The New England Journal of Medicine published the fraudulent TOGETHER trial, designed and conducted to launch anti-ivermectin headlines across every major media outlet across the world.
I’m already subscribed to so many Substacks — but your straightforward, blunt words just warm the cockles of my heart. To wit: “...I am exhausted with this mockery of a sham of a depraved fraud of a trial.” So i capitulate. Take care of yourself.
Thank you for continuing to expose the fraudulence that now passes as “science,” Dr. Kory! I gave you and your articles multiple shoutouts in my “Dialogue with a Curious Injectee” (https://margaretannaalice.substack.com/p/dialogue-with-a-curious-injectee), including in the calls for retractions at the end of that post.
I also want to call your special attention to this article, which explains the mechanism by which mass formation occurs—including groupthink in the scientific community—and how victims of menticide can recover from their indoctrination:
Needless to say I am forwarding this beyond comprehensive refutation of the Together trial et al to my naysayer friends, social media and captured reporters.
Together is a telling word, they certainly worked together to discredit Ivermectin!
I can only imagine the many days, weeks you have spent writing these articles fueled by anger and grief at this abhorrent chapter in medical malfeasance history.
The statements made prior to your testimony at the Homeland Security Hearings were a marker, a warning of the mountain before you. Your ensuing passion and conviction captured the hearts and minds of thousands. Myself included. I have not been the same since.
This has been an exhausting painful journey, to put it mildly.
I am eternally grateful for your tenacity and strength. There have been nights early on that I wept in despair. The rising dawn of a new day dispels the darkness and gives one strength and hope to march forward.
You are fighting a War, the battlefield strewn with untold thousands of lives needlessly lost, families hopes and dreams shattered.
You are an honorary five star general and frontline infantryman. The trenches are filled with the stench and filth of corruption, greed and gross inhumanity.
Battles may be lost, but the Victory of Truth is before you!
Whoa. I am not sure what to say. I identify and appreciate your sentiments greatly.Very moving. We'll get there I hope, or at least to someplace a little better. Thank you for this so much
Thank you Dr Kory. I know how hard it is to put together such detailed due diligence.  The case that you make is irrefutable.
My business deals with imports from China and I became aware of the situation in Wuhan in January 2019. Just a few months later there was an amazing paper on a broad search for repurposed drugs that had quickly tested 70 or so candidates and identified a small number that were very promising. HQC was one of them.  It’s sad to think what could’ve been.
I’ve followed your work and that of the FLCCC for sometime now.  Twice before I considered a telemedicine appointment to get ivermectin for prophylactic reasons, but I hesitated. 
When I saw a post that your team was giving telemedicine appointments, I decided then and there to sign up and I’m now one of your patients. I had three reasons. First I’m exposed to others with Covid in my day-to-day activities. Second some lingering brain fog that’s developed over the last year. And finally, and this is the primary reason, to walk the talk as it’s one way that one person can make a small difference. 
Fortunately for me I’m in relatively good health and can afford to pay for the medicines. By taking ivermectin for both recovery and prophylactic reasons I can confidently share with my family, friends and employees that repurposed drugs are safe. Furthermore, it’s the right thing to do, for those that can help others, to be in a position to do so when the time come that it’s needed. With Omnicron’s high level of infectivity it just stands to reason that all of us must be prepared for the next variant.
The telemedicine appointment was one of the best interactions I’ve had with a medical professional and I found your recommended pharmacy to be very helpful and quick to deliver.
Personally I’m noticing some improvements in my own symptoms in just a few days. And even more significantly, in sharing my experience with family and employees it’s already opened some doors that would have been hard to do otherwise. And serendipitously, I was in a position to refer someone who has also become your patient.
And maybe that’s another way to fight the corruption. Re-purpose drugs are the safest and most cost-effective insurance against the still unknown consequences of a fatally flawed global health policy. A policy that is evidently wrong because we can see our vaccinated friends and family members falling sick right in front of us. 
Thanks for that. Is there any way to get the journal to ask the authors to release the data? Remember the anti-HCQ article in the Lancet that was retracted when the journal asked the authors to release the data and the authors refused? In this case the journal NEJM has even more justification to ask for the data to be released since the authors promised to do so.
