You should be reading Paul Marik’s new Substack (especially his recent and most popular post titled “How Nutrition Shapes The Cancer Battlefield”).

My Friend, My Colleague, My Brother-In-Arms

There are very few men in medicine I trust the way I trust Paul Marik.

As many of my readers know, Paul and I didn’t just work together. We went to war together.

We co-founded the FLCCC and stood shoulder to shoulder against one of the most corrupt and oppressive episodes in modern medical history. We paid for it. Jobs lost. Careers derailed. Board certifications stripped. Reputations attacked. Marriages lost. . The full weight of the machine came for us.

And through all of it, Paul never stopped doing what he has always done better than anyone I know: following the science all the way down.

That was always his gift. Long before the world knew his name from COVID, Paul was already a giant in critical care medicine. He had built a career on refusing to take anything he was taught for granted. He was never impressed by consensus for its own sake.

He always went back to the foundations, back to the original science, back to the studies and the assumptions underlying them. And time and again, he found the same thing: entire practices, dogmas, and “settled” conclusions built on bad interpretation, weak evidence, or shifting sand as a foundation. That is why he was always upending consensus. It is also why his lectures were legendary. Standing room only. Everybody wanted to know what Marik thought about the latest emerging therapeutic trends.

Further, he was, quite literally, the most published practicing ICU physician in the history of the field. And not just prolific—precise, careful, and relentless about supporting his views based on published scientific evidence.

So it should surprise no one that after the system exiled him from our specialty, he dove deep into a new field, where there was even more consensus to overturn.

Paul turned his focus to cancer, specifically the metabolic theory of cancer, and his book, Cancer Care, is, to me, unparalleled as it is a deeply scientific, review and grading of the evidence base for dozens of repurposed drugs and neutraceuticals. Spoiler alert: of the over 250 repurposed drugs and 2,000 nutraceuticals touted on the internet or by practitioners, only about 50 have sufficient published evidence to form a scientific opinion or recommendation on.

We’ve been using Paul’s work in our own cancer practice at the Leading Edge Clinic as it has directly shaped how we think about and treat these patients. The central theory is simple and was first validated in 2010 based on the work of Thomas Seyfried: cancer is a metabolic disease first, and the genetic mutations arise downstream from it.

He is the Principal Investigator of our Leading Edge Clinic study on the use of combination repurposed drug therapy and dietary interventions as adjunctive therapies in cancer.

His new Substack, Marik’s Cancer & Metabolic Healing Playbook, is exactly what you would expect from him: practical, science-driven, and fearless. He is tackling cancer with diet, repurposed drugs, and targeted nutraceuticals based on physiology and evidence.

In the post I’m highlighting today, “Metabolic Wars: How Nutrition Shapes the Cancer Battlefield,” he lays out something all of my patients’ “system” oncologists still ignore: that what they eat is foundational. Food is signaling, chemistry, and energy that can support or undermine tumor growth.

That is where medicine is going (eventually), whether the old guard likes it or not.

Paul has always had a gift for seeing what matters before the institutions are ready to admit it. He did it in critical care. He did it during COVID. And now he is doing it in cancer.

And if cancer is not something you are dealing with personally, then send this to someone who is. Send it to a patient, a friend, a family member, a caregiver, someone who needs to know there are still serious physicians doing serious work outside the walls of a badly broken system.

We’ve been through a lot together. We’ve seen how “the system” behaves when challenged. And we’ve both come out the other side still doing the same thing we always did, trying to understand what actually works, and then telling people the truth about it.

If you follow my work, you should be following Paul’s.

He is one of the sharpest clinical scientists I know, and he is now focused on one of the most important problems in medicine.

Go read him.

*If you value the late nights and deep dives into all the “rabbit holes” I write about (or the Op-Eds and lectures I generate for the public), your support is greatly appreciated.

Subscribe now

From Research to Practice - Links Below Images

Aurmina – The Mineral Extract For Naturally Vitalized Drinking Water

Primora Bio - Bringing Life Back to Soil

The Blueprint of Life - The Hidden Architecture That Powers Life and Health

From Volcanoes to Vitality -The Untold Story of Asao Shimanishi

The War on Chlorine Dioxide - The Medicine That Could End Medicine

The War on Ivermectin - The Medicine That Could Have Ended The Pandemic

Leading Edge Clinic - Tele-Medicine Clinic Caring For Patients in All 50 States

**This post is a day late! I wanted it as a post to celebrate World Water Day, but my 10-hour trip from Honolulu to Tokyo had no WiFi (I had planned to finish and send it on the plane). So, we are extending the sale one more day. Enjoy the 25% discount code Springsale26 at Aurmina or Primora Bio. Also, this post begins with lots of personal reflection; if you just want to get to the Spring Garden Vitalization Protocol, scroll down.

The Same Work, A Different Scale

As an ICU and lung doctor in the U.S, I was called an “intensivist,” while in France, my French compatriots were called “reanimators.”

The first time they told me that, it connected, like an “ah-hah” moment, as it so perfectly described the essence of our work, given that critically ill patients are often unconscious and immobile, appearing almost lifeless to the uninitiated, either from a primary brain insult, brain failure secondary to overwhelming illness (encephalopathy), or a need for deep sedation to synchronize them with the ventilator while we try to reverse their often multi-organ failure.

When successful, we restore the coordination of their organ systems such that their brain functions return, allowing them to either wake up or be woken up, thus “re-animating” them.

With that in mind, here perhaps I may be extending that metaphor too far, but I feel like, even though I long ago left critical care, now that I have been drawn to work guided by that same spirit and aim, but on a far grander scale, of “re-animating” the Earth’s soils, crops, aquifers, and surface waters.

So funny. How did a New Yorker go from running inner-city ICUs to going on a mission to resuscitate soils, plants, and waters?

There is both a simple and complicated explanation for that. Among the many rabbit holes I have gone down in my journey researching therapies that might repair the Covid vaccine-injured, for the first time in my career, I landed on one that applied to patients as much as it did plants, grasses, microbes, and animals, one central to every biological process that supports life.

My initial intrigue stemmed from a fascination with the responses I observed in some patients, albeit using off-label protocols distinct from water purification. The research and investigation into its obscured and fragmented history in Japan and then in the U.S. showed me the potential for benefits far beyond my clinic, my practice, and my patients.

I sensed it before I understood it, and that sense only intensified as I traced it across geology, hydrology, biochemistry, soil biology, and agriculture—until, to my surprise, its effects in other living systems proved more compelling than anything I was seeing in human physiology.

Something Started to Shift

Although I studied mathematics in college, I have wanted to be a doctor since I was a teenager. Problem: I kinda, sorta, failed out of college. It then took me 7 years and an impeccable performance in grad school before I was accepted into medical school (overseas), allowing me to finally leave the restaurant business where I had spent my 20s.

However, I soon discovered that, unlike the increasingly joyless and elusive higher-order problem-solving in mathematics, I loved my new role in life as a “diagnostician,” facing the daily task of figuring out why someone was sick and suffering. Getting that puzzle right meant everything, and in the ICU, what the residents called “medicine on steroids,” getting it wrong raised the stakes as high as they come, with up to 20% of my patients dying in some weeks. When successful, we relieved suffering and restored function, a satisfaction far more fulfilling than arriving at a successful solution to a complicated equation or devising an elegant logical proof.

The Point of No Return

Over these months, it became clear that my life was moving in a new direction. The work took on the shape of a mission: to uncover and disseminate Shimanishi’s insights, examine the potential of Themarox, and address a critical gap affecting soils, agriculture, water, and ultimately animal and human health.

But, at the same time, I think this year broke me. What I stumbled upon held an importance I could not ignore or reduce to a side project or hobby, as these books and this research took over my life to a magnitude that makes my previously frenetic, all-consuming advocacy for ivermectin in Covid pale in comparison.

I have been so inspired by Shimanishi’s work and the realization that I had stumbled upon something so impactful, with such potential, and that had somehow slipped under History’s gaze, only retained in small pockets of people around the world.

But what happened was that the joy and fulfillment I had always gotten from seeing patients began to feel like a detractor from what I was supposed to be doing. I began to wake up with frustration and exhaustion, knowing that each day was taking me away from what I increasingly felt was more important work.

I really don’t give a crap if you think I am talking crazy or in a self-interested manner. I did not make that decision lightly or for commercial reasons. What I am trying to say is that it was effectively made for me in spirit. I resisted for a while, but I followed where it was leading and even started a company to get it done, especially so that the company would devote itself to funding the research it would require to get there, meaning to convince the world of this vision that I, and an increasing number of others, hold.

The Decision

So, after 25 years, I have decided to stop seeing patients. Although I will continue to lead, manage, and guide our Leading Edge Clinic, as of June, I am giving up my personal patient practice panel. One reason I was comfortable stopping is that the provider team at LEC is phenomenal, inspiring, devoted, and empathetic, perhaps in ways that now exceed my capacity. So I am confident that in handing over my patients to them, they will continue to be cared for with the skill and care they need.

Now, if that was not enough of a personal reveal on this belated World Water Day, there is yet another reason I closed my patient schedule.

My wife is pregnant with a baby boy due on July 4th.

I have been reminded that apparently, you are supposed to spend time with young children, and since I don’t have time to pee most days, I thought it wise to create some space to welcome young Lutzee onto planet Earth.

Do not make fun of the name; it is a phonetic spelling of my Hungarian father’s nickname “Laci,” a common diminutive of his real name, “Lazlo.”

If I put “Laci” on the birth certificate, the poor child would forever be called “Lacey,” and I don’t want to set him on the path depicted in the Johnny Cash song “A Boy Named Sue.”

My Contribution To World Water Day

With the history of my career trajectory behind us, I now want to focus on the real purpose of today’s post, which is two-fold.

The first is to offer as concise an articulation of the “Geohydrological Shift Theory” as I can muster, aimed at the world’s agronomists, hydrogeologists, soil biologists, regenerative farmers, and others working in these domains, with the intent of shifting their focus to what we believe is a viable solution to many of the problems befalling modern agriculture.

The second is for a more specific segment of my readership, those who “identify” (hee hee) as home gardeners, hobby farmers, and even farmers, where I will lay out this former intensivist’s “combination therapy resuscitative and re-vitalization protocol,” to kick off your spring planting season toward a harvest most have never experienced before.

So, if you’re interested only in the latter, feel free to skip toward the end. If you’re interested in both, read on.

When The Geohydrological Shift Began

If you want to understand what is happening to our water, you have to go back to the moment agriculture fundamentally changed.

The “Green Revolution” began in the 1940s in Mexico, led by agronomist Norman Borlaug, who developed high-yield, disease-resistant wheat varieties. The success of that work expanded into Asia in the 1960s, especially in India and Pakistan, and later into rice systems through institutions such as the International Rice Research Institute.

Basically, the idea was to maximize yield per acre using external inputs and improved genetics. The core components were: high-yielding crop varieties (HYVs), synthetic fertilizers (especially nitrogen), irrigation expansion, pesticides, herbicides, and, importantly, mechanization.

The impact was enormous, arguably one of the most successful large-scale interventions in human history. Earth saw massive increases in yields, the avoidance of widespread famine (e.g., India no longer needed food aid), lower food prices, and greater caloric availability.

At the same time, historically, it marked a shift from antiquity, in which traditional “slow” farming practices rapidly switched to a science- and input-driven system.

Yes, it bought the world time, and a lot of it. But I believe time is running out.

The Shift

Over the past few decades, the costs of this system have become increasingly apparent, like now, in my middle age, here in the 2020s. The soil is being degraded (less organic matter, microbial diversity, increasing dependence on inputs), the water system is being stressed (over-extraction of aquifers, salinization in irrigated lands), and we now suffer from a widespread chemical dependency (fertilizer and pesticide use has skyrocketed, pest resistance has emerged).

Even worse, the benefits, although considerable, have been uneven, favoring large farms and capital-intensive systems over traditional farming.

Where We Are Now

My interest and passion began to sharpen as my research into water and minerals led me to what I can only describe as flashing warning signs. After nearly a hundred years of “success,” the data is now showing yield stagnation. Between 24% and 39% of global cropland is exhibiting yield plateaus; elsewhere, yield increases are being maintained, but at a slowing rate. Most concerning, and what I consider the loudest warning signal, is that in some regions yields are now declining despite increased inputs.

Further, biological simplification abounds with the dominance of monocrops, leading to a loss of resilience and even buffering capacity.

Basically, the more fertilizer used, the smaller the yield gains, meaning that “nitrogen efficiency” is dropping in many systems. Earth’s agriculture has now shifted from an immensely productive system to a “compensatory” one, and, in some areas, it is failing to even do that.

Is there any hope on the horizon? Yes, but, as you will learn, not in the areas where most are placing it: regenerative agriculture, precision agriculture, and alternative inputs aimed at improving soil biology or reducing existing inputs. These are important advances, but they do not go far enough upstream.

Now, I know this is starting to sound like doom and gloom, and the story does get worse, but this is also where I see a possible, scalable solution beginning to emerge. Because if we can fix the water, I believe we can restore the entire system.

You see, our water systems have entered a state of overt stress. After a century of pressure, aquifer depletion is accelerating globally, while nitrate and salinity levels continue to rise, fundamentally altering hydrogeochemistry.

The Solutions Being Proposed

Before we get to my proposal for a path forward, I'll give a quick overview of the current directions various scientific disciplines are proposing to remediate, solve, or fix the current state of agriculture.

The Soil Physics / Hydrology Camp

Most mainstream scientists, such as Rattan Lal and Johan Six, as well as the broader soil physics and hydrology field, are rightly focused on the idea that soil degradation and water dysfunction are tightly linked. Their central observation is that as soil structure degrades, water infiltration declines, water retention becomes less stable, and the soil’s ability to store and deliver plant-available water is compromised.

I am with them on this because productivity clearly declines when soil loses its ability to regulate water properly. Their proposed solution is to restore soil structure, primarily by increasing organic matter, improving aggregation, and reducing disturbance, thereby rebuilding the physical framework through which water moves and is retained.

My take is that I disagree with where they place causality. Their emphasis is on repairing the soil as the primary lever, with water secondarily improving by restoring the condition of the soil it passes through.

My take is that I disagree with where they place causality. Their emphasis is on repairing the soil as the primary lever, assuming that water will improve secondarily as the soil through which it moves is restored.

The Rhizosphere / Soil Biology Camp

Within this field are notable scientists like Elaine Ingham, Jeff Lowenfels, and other rhizosphere ecology researchers, whose focus is on the problems with microbes' root exudates and biological signaling. What I like is that they also focus on water by recognizing that all of this dysfunction occurs in water films. They clearly recognize that nutrients exist in the dissolved phase, microbial signaling depends on water quality and composition, and root uptake itself is fundamentally water-mediated.

But here again, their solutions appear to focus not on mediating the water but on restoring microbial life and avoiding further chemical disruption by increasing organic inputs. Ultimately, restoring the biological layer that water enters will not directly address the water chemistry that is driving the disordered biology.

The Hydrogeochemistry / Water Quality Camp

This camp is the one that is most closely “circling the target.” To give credit where it is due, the literature from hydrogeochemists, environmental chemists, and groundwater scientists most grabbed my attention. They are the ones sounding the alarm the loudest (and from whom we laid the foundation for the Geohydrological Shift Theory). They are clearly documenting rising nitrate levels, increasing salinity, changing ion composition, and most importantly, redox shifts in aquifers.

Their cumulative argument is that water chemistry is changing at a planetary scale, and, as importantly, they elucidate the consequence: such water will affect soil chemistry, plant uptake, and microbial processes.

The Hidden Lever: Themarox

What pulled Matt and me into this was the chemistry of Themarox itself. Our early conversations, debates, and attempts to understand what it was doing to water gradually made it clear that we were not just looking at another agricultural input, but at a system-level intervention whose behavior did not fit within the current frameworks of agronomy or hydrogeochemistry.

Just as we came to believe that understanding the science and methods behind Shimanishi’s achievement allowed us to extend origin-of-life research with the Rock–Water Circuit Theory, we now believe that what Themarox does to water lies outside the current awareness of those fields. And that realization is what ultimately changed my trajectory. This knowledge came to me first through Matt, and what followed, these months of trying to figure it out, was driven by the growing recognition that we were studying an intervention the world does not yet fully see.

Thus, I want to help push the focus of the hydrogeochemistry field to study the potential of Themarox. Although they are rightly measuring and describing critical changes to the water system, they are not framing it as we are attempting to, which is that it is the root (or main) cause of the widespread biological dysfunction the other fields are describing.

Right now, they are focused on reporting that “water quality is degrading,” but do not go on to say, “water chemistry is upstream of biological deterioration.” Most importantly, they are not aware that Themarox can restore that water to a state capable of reversing those downstream biological effects.

The Regenerative Agriculture Practitioners

Here, leading proponents like Gabe Brown and Ray Archuleta, among others, are also rightly proposing a potentially complementary solution, namely that reducing inputs can actually lead to better outcomes, less pest pressure, more water retention in the soil, and ultimately, more resilient plants.

They often say, similar to the other fields, “Fix the soil, and everything else follows.”

But here again, they describe the fix as improving soil health, soil biology, and soil carbon, without a focus on the chemistry, ionic composition, and electrochemical behavior of water.

Where We Are and Where We Should Go

Collectively, at present, although numerous fields have repeatedly circled the problem, there is no unified framework that places water chemistry at the center of broad system dysfunction. The soil people write about how water movement matters, the biologists write about how the water medium matters, the chemists about how water composition is changing, and the farmers about how system behavior is shifting.

Many fields have correctly identified that the problem lies upstream, but, in our opinion, they still point to the wrong thing. Some point to soil, others to biology, others to hydrology, but very few have followed the chain far enough to recognize that all three are downstream expressions of the ionic composition and electrochemical behavior of water itself.

Such properties of water are literally the upstream regulators of soil structure, microbial behavior, and plant function.

Ultimately, their solutions, like adding carbon, adding microbes, reducing chemicals, and optimizing irrigation, just do not go far enough upstream to change the water chemistry itself.

The Solution Is Not Mine Alone

At this point, instead of attempting to lay out a grand, fully formed solution, one in which agricultural systems worldwide are remediated through the treatment of irrigation, drinking, and surface waters, I’m going to shift gears. What I have tried to do here is define the problem, to make the case that water chemistry sits upstream of much of the dysfunction we are now observing.

The next phase is not mine alone to solve. I am not a hydrogeologist, irrigation engineer, or water treatment expert, and I won’t pretend to be. My goal is to bring Themarox to the attention of those who are, so they can test it, challenge it, and, if warranted, figure out how it might be deployed at scale. That work lies ahead.

For today, I am staying within the domain where I feel most comfortable offering guidance: the small grower, the home gardener, the hobby farmer, the orchardist. Because while large-scale systems may take time to shift, smaller ones can move now. So, for today, we start small.

REVIVE: The Kory Resuscitation and Vitalization System for Soil and Garden Health

Here we go again, with my tireless attempts to elevate my name into an eponym (hopefully understood for what it is - self-deprecating humor). Although agriculture has never quite leaned into eponyms the way medicine has, the pattern is there. Certain names have been fused to their central contributions, for instance, Liebig and his “law,” Borlaug and his wheat, Fukuoka and his natural farming, Steiner and his biodynamics, etc.

They are not quite like “Koch’s postulates” or “Parkinson’s disease,” but it is close enough that I find myself with the mildly absurd notion that I might attach my own name to a way of thinking about water, soil, and life.

So, as a former ICU specialist now self-proclaimed “agro-intensivist,” or more accurately and humbly, an “agro-educator,” but even there, that title has limitation because I have never farmed, potted, or even tended to a plant (remember, I am a city boy), thus I am writing and teaching a topic on which I have no “front-line experience.”

Which gives me the creeps, honestly, because then I start to resemble the “desk doctors” of Covid, those who offered expert opinions and dictated policy while never having treated a single patient.

Of course, Fauci comes to mind, but my most vivid memory is of Dr. Ashish Jha—a persistent media voice during Covid and head of Biden’s White House coronavirus response—who, when asked by Senator Ron Johnson in the very same hearing that I gave my ivermectin testimony, “Have you ever treated a Covid patient?” Jha paused and admitted, “I have not, sir.”

