Bringing Dead Soil Back to Life—with a Breakthrough 20 Years in the Making
A photographic record of how a 1/2 acre of "dead" soil responded to Shimanishi’s mineral extract, and why the implications may extend far beyond agriculture (plus the Aurmina/Primora Bio Spring Sale).
As my readers know, I have spent months writing two books totaling more than 150,000 words, trying to understand why Shimanishi spent 20 years working alone to extract minerals from black mica rock, and what the true significance of that achievement might be.
The field trial I will show you below is one of the reasons I kept going.
What you’re about to see did not begin in fertile soil. It began in what can only be described as near-dead ground in Temecula, California—dry, sandy, lifeless land that lies outside even the marginal conditions under which the region’s vineyards can survive. No legacy fertility waiting to be unlocked. Just the near absence of life.
What is critical to understand is this: aside from water treated with Shimanishi’s extract, almost no conventional agricultural inputs were used.
No herbicides.
No pesticides.
No biologics.
No biostimulants.
No soil amendments.
Barely any fertilizer.
The soil was heavily irrigated 1–2 weeks before planting. Seeds went in. Once they emerged, the plants were supported with simple weekly “foliar” applications—fine misting of the plant leaves with Themarox-treated water. Mid-season, a single fish hydrolysate was applied, according to the farmers, “to enhance taste.”
That was the entire system. What followed is the reason I believe this work matters. You will see the beginning - bare, pale, structureless soil. And then you will see what it became:
Vibrant color. Density. Structure. Yield. Not forced. Not inflated. Organized.
Little pest pressure. No meaningful disease. Minimal hand weeding.
A single control row of cucumbers was planted under identical conditions, except that both irrigation and foliar spraying used untreated water. That row tells its own story: dull color, curled leaves, fungal pressure, visible stress. It looks like what we’ve come to accept as normal.
The rest of the field does not.
People came from around the area to see it, because the difference was not subtle. It was immediate, physical, and difficult to explain using the usual language of inputs and outputs. I have written thousands of words trying to describe the mechanism behind this.
But at some point, the words have to give way to something else. This is that moment. This is what it looks like when the system begins to organize again.
This field trial was conducted in Temecula, California, by the amazing regenerative farmers Patrick Raskin (Volcanna Rain) and Ryan Schumacher (Baker Creek Heirloom Seed Company).
Pre-planting irrigation: added a Themarox diluted solution equivalent to 12ml of Primora Bio per gallon of water (formulation used was Rascon’s Volcanna Rain), and the soil was irrigated with 100 gallons per 1/8 of an acre - 400 gallons total to the soil. (*Note that the amount of water applied was a special use case; water volume for typical every 5 year soil spray with Primora Bio requires far less water. )
Irrigation was applied 1-2 weeks before seed planting.
Weeds are not simply a sign of low minerals; they are a response to imbalance. When soil mineral availability and biological function improve, crops tend to become more competitive, and weed pressure often declines. As those conditions are restored, the advantage shifts away from opportunistic growth and back toward organized plant systems.
What you just witnessed departs from the long-standing practice of layering multiple inputs to “supercharge” yield and quality. Instead, it represents something more unusual, a novel agricultural intervention which operates upstream of all of that.
It was not the result of a better fertilizer program or a more refined protocol; it was a change in the medium itself. It is what happens when a cosmotropic aqueous solution is introduced into an agricultural system.
Cosmotropes, Chaotropes, and Hofmeister Chemistry
What does cosmotropic mean?
All water contains dissolved minerals, and the composition of the minerals determines the biological and chemical properties of the water.
For over a century, water chemists have recognized that different ions influence water in fundamentally different ways: some stabilize and organize it, while others disrupt it. This distinction was borne of the work of Franz Hofmeister, a 19th-century Austrian scientist who discovered that different ions influence protein behavior and water structure in systematic ways. His work led to the Hofmeister series, a foundational framework in chemistry and biology describing how ions stabilize or disrupt molecular organization in aqueous systems.
