The portion referencing water storage in mantle minerals seems to bolster the idea of "primary water". Primary water is essentially an ocean fresh water under our feet. Check out Primary Water Institute.org. But my guess is you are already aware of it. Looking forward to reading your books. Thanks Dr. PK.
"Sulfur becomes most geochemically productive within iron-rich systems, where iron-bearing minerals stabilize and organize sulfur’s reactivity. In these contexts, iron and sulfur couple tightly, enabling sustained electron exchange through proton-coupled redox reactions expressed at water–mineral interfaces. This coupling forms the energetic core of the ISAW system and underlies both ancient geochemical energy regimes and modern biological metabolism." So that's why S is so effective in UTI's.
Pierre, thanks for the dance. It’s more like poetry to me being a retired exploration geologist. I used daily the presence of plagioclase or orthoclase in a granite batholith to help me define the potentials for finding important metals. You have said it so eloquently. These are foundational clues. There have been some great geophysical tools used in the field to detect ore bodies lying underfoot. Think capacitors. Sorry to bother the non lovers in your audience. I have been following your words since you first chose to raise your head. It brings to mind a cartoon of a couple of deer wandering on the edge of a forest, One says, “bummer of a birthmark Hal”, referring to a bullseye growing prominently on his side. Your enquiring mind is important to me. You are a strait shooter. I hope we bump into each other someday? Health, strength & love to you. Steve
Steven, the knowledge contained in these posts are from words on paper (or pixels on screen), know how much I appreciate hearing from someone much more steeped in the field that i have not run off course... Fascinating stuff, and this is only the beginning... I too wish we could bump into one another one day.. (love the birthmark joke, so funny)
Pierre, Sundays gathering was amazing but I left with my tank on empty. Long night and day but I am back. Throughout the night and following day I thought about your exciting revelations and my comment about some geophysical instruments. One we called a VLF Machine…a portable radio sized receiver that picked up signals pulsed through the earth, (not atmospheric) They were used for communicating with subs. You tuned into the signals by choosing a station that was close directionally to the strike of the bedrock. I remember choosing Seattle. Walking on a cut grid through the terrain we would take a reading of field strength, direction and a + or - polarity. Based on replicating the procedure. hundreds of times eventually brought about a picture of a rock battery. To cut to the chase the sub signal was absorbed by the ore body and threw off a secondary field strength signal. I fantasied it could hold no more and burped to regain equilibrium? Your redox battery? I am committed now or should be as I pursue all of your work back to the bones or possibly stones. Many regards …Steve
Could you explain how these essential minerals apply to human need for these elements? I've heard that many people ingest too much iron in their diets which disturbs the assimilation of other nutrients--unscientifically speaking. Also, there is much research on injected compared to ingested aluminum in vaccines and the harmful effects of injected aluminum that reaches toxic levels exponentially more quickly.--unscientifically speaking. Is this report related to ingested minerals in the human diet? Maybe I'm misunderstanding the focus of your research.
Aluminum is present in everything we eat as it is ubiquitous in the Earth's crust. Tiny amounts are absorbed and then excreted. Injecting it directly into the body is not what Nature intended for aluminum. As far as iron, oh boy, here we go. Lets separate three different things that are often conflated: iron intake, iron absorption, and “free” iron in the body.
First, the body regulates iron absorption very tightly. Unlike many nutrients, humans have almost no active mechanism for excreting excess iron, so regulation occurs primarily at the level of intestinal absorption. The key regulator is the hormone hepcidin, produced by the liver.
When iron stores are adequate or high, hepcidin levels rise and essentially “close the gate” on iron absorption by degrading the iron transporter ferroportin in intestinal cells. When iron stores are low, hepcidin falls and absorption increases. Because of this system, the body typically absorbs only a small fraction of the iron that is consumed, and the percentage absorbed decreases as body iron stores increase.
For context, the typical daily dietary intake of iron in many Western diets is often 10–20 mg per day, sometimes more, yet most people maintain relatively stable iron levels because absorption adjusts according to need.
The second issue is the distinction between bound iron and “free” iron, which is an important concept in biology.