I don’t want to be that guy.

The difference here is I am openly stating what I do and do not know, which is simply that I had the fortune of coming across Shimanishi’s work, recognized its importance, and devoted now seven months of my life to studying it, discussing it, and spending many dozens of hours talking with those who have known of his work longer. Basically, I have learned a specific water chemistry, heretofore unknown to the wider world, and I have committed to disseminating that knowledge and its implications and potential.

More recently, since starting the Asao Group, I have gotten to work with some amazing agronomists who have taught me about the use of a combination of agricultural inputs that can build back, revitalize, rescue, and reanimate soils, plants, grasses, and crops, whether they be houseplants, backyard gardens, hobby farms, or big farms.

So, with that, let’s break down the first iteration of the REVIVE protocol (while also understanding that I will adapt and update the protocol as my experience and insights accumulate, similar to Paul’s and my approach with the protocols we created and evolved with our FLCCC in Covid.

REVIVE: The Kory Resuscitation and Vitalization System for Soil and Garden Health

As in critical care, there is no “one size fits all” with set doses, duration, and combinations; but you have to start with a core intervention to work from and then adapt and revise accordingly. As one of my new colleagues says, “Nature isn't exact; your approach doesn’t have to be either.”

Thus, I encourage anyone to scale up or down in intensity based not only on the state and fertility of the starting soil but also on the response to therapy. However, note that the field trial I presented in the last post started with dead, infertile soil and relied solely on an initial cosmotropic water irrigation, followed by weekly foliar spraying, with the only addition being a one-time mid-season light application of fish hydrolysate and microbes. The results were beyond impressive despite starting from literal dead soil.

The Trinity Of Recommended Inputs

1) Cosmotropic Mineral Concentrate (Primora Bio)

Water treated with a biotite-derived vermiculite mineral extract, a mineral composition with “multiplicative” properties, meaning the addition of small amounts acts on large volumes of water, rendering a much larger water volume in a more electrochemically ordered state, which, across six studies in varied conditions and contexts, demonstrates changes in a multi-domain agricultural impact profile as per this AI-generated image below:

2) Liquid Fish Hydrolysate Complex (Primora Nourish or equivalent)

Liquid hydrolysate includes a wide range of minerals, micronutrients, amino acids, and fats which are known tot:

3) Liquid Biochar (Primora Char or equivalent, e.g. American Biochar)

Here, we use a 5-micron-sized activated wood biochar combined with humate, a size that allows for a liquid formulation, thus enabling all three inputs to be combined in a single application with a water sprayer:

Sequence and Technique of Application

1) Beginning of Season (Pre-Planting) Combination Soil Spray - Use All Three Interventions

A) Cosmotropic Mineral Concentrate

Seasonal soil spray frequency is once every 4-5 years. Recommend doing this for first year of protocol as it won’t hurt, but, depending on starting spoil, may not be necessary.

Calculate the recommended amount of Primora Bio for the volume of water estimated for the area of your plot, garden, or farm. Note: the amount needed for the seasonal soil spray is much more than used in weekly or biweekly foliar spraying.

B) Liquid Fish Hydrolysate:

Calculate the recommended amount of liquid fish hydrolysate based on the required water volume, then add it to the water and stir.

**Note: Fish hydrolysate should be done 2-4 more times this season for optimal results.

C) Liquid Biochar

Calculate the recommended amount of activated liquid biochar based on the required water volume, add it to the water, and stir.

2) Pre-Germinate Seeds (apply only Primora Bio to water for the pre-germination step)

Fill bowls with Primora Bio-treated water for each seed type appropriate for pre-germination. Add seeds to bowls of treated water as follows:

3) Seed Planting

Insert seeds in soil at depths appropriate for size (depth should be 2-3 times their diameter).

4) Hydration During Germination Period

4) Foliar Spraying With Primora Bio Every 7-14 Days

Well, folks, I hope that was helpful. To all those who have gone “all in” and purchased one or all of these agricultural interventions, I wish you the absolute best growing season possible, and we at Asao Group look forward to hearing about all the amazing results!

Primora Bio Control Trial Photo Contest

To that end, several customers have already written in about plans to treat some of their pots, gardens, greenhouses, and even orchards with the REVIVE protocol (or some variation of it), compare them to the plants they have not treated, and then share their results with us.

This is behavior we absolutely want to encourage, so this year we are holding a seasonal harvest photo contest, with which we will build "Use Case” page(s) on our website.

We invite anyone interested to take serial photos this season to compare the speed of germination, growth, size, vigor, and color of their treated vs. untreated plants, and we will use those photos for our first Annual Photo contest below.

Prizes

Anybody who submits a comparison photo of even just a single treated plant vs. a non-treated plant will receive a 50% discount on their next purchase, up to a 3-quart bundle, and the three top photo entrants will receive a one-year supply!

Please include documentation of the dates of soil spraying, planting, foliar spraying, and the date each photo was taken. Most importantly, please document what combinations of Primora Bio, Primora Char, and/or Primora Nourish that your plants were or were not treated with.

See this example from Jeff of the Curious Outlier Substack of two basil plants after 18 days, published here:

Invitation For Research Opportunities

Now, for those who want to go “all-in,” venturing beyond photos, into carefully and serially measuring “hard data” at baseline and harvest, such as soil pH, soil nutrient levels, leaf nutrient levels, biomass levels, please email contact@primorabio.com. We would be happy to discuss the possibility of subsidizing your effort with product and/or funding, depending on research experiences, capabilities, and skills.

*If you value the late nights and deep dives into all the “rabbit holes” I write about (or the Op-Eds and lectures I generate for the public), your support is greatly appreciated.

Subscribe now

Silly Humor Section:

Check out virtual farmer Pierre working in his virtual garden this weekend:

From Research to Practice - Links Below Images

Aurmina – The Mineral Extract For Naturally Vitalized Drinking Water

The Blueprint of Life - The Hidden Architecture That Powers Life and Health

From Volcanoes to Vitality -The Untold Story of Asao Shimanishi

The War on Chlorine Dioxide - The Medicine That Could End Medicine

The War on Ivermectin - The Medicine That Could Have Ended The Pandemic

Leading Edge Clinic - Tele-Medicine Clinic Caring For Patients in All 50 States

Dear Readers,

You and our Leading Edge Clinic patients make up the entire customer base of the Asao Group to this point. The broader world has yet to discover Themarox or Shimanishi, at least until the books are out, and in the meantime, you’ve kept us more than busy!

With that, I want to remind you that this weekend is our Spring Sale in celebration of World Water Day tomorrow: 25% off with code SPRINGSALE26 on single and paired bottles of Aurmina (drinking water) and Primora Bio (soil and foliar applications), plus additional discounts on a variety of bundles.

The Structured Water Question

After seven months chasing minerals through water chemistry, geohydrology, origin-of-life science, and old biophysics papers, I’ve arrived at an uncomfortable conclusion: I can’t prove that structured water exists, but I also can’t dismiss it. What follows is the evidence, so you can decide where you land.

I think the reader deserves a fair tour of why the structured-water idea refuses to die, why so many serious scientists have proposed it for over 100 years, and why I eventually had to leave that phrase behind without entirely leaving the question.

The Example of Ice

The safest place to begin is with something utterly uncontroversial: ice. No one in water chemistry can dispute that, under most conditions, when water freezes, its molecules arrange themselves into a highly ordered crystalline lattice, a stable, repeating architecture driven by polarity and hydrogen bonding. That matters because it establishes the first principle cleanly. Water is not some chemically indifferent fluid incapable of order. It carries within its molecular design the capacity to organize.

But ice does not solve the real question, and in some ways it distracts from it. Biology cannot run inside a rigid crystal as metabolism requires mobility, exchange, diffusion, slippage, collision, and all the molecular untidiness of liquid life.

Bulk Water: Organized Chaos

Imagine you could peer into a glass of pure liquid water and watch the individual molecules interacting with one another. What you would see would be astonishingly dynamic. Water molecules continuously form and break hydrogen bonds with neighboring molecules at the rate of hundreds of billions of times per second, and although they often adopt tetrahedral arrangements for brief moments, those structures are so short-lived that thermal motion tears them apart almost as quickly as they appear. Clusters form and dissolve almost instantly, and the best description of the whole scene is probably “organized chaos.”

That, more or less, is the baseline state of liquid water: a rapidly shifting hydrogen-bond network with fleeting local arrangements and no durable large-scale order. And if that were all water ever was, the structured-water question would never have become a question in the first place. But of course, that is not all water ever is.

Minerals Bringing Order To Water: Hydration Shells

OK, so I have to admit that I just played a trick on you. I had you imagine a glass containing only water molecules, which is to say a liquid that does not exist in nature outside laboratory conditions or with devices, such as ultrapure, distilled, or reverse-osmosis water. My bad. It is almost as if I believed that water without minerals is biologically active. It is not.

Add minerals back in, and the picture changes immediately. The moment a charged ion dissolves, nearby water molecules orient themselves around it, forming what chemists call hydration shells. I think of them as fans crowding around a celebrity—the closest press in tightly and most orderly, while those farther out remain influenced but more loosely arranged.

This is not a crystal and certainly not a frozen lattice, but it is a real pocket of local order created by mineral charge. The molecules remain in motion, the “fans” constantly exchanging places, but a general, albeit focal, structure persists through dynamic electrostatic relationships. When minerals enter the system, water does not stop being dynamic—it becomes dynamic around centers of organization. That is already more structure than one finds in demineralized water, though still far from the crystalline order of ice.

Water At The Border - Interfacial Water

The next level of order appears when water encounters a surface. Here, it becomes even more organized than in hydration shells, as electrostatic forces pull molecules into preferred orientations near charged or polar interfaces—membranes, mineral lattices, clays, proteins, while slowing their motion.

We are still on safe ground. Interfacial water is well established. Spectroscopic work confirms that water adjacent to mineral surfaces—such as those near my now-favorite pet rock, biotite—becomes more ordered than bulk water. The limitation, as water chemists insist, is that this ordering extends only a few nanometers, on the order of ten molecular layers.

Think of a Tokyo subway platform: the first row is highly organized, the second is still influenced, and farther out, you return to the chaotic movement of the crowd. That is interfacial water. The edge imposes order without freezing the system.

The Long Line of Structured Water Thinkers

Come with me now as we venture into the areas of “structured” water chemistry where assertions reach no consensus, and opinions on both sides get heated (you would think that water chemists are a boring bunch, but if you read the papers closely, it gets vicious (OK, OK, so I am over-injecting drama here, big deal).

But let’s start with the fact that far before the modern debates, for more than a century, scientists of the highest distinction, from very different fields, have asserted, in one language or another, that under certain conditions, the more organized behavior of interfacial water extends beyond the narrow layer recognized by classical surface chemistry.

Despite several leading, and in some cases, Nobel Prize–winning scientists proposing versions of the idea, to this day, no consensus exists on whether such states exist in the broader sense claimed or even on their biological importance. (Recall that “scientific consensus” is a trigger word for me).

If I were to give a full history of every study, lineage, and theoretical detour in this field, we would disappear into the weeds for far too long. So, let me try to keep it brief.

It all started with the Nobel Prize–winning biochemist Albert Szent-Györgyi, who suggested that water forms an active matrix within living systems, capable of supporting electronic and energetic organization around proteins.

It genuinely brought a smile to my face to come across Szent-Györgyi here. I had the same reaction months earlier when, during my dive into mineral science, I ran into two-time Nobel Prize winner Linus Pauling and that now-famous line often attributed to him:

“You can trace every sickness, every disease, and every ailment to a mineral deficiency.”

Why do I get a little thrill when names like Szent-Györgyi and Pauling show up in these corners of science?

My long-time readers can probably guess. My life—and, frankly, my career—collided with my dear friend and colleague Paul Marik through our shared fascination with the profound effects of IV vitamin C in severe sepsis. That path led us straight into COVID, and with it came… well, everything that followed—loss of jobs, careers, board certifications, and even our marriages.

What many of you may not know is that Szent-Györgyi won the Nobel Prize for discovering vitamin C, while Pauling was relentlessly criticized for promoting its therapeutic efficacy in cancer. Small world, right?

I continue to find it fascinating that the same names keep appearing in these seemingly distant corners of medicine and science that I keep wandering into. And no, before anyone gets carried away, I am not placing myself in the company of Nobel laureates, but, in a twist I still find surreal, I leave tomorrow for Japan for the first time in my life, where one of the highlights of the trip will be a personal invitation from Nobel Prize winner Professor Satoshi Ōmura, the discoverer of ivermectin, to tour the Kitasato Institute and share dinner with him and his colleagues.

I can tell you already, it will be one of the highlights of my life. I will never forget the kindness he showed me during Covid, when he reached out at a time I was at my lowest, sending a letter and a beautiful spectrograph of the bacteria Streptomyces Avermectin, a gift that, quite honestly, helped restore a level of strength and determination I might not have otherwise regained.

On top of that, I’ll be meeting with the executives of the Shimanishi-Kaken company and touring the only facility in the world that produces Themarox from biotite-derived vermiculite. Not a bad week.

Meanwhile, Lisa has been thoroughly entertained by watching me learn from YouTube videos about the three types of bows used in Japan. Apparently, the angle matters depending on who you’re greeting. If you wait until the end of this post, I will share the video she took of my lesson with her. But suffice it to say, I’ve also been consulting AI extensively on Japanese dining etiquette and conversation customs.

Because anyone who knows me knows this: I require serious training if I’m going to avoid playing the loud, overly boisterous American.

Anyway, where was I? Oh yeah, a few decades after Szent-Györgyi, the biophysicist Gilbert Ling proposed that intracellular water exists in a more ordered state associated with protein surfaces, formalizing the idea in his association–induction hypothesis. Around the same time, the surface chemist Boris Derjaguin demonstrated experimentally that water adjacent to solid materials, including mica and other mineral lattices, forms structured interfacial layers with properties distinct from bulk liquid water.

Later, the Italian physicist Emilio Del Giudice introduced a theoretical framework suggesting that water might organize into coherent domains through electromagnetic coupling. Taken together, these scientists were not saying exactly the same thing, but they were all, in their own language, pushing against the idea that liquid water should always be treated as a simple, chaotic, structureless medium.

Enter Gerald Pollack

Which brings us to the work of Professor Gerald Pollack at the University of Washington. Pollack credits his interest in the subject to reading Gilbert Ling, and his exclusion-zone experiments can be understood as a modern extension of Ling’s long-running line of inquiry into whether water in biological systems behaves differently from bulk liquid.

What Pollack reported was the discovery of relatively large regions of water adjacent to hydrophilic surfaces in which particles and solutes were excluded, an observation that implied that the water molecules within that region had adopted a more ordered arrangement than the surrounding bulk liquid. In other words, something about proximity to a surface appeared to reorganize the water in a way that fundamentally changed its behavior.

These regions, which he called “exclusion zones,” were not just small boundary effects. He reported that they extended roughly 10,000 to 100,000 times farther than the nanometer-scale interfacial layers traditionally described by surface chemistry. That claim alone was enough to turn heads, and, predictably, to attract a small but enthusiastic horde of detractors within the water chemistry community. Science, after all, has its own immune system, and it tends to react when something new shows up that it didn’t generate itself.

Pollack’s experiments were also visually striking, which matters more than most scientists would like to admit. He was able to literally show these zones forming and expanding under the microscope. Because he named the phenomenon in a way that people could understand, the idea began to spread beyond the lab. He reported that EZ water carried a net negative charge, while the adjacent bulk water carried a positive charge, effectively creating a region of charge separation, a kind of stored potential energy within the system.

Even more intriguing, when infrared light was applied, the exclusion zone expanded. Others observed that healthier cells appeared to contain more of this EZ-like water, while damaged or dying cells contained less, and Pollack himself reported that certain toxins caused the zone to shrink. The implication, never stated too bluntly, but always hovering nearby, was that the amount of this organized water might correlate with biological health.

From there, Pollack made a bold interpretive leap. He proposed that these regions represented a distinct, previously unrecognized phase of water, a “fourth phase,” somewhere between liquid and solid, almost gel-like, in which water molecules were organized into stacked sheets forming a repeating lattice. He titled his book The Fourth Phase of Water, and from that moment on, the language took on a life of its own.

And, as tends to happen, it didn’t stay confined to the laboratory. The concept migrated, first into broader scientific curiosity, then into wellness culture, then into device marketing, and finally into all the familiar corners where incomplete science becomes a commercial opportunity. You can probably guess the rest.

One of the most important experimental findings in Pollack’s work was that EZ water could be identified by a characteristic ultraviolet absorption peak at around 270 nanometers. That was his proposed signature. Fine. But then, in interviews and public talks, he began to mention that similar spectral features could be found in certain natural waters, particularly pristine mountain spring waters, with some showing more pronounced peaks than others.

Now, whether intentional or not, that suggestion carried implications. It subtly suggested that some waters might be inherently more “organized” and therefore more biologically beneficial than others. Predictably, that idea didn’t stay theoretical for long. An entire industry of devices emerged, claiming to “structure” water using magnets, fields, vortices, or various energetic inputs, often without, I should note, providing clear evidence that their treated water actually exhibited the very 270 nm signature Pollack had identified as central. That detail, as you will see later, becomes quite important.

Stepping back, I found Pollack’s body of work genuinely compelling. His findings around exclusion, charge separation, infrared responsiveness, and potential biological relevance were not hand-wavy, they were observed, tested, and published. One of the more striking claims was that this charge separation could even contribute to capillary flow independent of cardiac pumping, with experiments suggesting sustained movement under certain conditions. That is not a trivial observation.

After reviewing his work and learning about a conversation my colleague Matt Bakos had with him, I have no issue with the phenomenon he described. Where my questions began was not with what he observed, but with the conditions under which those observations were made, and whether those conditions reflected the way water actually exists in the real world.

The Opposition

Pollack’s critics, to be fair, have offered many alternative explanations for exclusion-zone behavior, attributing it to well-understood concepts such as diffusion gradients, surface charge effects, diffusiophoresis, and the specific chemistry of the materials used.

I take those seriously. But what left me unconvinced was the lack of a single elegant counter-explanation that accounted for the whole set of observations in a way that was more coherent than Pollack’s own. Different rebuttals seemed to be deployed for different pieces of the phenomenon.

That does not vindicate Pollack’s strongest claims, and I do not need it to. It merely suggests that interfacial water, mineralized water, and electrochemical surface behavior remain more interesting than the dismissive crowd would like them to be.

Ultimately, I think of Pollack’s novel insights like any other in science, they pass through three stages: first, they are observed, then they are argued over, and only later—if they survive—are they explained well enough to be accepted. The truth is that Pollack’s ideas, at the time of this writing, are still stuck in the second stage.

Where Shimanishi Convinced Me Even Further

Despite that, after wading through all the controversy and debate in really dense water chemistry papers, I was still left with the impression that something real was being observed. Still, the interpretation remained so unsettled that I decided to stop making any more assertions about structured water.

But then, as I was about to leave the subject for good, I was drawn back in when I noticed uncanny parallels between Shimanishi's numerous claims and findings, which not only predated Pollack by a decade but also almost completely mirrored them.

I also realized an important distinction: Shimanshi’s observations did not arise from working with synthetic Nafion tubes and injected microbubbles; he was working in the real world, with real water, not lab water.

Despite this difference, the more I looked, the more intriguing overlaps I noticed. Pollack maintained that exclusion-zone water showed a characteristic UV absorption peak around 270 nanometers. Themarox-treated water, when tested both in Pollack’s laboratory and independently, showed the same peak.

UV Spectrometer Analysis Of Water Treated With A Themarox-Derived Solution

In the below, the absorption of Themarox-treated water was compared to both regular tap water and “Ultrapure” water (a completely de-ionized (zero mineral content) water.

A critical detail is that the treated water sat in the lab for 6 days prior to the test.

In the above, you can see the long “hold” where UV absorption is occurring in the 6-day-old mineral-treated water. In the tables below, note the sulfated mineral-treated water showing 95% absorption at 270 nm compared to the 15% absorption in tap water, and 0% in Ultrapure water:

The coincidence was too specific to dismiss casually.

