The College's expert attacked Dr. Hoffe for misinformation due to his public statements regarding the immense safety of ivermectin. Here is my defense testimony rebutting the College's "expert."
Re: Remdesivir: The link to the WHO Report is not available. Try this one.
"One of the surprising results of this trial is that remdesivir showed little to no effect, as remdesivir is the only drug candidate within this trial currently approved for the treatment of COVID-19 and has shown positive data in previous trials. "
Dr Kory - thank you for your excellent work and for going above and beyond to provide scientific evidence and accurate information to the public. I noted a couple of mistakes in your text above - "As per above table using data from the WHO’s Vigiaccess surveillance database as of today January 12, 2023: there have been 16 deaths attributed to ivermectin over a 30-year period, while there have been 11,056 deaths attributed to Remdesivir" Yet the table shows 26 deaths attributed to ivermectin, and 728 attributed to Remdesivir (the 11,056 number refers to adverse events attributed to Remdesivir). I'm sure these are accidents, but they should be corrected in the text.
I'm glad that you are coming to the defense of Dr. Hoffe. COVID has put a lot of people in a difficult position. Doctors can loss there license and job for going against the narrative. I lost my job for not going along with the narrative and getting the shot. In my case I chose to have the company terminate me so that I could file a discrimination suit for GINA violation. GINA says an employer can not ask for genetic information. If I'm successful in this defense then employers would not be able to mandate mRNA shots since they would not be able to ask for that information. To my knowledge this defense has not been used. I'm at the point that I need an expert witness who would be able to testify that the "vaccine" is gene therapy. I also have another argument that the "vaccine" is experimental and can not be mandated. Now I need to turn in my list of expert witnesses. I did not count on the fact that the doctors would face the same problem if they testify for me. If you know of someone who is retired or not in a position of losing a job and can testify that the "vaccine" is gene therapy and was not approved. If you know of someone in that position I would like to know. ewalton@engineer.com
I missed some relevant points on my long comments on Ivermectin yesterday. Examples reported on high doses of Ivermectin must be treated for what they are, just examples. If some got better with a single dose without suffering any side effects, it is clinically irrelevant. That is not any standard. All negative talking about Ivermectin is on inappropriately high doses or vetenary doses. The safe doses for humans have been known for long. That should be the norm, even while being used in Covid. All discussions about the use of Ivermectin for Covid should also be within those norms.
I would be pleased to exchange views with you at an individual level. I would particularly request researchers amongst you working on drug developments or any aspect of medicines to contact me for a fruitful exchange. Or if you know well anyone working on such research, you can link us. In my opinion, there is so much to be explored on repurposing of known drugs. It can be a massive work and a long haul, but can serve the needs of half the world population for cheap, affordable, safe and proven drugs for many diseases. I am 78, a PhD in organic chemistry, a long retired industrial R&D professional, is not working now, have not worked in drugs, but for some years now took to reading structural organic chemistry of drugs as a personal interest and got into some serious reading about Covid, this virus, treatments etc four years ago and wanting to pursue that activity in medicinal chemistry beyond this pandemic.
14 th line in my large message an hr ago, a small correction. Please read as “ ………….that was common in 2020 and part 2021”. It is not 2022. Thanks. Two other points. First, when people take small doses for preventive purposes, they need not carry any very small viral load or they can acquire one as they keep moving about. The next dose of Ivermectin should extinguish this in incipient load. Second is about the autoimmune phase and people in emergency care. Then the disease is about the body’s immune overdrive and not the virus infection directly. By then, the virus has reached its self limiting growth level, might even begin to go down. Yet, the virus still present could be triggering continuous auto immune activity. So the anti virals are still important there. That is how Remdisivir took some stage for a while. It was eventually found not useful and lost favour among the doctors. Control in that stage ( in hospitals) required control of excess immune activity, inflammation, excess histamine release etc in addition to reducing the present viral loads quickly. That is where the old school medicines with dual activity could score.