In healthy physiology, iron almost never exists as free, unbound metal ions in circulation. Free iron can catalyze damaging oxidative reactions (the classic Fenton reaction, which generates reactive oxygen species), so the body keeps iron tightly controlled. Nearly all iron in the body is bound to proteins such as:
• Transferrin in the bloodstream (transport)
• Ferritin for storage
• Hemoglobin and myoglobin for oxygen transport
• Various iron–sulfur enzymes in mitochondria
Because iron is normally protein-bound, the concentration of truly “free” or labile iron in the bloodstream is extremely low.
Toxicity occurs when this regulatory system becomes overwhelmed — for example in severe iron poisoning, repeated large supplemental doses, or genetic conditions such as hereditary hemochromatosis where absorption remains abnormally high. In those situations transferrin becomes saturated and non–transferrin-bound iron can appear, which is where oxidative damage becomes possible.
Under normal physiological conditions, however, the combination of intestinal regulation (via hepcidin) and protein binding of iron in the bloodstream prevents the accumulation of damaging free iron.
So the short answer to your observation is likely this:
• The body regulates how much iron is absorbed through the hepcidin–ferroportin system.
• Only a fraction of ingested iron is absorbed when stores are adequate.
• Once absorbed, iron is almost immediately bound to proteins, keeping free iron concentrations extremely low.
That combination is why modest amounts of dietary iron, even when consumed daily, do not automatically lead to iron overload in most people.
Here's is, almost like aluinum, the "demonization" of iron is silly - although yes, free iron is bad for the body, free iron has little to do with intake and everything to do with the person's health:, the most common causes of increased free iron are:
• chronic inflammation
• metabolic syndrome / insulin resistance
• fatty liver disease
• copper deficiency
• massive transfusions
• genetic iron disorders
• severe hemolysis
Free iron is not a cause of anything; it is a consequence - iron intake is NOT the villain!!! It is a marker of illness, and maybe a potentiator of damage, but the way to solve it is to control the dysregulated processes that cause it in the first place
To this layman, your ideas of the origin of life seem very similar to those of Nick Lane in The Vital Question. He argues that undersea hydrothermal vents would have supplied a constant flow of heat energy and fresh minerals which would self organise to produce proto-life systems. I am looking forward to reading your books to contrast your ideas.
Absolutely. Lane's work is foundational to this one... But, as you will see in the next post, I extend his 9and other insights. A key aspect I want those who are closely reading, which has never been put forth before 9to the best of my knowl3edge), is that the same iron-sulfur-water chemistry that is within rick, emerges from rock, is within biology, also serves to put it back into compressed rock (biotite), and then most importantly, sulfur in rain then "weathers" that rock into vermiculilte, minerals are released into water, beginning the cycle anew...
"the fundamental energy unit of life, electrostatic potential created by separated charges." I have been pushing this idea for years, both in biology and astrophysics. So happy to see someone with a MUCH larger reach than me bring out the same.
So cool... I sort of understood it, kinda, sorta, etc... But as I started digging deeper into mineral chemistry, asking question after question, I finally understood its foundational role in life, I too was transformed. Cool stuff. Thanks Michael, we are kindred spirits
Gods creation is awesome. The more we discover about the fine details of life the more we realize His wisdom and design in creation is omniscient …. HE IS The great I AM.
This document outlines a strategic vision to modernize and apply **Nikola Tesla’s advanced theories** on wireless power and universal resonance. It argues that the **Wardenclyffe Protocol** and the **3-6-9 mathematical framework** are not mystical concepts but rather blueprints for **decoupling energy from physical infrastructure**. By treating the Earth and its ionosphere as a **natural capacitor**, the text proposes a system where electricity is broadcast globally to tuned receivers. The author suggests using **natural gas surpluses** to power these atmospheric broadcasts, providing remote regions with **energy sovereignty** and making traditional power grids obsolete. Ultimately, the source frames these innovations as a shift from fragile, visible systems to a **foundation of harmonic resonance** and directed energy.
Oh boy. My next rabbit hole? I swear, Tesla has occupied my thoughts not only during the research of this book, but before, and I have literally made a mental note to find time and space to dig deeper, but haven't to date. I like what you wrote - cogent, understandable
The portion referencing water storage in mantle minerals seems to bolster the idea of "primary water". Primary water is essentially an ocean fresh water under our feet. Check out Primary Water Institute.org. But my guess is you are already aware of it. Looking forward to reading your books. Thanks Dr. PK.