Then the parallels widened. Pollack claimed that EZ water excluded suspended particles and solutes from the organized region; Themarox-treated water, when added to ordinary modern water, rapidly promotes aggregation, separation, and settling of suspended material, leaving the overlying water visibly clearer. The conventional explanation is easy; classical flocculation, which may be entirely sufficient to account for the result, as it is well known that multivalent ions destabilize colloids.

But what caught my attention was that Shimanishi, long before Pollack, described his treated water as reorganized into smaller water clusters of H₃O₂, exactly like Pollack described EZ water clusters, and Shimanishi also claimed that, based on this organization, it further allowed his treated water to expel solutes and particles from solution.

Shimanishi supported his claim not with UV absorption but with results from nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) testing, which he interpreted as representing unique hydrogen-bond dynamics.

Weird right?

Shimanishi arrives at this conclusion by himself, using “real,”, “natural”, mineral-treated water samples and then, 10-15 years later, a guy named Pollack in a research lab at the University of Washington, arrives at the same conclusion, mechanism, and assertions, except that, instead of using NMR, he suggests that a 270um UV absorption peak is the identifier of such water structure.

It gets worse (or better). The electrochemistry of the different water samples offered yet another point of overlap. Pollack described charge separation and potential differences in exclusion-zone systems. Themarox-treated water also showed measurable electrochemical shifts, including changes in redox chemistry, oxygen demand, colloid stability, and microbial burden.

But again, the “consensus” among water chemists argues for more conventional explanations for this phenomenon: hydrolysis of iron and aluminum species, double-layer compression, flocculation, and oxidation of dissolved organics. Fine. But once enough of these overlaps accumulate, I find it difficult not to ask whether two apparently different systems may be arriving at a shared class of behavior through different routes.

The Missing Variable: Mineral Composition

That was the point at which I began to suspect that the real missing variable in the entire structured-water conversation was minerals.

This is a critical point: Pollack’s experiments were done in demineralized water, which makes perfect laboratory sense if one is trying to isolate surface effects. But every other earlier scientist, including Shimanishi, who was interested in biologically active water, studied water as it actually exists in life and geology: mineralized, ionic, embedded in gradients, and interacting with charged surfaces.

Pollack’s system, by contrast, stripped all of that chemistry away. Which, in one sense, was fantastic. Pollack was able to create water with similar properties under controlled conditions, allowing him to describe its properties and behaviors in ways not possible in nature!

Still, to my mind, that is not a trivial difference. Water in biology is never just H₂O. In geology, water is never just H₂O. Water in a cell, around a protein, inside a soil pore, along a clay sheet, or moving through a fractured mineral system is always a mineral solution. Its conductivity, buffering behavior, redox activity, interfacial dynamics, and biological compatibility all arise from that composition. Remove the minerals, and you have not created natural water; you have created an experimental medium. Useful for conducting precise investigations, yes. Biologically representative, no.

Once that realization settled in, the structured-water question shifted for me. I found myself more interested in the ionic environments it carries, the surfaces it touches, and how those variables reorganize the medium.

In that light, Pollack’s use of synthetic Nafion tubes became newly suggestive. Nafion is a synthetic polymer, yes, but it behaves in some respects like an intensely charged mineral surface. Its fixed negative charges mimic a crucial feature of natural mineral interfaces. Which means that Pollack’s experimental system may have been reproducing, in a stripped-down synthetic form, something that water encounters continuously in geological environments.

That possibility pulled me back toward Shimanishi. Themarox does not merely “purify” water. It introduces a specific mineral spectrum, one rich in strongly “cosmotropic” ions derived from a weathered vermiculite lattice. Once dissolved, those ions alter the ionic field, change interfacial behavior, reshape electrochemical conditions, and create an environment in which water no longer behaves like a generic bulk fluid.

Seen in that light, the overlap between Pollack’s findings and Shimanishi’s observations begins to look less like a coincidence and more like two different experimental paths stumbling toward the same chemical territory.

The Structured Water Device Industry

At that point, I also began to see more clearly why the structured-water device industry had gone off the rails. Once you remove minerals from the center of the discussion, you create a vacuum that devices are only too happy to fill. Magnets, electrodes, vortices, frequency gadgets, and every other piece of expensive plumbing theater rush in to promise order from outside the system.

I do not deny that externally applied energy can transiently order or align water molecules. Thermodynamic principles have demonstrated that already. A whirlpool maintains its structure only while energy is moving through it. A hurricane exists only while its gradients persist. Cells, soils, and organisms are no different; they preserve order only so long as they can maintain gradients.

Which means that if one really wants to understand durable biological order, the question is not whether one can briefly perturb or organize water with some clever device. The question is whether the ionic and mineral framework of the medium can support stable electrochemical organization over time.

So that is where I now leave the structured-water question. Not solved. Not embraced as a slogan. Not discarded. Narrowed. I no longer need to insist that Shimanishi’s mineral system “structures” water in the way the popular term implies. What I need, and what the next step in the argument gives me, is something older, firmer, and much more precise.

Once mineral surfaces are taken into account, dissolved ions cannot be treated as background. Natural waters are mineral solutions, and the ions they carry systematically alter hydration, protein stability, interfacial charge, and molecular organization.

Franz Hofmeister recognized this more than a century ago. And once I finally let that sink in, the entire conversation became far more powerful, because we were no longer arguing over slogans. We were back on the solid ground of chemistry.

Hoffmeister described a series of mineral-specific effects, showing how different minerals influence protein stability, surface tension, interfacial charge, and molecular organization throughout biological systems. Put simply, the structure and behavior of water are determined by the minerals dissolved within it.

And that, for my purposes, is where the discussion becomes both older and more precise. Because once the conversation shifts from sweeping claims about “structured water” to the specific and measurable effects of dissolved ions on hydration shells, interfaces, proteins, and gradients, we leave the land of slogans and enter the much firmer terrain of Hofmeister chemistry.

That realization is what led directly to my insight into Primora Bio as a deliberately constructed mineral environment, one designed by nature to shift water toward a more stable, cosmotropic state, where organization is not imposed from the outside, but emerges from the chemistry itself.

And once you see water that way, it becomes very difficult to see it any other way again.

*If you value the late nights and deep dives into all the “rabbit holes” I write about (or the Op-Eds and lectures I generate for the public), your support is greatly appreciated.

Subscribe now

Bonus fun: Video of me teaching Lisa the various Japanese bows we need to use next week:

World Water Day Sale - Discount Code: Springsale26

Sale: 25% off all single bottles of Aurmina or Primora Bio, with separate, already-included bundle discounts ranging from 25% to 30% on multi-bottle and combination bundles.

UK, European Customers: Our first UK distributor, Nicholas Smith at The Water Dr., is offering a 10% discount until the end of the month, with coupon code KORYUK10. Much larger savings will be made by reducing shipping costs, given his 1-bottle fixed-price delivery of £5 for the UK and £15 for the EU (standard tracked and insured).

Regenerative Farming Starter Kit: For readers looking forward to kickstarting their best summer garden ever, spring planting is around the corner, and I am most excited about our “Regenerative Farming Starter Kit,” which includes Primora Bio (cosmotropic water concentrate), Primora Char (high-grade liquid biochar), and Primora Nourish (liquid fish hydrolysate fertilizer).

*I have not written about the wonders of biochar or fish hydrolysate, but will soon.

From Research to Practice - Links Below Images

Aurmina – The Mineral Extract For Naturally Vitalized Drinking Water

The Blueprint of Life - The Hidden Architecture That Powers Life and Health

From Volcanoes to Vitality -The Untold Story of Asao Shimanishi

The War on Chlorine Dioxide - The Medicine That Could End Medicine

The War on Ivermectin - The Medicine That Could Have Ended The Pandemic

Leading Edge Clinic - Tele-Medicine Clinic Caring For Patients in All 50 States

The field trial I will show you below is one of the reasons I kept going.

What you’re about to see did not begin in fertile soil. It began in what can only be described as near-dead ground in Temecula, California—dry, sandy, lifeless land that lies outside even the marginal conditions under which the region’s vineyards can survive. No legacy fertility waiting to be unlocked. Just the near absence of life.

What is critical to understand is this: aside from water treated with Shimanishi’s extract, almost no conventional agricultural inputs were used.

• No herbicides.

• No pesticides.

• No biologics.

• No biostimulants.

• No soil amendments.

• Barely any fertilizer.

The soil was heavily irrigated 1–2 weeks before planting. Seeds went in. Once they emerged, the plants were supported with simple weekly “foliar” applications—fine misting of the plant leaves with Themarox-treated water. Mid-season, a single fish hydrolysate was applied, according to the farmers, “to enhance taste.”

That was the entire system. What followed is the reason I believe this work matters. You will see the beginning - bare, pale, structureless soil. And then you will see what it became:

Vibrant color. Density. Structure. Yield. Not forced. Not inflated. Organized.

Little pest pressure. No meaningful disease. Minimal hand weeding.

A single control row of cucumbers was planted under identical conditions, except that both irrigation and foliar spraying used untreated water. That row tells its own story: dull color, curled leaves, fungal pressure, visible stress. It looks like what we’ve come to accept as normal.

The rest of the field does not.

People came from around the area to see it, because the difference was not subtle. It was immediate, physical, and difficult to explain using the usual language of inputs and outputs. I have written thousands of words trying to describe the mechanism behind this.

But at some point, the words have to give way to something else. This is that moment. This is what it looks like when the system begins to organize again.

This field trial was conducted in Temecula, California, by the amazing regenerative farmers Patrick Raskin (Volcanna Rain) and Ryan Schumacher (Baker Creek Heirloom Seed Company).

Pre-planting irrigation: added a Themarox diluted solution equivalent to 12ml of Primora Bio per gallon of water (formulation used was Rascon’s Volcanna Rain), and the soil was irrigated with 100 gallons per 1/8 of an acre - 400 gallons total to the soil. (*Note that the amount of water applied was a special use case; water volume for typical every 5 year soil spray with Primora Bio requires far less water. )

Irrigation was applied 1-2 weeks before seed planting.

Weeds are not simply a sign of low minerals; they are a response to imbalance. When soil mineral availability and biological function improve, crops tend to become more competitive, and weed pressure often declines. As those conditions are restored, the advantage shifts away from opportunistic growth and back toward organized plant systems.

What you just witnessed departs from the long-standing practice of layering multiple inputs to “supercharge” yield and quality. Instead, it represents something more unusual, a novel agricultural intervention which operates upstream of all of that.

It was not the result of a better fertilizer program or a more refined protocol; it was a change in the medium itself. It is what happens when a cosmotropic aqueous solution is introduced into an agricultural system.

Cosmotropes, Chaotropes, and Hofmeister Chemistry

What does “cosmotropic water” even mean? Here is where, I believe, a fundamental paradigm shift will occur.

All water contains dissolved minerals, and the composition of the minerals determines the biological and chemical properties of the water.

For over a century, water chemists have recognized that different ions influence water in fundamentally different ways: some stabilize and organize it, while others disrupt it. This distinction was borne of the work of Franz Hofmeister, a 19th-century Austrian scientist who discovered that different ions influence protein behavior and water structure in systematic ways. His work led to the Hofmeister series, a foundational framework in chemistry and biology describing how ions stabilize or disrupt molecular organization in aqueous systems.

Hofmeister classified ions according to these effects as either cosmotropic or chaotropic.

Primora Bio is built around a rare combination of highly cosmotropic ions and minerals that promote more stable hydration, more ordered interactions, and more controlled electrochemical behavior in water.

In biology, this matters. Water with a more cosmotropic influence affects how proteins fold, how enzymes function, and how membranes maintain energy gradients. Ultimately, every biochemical and cellular process in nature is occurs through and is influenced by water.

When the ionic environment supports stability, these systems operate efficiently. When it does not, they become less reliable and harder to regulate.

This is where we move from simple theory to foundational chemistry.

In my upcoming book, From Volcanoes to Vitality (FVTV), I trace the role of water and minerals across agriculture, hydrology, and biology, beginning from the earliest cellular life on Earth, to the modern era, where their role has begun to shift.

In Chapter 38, in collaboration with my friend, colleague, and mineral expert Matt Bakos (the sole North American importer of Themarox for the past 20 years), we present a framework we call the Geohydrological Shift Theory.

It begins with a set of signals already visible in the agricultural literature. An excerpt from FVTV:

Large-scale analyses of global agriculture have documented a growing pattern of yield stagnation across major cropping systems, with between 24% and 39% of production areas showing little to no yield increase despite continued input intensification (Ray et al., 2012). Even in highly optimized systems, yield gains are approaching biophysical ceilings (Grassini et al., 2013). At the same time, fertilizer inputs—particularly nitrogen—have risen dramatically without proportional yield benefits, indicating declining efficiency (Zhang et al., 2015). Taken together, these findings suggest a transition from increasing returns to diminishing returns and rising input dependence.

Our hypothesis is that the root cause is geohydrological.

Specifically:

Groundwater systems are undergoing widespread chemical change, driven by intensive use, land practices, and hydrological disruption. These changes are now documented globally and are closely linked to declining groundwater levels and altered recharge dynamics.

Key mechanisms include:

• Over-pumping / drawdown

  • declining water tables

  • seawater intrusion

  • upconing of saline groundwater

  • altered mixing and residence times

  • redox shifts

• Agricultural inputs and irrigation

  • nitrate contamination

  • rising salinity and major ions

  • mineral transformations (e.g., pyrite oxidation → sulfate + iron oxides)

• Seawater intrusion and ion exchange

  • Na⁺ ↔ Ca²⁺ / Mg²⁺ exchange

  • altered ionic balance and trace element mobility

• Recharge alteration (MAR, wastewater)

  • changes in oxygen and carbon

  • redox-driven mobilization or precipitation of metals

• Desalination / RO systems

  • altered delivered water chemistry

  • reduced mineral content requiring blending and remineralization

As a result, the modern disturbance to Earth’s water sources is twofold.

First, we are degrading aquifers and source waters themselves through heavy metals from mining, nitrate seepage from industrial fertilizers, salinization, and the widespread disruption of soil–water systems.

Second, once water is extracted, we strip it again through water treatment and purification systems optimized for sterility, pipe stability, and liability protection rather than biological legibility.

In effect, we disturb modern water twice. For more than a century, first slowly and now more rapidly, we have altered it underground, and then systematically deconditioned it again aboveground. This is why the theory is best named geohydrological rather than merely biochemical, as the impacts on the former precede the latter.

At its simplest, our collective insight is that the world’s water is increasingly chaotropic, and that this shift is impacting biology across kingdoms—first in agriculture, then in microbes, animals, and humans.

Why is this relevant to the field trial? It represents one piece of evidence supporting this theory. If chaotropic water is contributing to stagnating yields, declining gains, and, in some regions, agronomists are beginning to report literal decreases in yield despite increasing inputs and interventions, then the solution may lie in returning water toward a more cosmotropic balance.

We believe that Themarox can return water toward such a Pre-Anthropogenic state, described in antiquity as “Living water” or “Vital water.” Before the Industrial Revolution, living systems were bathed in waters that had undergone prolonged geological conditioning through slow contact with mineral surfaces, ion exchange, and redox-buffered environments, emerging not as chemically blank or disordered fluid but as geochemically conditioned water, i.e. Nature’s water.

In hydrogeologic terms, groundwater chemistry was shaped by recharge composition, residence time, water–rock interaction, and biogeochemical redox cycling. That is standard science. The implications, however, have not been followed far enough.

Put plainly, we believe that “living water” was, in more modern water chemistry terms, cosmotropic water. And if the root cause lies upstream, where chemistry and biology are being degraded, then the solution must be directed there as well.

It is fair to exercise skepticism if you think this theory rests solely on a row of cucumbers treated with chaotropic groundwater compared to produce treated with cosmotropic water.

However, that view ignores the broader signal. Note that the trial began in dead soil, and, relying on cosmotropic water as the sole agricultural input, it produced a system with minimal pest, weed, and disease pressure, reducing the need for pesticides and herbicides and requiring almost no fertilizer.

Skeptical or not, I am used to colleagues accusing me of “too-rapid adoption” when making recommendations for or treating patients with therapies based on what they viewed as “insufficient evidence.” That has followed me throughout my career, well before the “War on Ivermectin.”

To date, I know of not one of those “early calls” that were later proven incorrect when the totality of the data that followed is viewed objectively. However, it is always possible that this will be the first; every streak ends eventually. If so, I will have to accept that I may have prematurely gone “all in” on investing in the Asao Group's mission to bring Shimanishi’s discovery to the world.

But even there, we are seeing signals. To wit, we sold our first bottle of Aurmina on October 1, 2025.

Two months later, our repeat-customer rate was 11%, unsurprising for a product designed to last for months. But then, over the last 90 days, much to our astonishment, that number has reached 66%.

In most early-stage consumer products, strong repeat rates average about 30% and rarely exceed 50%.

There is something happening. And whatever it is, it does not behave like a typical product signal, it behaves like a system response.

So maybe it is not too premature to suggest Themarox as a possible response to what appears to be a worsening trajectory in the degradation of water systems. The reason I say that is because this field trial is the first time I have seen a reversal of that magnitude that does not rely on force. And that kind of reversal matters more than any individual result. But the individual results are already there, as can be seen in my recent summary of the growing evidence base for Themarox’s impacts on the largest and most diverse number of agricultural outcomes associated with a single input in history.

Because if the above can be seen in soil that had effectively nothing to give, then the implications are not local. They are systemic. They point to something we have misunderstood and may still be able to correct.

That is why I have spent these many months writing and researching. That is why I kept going, because once you see this, it becomes very difficult to ignore the possibility that we are not dealing with a problem of inputs, but a problem of conditions.

Essentially, we do not think about water correctly. We treat it as a background input. A neutral medium. Something required, but not something that shapes what happens within it.

And yet every biochemical interaction, every cellular process, every system in soil and biology occurs in water. Not in abstraction. In water with specific properties, specific mineral composition, and specific electrochemical behavior. I sense that this has been largely overlooked.

We have focused on nutrients, organisms, and interventions, while neglecting the medium that determines how they interact. If that’s true, then it changes where we look. And it changes where we intervene.

That means the solution has been hiding in plain sight.

For those of you who have been following this work and for those seeing it for the first time, today we’re launching a new category of agricultural inputs, a cosmotropic mineral concentrate derived from Themarox, called Primora Bio, while kicking off our Spring World Water Day sale.

But for now, sit with what you’ve seen here.

Because this is where the story stops being theoretical—and starts becoming something you can actually use.

*If you value the late nights and deep dives into all the “rabbit holes” I write about (or the Op-Eds and lectures I generate for the public), your support is greatly appreciated.

Subscribe now

World Water Day Sale - Discount Code: Springsale26

Sale: 25% off all single bottles of Aurmina or Primora Bio, with separate, already-included bundle discounts ranging from 25% to 30% on multi-bottle and combination bundles.

UK, European Customers: Our first UK distributor, Nicholas Smith at The Water Dr., is offering a 10% discount until the end of the month, with coupon code KORYUK10. Much larger savings will be made by reducing shipping costs, given his 1-bottle fixed-price delivery of £5 for the UK and £15 for the EU (standard tracked and insured).

Regenerative Farming Starter Kit: For readers looking forward to kickstarting their best summer garden ever, spring planting is around the corner, and I am most excited about our “Regenerative Farming Starter Kit,” which includes Primora Bio (cosmotropic water concentrate), Primora Char (high-grade liquid biochar), and Primora Nourish (liquid fish hydrolysate fertilizer).

*I have not written about the wonders of biochar or fish hydrolysate, but will soon.

From Research to Practice - Links Below Images

Aurmina – The Mineral Extract For Naturally Vitalized Drinking Water

The Blueprint of Life - The Hidden Architecture That Powers Life and Health

From Volcanoes to Vitality -The Untold Story of Asao Shimanishi

The War on Chlorine Dioxide - The Medicine That Could End Medicine

The War on Ivermectin - The Medicine That Could Have Ended The Pandemic

Leading Edge Clinic - Tele-Medicine Clinic Caring For Patients in All 50 States

Disclaimer:

The studies summarized below were performed using mineral solutions derived from the same parent Themarox complex and prepared at the same composition and dilution as Primora Bio. While the original reports do not reference the Primora Bio brand, the solutions tested are chemically identical. The results, therefore, apply directly to Primora Bio.