The working of Ivermectin clinically has to be understood correctly. I am not a physician, but having read this Covid story closely for these four years, this is my understanding. I wrote it in an earlier part of this podcast and this could be for those subscribing here. For prophylactic use, say once a week or fortnight for some length of time, low doses are adequate. They are safe, non consequential otherwise and and by themselves can eliminate very low viral loads that could have accumulated in an individual. That level of viral load is also inconsequential as it is. Next is asymptomatic, tested positive individuals, with slightly elevated viral load build up. For them, a slightly increased therapeutic dose of Ivermectin as single anti viral could be adequate. They can be on a short regular course, a week for example, and then have a prophylactic course as in the previous scenario. This will make them non spreaders in their family or close group work settings. The third category is those tested positive and with mild or severe symptoms, mostly respiratory ones. If they don’t take simple early treatments, some of them can get into the serious auto immune phase with most certainly emergency care. This is the kind of scenario that was common in 2020 and part 2022 every where. This category, especially those with severe symptom, will require not just therapeutic daily doses of ivermectin, but also a compliment of other URT medicines, for a quick, sure recovery. These medicines will include Azithromycin, Montelukast, Levocetrizine and the like, a compliment of antibiotics, anti histamines, anti tussives, anti inflammatories etc. One must recognise, the doctors treating patients in home care in particular, that these molecules are part anti virals because of their shared chemical structures which will put them in the category of cationic amphiphilic drugs (CADs) which is their key anti viral mechanism. The viral load at this stage is high, heading to its self limiting threshold. Any one of these as only single drug, including ivermectin can be inadequate. But in a combination, their individual anti viral heft gets pooled and this is adequate to stop further viral growth and reverse it back to low levels for recovery, mostly in home care. This clinical understanding is important. This is how later in 2021 ( the dangerous delta phase) and through 2022 and 2023 (Omiron phase), two thirds of humanity buried this virus. In India, the practised protocols included such combinations, sometimes without IVM also. I believe S. America’s protocols were IVM centric. The West ignored this basic clinical understanding, even after watching it work well in other continents, ignored early treatments and old school medicines, bet totally on m-RNA vaccines not being clear whether they were preventive or therapeutic and ended up in a mess. That is another story, told many times over by many people or many occasions. Now, this group is possibly the one on which the West conducted trials with normal therapeutic doses of only IVM, found to be inadequate, did not care to figure out why its performance was sub par, directly barred its use in Covid treatment. This is not the fault of the drug, but the emptiness of the brains that designed those trials. An opportunity to save a million lives with simple drugs and treatments was lost. Please note the basics behind a combination of drugs. They all work by different mechanisms, but on the pathology of this disease. They can pool in their anti viral properties. Whether they are primarily anti biotic or anti histamine or anti inflammatory, those roles are also needed to intervene in Covid, the disease. Now, the fourth category, tested positive, ignored all early treatments, could not ride their luck, became very sick and got into emergency care, mostly with choked lungs and breathing struggles. The most susceptible category. In the west perhaps, this category got only general emergency care, with no elements specific to the infection. That is because the general thinking there wax that there is no dedicated anti viral to this virus. A cancer patient in a sudden emergency care situation is also treated to mitigate temporarily his high cancer activity. I am sure the successful handling of this phase would have involved the compliment of medicinal categories mentioned earlier, including Ivermectin and plus steroids or other immune modulators like azathioprine etc. I have no direct idea, but I figure this out after listening to Dr. Shankara Chetty. His view is that this phase is hypersensitivity pneumonitis. According to him, Ivermectin here could help clearing the lungs ( of dead cell debris), from his long experience of handling filaria which could present such symptoms when severe. Possibly, this is another category of patients on which the official West conducted trials with therapeutic doses of Ivermectin ( only ivermectin) and reported no breakthrough performance. This must have been obvious then to those doctors like Dr. Pierre Kory with deeper clinical understanding of the disease and treatment options. I have a suggestion, which I have not heard or read before any where and Dr. Kory could clarify through these boxes. All those who fully recovered to normalcy from category 2, 3 and 4 that I described above, could receive a weekly small prophylactic dose of Ivermectin for a few weeks. This might clear all their lingering viral load traces and help them avoid any long Covid manifestations, which usually start appearing in those susceptible lot within weeks of recovery from the infection. This recourse, a long prophylactic dose of Ivermectin, can be considered by doctors and researchers on patients with suspected post vaccine conditions. Would be happy to see the views of doctors and active researchers from amongst you all. Thanks. For any 1 to 1 discussions for those interested, I am available only on e-mail which is : balakrishnan@gmail.com.
