In Kory v. Bonta, a federal judge just barred California’s Attorney General and its medical boards from coming after me and my colleagues for the expert opinions we share with patients.
What happened to the "it's between the patient and doctor" rhetoric that we so frequently hear in regard to abortion when it came to the government prohibiting doctors from telling their patients the truth about the pandemic??
Huge congratulations! Thank you for fighting for what's right and also for having the guts and the brains to change your views on a lot of things you were taught in medical school!!!
I may be naive but it seems a simple, logical consideration.
There are two basic issues:
1) A trained, licensed physician, treating a patient who is uniquely different from all other patients, must be free to address and advise that patient to his best medical ability. Just as there is not one medicine or treatment that is universal so there is not one protocol that is universal.
2) There is the First Amendment right to free speech, and free speech does not allow speech that may cause harm. In this case the doctor was trying to prevent, what in his best medical expertise was harm to his patient, no cause it.
I add, the injunction against the persecution of this doctor was correct and should have happened long before now. It is a no brainer. The judge did not inhibit the remedy of mal practice suit open to any patient, so the patient is still protected.
I just want to say one more time:
The LEFT DESTROYS EVERYTHING THEY TOUCH-
Thank you for standing up not only for yourself and your profession, but for humanity.
What happened to the "it's between the patient and doctor" rhetoric that we so frequently hear in regard to abortion when it came to the government prohibiting doctors from telling their patients the truth about the pandemic??
Hope this true. Government/ Corporate control of physicians has destroyed the Dr/patient relationship.
Creates a huge conflict of interest. Does the patient do the bidding of his/her masters or place his family, credentials, and livelihood at risk?
But I bet NGO’s and big pharma will
This is a big win for doctors, patients and the general public. Congratulations.
Huge congratulations! Thank you for fighting for what's right and also for having the guts and the brains to change your views on a lot of things you were taught in medical school!!!
Bonta is a hack. A hater like his wife. Common sense must prevail
Praise God! He is moving powerfully these days! The Truth prevails!
I may be naive but it seems a simple, logical consideration.
There are two basic issues:
1) A trained, licensed physician, treating a patient who is uniquely different from all other patients, must be free to address and advise that patient to his best medical ability. Just as there is not one medicine or treatment that is universal so there is not one protocol that is universal.
2) There is the First Amendment right to free speech, and free speech does not allow speech that may cause harm. In this case the doctor was trying to prevent, what in his best medical expertise was harm to his patient, no cause it.
I add, the injunction against the persecution of this doctor was correct and should have happened long before now. It is a no brainer. The judge did not inhibit the remedy of mal practice suit open to any patient, so the patient is still protected.
Hallelujah! Thank you for being strong and fighting against this ridiculous overreach!
😂😂😂😂
Thank you, Pierre Kory, for your bravery and courageous battle for justice.
Congratulation!!! Been following your outstanding work from the Netherlands. 💪❤️💪
Thank you for fighting, for all the time, finances, and emotional toll that took. You are a righteous and courageous man. ✝️
WOW! This is HUGE👍😄😉. Thank you Dr Kory!