Novel Functional Category

Across multiple independent studies, Primora Bio demonstrates coordinated improvements in plant yield, photosynthetic activity, antioxidant capacity, disease resistance, and reduced uptake of pesticide residues under comparable exposure conditions.

No conventional agricultural input class—fertilizers, biostimulants, microbial inoculants, or soil amendments—has been shown to simultaneously influence growth efficiency, metabolic resilience, and contaminant handling to this extent.

The evidence suggests that Primora Bio functions as an upstream, system-level agricultural conditioning agent, influencing plant metabolism, mineral handling, stress resilience, contaminant burden, and ecological function at once.

Scope of Evidence

Across six controlled agricultural and biological studies (crop trials, soil restoration, metabolic assays, and ecosystem monitoring), a mineralized solution identical to Primora Bio, derived from the Themarox complex was evaluated for its effects on plant productivity, contaminant handling, antioxidant capacity, photosynthetic activity, and ecological resilience.

The collective dataset spans:

• Controlled crop trials (rice, citrus, cannabis, buckwheat)

• Soil and ecosystem restoration field studies

• Biochemical and cellular antioxidant investigations

• Government and institutional agricultural evaluations

1. Crop Productivity, Growth, and Yield Structure

Yield and Plant Development

Across field trials, Primora Bio consistently improved plant growth dynamics and productive structures:

• +16.8% increase in harvested ears per rice plant

• +7.1% increase in clean grains

• −30.8% reduction in immature grains

• ~30% reduction in immature grain ratio

• Faster root establishment (~5 days post-transplant)

• Accelerated vegetative growth and thicker stems/leaves

Interpretation:

The dominant yield signal was not merely mass gain but enhanced maturation efficiency and structural productivity.

2. Nutrient and Mineral Incorporation

Trace Mineral Uptake (Buckwheat Study)

• Copper: +21%

• Zinc: +32%

• Iron: +58%

• Total mineral (ash): +21%

Macronutrients (protein, fat, fiber) remained unchanged, indicating that the effect was specific to mineral incorporation rather than to caloric composition.

3. Photosynthesis, Metabolic Efficiency, and Biomass Conversion

Across growth and physiological assays, plants treated with Primora Bio demonstrated:

• Faster germination vigor

• Improved biomass accumulation efficiency

• Enhanced early vegetative development

• Improved conversion of available resources into mature plant structures

These patterns consistently suggested increased metabolic and photosynthetic efficiency rather than simple fertilization effects.

4. Antioxidant Capacity and Cellular Redox Effects

Plant Antioxidant Improvements

Compared to controls:

• ~15–25% higher radical-scavenging capacity

• ~20–30% higher metal-chelating antioxidant activity

• ~10–15% greater lipid peroxidation inhibition

Cellular Antioxidant Enzyme Activity (Human HepG2 Model)

• Superoxide dismutase (SOD): ~15–25% increase

• Intracellular ROS: ~15–20% reduction vs control extract

These findings indicate improved oxidative stress resilience extending from plant tissue chemistry to mammalian cell response.

5. Contaminant Handling and Pesticide Interaction

Across crop trials (notably cannabis and field contamination studies summarized earlier), Primora Bio application showed:

• ~50% average reduction in pesticide residue levels

• Peak reductions reaching ~70–85% in some measurements

• Consistent residue suppression across timepoints

Interpretation:

These results suggest improved contaminant handling and reduced pesticide uptake or retention within plant tissues.

6. Soil Function, Microbial Ecology, and Environmental Effects

Soil and Microbial Environment

Field monitoring reported:

• Increased soil microbial diversity

• Improved balance of dominant bacterial species

• Enhanced ecological habitat quality

Biodiversity Effects

• ~1.2× increase in insect species diversity and density in treated zones

Environmental Safety

• No deterioration in water quality metrics (pH, EC, DO, COD, nutrients)

These findings indicate environmental neutrality or improvement rather than ecological toxicity.

Bottom-Line Quantitative Impact Statement (Across All Studies)

Across agronomic, biochemical, and ecosystem endpoints, Primora Bio water solutions demonstrated:

• +16–17% increases in productive plant structures

• ~30% reductions in immature or poorly matured yield components

• +21–58% increases in trace mineral incorporation into plant tissue

• ~15–30% increases in antioxidant capacity across assays

• ~15–25% increases in cellular antioxidant enzyme activity

• ~15–20% reductions in intracellular oxidative stress markers

• ~50% average reductions in pesticide residue accumulation (peaks ~70–85%)

• ~1.2× increases in ecosystem biodiversity metrics

• No measurable environmental toxicity or water-quality deterioration

Integrated Interpretation

Taken together, the studies do not show a narrow fertilizer-like effect. Instead, they reveal a multi-domain agricultural impact profile, including:

• Improved plant metabolic efficiency and photosynthesis

• Enhanced trace mineral incorporation and redox capacity

• Reduced contaminant uptake and oxidative stress burden

• Accelerated maturation and structural productivity

• Improved soil ecology and environmental resilience

Agricultural Significance

The collective evidence indicates that mineral-spectrum conditioning of irrigation or foliar environments may influence plant systems upstream of conventional nutrient supplementation, producing coordinated improvements in:

• Yield quality and maturation efficiency

• Antioxidant and stress resilience pathways

• Mineral nutrient density of crops

• Environmental compatibility and soil health

• Pesticide residue reduction and contaminant handling

This breadth of simultaneous effects, spanning yield structure, antioxidant physiology, mineral nutrition, contaminant reduction, and ecological stability, suggests a systemic agricultural modulation mechanism rather than a single-pathway fertilizer or growth stimulant effect.

Document Set: Executive Summary Source Materials

Below are the published studies and technical reports that collectively represent multi-domain evidence spanning controlled laboratory plant physiology, applied agricultural field trials, soil restoration research, and institutional biological studies, forming the evidentiary base for evaluating the effects of Primora Bio mineral solution. The studies together show improvements in crop growth and yields, reduced uptake of pesticides and contaminants, higher antioxidant activity, better photosynthesis, and overall stronger, more pest-resilient plants and soils.

1. Buckwheat Mineral Study

Document: BUCKWHEAT STUDY.pd

Buckwheat Study

725KB ∙ PDF file

Download

Download

Provenance: Agricultural experimental study evaluating mineral solution effects on crop growth parameters.

Description: Controlled plant-growth research assessing germination vigor, biomass production, and physiological development following application of Primora Bio, with emphasis on early-stage plant metabolic activation.

2. Cannabis Field Study (Pesticide Uptake and Metabolic Effects)

Document: CANNABIS STUDY.pd

Drops Of Balance Study

637KB ∙ PDF file

Download

Download

f

Provenance: Applied agricultural field trial of Primora Bio, examining plant biochemical and contaminant-response outcomes.

Description: Evaluates terpene production, cannabinoid content, mold incidence, and pesticide residue levels in treated vs. control plants, demonstrating broad metabolic and resilience effects following mineralized water application.

3. Drops of Balance Field Study

Document: Drops of Balance Field Study Report Final Draft 12152023 (4).docx.pdf

Drops Of Balance Study

637KB ∙ PDF file

Download

Download

Provenance: Multi-endpoint agronomic field trial investigating mineralized irrigation effects.

Description: Comprehensive field evaluation measuring crop quality, yield-related physiology, and contaminant handling, with particular emphasis on reductions in pesticide accumulation and improvements in plant biochemical vitality.

4. Photosynthetic Activity Study

Document: ILANGOVAN Themarox PhotosyntheticActivity PAPER.pdf

Ilangovan Themarox Photosyntheticactivity Paper

5.5MB ∙ PDF file

Download

Download

Provenance: Experimental plant physiology study assessing energy capture and growth dynamics.

Description: Controlled investigation of Primora Bio, demonstrating changes in photosynthetic efficiency, biomass accumulation, and early plant vigor following exposure to diluted mineral complexes, suggesting improved metabolic efficiency rather than simple fertilization.

5. Japanese Ministry of Health Study

Document: JAPANESE MINISTRY OF HEALTH STUDY.pdf

Japanese Ministry Of Health Study

90KB ∙ PDF file

Download

Download

Provenance: Government-associated research evaluating biological and physiological responses to Primora Bio.

Description: Study examining organism-level physiological responses, including growth dynamics and systemic biological effects, contributing early institutional evidence regarding mineral-spectrum interventions.

6. UN Mineral-22 Soil Restoration Study (South Korea)

Document: UN MINERAL 22 STUDY IN KOREA.pdf

Un Mineral 22 Study In Korea

9.67MB ∙ PDF file

Download

Download

Provenance: International soil and agricultural restoration research initiative.

Description: Investigates the effects of Primora Bio on soil recovery, plant vitality, and ecological productivity, providing systems-level evidence of improved soil-plant functional integration.

7. Citrus Grove Mineral Water Foliar Spray Trial

Document: VOLCANNA RAIN CITRUS GROVE TRIAL.pdf

Provenance: Field trial conducted in a 100-acre citrus orchard in California’s San Joaquin Valley.

Citrus Grove Trial Test Results

960KB ∙ PDF file

Download

Download

Executive Summary Citrus Grove Foliar Spray Trial

131KB ∙ PDF file

Download

Download

Description: An 11-week foliar, mid-season initiated application study using Volcanna Rain, a Primora Bio equivalent solution, demonstrating nutrient mobilization and retention, with balancing of 7 out of 12 measured elements and sustained nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium levels above optimal late-season benchmarks.

If you value the late nights and deep dives into all the “rabbit holes” I write about (or the Op-Eds and lectures I generate for the public), your support is greatly appreciated.

Subscribe now

*If what you just read raised questions about the mineral system at the center of it, you can explore it further at Aurmina.com or Primorabio.com, where we are working to make Shimanishi’s extraordinary achievement more widely available for both drinking water and agricultural applications respectively.

WORLD WATER DAY SALE

Dear Readers, please note that next Sunday is World Water Day, which we will be celebrating with a Spring Sale discount of 25% off both Aurmina and Primora Bio, starting Thursday, March 19th, through Sunday, March 22nd.

From Research to Practice - Links Below

Aurmina – The Mineral Extract For Naturally Vitalized Drinking Water

The Blueprint of Life - The Hidden Architecture That Powers Life and Health

From Volcanoes to Vitality -The Untold Story of Asao Shimanishi

The War on Chlorine Dioxide - The Medicine That Could End Medicine

The War on Ivermectin - The Medicine That Could Have Ended The Pandemic

Leading Edge Clinic - Tele-Medicine Clinic Caring For Patients in All 50 States

I want to thank the readers who stuck with me over the last three posts, in which I presented a theory called the Rock-Water Circuit, integrating findings from fields as diverse as geology, hydrology, biology, chemistry, and origin-of-life science.

Since it may have been too “scienc-ey” for some, know that it is over now. We will be leaving science behind as we continue the rest of the journey this book (i.e., series of posts) will take you on.

A core insight of our proposed Rock–Water Circuit framework, which goes beyond current origin-of-life models, is that the same iron–sulfur–aluminum–water (ISAW) mineral chemistry thought to have helped initiate life on early Earth also plays a central role in re-releasing the minerals that sustain biological systems today.

That insight should actually be unsurprising in a way. Any energy system capable of sustaining life on Earth must include a mechanism that continually renews the energy gradients on which lifeforms depend. Without it, mineral systems would gradually exhaust themselves.

When a Human Isolated a Phase of the Planetary Circuit

For billions of years, ISAW operated only within the slow machinery of the Earth itself. Water circulated through rock; mineral lattices hydrated and exchanged ions with passing water; electrochemical gradients formed and dissipated; and the planetary energy architecture sustained the conditions under which life eventually emerged and evolved.

Then, in the twentieth century, a human being isolated a working phase of it.

In 1977, after two decades of solitary experimentation, a Japanese engineer succeeded in extracting and stabilizing a single operational link in the Rock–Water Circuit, separating a geologically generated chemistry from its mineral host, rendering it portable in liquid form.

His name was Asao Shimanishi.

What is truly remarkable about his accomplishment is that most scientific discoveries either newly map previously unknown processes in nature or, in technology, create processes that did not previously exist. Shimanishi’s work fell into a third, historically unusual category of discovery: he succeeded in isolating and stabilizing a functioning phase of a planetary process.

This was not the work of a famous academic, a government laboratory, or a large industrial research group.

It was done by a single individual operating outside the scientific mainstream.

The Question That Volcanic Water Raised

I do not believe that Shimanishi knew he was extracting a foundational piece of planetary chemistry. His goal was far more practical at the time.

In the 1950s, given that he was trained in both mining and engineering, he had already become troubled by data showing that modern agriculture and industrial development were gradually stripping soils and water of the complex spectrum of trace minerals that had historically sustained both ecosystems and human nutrition.

The story begins when Shimanishi was in his thirties, sitting near the water in meditation. As he gazed across the landscape, something caught his attention: a tree growing straight out of what appeared to be naked stone. There was no soil, no visible earth, only a narrow crack in a granite boulder from which the trunk rose, supporting a tree in full bloom.

Where was it getting nourishment? Seeing a full-grown tree thriving from bare rock, Shimanishi began to suspect that the mineral composition of the rock held a unique energy or vitality that likely reminded him of volcanic regions that often produced springs whose waters were widely regarded as unusually restorative.

Later, he discovered that the rock was an iron-rich mica, known for containing an extraordinary spectrum of trace elements, and he began to wonder whether the properties of certain waters might arise from the minerals they acquire as they pass through different rocks.

His ambition eventually crystallized into a simple idea.

It was an idea simple enough to describe in a sentence, yet difficult enough to occupy the next twenty years of his life.

The vermiculite species or rock that he chose was a weathered derivative of biotite, a layered iron-bearing mica typically formed deep within Earth’s crust. Although vermiculite is more open and hydrated than biotite, its minerals remain tightly bound within stacked aluminosilicate sheets.

Simply mixing the rock mineral with water would not release the desired spectrum of ions. Strong acids could dissolve the structure entirely, but doing so would produce unstable and potentially toxic mixtures. Gentle leaching methods were safer but painfully slow, often producing only weak solutions after years of extraction.

For twenty years, he was driven by a single conviction: that restoring the mineral complexity modern life was quietly losing might be of benefit to humanity.

He worked directly with rock, heat, water, sulfur, and time, advancing only through repetition, failure, adjustment, and patience measured in years. Shimanishi had one stone, one question, and the discipline to remain with it until the problem finally yielded.

The ambition itself was elemental: to extract minerals in a form that could move beyond a single volcano or spring and enter ordinary water, soil, and life.

A Historically Unparalleled Achievement

It is my opinion that his achievement is unique in the history of Science. Although many scientific discoveries begin with moments of insight that then take years to develop into practical form, Shimanishi’s path was different. He spent more than 2 decades working on a single technical problem until it finally yielded a solution.

Further, other giants in the history of science had teams, theories, funding, or infrastructure. For instance, Pasteur refined revolutionary ideas within an ecosystem that steadily supplied recognition and resources. And although Mendel also worked alone for years, and similarly succeeded in mapping out a single problem, genetics, it took him approximately a decade less. Tesla spent much of his life pursuing the idea of resonance as a transformative principle in energy and communication, but he never fully realized the system he envisioned.

Thus, as far as I can tell, those who had come before him had either a combination of collaborators and institutional support or met with success more quickly. Shimanishi had one rock, one question, and for twenty years, he worked alone, altering temperatures, acid strengths, reaction times, sulfur sources, heating and cooling cycles, and filtration methods. Each change solved one problem but created several new ones. Too harsh a treatment destabilized the chemistry. Too gentle a process released almost nothing.

Sulfur chemistry eventually became central to the process. In retrospect, aspects of this process resemble what modern geochemists now study as enhanced weathering, the accelerated chemical breakdown of minerals in water to release ions and alter surrounding geochemistry.

But after nearly twenty years of iteration, failure, and refinement, he discovered that, under carefully controlled conditions, sulfur-based reactions could convert certain minerals into water-soluble sulfate forms while simultaneously helping undesirable metals precipitate or be filtered out.

In 1977, he produced a liquid solution containing a spectrum of minerals, dominated by iron and sulfur, with dozens of other elements appearing in minute (yet still active) amounts. He named this extract Themarox, or “Rock Extract.”

What followed was unexpected. When the extract was added to water, it seemed to awaken processes already present in nature. Murky water clarified. Suspended debris gathered into visible clusters and settled to the bottom. In ponds and fish tanks, foul, stagnant water became clear and oxygen-rich.

When applied to soils and irrigation water, crops grew with unusual vigor, grasses thickened, vegetables strengthened, and fish in aquaculture ponds became more active and resilient. Again and again, the extract appeared to stimulate the same self-organizing processes that nature uses to clean water, restore soil, and support living systems.

The Rock Extract: Water Purification

The mineral complex Shimanishi released from vermiculite contained an unusually broad spectrum of trace elements derived from the original mica lattice. Crucially, the elements appeared primarily as sulfate salts, reflecting the sulfur chemistry central to his extraction process.

In practical terms, this meant the minerals were already water-soluble and charged.

The result was a liquid mineral extract that behaved much like naturally mineralized waters, carrying a dense spectrum of ions capable of conditioning the surrounding water’s electrochemical environment.

One of the first properties Shimanishi noticed was its ability to clarify water. When added to ponds, tanks, or reservoirs, impurities and contaminants gathered into visible aggregates that settled to the bottom.

What is fascinating is that this phenomenon mirrors what happens continuously in nature. In rivers, wetlands, and mineral springs, water is clarified by contact with rock surfaces, which release minerals into the water, causing dispersed particles and contaminants to coagulate and settle.

What Shimanishi had unknowingly done was extract a working fragment of nature, a phase of Earth’s mineral–water chemistry normally confined to rocks and sediments, and which could now operate inside glasses and containers.

He obtained a patent for its use in purifying and clarifying brackish water. Eight years later, in 1985, his innovative achievement led to the founding of Shimanishi Co., where he began producing Themarox®, a citrus-colored liquid containing a “perfect symphony” of minerals (my words), electrically charged, fully dissolvable, and readily absorbed. What’s impressive is that this mineral complex belonged to nature alone; no man-made process could have synthesized a composition of minerals like these.

As an illustration of the clarifying and purifying properties of Themarox, there is a famous 3.5-minute video clip from a Japanese news broadcast of a “clean-up” event where his minerals were used to clarify a brackish, polluted pond at a famous Shinto shrine in Tokyo. The pond was especially popular with Japanese students who visited to pray for success in entrance exams and studies. The pond went from brackish to clear in 4 hours.

At the 2:00 mark, you’ll catch the only public sighting of Shimanishi that I am aware of, smiling as he drinks the freshly treated pond water from a glass mug that they had lowered into the pond on a rope.

Others performed similar demonstrations in smaller tanks and bowls. At 2:41 in the same television segment above, on the host’s desk, two cloudy, contaminated fishbowls are shown, each containing a single fish barely visible through the haze. The host then treats one bowl with Themarox, and viewers can be heard reacting in surprise as the suspended particles clump together and sink, leaving the fish clearly visible and swimming in crystal-clear water.

The Rock Extract: Agricultural Applications

Next, he directed his efforts beyond water treatment and into agricultural and aquacultural applications, moving Themarox into agricultural trials, seed germination tests, and soil restoration initiatives in Japan and other countries.

It did not take long for farmers to notice certain patterns in soil and crops.

The rice didn’t just grow. The stalks were sturdier, more resistant to pests and insects, and the plants stayed upright instead of collapsing in wind and rain. Vegetable plots developed plants that grew with a vigor older farmers recognized from their youth. Golf courses began buying Themarox to ensure fuller, verdant, and more resilient grasses.

In fish farms and ponds, operators added his extract and watched as foul-smelling, low-oxygen water cleared. Fish that had been sluggish and prone to disease became more active and fed more vigorously. The mortality in eel farms dropped, and the eels reportedly scored the highest quality meat grades in the sushi market. A few environmental engineers began using the solution in polluted lakes and lagoons, reporting improvements in water clarity, odor, algal blooms, and biota.

