Discussion about this post

User's avatar
HiggsBosonSlut's avatar

Amazing how your 7 yr old might be directed to start hormone transitioning (behind the parents' backs), but ask for a proven anti-viral in case of viral infection and you're Charles F-ing Manson.

This is about control and profits. I don't think the medical profession has realized how much damage their profession has taken in the last 3 years. I was on the fence about medical tourism or tele-health, but those seem like the only sane options when faced with a "Borg cube" of unthinking pill pushers and administrators only looking for the biggest payout.

Expand full comment
Chuck Muldoon's avatar

I wonder if their words will be used against them: “When a medical treatment falls beneath their standard of care for patient safety, then the court had no right to intervene for the patient.”

Of course the CARES act provides financial incentive for using Remedesivir, which was known at the time to shut down kidneys, forcing fluids into the lungs “pneumonia,” creating a pretext for another incentivized abomination, a ventilator.

The lawsuit to force medical practitioners to allow patients to choose their own treatment is all fine and good, but what’s really called for here are charges of intentional malice, mass murder and crimes against humanity.

Expand full comment
167 more comments...

No posts