P.s. Ivermectin does not have a chemical structure feature which provides anti viral properties to the very large group of CADs ( Cationic Amphiphilic Drugs), a feature found in hundreds of common drugs from dozens of different indications. That is why I got a view in mid 2021, after looking at the chemical structures of some 700 known drug molecules, that over 70% of the drugs stocked in a large high street pharmacy could be anti virals. So in 2020 and in part 2021, we were walking past our pharmacy store without realising a wide array of safe, simple, cheap and effective Covid cure was lying there. And this was known in published research much before Covid. Ivermectin’s anti viral biology make up is different chemically,
I can see why big pharma try everything to smear Ivermectin. Ivermectin not only makes most of vaccines unnecessary but also treat so many health issues safely and economically. In a way they succeeded. So many people are brain washed about IVM they wouldn't touch it with a 10 foot pole. It's so sad. Just today a friend of my daughter's is suffering from extreme itchness, probably from delayed effects of Coved vaccine. I knew IVM will work but my daughter couldn't bring up and talk about IVM as if she is promoting illegal drug. It's a shame. Ivermectin can save so many people.
In the mean time, I try to have enough supply of my favorite generic IVM, Austro. My whole family, including my cat and plants get benefits from it.
Perhaps one of the attorneys you know, Dr. Kory, would be interested in setting up a class action lawsuit for us Covid Longhaulers. I'm spending a lot of money (that I don't have) on trying to get back to the healthy state of being I was before Covid infection. After all, this was a bioweapon deployed on us by Dr. Mengele...I mean--Fauci, so the government should bear the cost of our medical care from wonderful practitioners at the FLCCC (which is where I found my doctor). If the class action was started, FLCCC practitioners could notify their patients so we could join in. Thank you for EVERYTHING you do and have done, Dr. Kory.
Dang! You must just feel like you need to climb the highest mountain and shout this out! Over and over and over again - people need to read your book! The world has gone mad. God Bless you for being so long suffering and committed to the truth. We need more doctors like you and Paul and all the others at FLCCC. Wish I had a million dollars to give.
Good man Dr Kory. It’s obscene how they have treated people both Drs & patients. Covid is still killing in numbers & the vaccine has not preformed as they said it would. Aus still not under decent control.
One keeps reading over and over and over again about the exceeding safety of Ivermectin; but, of course, the mass-murderous medical establishment, which wants as many millions of people to be murdered by the "treatments" for "Covid", and by the "vaccines" that are being used to reduce the population of planet Earth by millions, if not billions of people (in the long run?), having already successfully done so for about twenty million people globally SO FAR. The numbers of dead from the "vaccines" continue to rise every day, with people dropping dead like flies, but the medical establishment can't have that truth emphasized in the mainstream, which lies to us constantly, and unendingly. They claim they care about "safety", but they clearly don't care how many people the "vaccines" murder.