Hofmeister classified ions according to these effects as either cosmotropic or chaotropic.
Primora Bio is built around a rare combination of highly cosmotropic ions and minerals that promote more stable hydration, more ordered interactions, and more controlled electrochemical behavior in water.
In biology, this matters. Water with a more cosmotropic influence affects how proteins fold, how enzymes function, and how membranes maintain energy gradients. Ultimately, every biochemical and cellular process in nature is occurs through and is influenced by water.
When the ionic environment supports stability, these systems operate efficiently. When it does not, they become less reliable and harder to regulate.
This is where we move from simple theory to foundational chemistry.
In my upcoming book, From Volcanoes to Vitality, I trace the role of water and minerals across agriculture, hydrology, and biology, beginning from the earliest cellular life on Earth, to the modern era, where their role has begun to shift.
In Chapter 38, alongside my colleague and mineral expert Matt Bakos, we present a framework we call the Geohydrological Shift Theory.
It begins with a set of signals already visible in the agricultural literature. An excerpt:
Large-scale analyses of global agriculture have documented a growing pattern of yield stagnation across major cropping systems, with between 24% and 39% of production areas showing little to no yield increase despite continued input intensification (Ray et al., 2012). Even in highly optimized systems, yield gains are approaching biophysical ceilings (Grassini et al., 2013). At the same time, fertilizer inputs—particularly nitrogen—have risen dramatically without proportional yield benefits, indicating declining efficiency (Zhang et al., 2015). Taken together, these findings suggest a transition from increasing returns to diminishing returns and rising input dependence.
Our hypothesis is that the root cause is geohydrological.
Specifically:
Groundwater systems are undergoing widespread chemical change, driven by intensive use, land practices, and hydrological disruption. These changes are now documented globally and are closely linked to declining groundwater levels and altered recharge dynamics.
Key mechanisms include:
Over-pumping / drawdown
declining water tables
seawater intrusion
upconing of saline groundwater
altered mixing and residence times
redox shifts
Agricultural inputs and irrigation
nitrate contamination
rising salinity and major ions
mineral transformations (e.g., pyrite oxidation → sulfate + iron oxides)
Seawater intrusion and ion exchange
Na⁺ ↔ Ca²⁺ / Mg²⁺ exchange
altered ionic balance and trace element mobility
Recharge alteration (MAR, wastewater)
changes in oxygen and carbon
redox-driven mobilization or precipitation of metals
Desalination / RO systems
altered delivered water chemistry
reduced mineral content requiring blending and remineralization
As a result, the modern disturbance to Earth’s water sources is twofold.
First, we are degrading aquifers and source waters themselves through heavy metals from mining, nitrate seepage from industrial fertilizers, salinization, and the widespread disruption of soil–water systems.
Second, once water is extracted, we strip it again through water treatment and purification systems optimized for sterility, pipe stability, and liability protection rather than biological legibility.
In effect, we disturb modern water twice. For more than a century, first slowly and now more rapidly, we have altered it underground, and then systematically deconditioned it again aboveground. This is why the theory is best named geohydrological rather than merely biochemical, as the impacts on the former precede the latter.
At its simplest, our collective insight is that the world’s water is increasingly chaotropic, and that this shift is impacting biology across kingdoms—first in agriculture, then in microbes, animals, and humans.
Why is this relevant to the field trial? It represents one piece of evidence supporting this theory. If chaotropic water is contributing to stagnating yields, declining gains, and, in some regions, agronomists are beginning to report literal decreases in yield despite increasing inputs and interventions, then the solution may lie in returning water toward a more cosmotropic balance.
We believe that Themarox can return water toward such a Pre-Anthropogenic state, described in antiquity as “Living water” or “Vital water.” Before the Industrial Revolution, living systems were bathed in waters that had undergone prolonged geological conditioning through slow contact with mineral surfaces, ion exchange, and redox-buffered environments, emerging not as chemically blank or disordered fluid but as geochemically conditioned water, i.e. Nature’s water.