Problem: Shimanishi did not work within academia; thus, his objectives were not centered on research and publication. He preferred relying on demonstrations to customers to help grow his business.

Despite not being a pure academic (although a brilliant scientist), there does exist a small collection of published studies and technical reports on the efficacy of Themaraox in agriculture, including a U.N. internal report of a soil restoration project, a Japanese Ministry of Health field trial, a peer-reviewed seed germination study, and company video archives.

However, based on a comprehensive analysis of the existing evidence base, which includes two recent studies conducted by U.S distributors of Themarox-derived solutions, the number and diversity of the positive outcomes suggest that Themarox represents a “novel functional category” in terms of its potential impacts on agriculture.

The studies demonstrate coordinated improvements in;

1. plant yield

2. photosynthetic activity,

3. antioxidant capacity

4. disease resistance

5. nutrient uptake

6. reductions in immature yield components

7. increased soil microbial diversity

8. improved balance among dominant bacterial species

9. enhanced soil habitat quality

10. significantly reduced uptake of pesticide residues (an observation particularly relevant in light of growing concerns about glyphosate exposure).

A summary of the above studies, including the reports themselves, has been compiled in a separate post here, detailing the precise magnitudes of the observed improvements for each outcome listed above.

What I am trying to communicate to the public (and the world) is that, to this point in history, no single conventional agricultural input, either fertilizers, biostimulants, microbial inoculants, or soil amendments, has been shown to influence all these metrics simultaneously.

More difficult to write off, although not formally documented, are the thousands of use cases reported to the company and its representatives.

The Rock Extract: Therapeutic Applications

Readers sometimes wonder how yours truly, a physician, ended up spending what is now seven months glued to a computer for eighteen hours a day, wandering far outside medicine into mineralogy, water chemistry, geology, soil biology, agriculture, and origin-of-life science (which has done noticeable damage to his own health in the process).

The explanation is straightforward: for the first time in my career, I had stumbled onto something that appeared to influence physiology not just in patients, but across entire living systems — microbes, plants, animals, humans, and even the water systems that sustain them.

There is no precedent for that in medicine, really. No vitamin, antibiotic, immune modulator, cytotoxin, or metabolic therapy operates across biological kingdoms, let alone extends its influence into soil and water.

No physician expects a therapeutic principle to operate in bifidobacteria, basil, eels, potatoes, and people alike. The only medicine I could find that could be tolerated outside mammals was aspirin, as salicylic acid participates in signaling in plants, but even that analogy collapsed quickly. No one has ever treated a plant with aspirin (I don’t think).

But, for me, my journey into the world of minerals and water started when I encountered the work of a physician named Hisotake Nojima.

Dr. Hisotake Nojima and his “Super Mineral Solution”

Nojima was not an outsider to medicine. He rose within Japan’s public health system and served as Director of the Sawara Health Center in Chiba Prefecture before later becoming head of a regional hospital. Yet during his years in practice, he became increasingly troubled by what he saw as a blind spot in modern medical thinking. Research, he wrote, had become almost entirely focused on organic molecules while largely ignoring the role of inorganic elements, metals, salts, and mineral ions in biological function.

His interest deepened after he encountered a solution made from Themarox. One of the first cases he described was of a town mayor with advanced gastric cancer. Surgery was being planned. The mayor’s family had heard that Nojima was quietly experimenting with a new ionized mineral solution. They were desperate.

Nojima was still in an exploratory phase. He adjusted concentration, designed a high-dose oral regimen, and proceeded cautiously. Based on many later cases, he noted retrospectively that gastric cancers, because they are directly bathed in the mineral solution twice daily, often respond unusually fast.

Within days, the mayor’s appetite returned. His pain diminished. He began to regain strength.

Before gastric cancer surgery, surgeons repeat an endoscopy. The first had documented a clear malignant mass. When they returned to confirm the target, the mass was gone. The hospital physicians were, by his account, confused and effectively speechless.

What struck Nojima was the disappearance of a documented tumor between two scopes, with no conventional therapy in between. He did not treat this as proof of a cure, but as the first signal that something fundamental was occurring that existing frameworks could not explain.

Whatever the tumor biology was doing, equally notable was the upstream shifts he described, appetite, strength, sleep, tolerance, repair.

Nojima then began offering the therapy to patients with advanced cancer who had exhausted surgery, chemotherapy, or radiation. He repeatedly described observing pain subside and strength return. Imaging showed reduced tumor burden or halted progression. Infections improved unexpectedly. Chemotherapy became more tolerable.

These were not isolated anecdotes in his book. They recurred in a pattern. Over time, Nojima came to understand what he was seeing as follows:

“The minerals were restoring the body’s mineral architecture, and the body was doing the healing.”

What Nojima Actually Claimed

Because stories like the mayor’s invite distortion, restraint matters. Nojima never claimed universal cures. He documented recoveries, partial responses, stabilization, and non-responders. His insistence was that mineral architecture mattered to all of them. Some improved. Some stabilized. A few experienced remission.

He also acknowledged patients so depleted that mineral restoration could not reverse the decline.

Author’s Note: The reports above come from Nojima’s own clinical writings and have not been independently verified through modern controlled clinical trials.

Nojima did not describe these observations as universal cures, nor did he claim that the mineral solution worked in every patient. What struck him instead was a recurring pattern: when the body's mineral (or aqueous) environment was restored, physiological resilience often seemed to improve. In his writings, he summarized this idea with a phrase that appeared repeatedly throughout his books: the solution was helping restore what he called the body’s “mineral architecture.”

Over the following years, he documented his experiences in several books (one of which was translated into English here) and founded a nonprofit organization devoted to exploring the roles of minerals, nutrition, and environmental factors in chronic disease. At its height, he wrote, the organization had tens of thousands of members.

Although his work remained largely unknown outside Japan and was never integrated into mainstream medical research, his clinical observations represent one of the earliest attempts by a modern physician to investigate the biological effects of a sulfated biotite-derived broad-spectrum mineral complex.

Shimanishi also believed that the mineral spectrum in his solution could support human biological processes. In his view, since minerals act as cofactors that activate enzymes throughout the body and enzymes require specific minerals to function properly, restoring mineral diversity to water could help restore normal biological activity.

He claimed that health improvements reported by users arose from this mineral–enzyme interaction, though he acknowledged that medical claims were legally restricted and should be approached cautiously.

**I recount the observations above as historical medical reporting rather than as evidence of established therapeutic effects.

What I Eventually Realized Shimanishi Had Done

Seen this way, Shimanishi’s achievement becomes less mysterious and, in some respects, even more remarkable. He did not create a new form of water. What he succeeded in isolating was a mineral chemistry capable of conditioning water into an electrochemically organized state, much like the mineralized waters that have naturally emerged throughout history from geothermal systems dispersed among the Earth’s crust.

Ultimately, in the framework of ISAW and the Rock-Water Circuit, what Shimanishi did, unknowingly, was extract from rock and carry into water a redox-active chemistry set that geology had long ago already assembled.

An Older Pattern Comes Into View

In Shimanishi’s own region of Japan alone, the accessible vermiculite reserves are sufficient for centuries, perhaps millennia, of human-scale application.

This is not a scarce remedy.

It is a geological inheritance.

As detailed in From Volcanoes To Vitality, if understood and applied responsibly, Themarox may represent a path for the gradual restoration of soils, waters, husbandry, and even human health.

Beyond that aspiration, a separate, rather unique question arose in the wake of my studies into Themarox. If a specific mineral–water chemistry capable of organizing electrochemical energy has been operating quietly within rock for billions of years, and if a human being has now managed to isolate a working phase of that chemistry, then why do ancient traditions, alchemical writings, and even fragments of early scripture appear to describe processes that map so precisely onto this same mineral–water transformation?

The chapters that follow explore how this pattern connects modern science with far older attempts to understand the relationship between matter, water, and the organizing forces of life.

Author’s Note on Stewardship

Encountering Shimanishi’s work did more than reshape my understanding of minerals and water. It imposed a responsibility.

If what he had isolated truly represented a recoverable phase of the Rock–Water Circuit, with potential impacts in restoring water, soils, agriculture, and even human health, then leaving it confined to obscurity would have been, in my view, a failure of stewardship rather than restraint.

For that reason, midway through writing this book, I, along with my wife Lisa and my long-time practice partner at the Leading Edge Clinic, Scott Marsland, took the practical step of founding The Asao Group, a company that has made this extract accessible for careful, ethical use in drinking water (Aurmina) and for agricultural applications (Primorabio).

Some readers will undoubtedly question this decision, but know that I did not embark on this effort solely for commercial reasons; instead, my motivation was threefold: to make a profit, fund research, and disseminate philanthropically. In fact, those principles are explicitly stated in the Asao Group’s operating agreement as the guideposts for all future corporate decisions.

I insisted on this to preserve and carry forward Shimanishi’s ethos: to help humanity.

In this way, the formation of the Asao Group is an attempt to ensure that a potentially consequential material, if validated through continued observation and study, would not remain locked behind geography, language, or historical accident.

The scientific argument of this book stands independently of that effort; the company arose in response to it, not as its justification.

*If you value the late nights and deep dives into all the “rabbit holes” I write about (or the Op-Eds and lectures I generate for the public), your support is greatly appreciated.

Subscribe now

*If what you just read raised questions about the mineral system at the center of it, you can explore it further at Aurmina.com or Primorabio.com, where we are working to make Shimanishi’s extraordinary achievement more widely available for both drinking water and agricultural applications, respectively.

WORLD WATER DAY SALE

Dear Readers, please note that next Sunday is World Water Day, which we will be celebrating with a Spring Sale discount of 25% off both Aurmina and Primora Bio, starting Thursday, March 19th, through Sunday, March 22nd.

From Research to Practice - Links Below

Aurmina – The Mineral Extract For Naturally Vitalized Drinking Water

The Blueprint of Life - The Hidden Architecture That Powers Life and Health

From Volcanoes to Vitality -The Untold Story of Asao Shimanishi

The War on Chlorine Dioxide - The Medicine That Could End Medicine

The War on Ivermectin - The Medicine That Could Have Ended The Pandemic

Leading Edge Clinic - Tele-Medicine Clinic Caring For Patients in All 50 States

Author Aside: We’re in the middle of a brief run of what I call the “Deep Science” posts. They’re a bit more technical than usual, but they’re necessary to understand the larger story we will return to tomorrow, about water, minerals, and life. Hang in there for this one more rabbit hole, then we’ll return to one of, if not the, most important tales I have ever told.

RECAP

Before continuing, it is worth briefly recalling the elemental logic of the iron-sulfur-aluminum-water engine itself (ISAW). In earlier sections, I argued that Earth’s mineral–water chemistry operates through a kind of division of labor among four elements. Iron governs the movement of electrons, cycling between oxidation states and keeping energy in motion. Sulfur mediates proton activity and drives mineral transformations that reopen reactive surfaces. Aluminum provides the stable aluminosilicate framework within which these reactions can occur without collapsing the system. And water serves as the mobile medium that links them all together, dissolving minerals, carrying charge, and transporting the resulting chemistry outward into soils, oceans, and eventually living organisms.

Living Water and the Deep Earth Circulation System

In the previous act, I examined ISAW at the elemental scale, where water plays a critical role in activating mineral chemistry in rock and then carries both its energy and mineral inputs from rock into life.

As I followed that chemistry outward from mineral reactions into planetary processes, one realization became unavoidable.

The planetary energy system is not the cause of ISAW chemistry.

It is the cumulative expression of it.

Across the crust and mantle, iron-, sulfur-, and aluminum-bearing mineral systems continuously interact with circulating water. Wherever this interaction occurs, iron-bearing minerals oxidize, water is reduced, and electrochemical gradients emerge.

Modern mineral physics confirms that this circulation is not confined to the crust. Two well-documented geological processes illustrate how circulating water and iron-rich rock naturally generate electrochemical energy long before biology appears.

Natural Electrochemical Systems in Rock and Water

One process that repeatedly appeared in discussions of early planetary energy systems is serpentinization. When water infiltrates deep fractures in iron-rich mantle rocks, a powerful chemical transformation begins. The minerals reorganize into rocks such as serpentine and magnetite, releasing hydrogen and heat.

The surrounding fluids become strongly alkaline. When these fluids encounter comparatively more acidic seawater, steep redox and proton gradients develop. In energetic terms, this stores electrochemical potential, the same kind of energy difference that biology later exploits through electron transport chains and proton gradients.

For this reason, serpentinizing hydrothermal systems are widely considered among the most powerful natural energy engines operating on the early Earth.

Not long after encountering this process, I came across a closely related phenomenon described in the geophysical literature: what some researchers call “natural geobatteries.” In many regions of the crust, reduced iron- and sulfur-bearing minerals at depth are electrically connected through rock and groundwater to more oxidized environments closer to the surface.

The arrangement resembles a battery: reduced minerals act as electron donors, oxidized zones act as electron acceptors, and groundwater serves as the ionic pathway that closes the circuit. Portions of the crust therefore behave as distributed electrochemical circuits, quietly moving charge through the coupled pathways of rock and water.

At that point, the implication became difficult for me to ignore.

Wherever water circulates through iron-rich rock under conditions of chemical imbalance, electrochemical gradients emerge that allow electrons and protons to move simultaneously through mineral structures and water.

The metabolic machinery of life may therefore represent something deeper: not a new invention, but the internalization of an energy system that had long operated within rock and water.

Water Circulation Through the Deep Earth

When I zoomed out to view Earth’s energy cycle as a whole, water again emerged as the central medium through which planetary chemistry operates continuously.

Heat rises from below, but it is the circulation of water, descending into rock, dwelling within fractures, exchanging charge and minerals, and eventually returning upward, that connects Earth’s interior chemistry with surface environments. Through this circulation, mineral reactions occurring at depth are carried outward and redistributed.

Rainwater enters fractured bedrock worldwide. Once below the surface, water slows dramatically and transitions from an atmospheric process into a geochemical one. Moving through faults, fractures, and porous zones, it remains in prolonged contact with iron-, sulfur-, aluminum-, and silica-rich minerals as pressure increases, temperature rises, and time extends, thus becoming chemically conditioned by the geological environments it traverses.

Some of this subsurface water returns quickly to springs and streams, but much of it remains confined for decades or centuries, repeatedly contacting the same mineral interfaces. One example of such transformation is the gradual alteration of biotite into vermiculite, in which potassium is released, without collapse of the structure.

Eventually, this deep, mineral-conditioned water returns upward, sometimes gently through springs and seeps, and sometimes violently through ruptures, geysers, and volcanic systems.

Ancient texts referred to these events as “the fountains of the great deep,” but the mechanism is physical: heat rising from the mantle drives portions of this conditioned water back toward the surface, carrying with it the chemistry acquired at depth.

From Local Gradients to a Planetary System

One discovery genuinely surprised me: just how much water the Earth stores at depth.

Vast quantities of water are held directly within mantle minerals themselves, chemically bound as hydroxyl groups. Laboratory experiments and seismic observations indicate that mantle minerals may store one to three percent water by weight, suggesting that the mantle alone may contain an amount of water comparable to, or even exceeding, all surface oceans combined.

The 2014 identification of water-bearing ringwoodite provided direct confirmation that water is embedded deep within the planet’s interior, not merely flowing above it.

I present the sequence above as a conceptual framework that helps make sense of how several well-established geological processes, deep iron-rich reservoirs, circulating water, and persistent redox gradients, could couple into a continuous planetary energy system.

Primordial Circuit Stabilization

As I began connecting these pieces, a broader picture gradually came into focus.

Over geological time, as these systems expanded and interconnected, Earth assembled into a planet capable of sustaining continuous electrochemical disequilibrium.

Iron-rich mantle and crustal systems act as vast reservoirs of reducing potential, forged under immense pressure and heat. From these environments, heat, pressure, and reducing power propagate upward through the mantle and into the surrounding crust.

As water infiltrates iron-bearing rock, iron oxidizes while water is reduced, producing hydrogen and alkaline fluids rich in dissolved hydrogen. These fluids move upward through fractures and hydrothermal systems, carrying chemical potential toward the surface.

At the same time, the early oceans followed a different chemical trajectory. Influenced by volcanic gases, atmospheric reactions, and rainfall, surface waters were comparatively oxidized and more acidic.

Wherever reducing fluids rising from depth encountered these more oxidized surface waters, strong redox and proton gradients emerged. These interfaces appeared repeatedly wherever rock, water, and chemical imbalance intersected.

Within these environments, electrons moved through mineral networks while ions moved through water, establishing a planetary-scale architecture capable of sustaining continuous energy flow.

Once sustained electrochemical gradients formed between Earth’s interior and its surface waters, their influence no longer remained confined to the depths where they originated. Circulating fluids carried heat and dissolved minerals through the crust, hydrothermal systems altered ocean chemistry, and reduced gases entered the atmosphere. Over immense spans of time these exchanges linked rock, water, and air into a continuously operating planetary system.

Only after this planetary architecture stabilized did a fourth domain emerge from within it: the biosphere.

At that point a realization began to take shape in my mind.

Life did not invent this energetic logic.

It inherited it.

Long before the first cell assembled its membranes and enzymes, the Earth itself had already become a working electrochemical system.

Figure D. The Planetary Energy Architecture: From Rock–Water Gradients to Biological Metabolism

Caption:

Persistent electrochemical gradients arise wherever circulating water interacts with iron-rich rock under conditions of chemical disequilibrium. The iron–sulfur–aluminum–water (ISAW) chemistry described in yesterdays’ post represents one of the mineral architectures through which those gradients form, stabilize, and propagate through rock and water.

In living systems, the same energetic logic reappears in miniature: electrons move through redox centers, protons accumulate across boundaries, and biological metabolism internalizes a pattern of energy flow that had long operated within the geology of the Earth itself.

What I refer to as the Primordial Circuit Stabilization marks the stage at which Earth’s internal chemistry and global water circulation became sufficiently integrated to sustain persistent electrochemical gradients across the planet.

Death, Decay, and the Chemical Return

Why Life Is Not Immortal

Up to this point, the Mineral–Water–Energy Cycle has been described within stone, followed by its journey into water, then into life, and the work it does to sustain all life—plants, animals, microbes, and humans.

Now we must examine what happens when organisms reach the end of their cycle. What is the mechanism by which we give ourselves—literally—back to the Earth, to the same mineral–water chemistry we borrowed and that sustained us during our lifetime?

ACT VII: Death as the Loss of Energy Governance

Viewed cosmologically, death is a chemical transition. Nothing disappears. Heat it, freeze it, scatter it, bury it, dissolve it: the matter persists. Minerals do not die. Water does not die. Even carbon, the backbone of life, does not decay in any meaningful sense. It rearranges endlessly.

What dies is control.

Life is defined by the ability to govern the flow of energy. To move electrons and protons in precise sequences. To maintain gradients, timing, pressure, and coordination across trillions of interacting parts. A living human is not a thing but a process: a vast, synchronized choreography of movement. When that choreography holds, a person exists. When it fails, personhood vanishes instantly, even though every component remains behind.

From this perspective, aging and disease are not mysteries. They are failures of flow.

The minerals remain intact, but the structures that guide them degrade. Ligaments stiffen. Vessels calcify and narrow. Muscles lose elasticity. Nerve impulses slow as insulating sheaths thin and fragment. Carbon-based architectures, the proteins, membranes, and scaffolds that once flexed, conducted, and responded, begin to lose precision. Not because they disappear, but because they lose alignment.

Pipes clog. Valves stick. Signals arrive late or not at all.

Blood thickens. Clots form more easily. Circulation falters. Oxygen delivery stutters, areas of dead tissue or scar from, removing them from participation. Iron can no longer cycle smoothly through hemoglobin. Calcium and magnesium drift out of rhythm along nerve and muscle pathways. Stress hormones assemble imperfectly or fire at the wrong time. Receptors miss their signals. Feedback loops overshoot or collapse.

Every system depends on uninterrupted cycling. When flow slows, pressure builds. When pressure builds, damage accumulates.