Hi Pierre, we’re you involved in the treatment of Clive Palmer? He’s an Australian billionaire who refused to get vaccinated and got quite sick when he had Covid. The media reported that apparently he was advised to be ventilated, chose not to, then discharged against medical advice to be treated at home. He then took a number of medications including Ivermectin and made a full recovery.
If true that is an incredible story and worthy of writing up as a formal case study.
Also, I heard you mention on the podcast with Alexandros Marinos that the paper you had written with Paul Marik about ICU mortality had been rewritten and accepted for publication. Is that true? If so where is published?
The group the data was sent to ICODA is located in the UK. But the trials took place in Brazil. Could Dr. Cadegiani contact Brazilian president Bolsonaro, who supports early treatment, to apply pressure to have the data released? Could Dr. Lawrie in the UK contact government officials in the UK to apply pressure to ICODA to release the data?
I wanted to point you to "The Sugar Conspiracy" by Ian Leslie in the Guardian written on 7 Apr 2016. I think it would give you tremendous insight into your life and how everything your are dealing with was/is the same with the B.S. low-fat diets. It has everything from authorities with obnoxious personalities telling how it is without evidence to even calls for retraction in the BMJ for any criticism of their position. I think it would make you feel a lot better! P.S. Bucket hat or not; you rock!
“India stopped recommending the use of ivermectin for the management of the virus in September, citing a lack of scientific evidence of its benefits. “
Ed, I will be doing a substack on Uttar Pradesh very soon.. I think I will call it "The Censored Miracle of Uttar Pradesh". You can show it to your acquaintance, I am pretty sure it will be very convincing..
Ed, I wrote a blog post about a similar "factcheck" article in France. It's in French, but I guess online translation may help understanding the meaning of it.
As I documented, India did NOT stop recommending the use of Ivermectin in September. There was a war around ivermectin, and a document — which recommended against early treatments — was published by ICMR, which is an agency inside the Ministry of Health ; but ICMR did not have the authority to define recommendations. On the official site of the Ministry of Health, the recommendation for Ivermectin was online till Dec. 25th. (Then it actually was withdrawn ; opponents inside the MoH probably won the war...)
But there's something more important if we want to understand India's Covid policy: India is composed of 36 states, and each state has its own health policy and treatment recommendations. Some states did not follow the Indian Ministry of Health regarding its recommendations for Ivermectin. Some of them (Tamil Nadu, Mizoram, Kerala...) never recommended a large (or any) use of Ivermectin as an early treatment. On the contrary, other states (Uttar Pradesh, Uttarakhand...) went further, recommending ivermectin not only as an early treatment, but also as a prevention treatment, either for members of households of infected people, or for the wole population during the "delta" wave in the spring of 2021.
It's difficult to check this, but it's likely many Indian states keep recommending ivermectin as an early treatment even after central government stopped doing so.
One last thing: what is important is what people actually do. If doctors think IVM is efficient, nothing prevents them from prescribing it in India (there's no ban) and at least in some states IVM can be bought over the counter: nothing prevents someone to buy some if they think it may help.
It's hard to know what portion of the population get treated with IVM when they have Covid, but the fact that Indian government stopped recommending IVM in Dec. 2021 certainly wasn't a decisive halt in the use of IVM if people and doctors, thanks to their experience, think it works.
100% agree with the above. A very accurate description of what went on in India, however, the diamond in that rough was.. Uttar Pradesh. Their minister is anti-corruption, refused to go along with Big Pharma nonsense, and launched what I think is the greatest public health initiative in history. More on this soon
I’m already subscribed to so many Substacks — but your straightforward, blunt words just warm the cockles of my heart. To wit: “...I am exhausted with this mockery of a sham of a depraved fraud of a trial.” So i capitulate. Take care of yourself.
Hard not too. Such a great platform. 🇺🇸👍
Thank you for continuing to expose the fraudulence that now passes as “science,” Dr. Kory! I gave you and your articles multiple shoutouts in my “Dialogue with a Curious Injectee” (https://margaretannaalice.substack.com/p/dialogue-with-a-curious-injectee), including in the calls for retractions at the end of that post.