As a result of the very encouraging safety profile for Ivermectin, I am more and more convinced that I need to take it, not for "Covid", but for parasitic infection(s), and its anti-cancer properties. [I believe I may have a roundworm infection, as I had what looked like one come out through a BM about twenty years ago, and my PCP then did nothing to address it (plus I didn't know about Ivermectin at that time), as well as a possible scabies infection from when I was homeless for sixteen months (my then incompetent PCP claimed that because my skin looks healthy, I can't still have scabies, but I have a nagging suspicion that I still have it; and I treated it several times with Permethrin cream and shampoo, yet I don't think it got rid of it)---I was infested through many bed bug bites from the homeless shelters, thank you very much!].
Anyway, I have a difficult time understanding and/or converting the recommended dosage, so would someone please let me know how many kilograms I am in weight as an approximately 210 pound male? And where can I purchase safe Ivermectin from a "Covid" truth and treatment website without having to purchase an, to me, expensive kit for over $200.00 (even with all the discounts, I couldn't get it lower than $225.00, which my Medicare and/or Medicaid wouldn't pay for---at most I could use it to lower my subsidized rent temporarily), from FLCCC with several other drugs included as well as a fancy nebulizer. (FLCCC doesn't seem to sell Ivermectin alone.) I could take the train up to see Dr. Ana, but I'm hoping that such may not be necessary, even though I may go just for the EDTA/Vitamin C infusions alone.
So, what is a safe, effective dose of Ivermectin for my body weight? Anyone? And where can I best get it with an online prescription? I do NOT want to use one of those India, etc., sites to obtain it. Please let me know. Thank you.
Also, has FLCCC made certain that they source their Ivermectin from a completely-reliable, truly-safe source, and/or have they tested it, or had it tested, for complete purity and safety?
Re: Remdesivir: The link to the WHO Report is not available. Try this one.
"One of the surprising results of this trial is that remdesivir showed little to no effect, as remdesivir is the only drug candidate within this trial currently approved for the treatment of COVID-19 and has shown positive data in previous trials. "
https://www.clinicaltrialsarena.com/marketdata/the-interim-results-of-the-solidarity-trial-failed-to-show-efficacy-of-repurposed-drugs-in-mortality-of-hospitalized-covid-19-patients/
OR perhaps hidden on the wayback machine
1) https://web.archive.org/web/20230527160034/https://www.who.int/news-room/feature-stories/detail/who-recommends-against-the-use-of-remdesivir-in-covid-19-patients
2) https://web.archive.org/web/20231026103512/https://iris.who.int/rest/bitstreams/1449314/retrieve
3) https://web.archive.org/web/20220812151351/https://apps.who.int/iris/rest/bitstreams/1449370/retrieve
Dr Kory - thank you for your excellent work and for going above and beyond to provide scientific evidence and accurate information to the public. I noted a couple of mistakes in your text above - "As per above table using data from the WHO’s Vigiaccess surveillance database as of today January 12, 2023: there have been 16 deaths attributed to ivermectin over a 30-year period, while there have been 11,056 deaths attributed to Remdesivir" Yet the table shows 26 deaths attributed to ivermectin, and 728 attributed to Remdesivir (the 11,056 number refers to adverse events attributed to Remdesivir). I'm sure these are accidents, but they should be corrected in the text.
I'm glad that you are coming to the defense of Dr. Hoffe. COVID has put a lot of people in a difficult position. Doctors can loss there license and job for going against the narrative. I lost my job for not going along with the narrative and getting the shot. In my case I chose to have the company terminate me so that I could file a discrimination suit for GINA violation. GINA says an employer can not ask for genetic information. If I'm successful in this defense then employers would not be able to mandate mRNA shots since they would not be able to ask for that information. To my knowledge this defense has not been used. I'm at the point that I need an expert witness who would be able to testify that the "vaccine" is gene therapy. I also have another argument that the "vaccine" is experimental and can not be mandated. Now I need to turn in my list of expert witnesses. I did not count on the fact that the doctors would face the same problem if they testify for me. If you know of someone who is retired or not in a position of losing a job and can testify that the "vaccine" is gene therapy and was not approved. If you know of someone in that position I would like to know. ewalton@engineer.com
I missed some relevant points on my long comments on Ivermectin yesterday. Examples reported on high doses of Ivermectin must be treated for what they are, just examples. If some got better with a single dose without suffering any side effects, it is clinically irrelevant. That is not any standard. All negative talking about Ivermectin is on inappropriately high doses or vetenary doses. The safe doses for humans have been known for long. That should be the norm, even while being used in Covid. All discussions about the use of Ivermectin for Covid should also be within those norms.