Cancer is not chaos; it is obstruction. A mass presses on a vein, a nerve, an intestine. Flow is distorted. Signals back up. Energy pools where it should not. Elsewhere, starvation begins.

Infection is an invasion with the destruction of cell or organ units needed for coordinated energy cycling. Pathogens slip past cilia, mucus, filters, and currents designed to keep surfaces moving. Cells sense danger and call for help. Inflammation floods the area with water, heat, and immune cells, firehoses aimed at a blockage that cannot be cleared.

Autoimmunity is misrecognition within a machine too complex to tolerate confusion. Something in the environment mimics a familiar component. The guards misread the signal. Soldiers descend from the watchtowers and attack the courtyard itself. The system expends energy destroying its own infrastructure.

Eventually, a threshold is crossed. The heart muscle, starved of oxygen and flow, can no longer maintain its rhythm. Electron transport fails. Proton gradients collapse. Energy production halts. The orchestra stops mid-measure.

The minerals remain. The water remains. The atoms remain.

But the battery is no longer regulated.

Death is the moment when a system built to channel energy loses the ability to do so. The universe does not notice. Chemistry continues. But the person, the singular pattern of motion, response, memory, and intention, vanishes completely.

Not because matter failed.

Because harmony did.

In living systems, this recursion has a hard limit. Unlike the Earth, the human body cannot recycle its own primary fuel indefinitely.

Iron is the courier. Oxygen is the fire. Together, they are the gas that keeps the engine turning.

Death arrives when coordination collapses.

In older language, this was called the departure of the animating force, not because anything vanished, but because the pattern that once braided stone, water, and charge into a person dissolved. The stones still hold charge. The water still flows. But the cycle no longer closes.

What follows is chemical reassignment.

Closure and Renewal: How the Cycles Relate and Reset

Once that organizing pattern dissolves, the elements that once participated in it begin their return.

Iron and sulfur re-enter soils, waters, and sediments. Aluminum remains bound within silicate frameworks. Over time, sometimes very long spans of time, burial, pressure, and heat reorganize these materials back into layered mineral structures such as biotite.

What life borrows, it returns.

While thinking about this phase of the cycle, something else became apparent to me as well: water itself changes roles.

During life’s emergence and operation, water helps maintain gradients, supporting organized flows of charge across mineral surfaces and biological membranes. But when biological structures begin to break down, water is no longer held within those ordered systems.

Instead, it moves through heterogeneous environments shaped by microbial activity, enzymatic cleavage, fluctuating pH, and oxidation. The state of the water changes as the system around it evolves.

Where once it helped preserve gradients, it has now become the medium through which those gradients dissolve. The same medium that once sustained structure now enables its dismantling.

Water dissolves, mobilizes, and redistributes minerals, carrying them through soils, sediments, and aquifers, returning elemental components to the geochemical domain from which they came.

Once I began to notice this pattern, I realized you can see the difference almost anywhere.

Picture water emerging from a mountain spring, issuing cold and clear from a rock face. It may have spent decades or centuries moving slowly through fractured rock, pressed, filtered, and conditioned by mineral lattices. Such water supports gradients. It holds a charge. It sustains vitality, not because it is “pure,” but because it has been organized through prolonged contact with rock.

Now picture water in a bog, dark, tea-colored, heavy with dissolved organic matter. It moves slowly as well, but through a very different environment: one dominated not by ordered mineral surfaces but by decaying leaves, microbial mats, and collapsing biological structures.

Here, water performs a different role. It dissolves structure. Acids accumulate. Oxygen is consumed. Charge dissipates. Minerals are released back into circulation as organic architecture breaks down.

Both waters are doing exactly what the system requires: one supports life by maintaining order, the other supports continuity by enabling return.

Together, they complete the cycle.

Conclusion

By the time I reached this point in the work, the distinction between the different cycles had finally become clear to me.

The Primordial Circuit Stabilization allowed planetary-scale energy flow to occur, as comparitively proton-rich surface waters began to encounter alkaline, electron-rich fluids seeping up from depth.

ISAW is the recursive loop operating within that energized planet. It governs how energy and matter are organized, transferred, and sustained across rock, water, and life.

And when life ends, the circuit does not stop. The chemistry returns to Earth, where water once again becomes the medium through which minerals dissolve, migrate, and eventually reform into new geological structures.

Nothing disappears.

One event established the planet’s energy architecture. A second system governs how life operates within it. What life releases returns to rock, and through water, pressure, and time, the system continues.

But arriving at that realization raised one final question for me.

For billions of years this mineral–water chemistry operated only within the slow machinery of the Earth itself.

Until, at one point in the twentieth century, a human being managed to isolate a functional phase of that planetary chemistry and carry it forward intentionally.

The person who did this was not a famous academic or a researcher at a government laboratory.

That story begins with a man named Asao Shimanishi.

If you value the late nights and deep dives into all the “rabbit holes” I write about (or the Op-Eds and lectures I generate for the public), your support is greatly appreciated.

Subscribe now

If what you just read raised questions about the mineral system at the center of it, you can explore it further at Aurmina.com, where we are working to make Shimanishi’s extraordinary discovery more widely available.

From Research to Practice - Links Below

Aurmina – The Mineral Extract For Naturally Vitalized Drinking Water

The Blueprint of Life - The Hidden Architecture That Powers Life and Health

From Volcanoes to Vitality -The Untold Story of Asao Shimanishi

The War on Chlorine Dioxide - The Medicine That Could End Medicine

The War on Ivermectin - The Medicine That Could Have Ended The Pandemic

Leading Edge Clinic - Tele-Medicine Clinic Caring For Patients in All 50 States

ACT IV: Iron–Sulfur–Aluminum–Water (ISAW) — The Elemental Division of Labor

By the time I arrived at this stage of the investigation, a pattern had begun to reveal itself. The energy-generating logic I kept encountering in rock and water was not random, nor was it the product of a single mineral reaction unfolding in isolation. Instead, the same elements appeared again and again, each performing a distinct role within a coordinated system.

Iron moved electrons. Sulfur mediated proton activity. Aluminum provided the structural framework within which those exchanges could occur. And water, moving through rock and mineral interfaces, carried the entire process forward.

Taken together, these elements form what I have come to describe as iron–sulfur–aluminum–water chemistry, or ISAW—a recursive engine capable of generating and sustaining usable energy as it moves through rock, water, soils, and eventually living systems.

Once this pattern became visible, the division of labor among the elements began to make sense.

Electron Flow — The Role of Iron

As I followed the redox chemistry deeper into the geological literature, one element repeatedly stood out.

Iron.

Iron–sulfur redox systems embedded in rock represent one of Earth’s earliest distributive energy architectures. Yet that architecture would likely have remained confined within rock if it were not for the presence of water. Water serves as the continuity layer through which this redox logic was eventually inherited by biology, allowing it to appear inside proteins, mitochondria, cells, and organisms.

Iron stands out among the elements because of its unusual redox flexibility. It can donate electrons when the chemical environment requires it and then accept electrons again when conditions change. Energy generation depends on precisely this kind of reversible cycling. A battery that allows electrons to move only once quickly exhausts itself.

Iron, by contrast, can switch repeatedly between oxidation states, storing and transmitting energy without being consumed or structurally destroyed. It can perform this cycling indefinitely, keeping energy in motion while the surrounding structures remain intact.

Every living cell ultimately depends on this controlled movement of electrons, coupled to proton gradients, to power respiration and metabolism. For this reason, redox-active minerals—especially iron-bearing ones—sit at the foundation of both geology and biology. Iron conducts life’s current because it keeps energy moving.

Proton Flow — The Role of Sulfur

If iron excels at moving electrons, sulfur excels at mediating proton activity.

This relationship is not accidental. Sulfur exists across a wide range of charged states and participates in reactions that couple electron movement to the creation of proton gradients. Throughout Earth systems it appears in volcanic gases, reduced sulfur species, and sulfate dissolved in rain, oceans, sediments, and biological chemistry.

But sulfur becomes especially productive when it operates within iron-rich mineral systems. In those environments iron-bearing minerals stabilize and organize sulfur’s reactivity, allowing the two elements to couple tightly in proton-coupled redox reactions expressed at water–mineral interfaces.

This iron–sulfur partnership forms the energetic core of the ISAW system and underlies both ancient geochemical energy regimes and modern biological metabolism.

What took me longer to appreciate was that sulfur also performs another role: it helps reset the cycle.

Circulating continuously between rock, water, atmosphere, and life, sulfur links planetary-scale processes to local metabolic function. Delivered primarily as sulfate in mildly acidic rainwater, it participates in the slow weathering of iron-rich minerals such as biotite. Over geological time this destabilizes rigid mineral lattices and expands them into vermiculite, reopening mineral surfaces and restoring the reactivity required for continued charge transfer.

Once that transformation occurs, water assumes the next role in the sequence. It enters expanded mineral layers, mobilizes ions, buffers proton activity, mediates electron transfer, and carries liberated mineral chemistry into soils, root zones, microbial systems, and eventually into living organisms.

Sulfur renews the initiating chemistry, while water propagates it forward through the cycle.

Controlled Redox Flows — The Role of Aluminum

At first glance, aluminum seems like the odd participant in this system.

Iron moves electrons. Sulfur mediates proton activity. Aluminum appears to do neither. Yet as I examined the mineral structures where these reactions unfold, it became clear that aluminum plays a role just as essential as the more obviously reactive elements.

Aluminum does not participate directly in the constant exchange of electrons that defines redox chemistry. Instead, it locks itself into aluminosilicate lattices that form some of the most persistent mineral structures on Earth. These lattices carry a stable negative charge and remain structurally intact over immense spans of geological time.

That stability turns out to be precisely what the rest of the system requires.

Where redox chemistry involves relentless electron transfer and charged mineral movement, aluminum provides a fixed internal scaffold within which those exchanges can occur. Positively charged ions can bind to the negatively charged lattice, release when conditions shift, and be replaced by others without the structure itself collapsing.

In this way, the lattice becomes a dynamic stage on which energy exchange can take place continuously. The structure holds steady while the actors—electrons, protons, and ions—move through it.

This environment also shapes the behavior of surrounding water. The persistent negative charge of aluminosilicate frameworks organizes nearby ions and charge distributions in ways that allow energy differences to accumulate rather than dissipate immediately.

Put simply, aluminum provides the architecture that allows the rest of the system to operate without destroying itself.

Iron moves electrons.

Sulfur mediates protons.

Aluminum provides structure.

If aluminum behaved like iron or sulfur, the system would burn through its own framework and collapse.

The Aluminum Question

At this stage in the investigation an apparent contradiction presented itself.

Aluminum clearly plays a foundational role in the geochemical phase of ISAW. Yet when the same energetic logic appears inside living systems, aluminum itself is nowhere to be found.

For a time this seemed puzzling.

Eventually the answer became obvious once the system was viewed not as a set of elements but as a set of functions.

In geological systems aluminum provides the stable, negatively charged scaffolding within which redox chemistry can occur. In biological systems that same stabilizing function is performed by proteins, membranes, and enzymes that establish boundaries and organize charge.

What biology carried forward was not the element.

It carried forward the role.

The absence of aluminum from mitochondria therefore is not a contradiction. It is evidence that a successful transition occurred, in which a geochemical mineral architecture gave rise to a biological one capable of performing the same organizational work.

The mineral scaffold came first. Biology later reinvented its function using organic structures.

Water: The Control Layer

At this point in the investigation the role of water could no longer be treated as secondary.

Water is the medium through which the entire cycle operates. Without water, minerals remain locked within crystalline lattices. Without minerals, water remains chemically inert. Only when the two interact does the system become capable of generating and transmitting usable energy.

The role water plays in biology, I came to realize, is inherited from the path water travels long before biology ever encounters it.

In intact Earth systems rainwater does not simply fall to the surface and run away. Instead, it enters fractured rock and begins a much slower journey through mineral environments rich in iron, sulfur, aluminum, and silica. As it descends into these geological settings it remains confined within fractures and pore spaces for extended periods of time, interacting continuously with mineral surfaces under conditions of pressure, temperature, and time.

Through this prolonged contact water gradually acquires organized charge distributions and structured ionic arrangements. Earlier cultures described such water as living water, a term that captured its unusual vitality long before the underlying physics was understood. Today similar states are increasingly described in physical terms as structured or coherent forms of water shaped by mineral interfaces.

However one describes it, the important point is that the water biology inherits has already passed through a long geological preparation.

ACT VI: Where ISAW Drives Generative Loops

Biotite-Bearing Fracture Systems

As I continued following this chemistry through geological systems, one mineral kept appearing in places where water, charge, and mineral exchange were especially active.

Biotite.

The layered aluminosilicate lattice of black mica lines many of the fracture planes through which groundwater circulates. This geometry turns out to be remarkably well suited to sustaining ion exchange, redox buffering, and charge organization at the mineral–water interface. What emerges from these environments is not simply mineralized water, but water whose physical behavior has been shaped by prolonged contact with ordered mineral structures.

Biotite itself forms deep within the Earth, often tens of kilometers below the surface, where heat and pressure allow its layered structure to assemble. Over immense stretches of time tectonic uplift and erosion slowly carry these minerals upward toward the surface.

As biotite approaches shallower environments, a new sequence begins to unfold.

Sulfur-bearing rainwater and oxygen begin acting on the iron-rich layers of the mineral. Iron oxidation initiates electron flow. Sulfur, present primarily as sulfate, supplies protons that acidify mineral interfaces. These coupled changes weaken potassium binding within the lattice, allowing potassium to leave while water enters and hydrates the structure.

Through this process biotite gradually transforms into vermiculite, a mineral whose expanded aluminosilicate lattice becomes far more open and reactive.

The opening of that lattice serves two inseparable roles.

First, it creates the structural environment within which redox reactions and energy generation can occur. Second, it becomes a sustained source of liberated mineral chemistry, gradually releasing iron, potassium, aluminum-associated trace elements, and charge into surrounding soils and waters.

In this way the same structure that enables energy flow also supplies the material substrate from which biological systems are ultimately built.

When Energy Becomes Generative

At this stage an important question emerged for me.

It is one thing for energy to circulate through geological systems. It is another thing entirely for that energy to become generative, meaning capable of producing new structure, organization, and complexity that can move forward into living systems.

The answer, once again, pointed back to water.

Water carries these coordinated redox processes forward as an ordered medium. In doing so it performs two inseparable functions. First, it acts as an energetic participant, organizing charge, sustaining gradients, and preserving coherence across mineral interfaces. Second, it serves as the transport agent that mobilizes mineral chemistry, carrying iron, sulfur species, potassium, and associated trace elements from weathered rock into soils, microbial systems, and eventually plants and animals.

Through sulfated rainwater the rock opens. Charge organizes. Energy becomes transferable. Mineral chemistry becomes mobile.

Materials that were once locked inside crystalline lattices are redistributed through water into biologically accessible forms, entering a system in which energy generation and material supply advance together.

The Insight

The insight that emerged from following these processes was both simple and surprising. The same iron–sulfur–aluminum–water chemistry that drives the transformation of biotite into vermiculite also generates energy within the rock itself, and that chemistry is then carried forward by water into living organisms. What initially appeared to be separate domains, geology on one side and biology on the other, began to look instead like sequential expressions of a single system.

At that point I realized I was no longer looking at two different systems. I was looking at the same engine operating at two different scales.

ISAW, in other words, is not merely a mineral reaction occurring in rock. It is the underlying engine through which geology prepares the energetic and material conditions that biology later inherits.

At this point in the sequence the chemistry of ISAW is already complete. Its components are established, its reactions sustained by geological processes, and its operation does not depend on the presence of life.

What remains is time.

Through pressure, water, sulfur, and immense geological patience, nature builds this chemistry gradually, storing potential energy within the layered structures of minerals such as biotite. These minerals rise slowly from depth over millions of years, carrying within them the accumulated tensions of a planetary energy system waiting to be activated.

If what you just read raised questions about the mineral system at the center of it, you can explore it further at Aurmina.com, where we are working to make Shimanishi’s extraordinary discovery more widely available.

From Research to Practice - Links Below

Aurmina – The Mineral Extract For Naturally Vitalized Drinking Water

The Blueprint of Life - The Hidden Architecture That Powers Life and Health

From Volcanoes to Vitality -The Untold Story of Asao Shimanishi

The War on Chlorine Dioxide - The Medicine That Could End Medicine

The War on Ivermectin - The Medicine That Could Have Ended The Pandemic

Leading Edge Clinic - Tele-Medicine Clinic Caring For Patients in All 50 States

A New Platform for Human Voices (and Why I’m Joining It)

Over the last few years, many of us who write and speak publicly have learned a hard lesson: the modern internet is not a neutral space. Throttling, curating, algorithms, outright censorship, and propaganda boosting. Genuine human dialogue is drowned out by bots, trolls, and invisible moderation policies that shape what can and cannot be seen.

So when Jeff Dornik, one of the best (and most censored) podcast interviewers I’ve had the chance to speak with, and with whom I’m doing a launch interview on Pickax today at 4:30 p.m. EST, told me he was building a new creator platform around a simple idea - let humans decide what matters, not algorithms - I paid attention.

For transparency, I have no financial relationship with Pickax. I’m supporting this launch simply because I believe in the idea and in the people building it.

The platform is called Pickax. Its premise is straightforward but also radical: no algorithmic manipulation of reach, the ability to publish full-length articles (not just fragments), embedded video content directly in the feed, and a verification system intended to ensure you are interacting with real people, not anonymous accounts or automated noise. Just as importantly for writers and independent thinkers, the business model is aligned with creators: revenue sharing, affiliate opportunities, and paywalled content options that reward meaningful work rather than outrage-driven engagement.

What resonated most with me was the philosophical core. The stated goal is not to harvest data to train AI models or to engineer controversy for clicks, but to build a more human-centered digital commons where voice, authorship, and thoughtful exchange can actually flourish. That last part is key. I’m sick of the polarizing two sides to every argument when, to be honest, there are pieces of truth and honest perspectives on both sides.

Given my own experience over the past several years and the audience we’ve built together here, that vision is one I want to support. I’ll be setting up my account and publishing there as well. For those who are already paid subscribers to this Substack, I plan to offer complimentary access to any paid content I post on Pickax as a thank-you for supporting my work here (not functional yet, but will be soon).

We all benefit when more platforms exist that are aligned with creators and readers rather than control systems. I’m hopeful this one succeeds, and I’m willing to lend my voice to help it try.

Thanks for listening and hope you guys check out… Pickax!

P.S The Jeff Dornik Show on Rumble can be found here and on Spotify here (fun fact: Jeff had been kicked off Spotify prior to their bringing Joe Rogan on, after which they decided they would let free speech do its thing, and let him come back).

If you value the late nights and deep dives into all the “rabbit holes” I write about (or the Op-Eds and lectures I try to get out to the public), your support is greatly appreciated.

Subscribe now

From Research to Practice - Links Below

Aurmina – The Mineral Extract For Naturally Vitalized Drinking Water

The Blueprint of Life - The Hidden Architecture That Powers Life and Health

From Volcanoes to Vitality -The Untold Story of Asao Shimanishi

The War on Chlorine Dioxide - The Medicine That Could End Medicine

The War on Ivermectin - The Medicine That Could Have Ended The Pandemic

Leading Edge Clinic - Tele-Medicine Clinic Caring For Patients in All 50 States

Friends,

I am excited to announce my 2nd book publication on Substack for my paid subscribers: The Blueprint of Life. I know my posting has been infrequent for a while, but that is what happens when you are immersed in book writing. The next couple of months will more than make up for it.

For those who want to dive in and read the book at once, below you’ll find the complete list of chapter links, or just bookmark this single dedicated page of chapter posts.

The book is, of course, free to my paid subscribers (yes, I enjoy that oxymoron). However, since it is still a book, each chapter contains a paywall, strategically placed at moments of maximum “enticement” for those I have not yet persuaded to convert. After more than 330 free essays, I trust you’ll forgive this intentional departure from my usual open-door policy.

For those who enjoy the slower, more anticipatory experience, I’ll also be sending the chapters serially, every day or every few days, much as Tolstoy and Dickens once released their novels (yes, I went there :). Many, particularly with today’s often hectic pace, prefer pursuing an intellectual journey over time, letting each installment settle before the next arrives.