Part-2 of, Blueprint, Volcano's or something else?
Also, will there be a part-3?
Is there a way to order both books (Volcanoes + Blueprint) and have them shipped together?
hmm. doubt that would work in a practical sense, publication dates are widening apart...
"Sulfur becomes most geochemically productive within iron-rich systems, where iron-bearing minerals stabilize and organize sulfur’s reactivity. In these contexts, iron and sulfur couple tightly, enabling sustained electron exchange through proton-coupled redox reactions expressed at water–mineral interfaces. This coupling forms the energetic core of the ISAW system and underlies both ancient geochemical energy regimes and modern biological metabolism." So that's why S is so effective in UTI's.
Pierre, thanks for the dance. It’s more like poetry to me being a retired exploration geologist. I used daily the presence of plagioclase or orthoclase in a granite batholith to help me define the potentials for finding important metals. You have said it so eloquently. These are foundational clues. There have been some great geophysical tools used in the field to detect ore bodies lying underfoot. Think capacitors. Sorry to bother the non lovers in your audience. I have been following your words since you first chose to raise your head. It brings to mind a cartoon of a couple of deer wandering on the edge of a forest, One says, “bummer of a birthmark Hal”, referring to a bullseye growing prominently on his side. Your enquiring mind is important to me. You are a strait shooter. I hope we bump into each other someday? Health, strength & love to you. Steve
Steven, the knowledge contained in these posts are from words on paper (or pixels on screen), know how much I appreciate hearing from someone much more steeped in the field that i have not run off course... Fascinating stuff, and this is only the beginning... I too wish we could bump into one another one day.. (love the birthmark joke, so funny)
Pierre, Sundays gathering was amazing but I left with my tank on empty. Long night and day but I am back. Throughout the night and following day I thought about your exciting revelations and my comment about some geophysical instruments. One we called a VLF Machine…a portable radio sized receiver that picked up signals pulsed through the earth, (not atmospheric) They were used for communicating with subs. You tuned into the signals by choosing a station that was close directionally to the strike of the bedrock. I remember choosing Seattle. Walking on a cut grid through the terrain we would take a reading of field strength, direction and a + or - polarity. Based on replicating the procedure. hundreds of times eventually brought about a picture of a rock battery. To cut to the chase the sub signal was absorbed by the ore body and threw off a secondary field strength signal. I fantasied it could hold no more and burped to regain equilibrium? Your redox battery? I am committed now or should be as I pursue all of your work back to the bones or possibly stones. Many regards …Steve
Could you explain how these essential minerals apply to human need for these elements? I've heard that many people ingest too much iron in their diets which disturbs the assimilation of other nutrients--unscientifically speaking. Also, there is much research on injected compared to ingested aluminum in vaccines and the harmful effects of injected aluminum that reaches toxic levels exponentially more quickly.--unscientifically speaking. Is this report related to ingested minerals in the human diet? Maybe I'm misunderstanding the focus of your research.
Aluminum is present in everything we eat as it is ubiquitous in the Earth's crust. Tiny amounts are absorbed and then excreted. Injecting it directly into the body is not what Nature intended for aluminum. As far as iron, oh boy, here we go. Lets separate three different things that are often conflated: iron intake, iron absorption, and “free” iron in the body.
First, the body regulates iron absorption very tightly. Unlike many nutrients, humans have almost no active mechanism for excreting excess iron, so regulation occurs primarily at the level of intestinal absorption. The key regulator is the hormone hepcidin, produced by the liver.
When iron stores are adequate or high, hepcidin levels rise and essentially “close the gate” on iron absorption by degrading the iron transporter ferroportin in intestinal cells. When iron stores are low, hepcidin falls and absorption increases. Because of this system, the body typically absorbs only a small fraction of the iron that is consumed, and the percentage absorbed decreases as body iron stores increase.
For context, the typical daily dietary intake of iron in many Western diets is often 10–20 mg per day, sometimes more, yet most people maintain relatively stable iron levels because absorption adjusts according to need.
The second issue is the distinction between bound iron and “free” iron, which is an important concept in biology.