Sorry again. My mail id is : balakrishnan.moro@gmail.com
I would be pleased to exchange views with you at an individual level. I would particularly request researchers amongst you working on drug developments or any aspect of medicines to contact me for a fruitful exchange. Or if you know well anyone working on such research, you can link us. In my opinion, there is so much to be explored on repurposing of known drugs. It can be a massive work and a long haul, but can serve the needs of half the world population for cheap, affordable, safe and proven drugs for many diseases. I am 78, a PhD in organic chemistry, a long retired industrial R&D professional, is not working now, have not worked in drugs, but for some years now took to reading structural organic chemistry of drugs as a personal interest and got into some serious reading about Covid, this virus, treatments etc four years ago and wanting to pursue that activity in medicinal chemistry beyond this pandemic.
14 th line in my large message an hr ago, a small correction. Please read as “ ………….that was common in 2020 and part 2021”. It is not 2022. Thanks. Two other points. First, when people take small doses for preventive purposes, they need not carry any very small viral load or they can acquire one as they keep moving about. The next dose of Ivermectin should extinguish this in incipient load. Second is about the autoimmune phase and people in emergency care. Then the disease is about the body’s immune overdrive and not the virus infection directly. By then, the virus has reached its self limiting growth level, might even begin to go down. Yet, the virus still present could be triggering continuous auto immune activity. So the anti virals are still important there. That is how Remdisivir took some stage for a while. It was eventually found not useful and lost favour among the doctors. Control in that stage ( in hospitals) required control of excess immune activity, inflammation, excess histamine release etc in addition to reducing the present viral loads quickly. That is where the old school medicines with dual activity could score.
I have taken IVERMECTIN with good results and no side effects whatsoever. Thank you for the affirmation.
Brisbane Australia
The working of Ivermectin clinically has to be understood correctly. I am not a physician, but having read this Covid story closely for these four years, this is my understanding. I wrote it in an earlier part of this podcast and this could be for those subscribing here. For prophylactic use, say once a week or fortnight for some length of time, low doses are adequate. They are safe, non consequential otherwise and and by themselves can eliminate very low viral loads that could have accumulated in an individual. That level of viral load is also inconsequential as it is. Next is asymptomatic, tested positive individuals, with slightly elevated viral load build up. For them, a slightly increased therapeutic dose of Ivermectin as single anti viral could be adequate. They can be on a short regular course, a week for example, and then have a prophylactic course as in the previous scenario. This will make them non spreaders in their family or close group work settings. The third category is those tested positive and with mild or severe symptoms, mostly respiratory ones. If they don’t take simple early treatments, some of them can get into the serious auto immune phase with most certainly emergency care. This is the kind of scenario that was common in 2020 and part 2022 every where. This category, especially those with severe symptom, will require not just therapeutic daily doses of ivermectin, but also a compliment of other URT medicines, for a quick, sure recovery. These medicines will include Azithromycin, Montelukast, Levocetrizine and the like, a compliment of antibiotics, anti histamines, anti tussives, anti inflammatories etc. One must recognise, the doctors treating patients in home care in particular, that these molecules are part anti virals because of their shared chemical structures which will put them in the category of cationic amphiphilic drugs (CADs) which is their key anti viral mechanism. The viral load at this stage is high, heading to its self limiting threshold. Any one of these as only single drug, including ivermectin can be inadequate. But in a combination, their individual anti viral heft gets pooled and this is adequate to stop further viral growth and reverse it back to low levels for recovery, mostly in home care. This clinical understanding is important. This is how later in 2021 ( the dangerous delta phase) and through 2022 and 2023 (Omiron phase), two thirds of humanity buried this virus. In India, the practised protocols included such combinations, sometimes