In hydrogeologic terms, groundwater chemistry was shaped by recharge composition, residence time, water–rock interaction, and biogeochemical redox cycling. That is standard science. The implications, however, have not been followed far enough.
Put plainly, we believe that “living water” was, in more modern water chemistry terms, cosmotropic water. And if the root cause lies upstream, where chemistry and biology are being degraded, then the solution must be directed there as well.
It is fair to exercise skepticism if you think this theory rests solely on a row of cucumbers treated with chaotropic groundwater compared to produce treated with cosmotropic water.
However, that view ignores the broader signal. Note that the trial began in dead soil, and, relying on cosmotropic water as the sole agricultural input, it produced a system with minimal pest, weed, and disease pressure, reducing the need for pesticides and herbicides and requiring almost no fertilizer.
Skeptical or not, I am used to colleagues accusing me of “too-rapid adoption” when making recommendations for or treating patients with therapies based on what they viewed as “insufficient evidence.” That has followed me throughout my career, well before the “War on Ivermectin.”
To date, I know of not one of those “early calls” that were later proven incorrect when the totality of the data that followed is viewed objectively. However, it is always possible that this will be the first; every streak ends eventually. If so, I will have to accept that I may have prematurely gone “all in” on investing in the Asao Group's mission to bring Shimanishi’s discovery to the world.
But even there, we are seeing signals. To wit, we sold our first bottle of Aurmina on October 1, 2025.
Two months later, our repeat-customer rate was 11%, unsurprising for a product designed to last for months. But then, over the last 90 days, much to our astonishment, that number has reached 66%.
In most early-stage consumer products, strong repeat rates average about 30% and rarely exceed 50%.
There is something happening. And whatever it is, it does not behave like a typical product signal, it behaves like a system response.
So maybe it is not too premature to suggest Themarox as a possible response to what appears to be a worsening trajectory in the degradation of water systems. The reason I say that is because this field trial is the first time I have seen a reversal of that magnitude that does not rely on force. And that kind of reversal matters more than any individual result. But the individual results are already there, as can be seen in my recent summary of the growing evidence base for Themarox’s impacts on the largest and most diverse number of agricultural outcomes associated with a single input in history.
Because if the above can be seen in soil that had effectively nothing to give, then the implications are not local. They are systemic. They point to something we have misunderstood and may still be able to correct.
That is why I have spent these many months writing and researching. That is why I kept going, because once you see this, it becomes very difficult to ignore the possibility that we are not dealing with a problem of inputs, but a problem of conditions.
And if that’s true, then the solution has been hiding in plain sight.
For those of you who have been following this work, and for those seeing it for the first time, we’re launching Primora Bio today while also kicking off our Spring World Water Day sale.
But for now, sit with what you’ve seen here.
Because this is where the story stops being theoretical—
and starts becoming something you can actually use.
*If you value the late nights and deep dives into all the “rabbit holes” I write about (or the Op-Eds and lectures I generate for the public), your support is greatly appreciated.
World Water Day Sale - Discount Code: Springsale26
Sale: 25% off all single bottles of Aurmina or Primora Bio, with separate, already-included bundle discounts ranging from 25% to 30% on multi-bottle and combination bundles.
UK, European Customers: Our first UK distributor, Nicholas Smith at The Water Dr., is offering a 10% discount until the end of the month, with coupon code KORYUK10. Much larger savings will be made by reducing shipping costs and customs charges, given his 1-bottle fixed-price delivery of £5 for the UK and £15 for the EU (standard tracked and insured).
Regenerative Farming Starter Kit: For readers looking forward to kickstarting thier best summer garden ever, spring planting is around the corner and I am most excited about our “Regenerative Farming Starter Kit” which includes Primora Bio (cosmotropic water concentrate), Primora Char, (high-grade liquid biochar) and Primora Nourish (liquid fish hydrolysate fertilizer).
*I have not written about the wonders of biochar or fish hydrolysate but will soon.
From Research to Practice - Links Below Images
