitive information regarding the 'vaccination' of children?
Wednesday a gentleman that is awaiting his 3rd booster next month said he had proof that the shots are safe and effective. I asked him to show me the information and, lo and behold, he was unable to. This is why I suspect you will never be contacted regarding your letter.
Can't wait to read your book
Thank you Dr. Kory. THIS is the article I'm sending to the parents of babies/young children. The most comprehensive list of data/studies I have read. If they choose to delete at least I can say I tried!
exactly - we are responsible for speaking and disseminating truth, they are responsible for the decision on whether or not to listen.
Thank you. As a Doctor, i can say I have used your suggestions on many vaccine exceptions letters. Thank you. From Brazil. The war is global.
Thank you for being brave. We must keep talking.
Love the names in your letter. Very apropos. Faith and Hope Spring Eternal that Reason and Strength will Prevail.
This is good for court. Maybe, just maybe, a judge will read it, but please do not expect too much. Parents and doctors probably won’t read it unless you create an executive summary Q&A style. Many may dismiss it as “TMI” — Too Much Information.
Additional ideas for parent consultations:
1. Most parents want grandkids to love on someday. Although you did mention fertility concerns in your letter, consider informing parents that they may NEVER see healthy grandchildren if their child takes this shot, which initial studies and real-world evidence indicate is “sterilization” by another name.
2. Have the dissenting parent require the consenting parent to read and sign the Catherine Austin Fitts / Solari Informed Consent documents here: https://home.solari.com/forms/ . If these don’t change hearts and minds, nothing will.
3. Remind the parent there is NO liability — ZERO! — if the child is harmed, disabled long-term, or killed by the shot. No one will pay for injuries / death except the parents. (The Solari forms make this abundantly clear.)
Dr. Kory:
Ive been following you for quite some time.
I am interested in your comments and interpretation of the Covid -OUT trial published a couple weeks ago in the execrable NEJM, mixing and mashing ivermectin with fluvoxamine and metformin. The primary endpoints were as usual, a bit odd, (ER visits and a pulse ox of 93% were two that raise question marks), hospitalizations and death a bit more realistic. The methods section is full of confounders, eg different durations and start stop time of the drugs, age groupings, etc. so you cannot , as they admit, compare the results between different groups, overall. To me a pulse ox reading at home ,by a patient, of 93% doesn't ring alarm bells and suggest any particular treatment regimen "failure".
As you are well aware , most of these studies are 'designed to fail' with respect to ivermectin. The NEJM wont publish any article extolling any use of ivermectin, nor will it refrain from a publication exhorting more mRNA inocula.
M R Weiss, MD
This article just made me a founding member. Thank you for writing it. It reads just like the papers I would write in school when reviewing literature to put into practice in the ICU! Thank you!!
I am a critical care Clinical Nurse Specialist, Navy Nurse, retiring in June of 2023. If you know of parallel healthcare systems that are forming, I’d love to join!