In Kory v. Bonta, a federal judge just barred California’s Attorney General and its medical boards from coming after me and my colleagues for the expert opinions we share with patients.
Huge congratulations! Thank you for fighting for what's right and also for having the guts and the brains to change your views on a lot of things you were taught in medical school!!!
I may be naive but it seems a simple, logical consideration.
There are two basic issues:
1) A trained, licensed physician, treating a patient who is uniquely different from all other patients, must be free to address and advise that patient to his best medical ability. Just as there is not one medicine or treatment that is universal so there is not one protocol that is universal.
2) There is the First Amendment right to free speech, and free speech does not allow speech that may cause harm. In this case the doctor was trying to prevent, what in his best medical expertise was harm to his patient, no cause it.
I add, the injunction against the persecution of this doctor was correct and should have happened long before now. It is a no brainer. The judge did not inhibit the remedy of mal practice suit open to any patient, so the patient is still protected.
Dr. Kory, in your book with Jenna you mention being able to download a letter in support of the Grenon family to the US Attorney General. I can't seem to locate that letter.
But I bet NGO’s and big pharma will
This is a big win for doctors, patients and the general public. Congratulations.
Huge congratulations! Thank you for fighting for what's right and also for having the guts and the brains to change your views on a lot of things you were taught in medical school!!!
Bonta is a hack. A hater like his wife. Common sense must prevail
Praise God! He is moving powerfully these days! The Truth prevails!
I may be naive but it seems a simple, logical consideration.
There are two basic issues:
1) A trained, licensed physician, treating a patient who is uniquely different from all other patients, must be free to address and advise that patient to his best medical ability. Just as there is not one medicine or treatment that is universal so there is not one protocol that is universal.
2) There is the First Amendment right to free speech, and free speech does not allow speech that may cause harm. In this case the doctor was trying to prevent, what in his best medical expertise was harm to his patient, no cause it.
I add, the injunction against the persecution of this doctor was correct and should have happened long before now. It is a no brainer. The judge did not inhibit the remedy of mal practice suit open to any patient, so the patient is still protected.
Hallelujah! Thank you for being strong and fighting against this ridiculous overreach!
😂😂😂😂
Thank you, Pierre Kory, for your bravery and courageous battle for justice.
Congratulation!!! Been following your outstanding work from the Netherlands. 💪❤️💪
Thank you for fighting, for all the time, finances, and emotional toll that took. You are a righteous and courageous man. ✝️
WOW! This is HUGE👍😄😉. Thank you Dr Kory!
You believe some cray cray smack
Yeah ya do
Dr. Kory, in your book with Jenna you mention being able to download a letter in support of the Grenon family to the US Attorney General. I can't seem to locate that letter.
Please point to the US constitution, and show me where the government has any right, or responsibility, to tell people what they can or cannot say.
Oh finally, a sweet victory!
Bravo! A BIG WIN! Standing ovation, cheers and bouquets for your marathon court endeavours.