I also want to call your special attention to this article, which explains the mechanism by which mass formation occurs—including groupthink in the scientific community—and how victims of menticide can recover from their indoctrination:
• “Letter to the Menticided: A 12-Step Recovery Program” (https://margaretannaalice.substack.com/p/letter-to-the-menticided-a-12-step)
Boom!!
Needless to say I am forwarding this beyond comprehensive refutation of the Together trial et al to my naysayer friends, social media and captured reporters.
Together is a telling word, they certainly worked together to discredit Ivermectin!
I can only imagine the many days, weeks you have spent writing these articles fueled by anger and grief at this abhorrent chapter in medical malfeasance history.
The statements made prior to your testimony at the Homeland Security Hearings were a marker, a warning of the mountain before you. Your ensuing passion and conviction captured the hearts and minds of thousands. Myself included. I have not been the same since.
This has been an exhausting painful journey, to put it mildly.
I am eternally grateful for your tenacity and strength. There have been nights early on that I wept in despair. The rising dawn of a new day dispels the darkness and gives one strength and hope to march forward.
You are fighting a War, the battlefield strewn with untold thousands of lives needlessly lost, families hopes and dreams shattered.
You are an honorary five star general and frontline infantryman. The trenches are filled with the stench and filth of corruption, greed and gross inhumanity.
Battles may be lost, but the Victory of Truth is before you!
Thank you again for your ceaseless fight!
I’ve ordered 3 of your books.
Whoa. I am not sure what to say. I identify and appreciate your sentiments greatly.Very moving. We'll get there I hope, or at least to someplace a little better. Thank you for this so much
Thank you Dr Kory. I know how hard it is to put together such detailed due diligence.  The case that you make is irrefutable.
My business deals with imports from China and I became aware of the situation in Wuhan in January 2019. Just a few months later there was an amazing paper on a broad search for repurposed drugs that had quickly tested 70 or so candidates and identified a small number that were very promising. HQC was one of them.  It’s sad to think what could’ve been.
I’ve followed your work and that of the FLCCC for sometime now.  Twice before I considered a telemedicine appointment to get ivermectin for prophylactic reasons, but I hesitated. 
When I saw a post that your team was giving telemedicine appointments, I decided then and there to sign up and I’m now one of your patients. I had three reasons. First I’m exposed to others with Covid in my day-to-day activities. Second some lingering brain fog that’s developed over the last year. And finally, and this is the primary reason, to walk the talk as it’s one way that one person can make a small difference. 
Fortunately for me I’m in relatively good health and can afford to pay for the medicines. By taking ivermectin for both recovery and prophylactic reasons I can confidently share with my family, friends and employees that repurposed drugs are safe. Furthermore, it’s the right thing to do, for those that can help others, to be in a position to do so when the time come that it’s needed. With Omnicron’s high level of infectivity it just stands to reason that all of us must be prepared for the next variant.
The telemedicine appointment was one of the best interactions I’ve had with a medical professional and I found your recommended pharmacy to be very helpful and quick to deliver.
Personally I’m noticing some improvements in my own symptoms in just a few days. And even more significantly, in sharing my experience with family and employees it’s already opened some doors that would have been hard to do otherwise. And serendipitously, I was in a position to refer someone who has also become your patient.
And maybe that’s another way to fight the corruption. Re-purpose drugs are the safest and most cost-effective insurance against the still unknown consequences of a fatally flawed global health policy. A policy that is evidently wrong because we can see our vaccinated friends and family members falling sick right in front of us. 
Once again, I most heartfelt thank you
Thanks for that. Is there any way to get the journal to ask the authors to release the data? Remember the anti-HCQ article in the Lancet that was retracted when the journal asked the authors to release the data and the authors refused? In this case the journal NEJM has even more justification to ask for the data to be released since the authors promised to do so.
Robert Clark
Hi Pierre, we’re you involved in the treatment of Clive Palmer? He’s an Australian billionaire who refused to get vaccinated and got quite sick when he had Covid. The media reported that apparently he was advised to be ventilated, chose not to, then discharged against medical advice to be treated at home. He then took a number of medications including Ivermectin and made a full recovery.