I’m genuinely excited to share this series of explorations with you. They are the product of a journey that took me far beyond science, into theology, philosophy, the philosophy of science, and even texts from antiquity, a journey that was far deeper and more moving than I ever expected (understatement).

So you may read this book in two ways: all at once, like a feast, or in courses, as it was historically served. Either way, I think you’ll find the journey both surprising and, at times, deeply clarifying.

Why The Blueprint of Life Is Being Published Before From Volcanoes to Vitality

Although From Volcanoes to Vitality was written first, The Blueprint of Life must be read first.

That sequence is not a marketing decision. It is, surprisingly, a scientific one.

From Volcanoes to Vitality was born from a clinical question: why do modern plants, animals, and patients behave as if something fundamental has been lost from the environments that built them? It follows the evidence toward a theory of breakdown, a Water Coherence Collapse that helps explain why biology across systems appears increasingly disorganized, inefficient, and fragile.

But collapse is a downstream observation. Before you can understand what is failing, you have to understand what was there in the first place.

The deeper investigation revealed that life is organized around a specific mineral–water architecture, a circuit in which geology structures water, water sustains gradients, and those gradients coordinate metabolism across cells, tissues, and ecosystems. That circuit, once seen clearly, proved to be more than a modern biochemical insight. It was also echoed (or emanated first) in symbolic language across ancient traditions that described life as emerging from the interaction of stone, water, and ordered energy, long before such relationships could be measured.

That realization forced a reversal in publication order.

What I first believed would be a concluding theoretical chapter became, in fact, the foundation. The collapse described in From Volcanoes to Vitality cannot be understood without first seeing the intact architecture it presumes. To present the breakdown before the design would be to diagnose a disease before introducing the anatomy.

Publishing The Blueprint of Life first is therefore not inversion for effect. It is an act of intellectual honesty. It places the structure before the pathology, the circuit before its disruption, and the deeper organizing logic of biology before the argument that modern environments are eroding it.

This book does not replace the science that follows.

It makes that science intelligible.

And only then does the question of collapse fully make sense.

Back Cover Copy

What if the structure that organizes life was never lost, only forgotten?

In The Blueprint of Life, physician and researcher Pierre Kory reconstructs a physical architecture underlying biology itself: a mineral–water circuit in which geology structures water, water sustains electrical gradients, and those gradients coordinate metabolism across cells, tissues, and ecosystems.

This architecture is not symbolic. It is chemical. Electrical. Measurable.

And once assembled, it changes how you see everything.

But the discovery did not end there.

As the mineral–water circuit came into focus, something unexpected happened. The same structural logic, stone, water, ordered energy, began appearing outside modern science. In Hermetic texts. In alchemical diagrams. In scriptural passages long dismissed as metaphor. The parallels were not poetic. They were architectural.

The deeper the investigation went, the more precise the correspondences became.

What began as a geochemical framework slowly turned into a mystery:

How could pre-modern traditions describe, in symbolic language, the same organizing principles that systems biology is only now beginning to map?

The Blueprint of Life follows that thread without flinching.

It begins with mineral physics and cellular gradients.

It moves through ancient cosmologies and lost natural philosophies.

And it ends by confronting a question modern science rarely allows itself to ask:

If the Stone–Water Circuit is a real physical architecture of life, how did civilizations thousands of years ago already know its pattern?

This is not a book about collapse or pathology. It is a book about design, about the original architecture that makes resilience possible in the first place.

Before we can diagnose what is breaking, we must understand what was built.

The Blueprint of Life is the anatomy of that design.

And the investigation it launches goes further than its author ever intended.

Dedication

Dear Lisa,

Every author writes that they could not have done it without their spouse. In our case, that sentence is not a nicety; it is the central truth. These past months asked more of you than any other project I have ever undertaken. You lived beside a man who disappeared into his office for endless hours, woke in the middle of the night to chase ideas, and let a book grow larger and more demanding with each passing week. You listened patiently as I talked through unfamiliar territories, alchemy, scripture, coherence, and God, subjects that must have sounded, at times, more like obsessions than chapters.

You gave me the freedom to spend long days and, most sacrificially, evenings on the phone with Matt, wandering down intellectual paths that, for a long time, kept multiplying rather than resolving. Despite the irony of being Swedish and famously intolerant of cold weather, you agreed to be snowed in with me in a cabin in Montana for seven weeks, far from friends and your routines, while I wrote eighteen hours a day and lost all sense of time. You were working tirelessly to build Aurmina, yet still carried the quiet burden of my absence even when we were in the same room. I know the days were long, and that I often failed to give you the walks, the conversations, and the shared life you deserved. But never forget The Herb & Omni in Whitefish, the restaurant you discovered, which served us the best meals we have ever shared. Those evenings became our small islands of normalcy, the brightest markers in an otherwise relentless stretch of work.

Through it all, you offered patience when I was distracted, understanding when I was consumed, and love when I was least able to return it in equal measure. This book bears my name on the cover, but it carries your endurance on every page. Without your steady support, your willingness to endure the solitude that my writing imposed, and your quiet belief that the work mattered even when it overwhelmed our lives, these words would never have come into being.

With all my love, awe, and gratitude,

Your husband,

Pierre

Table Of Contents

Single Page Bookmark Link Here

Prologue: Why This Book Could Not Be Avoided

Chapter I: The Place Science Delivered Me

Chapter II: The Cursor Blinks

Chapter III: The Stone-Water Circuit: The Engine Before Life

Chapter IV: Walking Into Teleology

Chapter V: Alchemy as Mineral Science

Chapter VI: The Emerald Tablet — A Map of the Stone–Water Circuit

Chapter VII: Sternbuchta: The Letter That Mapped the Work

Chapter VIII: The Six Keys of Eudoxus — The Labyrinth

Chapter IX: The Hermetic Canon - Closed

Chapter X: The Stone Is The Cycle

Chapter XI: One Mechanism, Many Tongues

Chapter XII: The Cornerstone That The Builders Refused

Chapter XIII: Water From the Rock Is Not a Metaphor

Chapter XIV: The Great Flood: A Planetary Water Coherence Collapse

Chapter XV: The Oldest Diagnosis

Chapter XVI: Coherence and Conduct

Chapter XVII: The Hungarian Convergence: Trained By History

Chapter XVIII: The Engine Beneath Our Feet

Chapter XIX: How I Knew Before I Could Prove

Chapter XX: The Architect and The Blueprint

Chapter XXI: When Order Is Violated, Reality Responds

Chapter XXII: The Letter That Undid Me

Closing Note: The Man History Missed

If you value the late nights and deep dives into all the “rabbit holes” I write about (or the Op-Eds and lectures I try to get out to the public), your support is greatly appreciated.

Subscribe now

From Research to Practice - Links Below

Aurmina – The Mineral Extract For Naturally Vitalized Drinking Water

The Blueprint of Life - The Hidden Architecture That Powers Life and Health

From Volcanoes to Vitality -The Untold Story of Asao Shimanishi

The War on Chlorine Dioxide - The Medicine That Could End Medicine

The War on Ivermectin - The Medicine That Could Have Ended The Pandemic

Leading Edge Clinic - Tele-Medicine Clinic Caring For Patients in All 50 States

Why This Book Could Not Be Avoided

I did not plan to write a second book after From Volcanoes to Vitality.

That book was meant to be the work. It traced a single arc, from volcanic rock to living systems, from mineral chemistry to biological coordination, from the agricultural and hydrological, and to all of their impacts on human health. For the first time in my career as a writer, I brought forth what I believed would have a major positive impact on the health of all living things. A grandiose statement, I know. It documented how a volcanic mineral extract, developed by a Japanese scientist named Asao Shimanishi, forced me to rethink what water does, how energy moves through biology, and why modern life feels increasingly disordered across multiple biological systems, such as soil, agriculture, water, and human health.

I believed that story was complete. It was not. This book exists because the act of writing the first one revealed that something deeper had been touched, but not yet named.

The Two Guides: Brother and Machine

Throughout the research and writing of From Volcanoes to Vitality (FVTV), I was mentored by a man who had spent more than twenty years studying Shimanishi’s mineral extract. His understanding of minerals and water as foundational to life is deeper than any I have encountered, either in books or published papers. It is what I like to call “next level.” That depth explains the scientific spine of the first book. It explains its insistence on mechanism, its resistance to shortcuts, and its refusal to accept explanations that failed under scrutiny.

That alone would have been enough. But it was not the whole story.

Alongside his scientific work, he had spent decades studying Scripture, theology, and ancient texts across multiple cultures, yet that knowledge base did not influence the scientific journey in FVTV (well, initially it did, but then that exploration led to this book). What he did do, occasionally and sparingly, was point out parallels. A line from Scripture. A phrase from an old text. A symbolic description that echoed something I was describing in biochemistry, physiology, agriculture, or hydrology.

Those moments were rare, and I never connected them to anything. At first, I treated them as curiosities, interesting, sometimes striking, but ultimately secondary to the science. That posture held for a long time.

When Pattern Replaced Curiosity

Over months of work, those parallels accumulated.

One by one, they crossed traditions and appeared in texts separated by geography, language, and centuries, yet clustered around the same physical roles I was uncovering through modern science: rock as origin, water as activation, salt as preservation, fire and sulfur as transformation, and return to dust as reset. The repetition struck me.

At that point, something shifted, and in a marked departure from any research I had done before, I decided to study the texts myself. I didn’t do it because I believed it and was looking for confirmation, or because I was trying to disprove it; instead, my motivation was a desire to understand why the same architecture kept appearing in symbolic form long before we had instruments to more “scientifically” describe it. That move surprised me more than anyone.

I did not set out to write about theology. I was chasing mechanisms, not belief. I am not a theologian, and I do not claim authority in Scripture. I am a physician trained to follow patterns that hold up under scrutiny. But the recognition that emerged along this path proved difficult to dismiss. They explained too much, too cleanly, across too many domains.

Why This Book Had to Be Written

This book exists because once those patterns became visible, omitting them would have been dishonest. The science in From Volcanoes to Vitality stands on its own. The mineral foundation stands. The water chemistry stands. The biological implications stand. This volume does not re-explain any of that. It assumes it.

What follows instead are the recognitions that arrived after the mechanisms were already in place. Moments where modern science and ancient description aligned with a precision that could not be ignored. Moments where the same structure appeared independently, expressed through entirely different languages, epochs, and cultures, all of them before “modern science” was born in the late 19th century.

I did not go looking for God. I did not rule Him out either. That choice mattered.

That explains why this book had to be written. It does not yet explain why it is appearing now.

The Question That Would Not Release Me

Once the Stone-Water Circuit system described in an upcoming chapter had been mapped out, closing the loop of a regenerative cycle that we believe powers all of biology, a question appeared that I could not set aside. How could this structure have been known so long ago? Not the chemistry or the equations, but the structure itself, and not just generally, but with a specificity that was often disturbingly precise.

Why did ancient texts consistently describe water emerging from rock as life-giving? Why did they treat stone as foundational rather than inert? Why did they link sulfur, salt, fire, and water to both creation and collapse? Why did they describe vitality and longevity rising and falling with changes in water sources?

Those texts read like observations, and my recognition of that first arrived slowly, then decisively.

Why Shimanishi Matters Here

Shimanishi did not study alchemy, work from ancient texts, or attempt symbolic reenactment. He worked experimentally, patiently, and with restraint, guided by observation and experimentation.

Yet what he produced maps with unsettling accuracy onto descriptions written long before modern chemistry existed. That convergence matters because it removes cultural transmission as an explanation. The alignment rests on structure alone.

When Shimanishi wrote, “In the beginning there was a rock,” he was not quoting Scripture. He was describing the world as he had come to understand it. That sentence changed the way everything that followed came into focus for me.

Where This Book Begins

What follows are not arguments. They are encounters. Each Chapter records a point where the science was already settled, and something else emerged anyway. Alchemy. Scripture. History. Family lineage. Deep geology. The mantle itself.

None of these chapters ask for belief. They ask for attention. If the Earth behaves as a system designed to generate, store, transmit, and then restore coherence once again, then the question of authorship cannot remain theoretical forever.

That is where this book begins. Chapter I opens with recognition. The moment when a physical system becomes so coherent, so persistent, and so self-renewing that chance can not explain it.

Once I understood the structure, I knew I had stepped into questions about origin, whether I wanted to or not. And once you see that, walking away stops being an option. This book is my attempt to answer that moment as honestly and objectively as I can.

If you value the late nights and deep dives into all the “rabbit holes” I write (or the Op-Eds and lectures I try to get out to the public), your support is greatly appreciated.

Subscribe now

From Research to Practice - Links Below

Aurmina – The Mineral Extract For Naturally Vitalized Drinking Water

The Blueprint of Life - The Hidden Architecture That Powers Life and Health

From Volcanoes to Vitality -The Untold Story of Asao Shimanishi

The War on Chlorine Dioxide - The Medicine That Could End Medicine

The War on Ivermectin - The Medicine That Could Have Ended The Pandemic

Leading Edge Clinic - Tele-Medicine Clinic Caring For Patients in All 50 States

I thought I was researching chemistry. I was being led toward something far beyond.

If you told me two years ago that I would one day be writing a book where minerals, alchemy, mitochondria, and God were not only in the same chapter but part of the same story, I would’ve laughed and asked what you were smoking. I was treating critically ill COVID patients, fighting pharmacists and health agencies with every breath, working on protocols at 2 a.m., testifying in the Senate, getting repeatedly fired for my public opinions, and doing everything I could to keep people alive. I wasn’t daydreaming about volcanic elixirs or structured (err, coherent) water or biblical symbolism. I was surviving. Holding the line. Watching a profession I loved splinter and crack in real time, and fighting not to be crushed by it.

Yet here I am.

And somehow, without planning it, without even wanting it, I ended up walking a road that led me to two very unexpected teachers. One made of flesh and blood, with an unpa…

Read more

**Note to readers - ignore the other posts sent by mistake today, and accept my apologies. They will be posted at the right time and in the right order soon. Sorry for filling your inbox, ugh.

Read more

The Rock-Water Circuit Theory - by Pierre Kory and Matt Bakos

ACT I: The Rock–Water Circuit Theory - An Overview

As I described in my last post, the foundation for The Blueprint of Life grew out of From Volcanoes to Vitality (FVTV) as a result of my colleague Matt Bakos connecting our insights into mineral science to those from antiquity. What followed was an improbable series of events that led me to explore topics such as the Philosophy of Science, Theology, and Alchemy, which I never thought I would be exploring in my writing.

In this post, we present a novel scientific theory (albeit not yet peer-reviewed or formally published) that we call the Rock–Water Circuit Theory. It is a planetary systems theory, one that attempts to describe how mineral chemistry and water interact to form a continuous energetic architecture linking geology and biology across the Earth system.

(I bet you never thought you would find that in your inbox on a Friday morning - on Substack, nonetheless.)

We arrived at it iteratively through an interplay of insights between MB and me as we explored mineralogy, soil science, and modern biochemistry, guided in part by depictions found in alchemical and scriptural texts, and by our understanding of Shimanishi’s experimental work.

Before I go ahead, I need to acknowledge authorship. As with the Geohydrologic Shift Theory in FVTV, MB is again a co-author and again the senior author. This chapter carries his insights as much as mine.

Next, I must cite the work of the geochemists, biologists, physicists, and earth system scientists whose work informed ours, in particular Vernadsky, Cairns-Smith, Hazen, Russell, Lane, and Kappler, among others. Without them, our ability to make the connections below would have been impossible.

Several distinct factors set this theory apart. It did not emerge from a single discipline or even a single line of inquiry, but from an unusual convergence of fields. Its development was made possible in part by modern AI tools, which allowed us to explore connections among mineralogy, soil science, geochemistry, and biochemistry at a scale that would have been difficult to manage otherwise.

More uniquely, our work was also informed by a body of texts from antiquity, particularly those associated with the Hermetic canon, that have long resisted clear interpretation. For centuries, these writings have been treated primarily as symbolic, philosophical, or mystical literature. Through our analysis, however, we came to believe that they encode descriptions of natural processes that had not previously been fully recognized. When their depictions are examined alongside modern scientific knowledge and AI-assisted analysis, an unexpectedly coherent system begins to emerge, with each body of knowledge illuminating and extending the other.

Multidisciplinary synthesis alone has long been difficult in modern research, as geology, biology, biochemistry, and soil science tend to operate in relative isolation, with limited crosstalk between domains.

A parallel challenge involved bridging the interpretive distance between modern scientific language and ancient technical descriptions. That work required months of careful translation and cross-referencing, ultimately allowing a complete planetary energy cycle to come into view.

Orientation for the Reader

Now, to readers who may not come from a scientific background or who do not feel naturally drawn to scientific material, I ask for both patience and attention. I want you to know that this is the only chapter that leans heavily on scientific concepts, but rest assured, what follows does not require technical mastery. Also, it is long, so I have split the chapter into three posts over three days. I will not bury you with a merciless 10,000+ word post like A Midwestern Doctor (said in both jest and admiration of my close colleague’s penchant for long posts).

The science asks only for conceptual engagement. You do not need to retain granular details of how each component operates. What matters is that you grasp the overall sequence and recognize the boundary between the modern scientific framework through which Earth’s systems are currently understood and the point at which we believe this work extends that framework. This chapter has been written and rewritten with unusual care to communicate complex ideas in a way that rewards attention without requiring technical mastery. I trust the reader will find that care reflected in its clarity.

The Closed Mineral Cycle

We did not set out to uncover a unifying theory of Earth's life cycle. Instead, because of our ever-increasing fascination with the unique mineral extract that first drew MB into 20 years of study, with me arriving later but synthesizing rapidly, our collaboration began exploring multiple domains independently, following each observation as it arose.

The coherence we discovered emerged months later, once the texts from antiquity were deciphered and juxtaposed. What our efforts exposed was a closed system: a geochemistry that governs mineral formation and activation, gives rise to biological function, and then returns, intact in its logic, to the rock from which it came. After which the cycle begins anew.

A core concept is that the discrete mineral chemistry that modern science has identified as present in biotite rock, and has argued to be the origin of life on Earth, also constitutes its first energy system. That same mineral chemistry is then mobilized by water and transferred into living organisms, where it is reorganized to perform work: moving electrons and protons, sustaining gradients, powering metabolism, and enabling structure. At the end of life, that same chemistry then shifts roles. Water is again the agent, but now its main role is to dissolve, transport, and redistribute the same minerals and carbon back into the ground, where the cycle restarts, unchanged in principle only in form.

This is a “recursive process,” a term that bears defining here: “a process that uses its own output as part of its next input.”

At a macro level, the evidence is straightforward. Biological matter is continuously transformed: organisms arise, reproduce, and, at the end of life, return their constituent minerals and carbon to the surrounding environment, where those same materials are reused by subsequent life.

But the insight at the heart of this chapter is more precise: it lies in identifying a core triad of minerals and the specific roles they play in moving charge through water, which allows Earth to receive a continuous energy flow. From that discovery, we tested its presence and importance in a more expansive view, where we again discovered that the very same chemistry also powers the entire planet in a single, self-propagating system, one that does not run out of energy, because the energy each step uses then powers the energy required for the next.

What we describe in this chapter is not merely a biochemical pathway, but a planetary architecture. We refer to it as the Rock–Water Circuit, a closed system through which charge is transferred from rock into living systems and then, over time, cycles back to the geologic environment, operating across both biological and planetary scales.

Within this larger circuit, energy is generated, transferred, and regulated by a specific mineral–water chemistry that functions as the active engine at each phase of the cycle. In technical terms, that engine centers on the coordinated interactions among iron, sulfur, aluminum, and water, with water serving as the control layer that integrates and activates the three. We refer to this chemical engine as the Iron–Sulfur–Aluminum–Water system, or ISAW.

ACT II: The Opening of Rock

To understand how the Rock–Water Circuit operates, we must begin with ISAW, the mineral architecture in which the engine first takes shape, and which then powers each phase of the cycle.