without IVM also. I believe S. America’s protocols were IVM centric. The West ignored this basic clinical understanding, even after watching it work well in other continents, ignored early treatments and old school medicines, bet totally on m-RNA vaccines not being clear whether they were preventive or therapeutic and ended up in a mess. That is another story, told many times over by many people or many occasions. Now, this group is possibly the one on which the West conducted trials with normal therapeutic doses of only IVM, found to be inadequate, did not care to figure out why its performance was sub par, directly barred its use in Covid treatment. This is not the fault of the drug, but the emptiness of the brains that designed those trials. An opportunity to save a million lives with simple drugs and treatments was lost. Please note the basics behind a combination of drugs. They all work by different mechanisms, but on the pathology of this disease. They can pool in their anti viral properties. Whether they are primarily anti biotic or anti histamine or anti inflammatory, those roles are also needed to intervene in Covid, the disease. Now, the fourth category, tested positive, ignored all early treatments, could not ride their luck, became very sick and got into emergency care, mostly with choked lungs and breathing struggles. The most susceptible category. In the west perhaps, this category got only general emergency care, with no elements specific to the infection. That is because the general thinking there wax that there is no dedicated anti viral to this virus. A cancer patient in a sudden emergency care situation is also treated to mitigate temporarily his high cancer activity. I am sure the successful handling of this phase would have involved the compliment of medicinal categories mentioned earlier, including Ivermectin and plus steroids or other immune modulators like azathioprine etc. I have no direct idea, but I figure this out after listening to Dr. Shankara Chetty. His view is that this phase is hypersensitivity pneumonitis. According to him, Ivermectin here could help clearing the lungs ( of dead cell debris), from his long experience of handling filaria which could present such symptoms when severe. Possibly, this is another category of patients on which the official West conducted trials with therapeutic doses of Ivermectin ( only ivermectin) and reported no breakthrough performance. This must have been obvious then to those doctors like Dr. Pierre Kory with deeper clinical understanding of the disease and treatment options. I have a suggestion, which I have not heard or read before any where and Dr. Kory could clarify through these boxes. All those who fully recovered to normalcy from category 2, 3 and 4 that I described above, could receive a weekly small prophylactic dose of Ivermectin for a few weeks. This might clear all their lingering viral load traces and help them avoid any long Covid manifestations, which usually start appearing in those susceptible lot within weeks of recovery from the infection. This recourse, a long prophylactic dose of Ivermectin, can be considered by doctors and researchers on patients with suspected post vaccine conditions. Would be happy to see the views of doctors and active researchers from amongst you all. Thanks. For any 1 to 1 discussions for those interested, I am available only on e-mail which is : balakrishnan@gmail.com.
P.s. Ivermectin does not have a chemical structure feature which provides anti viral properties to the very large group of CADs ( Cationic Amphiphilic Drugs), a feature found in hundreds of common drugs from dozens of different indications. That is why I got a view in mid 2021, after looking at the chemical structures of some 700 known drug molecules, that over 70% of the drugs stocked in a large high street pharmacy could be anti virals. So in 2020 and in part 2021, we were walking past our pharmacy store without realising a wide array of safe, simple, cheap and effective Covid cure was lying there. And this was known in published research much before Covid. Ivermectin’s anti viral biology make up is different chemically,
.
I can see why big pharma try everything to smear Ivermectin. Ivermectin not only makes most of vaccines unnecessary but also treat so many health issues safely and economically. In a way they succeeded. So many people are brain washed about IVM they wouldn't touch it with a 10 foot pole. It's so sad. Just today a friend of my daughter's is suffering from extreme itchness, probably from delayed effects of Coved vaccine. I knew IVM will work but my daughter couldn't bring up and talk about IVM as if she is promoting illegal drug. It's a shame. Ivermectin can save so many people.