If true that is an incredible story and worthy of writing up as a formal case study.
Also, I heard you mention on the podcast with Alexandros Marinos that the paper you had written with Paul Marik about ICU mortality had been rewritten and accepted for publication. Is that true? If so where is published?
Thank you! God will hold all liars accountable.
The group the data was sent to ICODA is located in the UK. But the trials took place in Brazil. Could Dr. Cadegiani contact Brazilian president Bolsonaro, who supports early treatment, to apply pressure to have the data released? Could Dr. Lawrie in the UK contact government officials in the UK to apply pressure to ICODA to release the data?
Robert Clark
I wanted to point you to "The Sugar Conspiracy" by Ian Leslie in the Guardian written on 7 Apr 2016. I think it would give you tremendous insight into your life and how everything your are dealing with was/is the same with the B.S. low-fat diets. It has everything from authorities with obnoxious personalities telling how it is without evidence to even calls for retraction in the BMJ for any criticism of their position. I think it would make you feel a lot better! P.S. Bucket hat or not; you rock!
Thanks doctor.
By the way I do not take a “your” title lightly. But! Others that have betrayed their professional standing can eat......🥶
Please never stop working to save our country. 🇺🇸🙏🗣
I have a lot of confidence in your insights on this but I mentioned India’s success in the state of Uttar Pradesh to someone today and they in turn directed me to this article refuting everything I had read about India’s miracle. Which is true and how do I refute this? https://www.newswise.com/factcheck/success-of-ivermectin-in-preventing-covid-19-in-india-has-not-been-proven
“India stopped recommending the use of ivermectin for the management of the virus in September, citing a lack of scientific evidence of its benefits. “
Thanks
Ed, I will be doing a substack on Uttar Pradesh very soon.. I think I will call it "The Censored Miracle of Uttar Pradesh". You can show it to your acquaintance, I am pretty sure it will be very convincing..
Ed, I wrote a blog post about a similar "factcheck" article in France. It's in French, but I guess online translation may help understanding the meaning of it.
https://blogs.mediapart.fr/enzo-lolo/blog/251221/covid-19-comment-les-fact-checkers-nous-desinforment-exemple-du-covid-en-inde
As I documented, India did NOT stop recommending the use of Ivermectin in September. There was a war around ivermectin, and a document — which recommended against early treatments — was published by ICMR, which is an agency inside the Ministry of Health ; but ICMR did not have the authority to define recommendations. On the official site of the Ministry of Health, the recommendation for Ivermectin was online till Dec. 25th. (Then it actually was withdrawn ; opponents inside the MoH probably won the war...)
But there's something more important if we want to understand India's Covid policy: India is composed of 36 states, and each state has its own health policy and treatment recommendations. Some states did not follow the Indian Ministry of Health regarding its recommendations for Ivermectin. Some of them (Tamil Nadu, Mizoram, Kerala...) never recommended a large (or any) use of Ivermectin as an early treatment. On the contrary, other states (Uttar Pradesh, Uttarakhand...) went further, recommending ivermectin not only as an early treatment, but also as a prevention treatment, either for members of households of infected people, or for the wole population during the "delta" wave in the spring of 2021.
It's difficult to check this, but it's likely many Indian states keep recommending ivermectin as an early treatment even after central government stopped doing so.
One last thing: what is important is what people actually do. If doctors think IVM is efficient, nothing prevents them from prescribing it in India (there's no ban) and at least in some states IVM can be bought over the counter: nothing prevents someone to buy some if they think it may help.
It's hard to know what portion of the population get treated with IVM when they have Covid, but the fact that Indian government stopped recommending IVM in Dec. 2021 certainly wasn't a decisive halt in the use of IVM if people and doctors, thanks to their experience, think it works.
100% agree with the above. A very accurate description of what went on in India, however, the diamond in that rough was.. Uttar Pradesh. Their minister is anti-corruption, refused to go along with Big Pharma nonsense, and launched what I think is the greatest public health initiative in history. More on this soon
Thanks for your prompt reply overnight, Doctor. God bless you in all you do.
Thanks for that, Enzo
Thank you ❤️