2 Comments

Thank you, Dr Kory, for all you do. It boggles the mind there are still those that defend it, despite all this data. For those on the wrong side of history, I’m convinced it is a matter of pride (like my pulmonologist family member, on the 6th …or maybe 7th dose..?), a handsome pay-check, or …they’re from Ottawa, Canada.

Forgive me if you have talked about this elsewhere, but are there recommendations/ suggestions or any discussion (by you or like-minded others) with regards to necessary blood transfusions? Is it reasonable to be somewhat concerned about being on the receiving end of one nowadays?

Thank you kindly.

Expand full comment

Hi Dr. Kory, proud owner of your book.

I took the "Hannnibal Lecter" approach, consentrating on the first cases of "serial killer", when mistakes were made:

- vaers: 50 000 reports for the first 5 weeks, ie the norm year amount but with ca 60% of interventions, in first month! Surprice staff increase >1000's for classification.

- pfizer first 10 weeks: 42000 reports internationally, most serious. Surprising staff need 1800 until summer.

- time frame dec 2020 and on for the above.

- west Australia: 25 to 50 fold increase in adverse claims after rollout 2021, >60% severe with hospital admissions. No background covid as a confounder!

I think I saw a pfsignal...

What is actually required for a signal to fda/cdc, to be acted upon or just studied? The above is a huge change. Their only problem seems to be number of accountants.

JR

Expand full comment