In the mean time, I try to have enough supply of my favorite generic IVM, Austro. My whole family, including my cat and plants get benefits from it.
Perhaps one of the attorneys you know, Dr. Kory, would be interested in setting up a class action lawsuit for us Covid Longhaulers. I'm spending a lot of money (that I don't have) on trying to get back to the healthy state of being I was before Covid infection. After all, this was a bioweapon deployed on us by Dr. Mengele...I mean--Fauci, so the government should bear the cost of our medical care from wonderful practitioners at the FLCCC (which is where I found my doctor). If the class action was started, FLCCC practitioners could notify their patients so we could join in. Thank you for EVERYTHING you do and have done, Dr. Kory.
Dang! You must just feel like you need to climb the highest mountain and shout this out! Over and over and over again - people need to read your book! The world has gone mad. God Bless you for being so long suffering and committed to the truth. We need more doctors like you and Paul and all the others at FLCCC. Wish I had a million dollars to give.
Good man Dr Kory. It’s obscene how they have treated people both Drs & patients. Covid is still killing in numbers & the vaccine has not preformed as they said it would. Aus still not under decent control.
One keeps reading over and over and over again about the exceeding safety of Ivermectin; but, of course, the mass-murderous medical establishment, which wants as many millions of people to be murdered by the "treatments" for "Covid", and by the "vaccines" that are being used to reduce the population of planet Earth by millions, if not billions of people (in the long run?), having already successfully done so for about twenty million people globally SO FAR. The numbers of dead from the "vaccines" continue to rise every day, with people dropping dead like flies, but the medical establishment can't have that truth emphasized in the mainstream, which lies to us constantly, and unendingly. They claim they care about "safety", but they clearly don't care how many people the "vaccines" murder.
As a result of the very encouraging safety profile for Ivermectin, I am more and more convinced that I need to take it, not for "Covid", but for parasitic infection(s), and its anti-cancer properties. [I believe I may have a roundworm infection, as I had what looked like one come out through a BM about twenty years ago, and my PCP then did nothing to address it (plus I didn't know about Ivermectin at that time), as well as a possible scabies infection from when I was homeless for sixteen months (my then incompetent PCP claimed that because my skin looks healthy, I can't still have scabies, but I have a nagging suspicion that I still have it; and I treated it several times with Permethrin cream and shampoo, yet I don't think it got rid of it)---I was infested through many bed bug bites from the homeless shelters, thank you very much!].
Anyway, I have a difficult time understanding and/or converting the recommended dosage, so would someone please let me know how many kilograms I am in weight as an approximately 210 pound male? And where can I purchase safe Ivermectin from a "Covid" truth and treatment website without having to purchase an, to me, expensive kit for over $200.00 (even with all the discounts, I couldn't get it lower than $225.00, which my Medicare and/or Medicaid wouldn't pay for---at most I could use it to lower my subsidized rent temporarily), from FLCCC with several other drugs included as well as a fancy nebulizer. (FLCCC doesn't seem to sell Ivermectin alone.) I could take the train up to see Dr. Ana, but I'm hoping that such may not be necessary, even though I may go just for the EDTA/Vitamin C infusions alone.
So, what is a safe, effective dose of Ivermectin for my body weight? Anyone? And where can I best get it with an online prescription? I do NOT want to use one of those India, etc., sites to obtain it. Please let me know. Thank you.
Also, has FLCCC made certain that they source their Ivermectin from a completely-reliable, truly-safe source, and/or have they tested it, or had it tested, for complete purity and safety?
May your evidence (finally) prevail over current political winds! Thank you, Dr Kory!
Bravo, Dr. Kory.
Rebel News did a great interview with Dr. Hoffe early on, I highly recommend it.