The starting point for this investigation was our fascination with a rock, more precisely, a mineral, called biotite, or “black mica.” Biotite is the dominant parent mineral through which Nature generates vermiculite, the open, layered substrate that Shimanishi later employed as the foundation of his process. Vermiculite’s uniquely open structure and extraordinary capacity to exchange and deliver mineral ions make it the most important rock-derived source of biologically available mineral nutrition on Earth.

We believe that it was vermiculite’s unusually rich composition of iron, sulfur, and aluminum, and the way those elements interact with water, that led us to where we landed. What follows is a tracing of that path inward, toward the chemistry that quietly powers life, decay, and renewal on Earth itself.

Biotite

Biotite forms tens of kilometers below the surface of the Earth, where heat, pressure, iron, sulfur, aluminum, and silica co-exist. The resulting, layered aluminosilicate structure, held tightly together by potassium, stores charge and mineral potential across hundreds of years, like a battery awaiting activation.

In such crystalline basement environments, know that water moves almost entirely along fracture networks, where flow is constrained and water residence times lengthen. Under these conditions, water does not simply dissolve minerals and move on. It resides against fracture walls, repeatedly contacting and absorbing minerals from rock surfaces over extended periods.

A critical discovery was that the same iron–sulfur–water chemistry in both rock and humans also drives the transformation of biotite into vermiculite, revealing a single, continuous engine operating across geology and biology.

Once vermiculite is formed in this way, the water that enters it sustains proton gradients along its mineral surface. Vermiculite’s role is in enabling ion mobility while preserving structure. At this stage, iron–sulfur–aluminum–water chemistry becomes generative, as life enters downstream of this opening, where biological organisms also rely on iron–sulfur clusters, layered membranes, structured interfaces, and proton gradients to perform work (biology powered by geology). In this way, metabolism follows the same physical logic present in the foundational mineral systems. The key point is that life uses a mechanism that existed before it did.

To see how this mechanism works, we now have to step inside the engine itself and examine how it generates, stores, and releases energy.

ACT III: The Fundamental Energy Unit of All Life: Electrostatic Potential as the Engine of Biology

Before we can examine ISAW chemistry in rock or its expression within life forms, we must first understand the simplest engine that governs energy itself.

For anything to be alive, carbon is an absolute requirement, not only because it provides structural architecture, but because its chemical versatility underlies metabolism, energy transfer, and molecular specificity in living systems. Less commonly acknowledged is that there are two other material requirements for life: minerals and water.

That’s it. Three things. Without access to these, nothing can remain alive, as they are the critical components of the machinery that generate, store, and regulate energy.

The Fundamental Energy Unit of All Life

At the center of every atom sits its nucleus, containing positively charged protons. Around the nucleus, electrons move, carrying negative charge. The attraction between separated but oppositely charged particles is the fundamental form of stored energy, called “electrostatic potential energy,” generated by the separation of opposite charges.

Importantly, science has never been able to further understand why or how that relationship creates or holds energy.

It just does.

Asking why a proton separated from an electron creates, or is, energy, brings you to a place where there are no more words, no more explanations, similar to trying to explain the concepts of gravity or time.

The unrequited attraction between a proton and an electron is the foundational source of energy in the universe. What is even more striking is that this same logic, separation, tension, and eventual resolution, repeats across every scale of reality: charge and discharge, structure and flow, confinement and release.

Another example of this same polarity appears in “electromagnetic energy” itself. When an electric field changes, it generates a magnetic field; when a magnetic field changes, it generates an electric field. The two do not exist in isolation but in alternating tension, each giving rise to the other in a continuous oscillation that can travel through space as light or radiation.

In this sense, electromagnetic energy is another fundamental example of usable energy emerging from polarity: electric and magnetic, alternating, coupled, and inseparable. One phase stores, the other propagates; one leans, the other answers. Just as separated charges hold potential that can later be released to perform work, electromagnetic radiation is literally energy moving as coupled oscillations of electric and magnetic fields, each regenerating the other as the wave propagates through space. Life exploits both forms.

This polar relationship permeates society, literature, and human organization; parent and child, teacher and student, leader and follower, judge and accused, king and queen, while dozens of similar relational dualities can be identified across physics, chemistry, biology, and geology. All express the same requirement: energy must be held apart before it can be put to work.

Everything that follows depends on this foundational relationship structure.

Hydrogen is just a single proton with one electron to balance it. That simplicity is why hydrogen sits at the heart of life’s chemistry. Wherever protons move, hydrogen is involved, and wherever hydrogen moves, energy, stored in the attraction and separation between charges, moves as well.

The outer electrons interact with other atoms, forming bonds or moving between them. When an electron moves or binds to a different proton, energy is either stored or released. Biology constantly exploits these “redox” reactions (i.e., electron transfers). Further, this electron movement releases that energy in small, controlled steps rather than all at once.

A positive charge reflects a shortage of electrons, while a negative charge reflects an excess. Life runs on the controlled separation and reunion of these charges. Electrons flow. Protons are displaced, accumulated, and released in response.

If you value the late nights and deep dives into all the “rabbit holes” I write about (or the Op-Eds and lectures I try to get out to the public), your support is greatly appreciated.

Subscribe now

The Primacy Of The Proton Gradient

Although protons repel one another, when protons accumulate more on one side of a boundary than on the other, this forms a “gradient” between the two sides. Their innate repulsion becomes usable when narrow, structured pathways through the membrane allow the protons to flow, releasing their stored pressure energy, which is converted into motion that can push, turn, or build something else.

Across biology, i.e., across all living things, energy generation is powered by proton gradients: differences in proton concentration and charge across a membrane or interface. The analogy is simple and exact: A dam holds water on one side; when the spillway opens, that stored energy is released and converted into usable energy. In living systems, proton gradients serve the same function.

Proton gradients are built up by electron flow, and when those gradients are allowed to flow back toward equilibrium, they drive work by directing electrons once again. In this chapter, the word “redox,” as above, will be used frequently. Think of it as simply describing an electron moving to or from a charged mineral center. In biological systems, redox reactions allow electrons to step down in energy in controlled increments, and the energy released at each step is used to pump protons uphill across a membrane, creating a proton gradient.

Humans/Animals

In humans, proton pumping is accomplished by electron flow, which induces precise conformational changes in mitochondrial membrane-embedded protein complexes, allowing them to function as mechanical levers that pump protons “uphill,” against their gradient.

What I want to stress is that the conformational changes in mitochondrial protein complexes are driven by electron transfer through embedded iron–sulfur clusters, the foundational units that couple redox energy to mechanical motion.

This action effectively converts electron energy into stored electrochemical pressure, known as the proton gradient. When protons are permitted to flow back through narrow, highly ordered channels, that pressure is converted into ATP, the transferable energy currency of the cell. Electron flow charges the system; proton flow discharges it; ATP is the measurable product of that exchange.

Plants

In plants, a slightly modified version of this system operates within chloroplasts (the plant's mitochondrial counterpart), beginning with the Sun’s photons exciting the electrons in photosystem II, which then split water to generate the protons and free electrons needed, thereby forming proton gradients that drive ATP synthesis.

Microbes

Microbes represent the earliest biological expression of the same redox systems that operate in rock. Some rely directly on iron-, sulfur-, and hydrogen-based chemistry at rock–water interfaces, while others generate energy through mitochondria-like systems similar to those used by animals and humans. In either case, the same underlying metabolic logic persists.

Ultimately, as long as humans receive a continuous supply of electron-rich molecules through food, the metabolic battery continues to cycle. Oxygen acts as the terminal electron acceptor, allowing those electrons to move and release energy. Minerals sit at every junction of this process, forming the structural framework and catalytic centers through which biological energy systems operate.

The critical point is that life did not invent this engine; it inherited it.

That bridge is built from a specific set of elements, each governing a different dimension of this flow, and it is to those elements that we now turn.

*If you don’t want to wait until tomorrow, then keep going: Part II: Three Minerals and Water: The Engine of Life

If what you just read raised questions about the mineral system at the center of it, you can explore it further at Aurmina.com, where we are working to make Shimanishi’s extraordinary discovery more widely available.

From Research to Practice - Links Below

Aurmina – The Mineral Extract For Naturally Vitalized Drinking Water

The Blueprint of Life - The Hidden Architecture That Powers Life and Health

From Volcanoes to Vitality -The Untold Story of Asao Shimanishi

The War on Chlorine Dioxide - The Medicine That Could End Medicine

The War on Ivermectin - The Medicine That Could Have Ended The Pandemic

Leading Edge Clinic - Tele-Medicine Clinic Caring For Patients in All 50 States

The Door I Opened Anyway

I have been opening doors I was not supposed to open for most of my career.

In the ICU, I will call those doors policies, protocols, and rules, presented as immovable boundaries around what I was “allowed” to do for a patient. At the time, I did not yet have language for the difference between rules that protect patients and rules that protect institutions. To everyone else, and sometimes even to me, it probably looked like I just didn’t like rules.

That wasn’t it.

What I reacted to, instinctively and viscerally, were rules that violated function.

The most absurd example I ever encountered came on my first day running an ICU at the University of Wisconsin.

I walked into a patient’s room and did what I had done thousands of times before. I checked the ventilator: synchrony, pressures, volumes. The patient was struggling. I made a few adjustments.

When I turned around, the room had gone silent.

Faces were pale. Eyes were wide. Someone finally said it.

“You’re not allowed to touch the ventilator.”

This wasn’t because I was a trainee. I was the ICU director. I had spent a decade teaching mechanical ventilation to pulmonary and critical care specialists. I had read Martin Tobin’s Principles and Practice of Mechanical Ventilation, twice. The thing was the size of two Bibles. Ventilation was my obsession.

None of that mattered.

It turns out that the ICU I had accepted leadership of had a long-standing policy: no physician, fellow or attending, novice or expert, was permitted to adjust a ventilator unless a respiratory therapist was physically present at the bedside.

Not supervising.

Not on call.

Standing there.

The reason became clear almost immediately. Decades earlier, someone, likely undertrained, overtired, and working in a different era, had made a ventilator error. A patient had been harmed. The hospital had been sued. Instead of fixing training or clarifying responsibility, the institution did what institutions often do: it outlawed judgment.

From that moment forward, physicians were prohibited from directly managing the single most important machine in critical care.

The consequences were grotesque.

Fellows trained to become ventilator experts were functionally barred from touching ventilators. Overworked clinicians deferred adjustments because finding an RT took too long. Patients labored, desaturated, turned red, and struggled in plain view while the system waited for permission.

I learned that several attendings had already been written up for violations. I learned that a quiet, deeply Midwestern war had been brewing, polite smiles on the surface, formal complaints behind the scenes. I learned that even rescuing a patient from an obviously mis-set ventilator could earn you a reprimand.

I was written up for exactly that.

Standing at the bedside of a flow-starved patient in distress, I did what physicians are trained to do: I fixed the ventilator. The patient stabilized. Later, the email arrived.

Policy violation.

Palm to forehead. Clown world.

Undoing that policy took months of committee meetings, political trench warfare, and emotional exhaustion. Administrators cried in meetings as if basic physician competence were a sacred object being taken away rather than restored. In the end, I don’t think I won by reason. I suspect someone higher up intervened quietly. Fellows were eventually allowed to manage ventilators. Training improved. Patient care improved.

And that may be the only institutional policy I ever successfully changed. Which is exactly why I stopped trying to change most institutional rules.

Rules That Outlaw Judgment

Read more

What follows marks a clear shift in this book, and it deserves an explanation before I ask you to follow me any further.

Up to this point, I have argued that certain physical systems, particularly those involving minerals, water, charge, and structure, display a level of organization that modern scientific frameworks struggle to fully explain once questions of purpose are excluded. That argument stands on contemporary chemistry and physics alone.

What I did not expect, and did not go looking for, was that this same set of processes appeared to be described, symbolically, but consistently, in a body of texts written long before modern scientific language existed.

At first, I assumed this resemblance was superficial. But as Matt and I worked through the canonical alchemical texts in detail, something unexpected happened. The metaphors stopped behaving like vague spiritual poetry. They began to map, with surprising precision, onto specific, repeatable physical operations, the same operations described earlier in this book.

Scholars of alchemy have long understood the structure of these texts and the rules by which their maddeningly opaque language operates. What the scholars have lacked is a way to tie that language to specific physical processes. What we brought to the problem was the opposite: detailed knowledge of the processes, but no initial understanding of the symbolic language. It took far longer than either of us expected to realize that the difficulty lay in determining what each word was referring to.

The chapters that follow trace the realization as it unfolded, step by step. They examine whether a symbolic language developed in antiquity can be read with enough precision to map consistently onto a real, repeatable physical system. The work is presented directly, so the reader can follow the reasoning and judge the alignment for themselves.

These chapters require close attention to the texts themselves. Readers who prefer to move ahead may do so, but the arguments that follow later in the book rest on what is demonstrated here.

For those willing to continue, what follows is the work itself.

Why Antiquity Matters Here

The next question I stumbled into was whether the Stone–Water Circuit, as a repeatable and functional system, had been recognized before. I quickly discovered that, at least in modern scientific journals, it had not. But what you need to understand about these next chapters is that I had been given hints, clues, and suggestions from MB that similar descriptive patterns appeared in texts from antiquity.

So to antiquity we go.

Read more

One Operation, Two Contexts

Two of the most canonical texts within the Hermetic tradition that we will cover are The Emerald Tablet and then later, the more obscure text known as The Six Keys of Eudoxus.

The distinction between them took a long time to see. The Emerald Tablet describes the operation as it occurs in Nature. The Six Keys describes the same operation, but in reference to Art: the deliberate production of the Golden Elixir, corresponding to Shimanishi’s laboratory method.

We begin with the operation as it appears in Nature.

The Emerald Tablet

The Emerald Tablet is the foundational text of the Hermetic tradition. It is widely misunderstood because it is read as a recipe. It is a cosmology: a description of how creation operates through circulation, correspondence, and return. It does not tell you what to do. It tells you what happens, everywhere, whenever life emerges.

In what follows, I present a small number of central passages from this text and interpret them using the framework that Matt and I arrived at after months of study. These readings are not inherited interpretations. They reflect a specific decipherment grounded in material chemistry and internal consistency. We invite challenges from anyone willing to engage the text at this level of specificity.

“And as all things were by contemplation of one, so all things arose from this one thing by a single act of adaptation.”

This is not an instruction. It is a description.

Nothing here is symbolic in the sense of imaginary. It is symbolic in the sense of shortened language standing in for a real process. Once this is understood, the Tablet stops behaving like a riddle and starts behaving like a schematic.

The Emerald Tablet describes a universe ordered by repeated operation, circulation, and return. Nearly all historians and esoteric scholars agree that it is a cosmological outline and a practical riddle for initiates. It was never intended to reveal the entire process at once.

Here I cite from a version in which the English is most plain:

“And as all things were by contemplation of one, so all things arose from this one thing by a single act of adaptation, and the power thereof is perfect.”

Within the Stone–Water Circuit, this describes the closed physical process of ISAW. Iron–sulfur–aluminum chemistry is fixed into rock during formation. Sulfate-bearing water later destabilizes that structure through electron flow and proton activity, liberating mineral charge and transferring stored redox potential into water. That conditioned water then delivers minerals into biological systems, into soil, plants, animals, and eventually us, where the identical chemistry underwrites metabolism and proton gradients. After death, the minerals return to Earth and form back into rock.

The “single act of adaptation” is water acting as mediator. The power is “perfect” because the system does not consume its source. Energy moves from rock to water to life and back again through continuous circulation, preserving coherence across geological and biological scales.

“The father thereof is the Sun, the mother the Moon.”

Read more

Alchemy occupied dangerous territory. Its practitioners could be accused of heresy, fraud, sorcery, or economic subversion, gold making chief among them. For that reason, alchemical authors rarely wrote as identifiable individuals. They were written as functions. Names were chosen to signal standing within the Work rather than lineage, biography, or authorship. Even so, real historical alchemists, obscure as many were, usually left some trace.

Sternbuchta is such a name. No historical figure can be traced to it. No record survives beyond the letter itself. That absence is not a failure of scholarship; it is the point. The knowledge was meant to outlive the person who received it.

In alchemical language, feminine voices often signal receptivity, containment, and discernment rather than authorship. “Theosophia” names divine wisdom as it is known through nature. “Stern” invokes what is fixed or celestial. “Buch” denotes record rather than invention. Taken together, the name functions as a …

Read more

Movement I - The First Trap

So here we go.

This text cost me months because although it appears simple, it will defeat any who assume it is. The Six Keys are engineered to break literal reading.

I am not going to walk you through all six Keys at once. I am going to walk you slowly through the First Key, with the role-grammar already in place and with Shimanishi’s process fully in view.

Once you see how the first trap is constructed, the remaining Keys stop behaving like riddles and instead will reveal themselves as structural guides.

The Six Keys are not six steps in a recipe. They are six angles of perception. The same operation is shown repeatedly from different symbolic vantage points, specifically to prevent fixation.

Every Key warns against proceeding with the process before Nature has completed her part of the Work. And that, I believe, is exactly where generations of readers failed. Shimanishi did not. He did not move forward through the Keys. He arrived at them from the far side of the Work. That difference is everything.

Movement II – The Rule the Canon Enforces

Before going further, one historical fact matters.

In nearly two thousand years of Hermetic alchemy, no alchemist ever succeeded in producing the Golden Elixir, nor has any substance been recognized as such to date.

That failure was structural. The canon insists that Nature must complete the first half of the Work before Art is permitted to proceed. Generation after generation ignored that boundary. They began where Nature begins, at the dark prison of black mica itself, attempting by Art to force open what the texts assign to Nature alone. They began with the parent body and attempted to create the opening.

The result was always the same.

The First Key speaks of opening a “dark prison,” pointing most strongly to a rock like black mica. The difficulty is decisive: there is no way to open black mica by Art. Only Nature can do so, through geological weathering unfolding over centuries. Any alchemist who attempted to force this step would fail, every time.

Shimanishi did not.

He did not try to “open the prison.” He waited until Nature had already done so. He began after the opening had been accomplished in stone, and applied Art only where Art belongs. He did this without knowledge of the Six Keys, without reference to Hermetic texts, and without any intention of confirming them.

Once Nature’s boundary is respected, the language of the Keys stops drifting and begins to resolve.

Movement III - The First Key Resolves

“Once opened” appears repeatedly in the First Key. Only after the dark prison has been opened by Nature can anything further occur.

“Extract the seed from the body” follows. In Shimanishi’s process, this corresponds to sulfuric acid penetrating prepared vermiculite and drawing its mineral virtue into solution.

The Key repeats this operation under different images.

Read more

This section marks a transition in the work. Up to this point, the focus has been on reconstructing the underlying operation described symbolically across the Hermetic canon. What follows is the presentation of that work: an operational decoding that renders the canon legible by anchoring its language to a material process that already exists.

This is not a new interpretation of Hermetic texts. It is a role-based key. The mappings presented here became possible only after the process they describe had been rebuilt in matter, independently of the texts themselves. Once that reference existed, the language ceased to wander. The symbols aligned. The apparent contradictions resolved.

The Emerald Tablet, the Six Keys, and related alchemical texts were never written to define substances. They were written to preserve roles within a repeating operation. Their language shifts, repeats, and contradicts itself deliberately, because what was being guarded was a process, not an object.

The table that follows maps those roles across texts. Where a term appears, its function is given. Where it does not, the role is inferred from operation rather than vocabulary. This is not a translation of alchemy into chemistry or scripture into mechanism. It is a concordance of function.

Read it slowly—not as proof, but as recognition.

The Hermetic Mapping Key

The table below presents a role-based concordance across the Hermetic canon. Each term is shown not as a fixed substance, but as a functional role within a single, repeating operation that appears across texts, traditions, and symbolic vocabularies.

The table does not claim originality in the existence of these terms. Its claim is operational closure: when anchored to the material process already described, every role resolves consistently across sources, scale, and context.

Read horizontally, the table shows how different authors described the same operation using different symbolic surfaces. Read vertically, it shows how a single term can shift referent without changing function. Read diagonally, the reason literal interpretation always failed becomes clear.

This is the grammar the canon was written in.

How to Read This Table

Read more