In healthy physiology, iron almost never exists as free, unbound metal ions in circulation. Free iron can catalyze damaging oxidative reactions (the classic Fenton reaction, which generates reactive oxygen species), so the body keeps iron tightly controlled. Nearly all iron in the body is bound to proteins such as:
• Transferrin in the bloodstream (transport)
• Ferritin for storage
• Hemoglobin and myoglobin for oxygen transport
• Various iron–sulfur enzymes in mitochondria
Because iron is normally protein-bound, the concentration of truly “free” or labile iron in the bloodstream is extremely low.
Toxicity occurs when this regulatory system becomes overwhelmed — for example in severe iron poisoning, repeated large supplemental doses, or genetic conditions such as hereditary hemochromatosis where absorption remains abnormally high. In those situations transferrin becomes saturated and non–transferrin-bound iron can appear, which is where oxidative damage becomes possible.
Under normal physiological conditions, however, the combination of intestinal regulation (via hepcidin) and protein binding of iron in the bloodstream prevents the accumulation of damaging free iron.
So the short answer to your observation is likely this:
• The body regulates how much iron is absorbed through the hepcidin–ferroportin system.
• Only a fraction of ingested iron is absorbed when stores are adequate.
• Once absorbed, iron is almost immediately bound to proteins, keeping free iron concentrations extremely low.
That combination is why modest amounts of dietary iron, even when consumed daily, do not automatically lead to iron overload in most people.
Here's is, almost like aluinum, the "demonization" of iron is silly - although yes, free iron is bad for the body, free iron has little to do with intake and everything to do with the person's health:, the most common causes of increased free iron are:
• chronic inflammation
• metabolic syndrome / insulin resistance
• fatty liver disease
• copper deficiency
• massive transfusions
• genetic iron disorders
• severe hemolysis
Free iron is not a cause of anything; it is a consequence - iron intake is NOT the villain!!! It is a marker of illness, and maybe a potentiator of damage, but the way to solve it is to control the dysregulated processes that cause it in the first place
To this layman, your ideas of the origin of life seem very similar to those of Nick Lane in The Vital Question. He argues that undersea hydrothermal vents would have supplied a constant flow of heat energy and fresh minerals which would self organise to produce proto-life systems. I am looking forward to reading your books to contrast your ideas.
Absolutely. Lane's work is foundational to this one... But, as you will see in the next post, I extend his 9and other insights. A key aspect I want those who are closely reading, which has never been put forth before 9to the best of my knowl3edge), is that the same iron-sulfur-water chemistry that is within rick, emerges from rock, is within biology, also serves to put it back into compressed rock (biotite), and then most importantly, sulfur in rain then "weathers" that rock into vermiculilte, minerals are released into water, beginning the cycle anew...
"the fundamental energy unit of life, electrostatic potential created by separated charges." I have been pushing this idea for years, both in biology and astrophysics. So happy to see someone with a MUCH larger reach than me bring out the same.
So cool... I sort of understood it, kinda, sorta, etc... But as I started digging deeper into mineral chemistry, asking question after question, I finally understood its foundational role in life, I too was transformed. Cool stuff. Thanks Michael, we are kindred spirits
Gods creation is awesome. The more we discover about the fine details of life the more we realize His wisdom and design in creation is omniscient …. HE IS The great I AM.
Lisa Osgood - AMEN and HALLELUJAH!
100%
This document outlines a strategic vision to modernize and apply **Nikola Tesla’s advanced theories** on wireless power and universal resonance. It argues that the **Wardenclyffe Protocol** and the **3-6-9 mathematical framework** are not mystical concepts but rather blueprints for **decoupling energy from physical infrastructure**. By treating the Earth and its ionosphere as a **natural capacitor**, the text proposes a system where electricity is broadcast globally to tuned receivers. The author suggests using **natural gas surpluses** to power these atmospheric broadcasts, providing remote regions with **energy sovereignty** and making traditional power grids obsolete. Ultimately, the source frames these innovations as a shift from fragile, visible systems to a **foundation of harmonic resonance** and directed energy.
Oh boy. My next rabbit hole? I swear, Tesla has occupied my thoughts not only during the research of this book, but before, and I have literally made a mental note to find time and space to dig deeper, but haven't to date. I like what you wrote - cogent, understandable